JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
My track opens Sunday and I'm wondering if I should run some race gas with my new JWT ECU. I found out a local Citgo gas station has 100 octane unleaded at a credit card pump (how cool). I'm debating on running my typical 92 octane (best you can do in Kansas City) and then some 100 octane. I'm figuring about 4 gallons of 92 and 2 gallons of 100 which should put me around 95 octane overall. I just figured since the ECU uses advanced timing, maybe it could take some advantage of a slightly higher fuel grade. I'd think anything over 95 would probably be worthless and possibly detrimental to performance.
Yay or nay?
Dave
Yay or nay?
Dave
The reason for using a higher octane fuel is to reduce or eliminate pre-ignition, detonation or engine knock, whichever you choose to call it.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
Originally posted by Jime
The reason for using a higher octane fuel is to reduce or eliminate pre-ignition, detonation or engine knock, whichever you choose to call it.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
The reason for using a higher octane fuel is to reduce or eliminate pre-ignition, detonation or engine knock, whichever you choose to call it.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
Originally posted by Jime
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.

I doubt JWT advances the timing enough to cause detonation problems. I would think its a waste of money. If anything I'd try to find 94 octane or so...
I used racing gas last year at the track (I think 108 octane) when I was using nitrous, but mainly because I was going to run out of gas otherwise. I did notice the car was quite a bit lighter...oh...wait...that was my wallet. $5/gallon!
Originally posted by Jime
The reason for using a higher octane fuel is to reduce or eliminate pre-ignition, detonation or engine knock, whichever you choose to call it.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
The reason for using a higher octane fuel is to reduce or eliminate pre-ignition, detonation or engine knock, whichever you choose to call it.
Unless you have some indication that you are experiencing knock then you would be wasting you money and could even reduce performance by running higher octane fuel.
If you can advance your timing more until the point you get pre-ignition or you can see you timing being pulled back by the knock-sensor then the higher octane would show a performance gain.
Race fuel is mainly used for boosted vehicles which are much more prone to pre-igniton.
Yeah yeah, I know all about octane ratings. Definately good info for those that don't know. I was just concerned since at my track you usually have to wait 1 hour in the lanes to get a run in and the engine and intake manifold usually become baking hot. Seeing how the VQ has reverse-flow cooling (not a great thing), high compression, a sensitive knock sensor, plus I've got advanced timing now, I just wonder if the extra octane might safe guard against any knock and ignition retard. I might give it a shot. JWT requires at least 92 octane.
Dave
Try going to a hotter plug and running 100 octane. It is known that going to a colder plug would reduce overall power by 5-15hp, so maybe going to a hotter plug with higher octane gas would help? Next time I goto the track I'm going to try out a hotter plug, if it doesn't detonate it might make more power.
Originally posted by Nismo87SE
Try going to a hotter plug and running 100 octane. It is known that going to a colder plug would reduce overall power by 5-15hp, so maybe going to a hotter plug with higher octane gas would help? Next time I goto the track I'm going to try out a hotter plug, if it doesn't detonate it might make more power.
Try going to a hotter plug and running 100 octane. It is known that going to a colder plug would reduce overall power by 5-15hp, so maybe going to a hotter plug with higher octane gas would help? Next time I goto the track I'm going to try out a hotter plug, if it doesn't detonate it might make more power.
You may come up with a winner for people who want to run N/A and get a bit more HP.
interesting on the hotter plug idea...also i concur on what was said earlier about the 350z...they tried race gas and it increaed horsepower, but only for the last 1000rpm or so...
i would say go for it b/c the ecu advances the timing right? i know on the VE brian h said to try race gas when advancing the timing on the VE...maybe itll do u sum good...
i would say go for it b/c the ecu advances the timing right? i know on the VE brian h said to try race gas when advancing the timing on the VE...maybe itll do u sum good...
Re: JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
when i had the Gforce ECU, i always tried to run with octane boosted 91. since in cali, we only have 91 octane...
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
Re: Re: JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
Originally posted by Chebosto
when i had the Gforce ECU, i always tried to run with octane boosted 91. since in cali, we only have 91 octane...
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
when i had the Gforce ECU, i always tried to run with octane boosted 91. since in cali, we only have 91 octane...
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
I wonder if you could send a G-force ECU into JWT for the raised rev limiter only. Then you would have best of both worlds.
Re: Re: Re: JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
Originally posted by I30tMikeD
It's all about the raised rev limiter.
I wonder if you could send a G-force ECU into JWT for the raised rev limiter only. Then you would have best of both worlds.
It's all about the raised rev limiter.
I wonder if you could send a G-force ECU into JWT for the raised rev limiter only. Then you would have best of both worlds.
Re: Re: JWT ECU: Should I run some race gas at the track?
Originally posted by Chebosto
when i had the Gforce ECU, i always tried to run with octane boosted 91. since in cali, we only have 91 octane...
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
when i had the Gforce ECU, i always tried to run with octane boosted 91. since in cali, we only have 91 octane...
but yea. the 'leaner' fuel curve at cruise speed takes advantage of the fuel octane and the timing advance..
i take it you went with the JWT ecu over the Gforce ecu out of spite? ha. as long as you're happy with it.. you could have gotten a slightly more aggressive program with GForce..
Even from 2000-4000rpms, the gains of the ECU are quite apparent. My MEVI 4th gen now drives like it did with the US-spec manifold from 2000-5000rpms (ie very torquey). I especially like the turbo-like surge from 3000-4000rpms
Dave
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM




