Dilemma....2k2 Maxima SE vs. 2003 RSX TypeS
06-07-2003, 06:35 AM
#1
Newbie - Just Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
Dilemma....2k2 Maxima SE vs. 2003 RSX TypeS
I've been planning on getting a 2003 RSX TypeS once I got back to the States (stationed overseas for the military). I've been wanting this car for over a year now. I didnt even consider other cars with the same or better specs since my budget is pretty tight. My brother got a 2002 Max SE last year but he wants to me take over payments and drive it since I'll be needing a car once Im back. I love the Maximas but there's only one problem with his Max. Its an auto with 22k miles on it already. I know he didnt drive it hard or treat it like $hit. I love Maximas but I also love manual shifting. I was checking online to see what the figures would be to trade it in for a 2k3 or 2k4 SE 6sp but the value dropped $10k just after one year (sup with dat?!?) Anyways, I just wanted to get some opinions/recommendations. Any would be appreciated.
06-07-2003, 06:55 AM
#3
Newbie - Just Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
i know...but thought it'd get an opinion from others (unbiased if possible..hehe). I read through the posts and it seems like there's a big difference between an auto and a manual (duh!) I just dont wanna be kicking myself in the *** down the road for going with an auto.
06-07-2003, 07:02 AM
#4
2k3 honda accord 2 door coupe w/ navigation and 6 speed. I've seen it in person and i am very impressed with the power, the build and the navigation is the best i have ever seen. If i had my choice between that car and the two you mentioned, i would go honda accord. Plus the coupe 6 speed would give the new maxima a real good run
(3.0 vtec 6 cylinder by the way :wow
(3.0 vtec 6 cylinder by the way :wow
06-07-2003, 07:35 AM
#6
Newbie - Just Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
Originally posted by JerseyMaxima
If you can somehow get the Max in a manual, then there is not even a discussion.
BUT if you are going to be driving a automatic transmission (even though it is a wonderful MAXIMA) Get the RSX-S, manual.
If you can somehow get the Max in a manual, then there is not even a discussion.
BUT if you are going to be driving a automatic transmission (even though it is a wonderful MAXIMA) Get the RSX-S, manual.
06-07-2003, 07:44 AM
#7
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,749
Ill take the Max even in auto over the RSX-S, not a honda fan, and definately not an RSX fan, dont like the look of them.
Eric
Eric
06-07-2003, 09:47 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Re: Dilemma....2k2 Maxima SE vs. 2003 RSX TypeS
Originally posted by NeedaMax
I've been planning on getting a 2003 RSX TypeS once I got back to the States (stationed overseas for the military). I've been wanting this car for over a year now. I didnt even consider other cars with the same or better specs since my budget is pretty tight. My brother got a 2002 Max SE last year but he wants to me take over payments and drive it since I'll be needing a car once Im back. I love the Maximas but there's only one problem with his Max. Its an auto with 22k miles on it already. I know he didnt drive it hard or treat it like $hit. I love Maximas but I also love manual shifting. I was checking online to see what the figures would be to trade it in for a 2k3 or 2k4 SE 6sp but the value dropped $10k just after one year (sup with dat?!?) Anyways, I just wanted to get some opinions/recommendations. Any would be appreciated.
I've been planning on getting a 2003 RSX TypeS once I got back to the States (stationed overseas for the military). I've been wanting this car for over a year now. I didnt even consider other cars with the same or better specs since my budget is pretty tight. My brother got a 2002 Max SE last year but he wants to me take over payments and drive it since I'll be needing a car once Im back. I love the Maximas but there's only one problem with his Max. Its an auto with 22k miles on it already. I know he didnt drive it hard or treat it like $hit. I love Maximas but I also love manual shifting. I was checking online to see what the figures would be to trade it in for a 2k3 or 2k4 SE 6sp but the value dropped $10k just after one year (sup with dat?!?) Anyways, I just wanted to get some opinions/recommendations. Any would be appreciated.
If your answers are yes/no/yes/yes then the Maxima is for you.
If you are looking for a car that is fun to drive in the handling dept. and doesn't depreciate much, then the Acura is for you. It has no torque but that doesn't detract from the way it drives. The only way I can answer your sup wit dat question is a NCD (new car dealer) CANNOT pay more in a trade for a car than what they can get from the mfg, incl kickbacks, marketing scams, and holdback. You drive a new car off the lot, really it boils down to titling but driving off the lot is an expression, the diff between what you paid and their true cost (invoice less holdback less kickbacks) is lost, PLUS whatever profit they expect to make by selling this car on the used car market. 10k in a year for a max is not that surprising, though I would expect it to be more like 6-7.
06-07-2003, 11:06 AM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 469
Re: Re: Dilemma....2k2 Maxima SE vs. 2003 RSX TypeS
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Of course it depends on what you want/need. Do you need a 4d? Do you care about handling? Are you going to tow a trailer? Will you keep the vehicle for 7 years?
If your answers are yes/no/yes/yes then the Maxima is for you.
If you are looking for a car that is fun to drive in the handling dept. and doesn't depreciate much, then the Acura is for you. It has no torque but that doesn't detract from the way it drives. The only way I can answer your sup wit dat question is a NCD (new car dealer) CANNOT pay more in a trade for a car than what they can get from the mfg, incl kickbacks, marketing scams, and holdback. You drive a new car off the lot, really it boils down to titling but driving off the lot is an expression, the diff between what you paid and their true cost (invoice less holdback less kickbacks) is lost, PLUS whatever profit they expect to make by selling this car on the used car market. 10k in a year for a max is not that surprising, though I would expect it to be more like 6-7.
Of course it depends on what you want/need. Do you need a 4d? Do you care about handling? Are you going to tow a trailer? Will you keep the vehicle for 7 years?
If your answers are yes/no/yes/yes then the Maxima is for you.
If you are looking for a car that is fun to drive in the handling dept. and doesn't depreciate much, then the Acura is for you. It has no torque but that doesn't detract from the way it drives. The only way I can answer your sup wit dat question is a NCD (new car dealer) CANNOT pay more in a trade for a car than what they can get from the mfg, incl kickbacks, marketing scams, and holdback. You drive a new car off the lot, really it boils down to titling but driving off the lot is an expression, the diff between what you paid and their true cost (invoice less holdback less kickbacks) is lost, PLUS whatever profit they expect to make by selling this car on the used car market. 10k in a year for a max is not that surprising, though I would expect it to be more like 6-7.
06-07-2003, 11:58 AM
#12
I would not base this choice on power or transmissions, rather the other aspects of the car. Could you live with the room of a 2dr? Do you drive highways a lot and crave V-6 power? Do you want a small car for city driving? Do you plan to modify the car heavily? etc. My $.02.
-Cyrus
-Cyrus
06-07-2003, 12:32 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 508
If you're gonna be making payments on whatever car, make payments on something you WANT.
06-07-2003, 01:19 PM
#14
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
If you want 84lb-ft of torque at the wheels @ 8000rpm, get the cute little RSX-S.
06-07-2003, 01:21 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 508
spoken like a true mustang owner...heh
06-07-2003, 03:39 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,868
if the payments will be relatively the same, get the RSX-S. it may not be as torquey but its still a quick car with lots of potential. it handles well and has good reliablity and resale value. and if you like manuals, this shouldnt even be a decision. its not worth making payments every month just to wish you had something else. get the rsx.
plus, your brother is probably getting rid of his 2k2 so he can go buy a manual car
plus, your brother is probably getting rid of his 2k2 so he can go buy a manual car
06-07-2003, 03:54 PM
#17
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
RSX-S: 142lb/ft.@6000rpm Curb weight: 2778 lbs.
3.5Max: 265lb/ft.@4400rpm Curb weight: 3300 lbs.
3.5Max: 265lb/ft.@4400rpm Curb weight: 3300 lbs.
06-07-2003, 04:38 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally posted by DTR Maxima
if the payments will be relatively the same, get the RSX-S. it may not be as torquey but its still a quick car with lots of potential. it handles well and has good reliablity and resale value. and if you like manuals, this shouldnt even be a decision. its not worth making payments every month just to wish you had something else. get the rsx.
plus, your brother is probably getting rid of his 2k2 so he can go buy a manual car
if the payments will be relatively the same, get the RSX-S. it may not be as torquey but its still a quick car with lots of potential. it handles well and has good reliablity and resale value. and if you like manuals, this shouldnt even be a decision. its not worth making payments every month just to wish you had something else. get the rsx.
plus, your brother is probably getting rid of his 2k2 so he can go buy a manual car
06-07-2003, 04:42 PM
#20
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
RS-X Type S is a sports car
RS-X Type S is a sports car
06-07-2003, 04:55 PM
#21
I dont like Honda/toyota. Just tell the bro to keep the 2k2 and get urself a used 2k2 6spd. DO NOT GET AN AUTO, I repeat DO NOT GET AN AUTO.
And maxima resale value is not bad if you catch a sick deal on it used. few years later it wont drop much. I know I had few of them.
And maxima resale value is not bad if you catch a sick deal on it used. few years later it wont drop much. I know I had few of them.
06-07-2003, 05:01 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally posted by 190hpKiLLA
I dont like Honda/toyota. Just tell the bro to keep the 2k2 and get urself a used 2k2 6spd. DO NOT GET AN AUTO, I repeat DO NOT GET AN AUTO.
And maxima resale value is not bad if you catch a sick deal on it used. few years later it wont drop much. I know I had few of them.
I dont like Honda/toyota. Just tell the bro to keep the 2k2 and get urself a used 2k2 6spd. DO NOT GET AN AUTO, I repeat DO NOT GET AN AUTO.
And maxima resale value is not bad if you catch a sick deal on it used. few years later it wont drop much. I know I had few of them.
06-07-2003, 06:38 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 508
If the RSX-S is the car you've wanted for so long, then go for it. It handles, looks, and brakes good, and it's more fun to drive. If you want to have power to go straight and haul your kids around, get the Max, but don't sell yourself short by getting an auto....hehe.
06-07-2003, 08:18 PM
#25
Newbie - Just Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12
Thank you for all your inputs. I've always wanted the RSX cuz of the price with all of its specs. I never considered a Maxima since it was out of my price range but I love the car. The payments will be almost the same...same with the insurance. I just think that if you're getting a sports sedan you should go manual. Whats the point of getting a fast, powerful engine if you cant take full advantage of it? Thats just my opinion so please dont flame me. My brother will see about trading it in for a 2002 or 2004 maxima 6sp without getting screwed too much. If he can pull it off, i'll be one happy SOB.
06-07-2003, 08:29 PM
#26
Originally posted by 99Maxima5sp
Ill take the Max even in auto over the RSX-S, not a honda fan, and definately not an RSX fan, dont like the look of them.
Ill take the Max even in auto over the RSX-S, not a honda fan, and definately not an RSX fan, dont like the look of them.
the rsx looks alright...better than the max IMO.
but it does lack torque.
like mecca said...accord coupe v6 6spd is really nice
rsx-s is nice too...i drove it...and the tranny is like butter...unlike mine...which is like grinding sand
06-07-2003, 08:43 PM
#27
Cheesing away...
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,613
Re: Dilemma....2k2 Maxima SE vs. 2003 RSX TypeS
Originally posted by NeedaMax
I was checking online to see what the figures would be to trade it in for a 2k3 or 2k4 SE 6sp but the value dropped $10k just after one year (sup with dat?!?)
I was checking online to see what the figures would be to trade it in for a 2k3 or 2k4 SE 6sp but the value dropped $10k just after one year (sup with dat?!?)
06-07-2003, 10:37 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,659
if you want to be somewhat original, go for a camry and get the TRD supercharger......but if i had to choose between those two choices, i'd get the maxima, its better in every single aspect, except for handling (i'm referring to stock)
06-07-2003, 10:50 PM
#29
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Ok listen up.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
06-07-2003, 11:01 PM
#30
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Ok listen up.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
Ok listen up.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
06-07-2003, 11:03 PM
#31
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Lordrandall
06-08-2003, 04:33 AM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Ok listen up.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
Ok listen up.
Forget the Maxima. Forget the girly honda car. Get your self a 2002 Blue Camaro SS 6spd. 300hp to the wheels stock, and even more torque. Worth the higher insurence.
Flame on, you torqueless riceboys.
06-08-2003, 07:14 AM
#35
If you're single and not planning on getting married anytime soon, then I would personally go with the RSX-S. Do you know what's going on with the aftermarket with that particular engine? It's off the charts. You'll be able to do whatever you want to that thing...
06-08-2003, 09:04 AM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,868
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Hell yea bro! You have good taste, good sir.
Hell yea bro! You have good taste, good sir.
now adays, the power of a camaro is nothing, when all parts of the car are considered. sure you get raw power, but u also get a car that is going to need more money to upkeep than a playboy model. for around the same price, you can get an sti or evo, or used s4, all with just as much potential but better handling by far, and of course reliability. not to mention all the cars above are 13 second cars, and i have a hunch once a real driver drives an sti 12 will be seen stock, easily.
sorry for whoring your thread
06-08-2003, 09:30 AM
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally posted by DTR Maxima
camaros are junk.
camaros are junk.
06-08-2003, 09:32 AM
#38
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Whether it's politically correct or not, I will totally agree with that statement. Unless you're bald, over 45 years-old, have a belly at least 5-6" hanging over your belt, you know what I mean, I'm not sure that the Camaro lifestyle is for you. Dang I gotta go now and cut the grass, that stuff is green but growing like crazy!
Whether it's politically correct or not, I will totally agree with that statement. Unless you're bald, over 45 years-old, have a belly at least 5-6" hanging over your belt, you know what I mean, I'm not sure that the Camaro lifestyle is for you. Dang I gotta go now and cut the grass, that stuff is green but growing like crazy!
06-08-2003, 09:39 AM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 214
Having gone from a:
1995 Altima (new) to a...
1996 Civic EX (new) to a...
2000 Maxima (new) to a...
2003 Civic Si (new)...
I can give a little insight on this Honda vs Nissan dilemna.
#1) These cars you're comparing have NOTHING in common.
#2) GET WHAT YOU WANT THE FIRST TIME....DON'T SETTLE!
#3) Honda service > Nissan service (NO CONTEST)
I traded in my 2000 Maxima after 1.5 years and it lost HALF its value.
That is the only reason i'd never buy a nissan again.
PS: My old 96 civic retained 75% of its sticker price after 4 years!
I decided to look into smaller Honda/Acuras.
I test drove the RSX and at 6'6", i just didnt fit.
My knees were on the dash board.
So i test drove a 2003 Civic Si, and there was ALOT more room.
That's what i ended up buying, and I love it.
I'll repeat this again, GET WHAT YOU WANT.....the 1st time!
1995 Altima (new) to a...
1996 Civic EX (new) to a...
2000 Maxima (new) to a...
2003 Civic Si (new)...
I can give a little insight on this Honda vs Nissan dilemna.
#1) These cars you're comparing have NOTHING in common.
#2) GET WHAT YOU WANT THE FIRST TIME....DON'T SETTLE!
#3) Honda service > Nissan service (NO CONTEST)
I traded in my 2000 Maxima after 1.5 years and it lost HALF its value.
That is the only reason i'd never buy a nissan again.
PS: My old 96 civic retained 75% of its sticker price after 4 years!
I decided to look into smaller Honda/Acuras.
I test drove the RSX and at 6'6", i just didnt fit.
My knees were on the dash board.
So i test drove a 2003 Civic Si, and there was ALOT more room.
That's what i ended up buying, and I love it.
I'll repeat this again, GET WHAT YOU WANT.....the 1st time!
06-08-2003, 10:47 AM
#40
test drive the maxima and see hwo you like it and then test drive the rsx. the auto max is much better than an rsx. rsx screams... im a teenage boy where the max says.... hey im successful in life and know what luxury is.