me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
#1
me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
The District sent me a notice of infraction for passing a red light. OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left. Says the light was red for 0.5 sec when I blew it at 17 mph.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
#2
Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Welcome to DC I got my first last week. we also have speed cameras too, sometimes you'll see a undercover cop in a Crown Vic sitting on the side of the road, and then you'll see a mysterious flash of light behind you my dad gets the speeding ones all the time...
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
The District sent me a notice of infraction for passing a red light. OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left. Says the light was red for 0.5 sec when I blew it at 17 mph.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
The District sent me a notice of infraction for passing a red light. OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left. Says the light was red for 0.5 sec when I blew it at 17 mph.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
#3
Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
I hope that was a joke. Redlight cameras are unconsitutional. You do not have the opportunity to confront your accuser. You are presumed guilty.
These cameras have never been shown to reduce accidents. The manufacturer of the camera gets a cut of each fine. They shorten the yellow light at intersections with cameras to increase revenue.
The best way to decrease redlight running is simple... longer yellow lights. But this solution does not earn any money for anyone, so it is ignored.
Conratulations, you've been screwed.
#5
Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
The District sent me a notice of infraction for passing a red light. OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left. Says the light was red for 0.5 sec when I blew it at 17 mph.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
The District sent me a notice of infraction for passing a red light. OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left. Says the light was red for 0.5 sec when I blew it at 17 mph.
Time to man the f*** up and pay the $75. Says no points to the owner or driver. I just hope there weren't any other infractions on that crazy trip. We need more of these cameras in Phila.
those cameras are amazing indeed...
my brother got caught a bunch of times... these cameras take 2 shots... like a second or 2 two apart.. one shows him crossing the intersection, the other he's already 1/2 down the block.. they could have easily figured out he was doing like triple the speed limit through that but they didn't
the cameras do work wonders
i see people hustling to clear that intersection where the cameras are.. often people are skidding or braking crazy hard so they don't go through a red..
#6
Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left.
OMFG, the pictures are as clear as a stream flowing in North Bay Ontario! You can see my bad boy 18's and then my signal as I was turning left.
Most places will only let you pull that defense if you rat out who was driving...
As an American I feel totally violated just knowing that these things are out there...
#9
Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by mzmtg
But can you see you in the driver's seat? There is NO proof that you were the one driving.
Most places will only let you pull that defense if you rat out who was driving...
As an American I feel totally violated just knowing that these things are out there...
But can you see you in the driver's seat? There is NO proof that you were the one driving.
Most places will only let you pull that defense if you rat out who was driving...
As an American I feel totally violated just knowing that these things are out there...
#10
Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by mzmtg
I hope that was a joke. Redlight cameras are unconsitutional. You do not have the opportunity to confront your accuser. You are presumed guilty.
These cameras have never been shown to reduce accidents. The manufacturer of the camera gets a cut of each fine. They shorten the yellow light at intersections with cameras to increase revenue.
The best way to decrease redlight running is simple... longer yellow lights. But this solution does not earn any money for anyone, so it is ignored.
Conratulations, you've been screwed.
I hope that was a joke. Redlight cameras are unconsitutional. You do not have the opportunity to confront your accuser. You are presumed guilty.
These cameras have never been shown to reduce accidents. The manufacturer of the camera gets a cut of each fine. They shorten the yellow light at intersections with cameras to increase revenue.
The best way to decrease redlight running is simple... longer yellow lights. But this solution does not earn any money for anyone, so it is ignored.
Conratulations, you've been screwed.
There is no way in he11 that the manufacturer should be getting a cut. I guess it just further proves that it's all about the $ not the safety.
#11
Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
I hear that one county sent back a pic of a pair of handcuffs.
Originally posted by thebigsadler
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
#12
Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by mzmtg
But can you see you in the driver's seat? There is NO proof that you were the one driving.
Most places will only let you pull that defense if you rat out who was driving...
As an American I feel totally violated just knowing that these things are out there...
But can you see you in the driver's seat? There is NO proof that you were the one driving.
Most places will only let you pull that defense if you rat out who was driving...
As an American I feel totally violated just knowing that these things are out there...
SuDZ
#13
Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by NYCe MaXiMa
the cameras do work wonders
i see people hustling to clear that intersection where the cameras are.. often people are skidding or braking crazy hard so they don't go through a red..
the cameras do work wonders
i see people hustling to clear that intersection where the cameras are.. often people are skidding or braking crazy hard so they don't go through a red..
Work wonders?
What you have witnessed is the mere presence of the cameras making people drive unsafely...another bad idea...
#14
Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
It says there the registered owner is responsible.
It says there the registered owner is responsible.
So if I lend my car to my dad, and he gets a speeding ticket, I should have to pay it?
I dont think so.
#15
Re: Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by mzmtg
So if I lend my car to my dad, and he gets a speeding ticket, I should have to pay it?
I dont think so.
So if I lend my car to my dad, and he gets a speeding ticket, I should have to pay it?
I dont think so.
You have the opportunity to put the driver's name and address down if you feel like doing so, then you will have a hearing. Why do all that? If you broke the rules, you should be a man and pay. If you don't, there's a good chance that you will be the same way in other walks of life. Once on SEPTA the conductor missed a dude and his son, so he didn't give up the ticket. The son asked his dad why he didn't give the conductor the ticket. How embarassing that his own son saw him not being a man.
#16
Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by thebigsadler
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
Dave
#17
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Once on SEPTA the conductor missed a dude and his son, so he didn't give up the ticket. The son asked his dad why he didn't give the conductor the ticket. How embarassing that his own son saw him not being a man.
Once on SEPTA the conductor missed a dude and his son, so he didn't give up the ticket. The son asked his dad why he didn't give the conductor the ticket. How embarassing that his own son saw him not being a man.
SuDZ
#18
Uncle Sam is watching!!!
Seriously though, I'm kind of torn between this idea. On one hand it's good because some people blatantly blow red lights, but I myself have sometimes went through a yellow-changing-to-red light and if I had tried to stop the idiot tailgating me behind would've rammed me in the rear. So I don't know if these are good or not.
They got some on Ocean Pkwy in Brooklyn at one intersection. I drove through it one time, and look back and there are white flashes going off. You've got mail!!!
Seriously though, I'm kind of torn between this idea. On one hand it's good because some people blatantly blow red lights, but I myself have sometimes went through a yellow-changing-to-red light and if I had tried to stop the idiot tailgating me behind would've rammed me in the rear. So I don't know if these are good or not.
They got some on Ocean Pkwy in Brooklyn at one intersection. I drove through it one time, and look back and there are white flashes going off. You've got mail!!!
#19
I do not like them as MZMTG stated, but I am not a nuts about it as he.
They have PROVEN IT A FACT that these cameras CAUSE more accidents than prevent.
And the right to confront your accuser is in the consititution... so this is where I agree that they are BS
They have PROVEN IT A FACT that these cameras CAUSE more accidents than prevent.
And the right to confront your accuser is in the consititution... so this is where I agree that they are BS
#20
I'm with mzmtg...
I know I saw a news story here couple years back that said they couldn't put the cams up because an officer of the law had to be present to give you an infraction....but I think that's changed since, and they're going to start putting them up.
To me, it's the equivalent of having a satellite modem in a car that when you go .00000001mph over the speed limit, automatically reports you to local authorities, and an infraction is automatically issued.
The second you break the speed limit, you're breaking the law.
But I don't expect the law to change people's opinions on running red lights, and they have to enforce the consequences of what can happen if someone runs one and causes an accident. I think they know this isn't a good way to do it, but what are some other options? Same with all other cases where someone gets charged for doing something that could potentially lead to another damaging situation (like a car accident...like...chirping your tires COULD lead to loss of control, so here, we'll give you a ticket).
I know I saw a news story here couple years back that said they couldn't put the cams up because an officer of the law had to be present to give you an infraction....but I think that's changed since, and they're going to start putting them up.
To me, it's the equivalent of having a satellite modem in a car that when you go .00000001mph over the speed limit, automatically reports you to local authorities, and an infraction is automatically issued.
The second you break the speed limit, you're breaking the law.
But I don't expect the law to change people's opinions on running red lights, and they have to enforce the consequences of what can happen if someone runs one and causes an accident. I think they know this isn't a good way to do it, but what are some other options? Same with all other cases where someone gets charged for doing something that could potentially lead to another damaging situation (like a car accident...like...chirping your tires COULD lead to loss of control, so here, we'll give you a ticket).
#22
Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by thebigsadler
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
if they sent you a picture of the infraction and a ticket.. send them a picture of the money they want.. same idea.
P.S MD has too many of those nasty cameras as well, after u get u'r first tickit, you are rmineded yellow light means prepare to STOP if possible, NOT SPEED AWAY.
#23
Originally posted by mzmtg
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
Adam
#24
Originally posted by mzmtg
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
#25
The ACLU fights for our freedom. Keep in mind... freedom doesnt just disappear overnight. It's a slow, slow process. What if there were camera's EVERYWHERE except in our own homes. While some people might be comfortable being on camera everywhere they went, whenever they left the privacy of their own home, I on the other hand would NOT. Something like this might sound ludicrous now but what about in 5 years? This world is crazy.
I'm with mzmtg on this one.
I'm with mzmtg on this one.
#26
when I was in taiwan, they have like these cameras every couple of miles, which was really annoying. But to make them legal, the gov't had to post warnings with the distance left until the camera while on the freeway/local streets.
a way the ppl there figured out a way to avoid this was a special spray that you could buy that makes your license plate look like a shining piece of white when the camera takes your picture so you can never get caught.
a way the ppl there figured out a way to avoid this was a special spray that you could buy that makes your license plate look like a shining piece of white when the camera takes your picture so you can never get caught.
#27
I'm wholeheartedly against these cameras. My Mom recieved one of these for running a red light in san diego to the tune of $300+
They said that she could challenge it, but she would have to show up in court in S.D. A few months later we read a newspaper article about how s.d. abused the systems, shortened the yellows and used the cameras solely as a money making enterprise.
I agree with mzmtg that they violate the constitution and that it's one step toward a 'big brother' type future.
They said that she could challenge it, but she would have to show up in court in S.D. A few months later we read a newspaper article about how s.d. abused the systems, shortened the yellows and used the cameras solely as a money making enterprise.
I agree with mzmtg that they violate the constitution and that it's one step toward a 'big brother' type future.
#28
Here in california, they stoppd sending the pictures w/ the ticket. Apparently they had some big problems w/ it... for example, the husband runs the red light, picture of taken of car (front back) and a couple weeks later, mail comes in and wife opens it.... to find her husband w/ another woman (i guess she was already suspecting he was cheating on her)... you get the point.
That's about the only thing i learned from traffic school lol
That's about the only thing i learned from traffic school lol
#29
Re: Re: Re: me and my Maxima, nailed in DC!
Originally posted by mzmtg
Work wonders?
What you have witnessed is the mere presence of the cameras making people drive unsafely...another bad idea...
Work wonders?
What you have witnessed is the mere presence of the cameras making people drive unsafely...another bad idea...
The fact people brake hard to avoid running them is better than them running it and hitting a person or another car and causing an accident. If they can run the red and know there is a chance they can get away with it, a very big one at that.. then they will.. i see other intersections here, that are fairly dead, especially at night.. where people slow down, look around for cops, dont see any and go.. if they had cameras, i dont think theyd do that..
#30
Originally posted by mzmtg
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
It's very cut and dried to me. With the current setup, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
This goes against everything that our legal ssytem is based on. Plain and simple.
technically, they prove that the person behind the wheel of YOUR car at that exact time, going through that particular intersection ran a red light. They provide pictures that clearly show your license plate and they have a recorded time. I do not remember but I'm sure they give you some kind of chance to appeal it.
You can appeal anything these days..
#31
Oh, man!! Talk about BUSTED!
DW
DW
Originally posted by nadir_s
Here in california, they stoppd sending the pictures w/ the ticket. Apparently they had some big problems w/ it... for example, the husband runs the red light, picture of taken of car (front back) and a couple weeks later, mail comes in and wife opens it.... to find her husband w/ another woman (i guess she was already suspecting he was cheating on her)... you get the point.
That's about the only thing i learned from traffic school lol
Here in california, they stoppd sending the pictures w/ the ticket. Apparently they had some big problems w/ it... for example, the husband runs the red light, picture of taken of car (front back) and a couple weeks later, mail comes in and wife opens it.... to find her husband w/ another woman (i guess she was already suspecting he was cheating on her)... you get the point.
That's about the only thing i learned from traffic school lol
#32
I'm not playing devil's advocate. I have very strong feelings about this issue.
If a police officer stands on the side of the road and writes down my plate when I run a red light, I can have the opportunity to question him and attempt to counter his testimony. This basic right is totally removed when automatic cameras are used. That is the problem.
If a police officer stands on the side of the road and writes down my plate when I run a red light, I can have the opportunity to question him and attempt to counter his testimony. This basic right is totally removed when automatic cameras are used. That is the problem.
#33
in the event of the the camera ticket who is listed as the "accuser" wouldnt it be the "state of ..." with the camera as the "witness."
if that is the case then you always have the oppurtunity to face your accuser, the state.
if that is the case then you always have the oppurtunity to face your accuser, the state.
#34
Originally posted by DAREN
in the event of the the camera ticket who is listed as the "accuser" wouldnt it be the "state of ..." with the camera as the "witness."
if that is the case then you always have the oppurtunity to face your accuser, the state.
in the event of the the camera ticket who is listed as the "accuser" wouldnt it be the "state of ..." with the camera as the "witness."
if that is the case then you always have the oppurtunity to face your accuser, the state.
Adam
#36
You ever get caught by some girl's father messing around? A man faces up to it, doesn't call the ACLU and try to say he wasn't doing it and use legal mumbo jubmo. And this advice is coming from a lawyer!
I just think it's a messed up way to enforce a law that should have some slack and human analyzation built into it. Guilt is kind of relative in that situation to me.
#37
Originally posted by I30tMikeD
Slippery slope.
Slippery slope.
Yep.
Exactly.
If a camera recorded someone that looked like you from behind committing murder, but never showed your face....wouldn't you like a little more proof?
#38
Originally posted by mzmtg
Yep.
Exactly.
If a camera recorded someone that looked like you from behind committing murder, but never showed your face....wouldn't you like a little more proof?
Yep.
Exactly.
If a camera recorded someone that looked like you from behind committing murder, but never showed your face....wouldn't you like a little more proof?
Seriously, if you really believe in what you say, I suggest you go to law school, because there are plenty of shylocks with law degrees making money defending criminals and in many cases getting them off on technicalities. This bu****** goes back to the 1800's, so it's nothing new in the USA. If you feel that strongly, why not turn your beliefs into cash? My philosophy is so much simpler--do the crime, pay the fine! I've wasted more than $75 worth of my time posting to this thread I started!
#40
Those cameras pull down A LOT of ca$H for their districts! I think they are a good idea because they DO reduce red-light-running. However, when the yellow is only lit for less that 2 seconds, I think that they become a hazard.