Which is faster?: Maxima 6pd vs CL-S 6spd - Newton Says...

Subscribe
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:04 AM
  #41  
Quote:
Originally posted by KL99SEA
You saw a slip?? Or are you going by the 2nd hand reply to your post in the Acura forum that said, and I quote "he ran side by side to a another car that has ran high 13's" ??? Lets see a factual report of this car running 13's. An auto in the 13's....I would like to believe it. Can you say NAWS......
There was a slip posted a while back on this car, but it was like 9 months ago or so. I actually forgot about this car running 13.9.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:13 AM
  #42  
Quote:
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
Among others.....I will call BS on the 13.9 in an auto. Again I will say no CL-S has hit 13's N/A. The record on acura-cl.com is 14.1 with mods. My friends car ran a high 13 and I was neck and neck with him, so automatically my car now runs 13s....haha. Many people on that board honestly dont know their head from their @ss.
lol, I will ask for more into on that run. Because it was posted it has been done. A few cl-s have hit 14.2s-14.4s with mods AUTOS.

A car with 240hp to teh wheels in auto form SHOULD hit low 14s possibly high 13s if your really good.

Every bolt on mod puts that much power out.

So if a 190 hp max with all the bolt on mods can hit 13.9 how come a 260hp auto car with 240 to the wheels not hit high 13s? Please answer me this question because I am listening.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:29 AM
  #43  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
So if a 190 hp max with all the bolt on mods can hit 13.9 how come a 260hp auto car with 240 to the wheels not hit high 13s? Please answer me this question because I am listening.
I dunno, but it might have something to do with torque and weight.



Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:30 AM
  #44  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac



So if a 190 hp max with all the bolt on mods can hit 13.9 how come a 260hp auto car with 240 to the wheels not hit high 13s? Please answer me this question because I am listening.
its simple doofus..

the same reason a 300 hp car (GS 400) can't get better than 14.3 in the 1/4 mile..

WEIGHT


that and Honda's have no torque
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:31 AM
  #45  
<Just finished reading last 3 pages>

Just as I expected!
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:36 AM
  #46  
I would say the 6sp CL-S is faster. Watch out for the ones with headers I've heard they can be quite fast.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:39 AM
  #47  
Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax


its simple doofus..

the same reason a 300 hp car (GS 400) can't get better than 14.3 in the 1/4 mile..

WEIGHT


that and Honda's have no torque
lol, well 3440 the car is a bit overweight with all that sound deading ****. But if a guy has ran 13.9 he ran it. It's not impossible and you know that.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:41 AM
  #48  
Quite fast...ok I give up now. How can you argue with reasoning like that!!! The CL-s HAS to be faster, I think Russ proved his point with the comparison to the 4th gen 13.99. Oh well I'm slower.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:45 AM
  #49  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


lol, well 3440 the car is a bit overweight with all that sound deading ****. But if a guy has ran 13.9 he ran it. It's not impossible and you know that.

I am not concerned with who ran 13.9 or not.. notice i wasn't in that debate.. i meerly answered your question
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:48 AM
  #50  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
lol, I will ask for more into on that run. Because it was posted it has been done. A few cl-s have hit 14.2s-14.4s with mods AUTOS.

A car with 240hp to teh wheels in auto form SHOULD hit low 14s possibly high 13s if your really good.

Every bolt on mod puts that much power out.


***** envy perhaps?

Quote:
So if a 190 hp max with all the bolt on mods can hit 13.9 how come a 260hp auto car with 240 to the wheels not hit high 13s? Please answer me this question because I am listening.
Uh, SteVTEC has answered it countless times. Did you see the first post in this thread?

Also, a 96 GXE like Neal has is just a dab lighter than a CL-S.


From here, it's physics.......
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 09:53 AM
  #51  
I saw what Steve said, but when it has been done, then something is wrong

Quote:
Originally posted by bill99gxe


***** envy perhaps?



Uh, SteVTEC has answered it countless times. Did you see the first post in this thread?

Also, a 96 GXE like Neal has is just a dab lighter than a CL-S.


From here, it's physics....... [/B]
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:05 AM
  #52  
Quote:
Originally posted by bill99gxe
Uh, SteVTEC has answered it countless times. Did you see the first post in this thread?

Also, a 96 GXE like Neal has is just a dab lighter than a CL-S.

From here, it's physics.......
Torque and weight just *might* have had something to do with me beating that CL-S from 0-80 mph by a car and a half.

Too bad that thread got deleted. I think Darren has it saved on his site, though
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:10 AM
  #53  
Quote:
Originally posted by SteVTEC
Torque and weight just *might* have had something to do with me beating that CL-S from 0-80 mph by a car and a half.

Too bad that thread got deleted. I think Darren has it saved on his site, though


go look for yourself

http://64.252.156.63/orgthreads/
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:12 AM
  #54  
Quote:
Originally posted by SteVTEC
Torque and weight just *might* have had something to do with me beating that CL-S from 0-80 mph by a car and a half.

Too bad that thread got deleted. I think Darren has it saved on his site, though
Then if TQ is so much of a advatage, then tell me why MY CAR, can beat or most of the time stay dead even wtih a GTP till 100 mph off the line or on a roll? Then I start to edge him at 90 or so. Sometimes he got the jump or I got the jump, it was the same results 10 times. A GTP with pullies and intake on it? The GTP had the 3.20 pully which gives it 10psi over 7 psi which is stock. He runs 14.4 at 99 mph at the track.

Next time run a driver who knows how to race the CL-S or knows your racing. I have beaten plenty of 4th gens, haven't tried 5th gens yet. Ants wants to run me again with the VI because I have taken him down a few times. And his 4th gen is fully modded!

Oh yeah, but thats right. Nothing IS BETTER OR CAN BE BETTER OR FASTER THAN THE MAXIMA! Thats right. I forgot.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:17 AM
  #55  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Then if TQ is so much of a advatage, then tell me why MY CAR, can beat or most of the time stay dead even wtih him till 100 mph off the line or on a roll?
are you talking a 4th Gen? if so.. look at a 4th Gen dyno.. they have no power after 5500 rpms


Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Sometimes he got the jump or I got the jump, it was the same results 10 times. A GTP with pullies and intake on it? The GTP had the 3.20 pully which gives it 10psi over 7 psi which is stock. He runs 14.4 at 99 mph at the trakc.
look at his traps.. he can't launch his car.. when i was at etown i saw a GTP running 14.4 @ 94 bone stock.. Lisa in NJ runs 13.9 @ 95 mph in her 1 pulley sisze smaller GTP.. ither his car is fcked up.. or he can't stomp the gas and go


Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Next time run a driver who knows how to race the CL-S or knows your racing. I have beaten plenty of 4th gens, haven't tried 5th gens yet. Ants wants to run me again with the VI because I have taken him down a few times. And his 4th gen is fully modded!
like i said before.. look athe the 4th Gen dyno.. they are making 130 fwhp @ 6500 rpms.. i bet money that Ants will whoop your **** when he gets his VI workign correctly.. why don't you put it on video


Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Oh yeah, but thats right. Nothing IS BETTER OR CAN BE BETTER OR FASTER THAN THE MAXIMA! Thats right. I forgot.
they are your words.. would you like me to search and prove it?
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #56  
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=82238

thread with 1/4 times of CL-Ss.....

There are actually 3 cars in the 13s.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:27 AM
  #57  
The GTP runs are on video.

I was talking about the GTP to 100 not Ants. Ants was highway runs a while back before he got the VI.

Also the GTP has stock Goodyear RSAs on it. We both spun a little off the line when we launched but stayed right next to each other. Either he edged a little or I did, depends what part of the powerband we were in. Even on a roll it takes the launch out of the race. His trap 99 mph, that means he should walk from me right? He doesn't. Where do I see a 4th gen trapping that stock?

I know when I had my 98 Max, and 01 5spds, GTPs killed me no matter where I launched and they were stock.

Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax
are you talking a 4th Gen? if so.. look at a 4th Gen dyno.. they have no power after 5500 rpms




look at his traps.. he can't launch his car.. when i was at etown i saw a GTP running 14.4 @ 94 bone stock.. Lisa in NJ runs 13.9 @ 95 mph in her 1 pulley sisze smaller GTP.. ither his car is fcked up.. or he can't stomp the gas and go




like i said before.. look athe the 4th Gen dyno.. they are making 130 fwhp @ 6500 rpms.. i bet money that Ants will whoop your **** when he gets his VI workign correctly.. why don't you put it on video




they are your words.. would you like me to search and prove it?
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:29 AM
  #58  
Why would you want to search when you guys are the ones showing it in this thread now. When I started replying I said they were even. You can't give one the better of the doubt. But then someone came in and said I give the MAx the edge. lol

Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax
are you talking a 4th Gen? if so.. look at a 4th Gen dyno.. they have no power after 5500 rpms




look at his traps.. he can't launch his car.. when i was at etown i saw a GTP running 14.4 @ 94 bone stock.. Lisa in NJ runs 13.9 @ 95 mph in her 1 pulley sisze smaller GTP.. ither his car is fcked up.. or he can't stomp the gas and go




like i said before.. look athe the 4th Gen dyno.. they are making 130 fwhp @ 6500 rpms.. i bet money that Ants will whoop your **** when he gets his VI workign correctly.. why don't you put it on video




they are your words.. would you like me to search and prove it?
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:32 AM
  #59  
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #60  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
The GTP had the 3.20 pully which gives it 10psi over 7 psi which is stock. He runs 14.4 at 99 mph at the track.
So now you can run even with a MODDED 14.4 GTP in your nearly stock 15.3 CL-S?

That would be like me saying I can't beat a stock Gen6 Accord V6. haha

Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Next time run a driver who knows how to race the CL-S or knows your racing.
Yeah, he wasn't racing. We were only going 80 in a 40 zone

Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Oh yeah, but thats right. Nothing IS BETTER OR CAN BE BETTER OR FASTER THAN THE MAXIMA! Thats right. I forgot.
There are plenty of cars out there faster than mine. I know who they are and give them the respect they deserve by not messing with them.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:38 AM
  #61  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=82238

thread with 1/4 times of CL-Ss.....

There are actually 3 cars in the 13s.
I only see two 13 second cars and ones a 1st gen CL. Neither of them have proof but i know of the 1st gen CL from Honda-tech.

*edit* Actually there is only one and thats the first gen. Someone else says "there's gotta be faster autos then that, there is a guy running out here at fontana turning mid 13's w/ a 75 shot" but they dont say anything else about it.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #62  
Okay, so your 15.1 car trying to beat a 14.7 car, doubt it.

Per what you say that can't happen.

Yes, 10 times we have proved it in front of many people and its on video. That is why I am saying if I launch the CAR RIGHT, it will do 14s. The 15.3 was the 1st time at the track and it was heatsoaked. I am waiting for the weather to be cold again so I will tehn run again at the track.

Quote:
Originally posted by SteVTEC
So now you can run even with a MODDED 14.4 GTP in your nearly stock 15.3 CL-S?

That would be like me saying I can't beat a stock Gen6 Accord V6. haha

Yeah, he wasn't racing. We were only going 80 in a 40 zone

There are plenty of cars out there faster than mine. I know who they are and give them the respect they deserve by not messing with them.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:43 AM
  #63  
Read again. Further down the moderator said there are 3 cars in the 13s. And they are 2001+ CL-Ss.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:44 AM
  #64  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Read again. Further down the moderator said there are 3 cars in the 13s. And they are 2001+ CL-Ss.
thats a whole lot of proof.. something i would put the house up for
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #65  
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which is faster?: Maxima 6pd vs CL-S 6spd - Newton Says...
Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax
is that your S4?
Nope, it's my cousins, his username is "TunedS4" on audiworld I believe.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #66  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Okay, so your 15.1 car trying to beat a 14.7 car, doubt it.

Per what you say that can't happen.
There's a big difference between a few tenths and a FULL SECOND when you're street racing.

Stock times for both the CL-S and a 4th Gen 5spd are the same. High-14's to Low-15's. It could go either way on the streets, but I have the advantage at lower speeds and exploited it.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #67  
i thought this car was for luxuury.. i thought you were not going to bring it to the track.. i thought you were done racing?
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Okay, so your 15.1 car trying to beat a 14.7 car, doubt it.

Per what you say that can't happen.

Yes, 10 times we have proved it in front of many people and its on video. That is why I am saying if I launch the CAR RIGHT, it will do 14s. The 15.3 was the 1st time at the track and it was heatsoaked. I am waiting for the weather to be cold again so I will tehn run again at the track.

Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:46 AM
  #68  
Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax
thats a whole lot of proof.. something i would put the house up for
Since I had to manually go back and find that post which took a while. The damn search isn't working on that site it keeps erroring out. So I can't get the actual posts from the people who hit 13s like I was recommended to search by other members.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 10:56 AM
  #69  
Quote:
Originally posted by SprintMax
i thought this car was for luxuury.. i thought you were not going to bring it to the track.. i thought you were done racing?
Well like yours is for family.

The only way I will stop is if I got a SUV. lol

WWW.G35WORLD.COM 2004 I might have one.
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #70  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Well like yours is for family.

The only way I will stop is if I got a SUV. lol

WWW.G35WORLD.COM 2004 I might have one.

with all the new high powered SUV's coming out.. no you won't you know you won't
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 11:04 AM
  #71  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
WWW.G35WORLD.COM 2004 I might have one.
me too
Reply
Oct 7, 2002 | 12:09 PM
  #72  
I love peanut butter and jelly...
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 02:49 AM
  #73  
my auto cl-s ran a 14.16 @ 99.11 tonight.

n/a, stock wheels.
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 06:07 AM
  #74  
Quote of SteVTEC
Quote:
This post is flamebait

Hook line and sinker
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 06:09 AM
  #75  
Quote:
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


Well like yours is for family.

The only way I will stop is if I got a SUV. lol

WWW.G35WORLD.COM 2004 I might have one.
I know that site
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #76  
i love maximas and all, but i still think the cls has the advantage......(it gets better fuel economy too)
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #77  
The man with the knowledge has spoken....

btw NICE time max2acs. thats impressive.
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 10:53 AM
  #78  
Quote:
Originally posted by EF-9
I love peanut butter and jelly...
CLICK ME --> <--- CLICK ME
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 12:08 PM
  #79  
Quote:
Originally posted by max2acs
my auto cl-s ran a 14.16 @ 99.11 tonight.

n/a, stock wheels.
Nice time bro!! Are you Mattg from CL forum? I saw some of your old times from 14.2 and 14.3 with just i/h/e..
Reply
Oct 12, 2002 | 02:07 PM
  #80  
damn, you blew my cover

yep, thats me. thanks for the kind words guys. with some light weight rims i should be hitting some high 13's.
Reply