General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

When will you give up on the Maxima?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:02 AM
  #81  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by SteVTEC


Before you start disagreeing with seasoned drag racers like Jime and Dave you ought to read into their arguments a bit more and think of why the autos are eventually quicker. At those power levels a manual is shifting 3 or maybe even 4 times vs an auto shifting only twice. All that extra shifting costs you time which the auto does not suffer. The auto launches much more consistently and is much more controllable. Shifts are much more controlled on the auto. Think about it....

On the street with "normal" power, yes, a manual will almost always be quicker. But when you're putting down lots of power, especially very thick torque, the longer gears on the auto are advantageous along with the consistency. That buys you more in the 1/4 mile than the higher efficiency of a manual gives you.
Im still going to disagree about auto's being faster in 12-13 second cars. I guess the only way to know is when and if Neal gets his NX kit and slaps the slicks on.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:09 AM
  #82  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MAX2000JP
Im still going to disagree about auto's being faster in 12-13 second cars. I guess the only way to know is when and if Neal gets his NX kit and slaps the slicks on.
Jime is down over 100 whp peak to Mardi and is nearly as quick despite having an auto. If Jime had the top-end from the MEVI to level the playing field, I think Jime would be quicker.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:24 AM
  #83  
Cutler's Avatar
......................
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,913
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Jime is down over 100 whp peak to Mardi and is nearly as quick despite having an auto. If Jime had the top-end from the MEVI to level the playing field, I think Jime would be quicker.
Not after Matt drops in the frankenmotor with boost....

I think Jime will agree with that
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:32 AM
  #84  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Cutlr7
Not after Matt drops in the frankenmotor with boost....

I think Jime will agree with that

of course he will be faster. Jime ran a 12.1 and was making nearly 310whp. Mardi ran a 11.9 with 423whp. Give Jim 400+ whp and see what he runs in a slow slush box.

Matts car amazes me though, his trap speeds are crazy 117
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:42 AM
  #85  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064


And the fact that we're arguing about whose grocery getter is gonna be quicker, and that we're talking about 12 or 11 second cars (do I hear 10's? ) just goes to show how awesome these cars are and how much potential they have.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #86  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Jime is down over 100 whp peak to Mardi and is nearly as quick despite having an auto. If Jime had the top-end from the MEVI to level the playing field, I think Jime would be quicker.
Mardi also traps nearly 10 mph faster. I'm all about trap speeds because it gives you a idea of how quick the car really is, but thats another topic itself.

As for Jime's times, I am not trying to knock his accomplishments, they are impressive, but he would have trouble with a stock C5 if he wasn't launching as hard. My buddy ran a 108 trap stock and 110 with exhaust and intake.

Back on topic, these recent posts are a reminder why I am getting a new ride. I want a performance car and have realized that my Max doesn't fit the bill. I used to talk to my friends about so and so's 1/4 times in a Maxima and how much whp they put down, until a friend asked "If so and so is serious about drag racing or racing in general, why are they using the Maxima?"
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #87  
|Bijan|'s Avatar
UCF Lexus
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,845
From: Colorado
I'll give up on the maxima the day I can afford a skyline....

I'm sure many people would agree....
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:09 AM
  #88  
deezo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by SteVTEC


just goes to show how awesome these cars are and how much potential they have.
True.
"
Some people are just stuck on the "5 speed is better than auto" stuff but there is always going to be a catogory where the auto will win. I can't imagine how much faster my auto would be with 300 HP.

Max2000jp: Even our current tranmission with the resistor mod, I don't see someone out shifting it in the 5 speeds.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #89  
Shadow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,145
So very true, I never even though of it that way. Very impressive, this is a day I never though would come.

Originally Posted by SteVTEC


And the fact that we're arguing about whose grocery getter is gonna be quicker, and that we're talking about 12 or 11 second cars (do I hear 10's? ) just goes to show how awesome these cars are and how much potential they have.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:29 AM
  #90  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,919
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
You can't compare trap speed of cars with different forms of boost. Huge difference, nitrous makes power down low and drops off up high, the reverse is true of a S/C and Turbo cars. Nitrous will always have lower trap speeds.

Also I use all 4 gears in my auto in the 1/4, I am hitting almost 5k in 4th when I cross the line.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #91  
deezo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by Jime
You can't compare trap speed of cars with different forms of boost. Huge difference, nitrous makes power down low and drops off up high, the reverse is true of a S/C and Turbo cars. Nitrous will always have lower trap speeds.

Also I use all 4 gears in my auto in the 1/4, I am hitting almost 5k in 4th when I cross the line.
You're not able to finish in third?
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:44 AM
  #92  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,919
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Its a long way to the end when I redline in 3rd. Speedo is hitting around 130 or more when I cross the traps because of the 22" tires. Ultimately I would like to redline in 4th when crossing the traps but I will either have to get smaller tires or go faster.

I have contemplated changing to a different platform to race but the more I go to the track and more I see what people are doing and have done I still think I can get my Maxima to go faster that all of them for much less money.

The other thing I love about racing a Maxima is that I am the only one there. If I raced one of the others I would be just another Lemming. I don't like copying what everyone else is doing, experimenting and coming up with different ways to improve a unique ride is much more enjoyable.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 09:55 AM
  #93  
deezo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by Jime
Its a long way to the end when I redline in 3rd. Speedo is hitting around 130 or more when I cross the traps because of the 22" tires. Ultimately I would like to redline in 4th when crossing the traps but I will either have to get smaller tires or go faster.
I forgot you ran smaller tires...
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #94  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by Jime
I have contemplated changing to a different platform to race but the more I go to the track and more I see what people are doing and have done I still think I can get my Maxima to go faster that all of them for much less money.
Translation: Maxima rules!

Originally Posted by Jime
The other thing I love about racing a Maxima is that I am the only one there. If I raced one of the others I would be just another Lemming. I don't like copying what everyone else is doing, experimenting and coming up with different ways to improve a unique ride is much more enjoyable.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #95  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Jime
You can't compare trap speed of cars with different forms of boost. Huge difference, nitrous makes power down low and drops off up high, the reverse is true of a S/C and Turbo cars. Nitrous will always have lower trap speeds.

Also I use all 4 gears in my auto in the 1/4, I am hitting almost 5k in 4th when I cross the line.
I see what you are tryin to say....MPH is a standard measure at all 1/8 and 1/4 tracks I know of. I don't know why people say that you cant compare different types of boost etc. Thats why people go to drapstrips, to get various measurements from a standardized system. I compare traps to see what vehicle is ultimately faster.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:15 AM
  #96  
spirilis's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,235
From: New Market, MD
This car is quite frankly as close to "luxury" as I ever plan to get--leather seating, powerful engine, 5-speed manual, self-installed sound system, roomy, decent fuel economy, decent suspension... It's perfect.

I'm paying off my car loan at a vastly accelerated rate (at least for now) and keeping it 'till she drops. Like the quote from Fight Club... "I keep telling myself 'OK, whatever happens I know that sofa problem is solved'" ... yeah, unless my car goes kerplunk, whatever happens, I know my car problem is most definitely solved... now I can concentrate on everything else in life, until the Maxima falls apart, and even then if nothing major goes wrong, I'll probably keep restoring it for a while (if it's mostly DIY stuff like alternator, belts, etc.)
Keeping this goal in-line with Mobil 1 synthetic motor oil and Redline synthetic gear oil... plus I plan to keep it *mostly* stock (except some suspension mods, and maybe an intake)
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #97  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Jime

I have contemplated changing to a different platform to race but the more I go to the track and more I see what people are doing and have done I still think I can get my Maxima to go faster that all of them for much less money.

The other thing I love about racing a Maxima is that I am the only one there. If I raced one of the others I would be just another Lemming. I don't like copying what everyone else is doing, experimenting and coming up with different ways to improve a unique ride is much more enjoyable.
Please don't take this as an attack, but IF for some reason you ran out of nitrous, your car is only running high 14s at best. That's the reason I perfer N/A or boost, plain and simple it's always there.

Your method of running fast is very economical. Run a high shot of Nitrous, drag slicks, and weight reduction. If the engine/tranny can handle it, you can do the same with many cars on the market. The problem I see with running large shot's of nitrous is the car wasn't designed to handle the tq. Eventually something will break.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:33 AM
  #98  
AntGVR4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,308
From: Clifton, NJ
I gave up on the maxima about a year ago.
I should've waited till I graduated so that I'd have enough money to play with. I got another maxima as a daily driver for when my car is broke.
I don't like bottles or S/C and turbo kits on FWD is crap. I don't like spinning tires through 3 of my 5 gears, NO THANKS.
Don't say Jime ran a 1.75 sixty foot so it's plenty of traction.
That is at the track with slicks and some sort of trick rear suspension so the rear barely squats. I need a car that has traction and power every day all day on any pavement.
Next car will be S4, hopefully this summer when I graduated then I can make the galant full race.

Ant
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #99  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MAX2000JP
Your method of running fast is very economical. Run a high shot of Nitrous, drag slicks, and weight reduction. If the engine/tranny can handle it, you can do the same with many cars on the market. The problem I see with running large shot's of nitrous is the car wasn't designed to handle the tq. Eventually something will break.
The 4th gen Maxima's rather unique combination of extremely lightweight and an incredibly sturdy drivetrain is what sets it apart from the competition in this regard. It can take a lickin and keep on tickin. Maybe you could do the same thing on a Camry, but that car is 200 lb heavier and won't get off the line as well. Maybe you could do the same thing on an Accord, but those cars are heavier still and the automatic transmissions in those cars are weak and can't even handle the stock 195 lb-ft that the engine makes, much less nitrous for very long.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #100  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MAX2000JP
I see what you are tryin to say....MPH is a standard measure at all 1/8 and 1/4 tracks I know of. I don't know why people say that you cant compare different types of boost etc. Thats why people go to drapstrips, to get various measurements from a standardized system. I compare traps to see what vehicle is ultimately faster.
When a 4th Gen Maxima runs a 15.2 @ 91, and a Prelude runs a 15.5 @ 95 (both average stock times), that shows that the Prelude is ultimately quicker because of the faster trap, but the Maxima still won the race. Quick ET means you are quick on the streets and quick in the real-world. A fast trap just means you have a lot of highway power which you might not be able to fully utilize.

At least around here in the DC area, highway power is pretty much useless because you're lucky to ever break 80 around here. Out in the midwest there's a lot more room to stretch the legs though, so whatever floats your boat. The ET is the standard by which all are judged, though. Not the trap.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #101  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
The 4th gen Maxima's rather unique combination of extremely lightweight and an incredibly sturdy drivetrain is what sets it apart from the competition in this regard. It can take a lickin and keep on tickin. Maybe you could do the same thing on a Camry, but that car is 200 lb heavier and won't get off the line as well. Maybe you could do the same thing on an Accord, but those cars are heavier still and the automatic transmissions in those cars are weak and can't even handle the stock 195 lb-ft that the engine makes, much less nitrous for very long.
I wouldn't say that our tranny's are incredibly sturdy. A lot of owners have had problems with both auto and manual trannies when adding power adders. I know of a couple local Maxima overs who have had to get their auto trannies built to handle the power of a s/c. We all know the troubles that BriGuyMax and EricdWong had with their manual trannies.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #102  
Redmax's Avatar
Redlinemax Owner
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,027
yeah but have u ever seen Ericdwong do a burnout? that should give you a hint to his tranny problems!!!

Autos Rule!!! :P
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #103  
deezo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by Redmax
yeah but have u ever seen Ericdwong do a burnout? that should give you a hint to his tranny problems!!!

Autos Rule!!! :P
Exactly!!!! Eric is a knowledgeable fella but he was looking for tranny problems doing all of those burnouts and anyone boosting an auto should know to upgrade it from the start.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #104  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by MAX2000JP
I wouldn't say that our tranny's are incredibly sturdy. A lot of owners have had problems with both auto and manual trannies when adding power adders.
Okay, so compare that to the Accord V6 guys who easily have 10x the trouble rate on their trannys without adding any power at all.

The poor fellas waited like 3 or 4 years for that Comptech Supercharger to come out, and now everybody is too afraid to do anything with it because they know the tranny is just going to fry and it won't get warrantied with the S/C on the car. The only guys having fun with it are the CL-S 6spd guys who don't have to worry about these truly weak autotragic transmissions that Honda has been putting out lately. V6Performance.net is working on a built tranny that will finally fix that (hopefully) and allow some serious power. The cost? $2-3k. Nice, but there goes your performance per dollar ratio right out the window.

Jime is running 12's with the drop resistor for $2k. The Honda guys need to spend that much alone just to get a tranny that won't pop at stock power levels just so that they can start modding. The Nissan autos appear to be pretty sturdy just with the drop resistor trick for about fi-dolla in parts.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 11:23 AM
  #105  
deezo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
The Nissan autos appear to be pretty sturdy just with the drop resistor trick for about fi-dolla in parts.
Plus, I run my auto hard at the track (when I go) and its still running like new. I shift it to get into the powerband faster and run it to redline and she's still happy.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #106  
PCGuRu2K's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,006
From: NY, NY
I gave up on the Maxima after I wrecked mines... After the accident I was thinking to myself, "wtf did I waste all the $$ on the max".. I should have started out with a much faster car and build from there..

°¨°º©[SuperCharged 2K1 5SPD Maxima GLE]©º°¨°
.::R.I.P. 7/26/03 - WRX STI/EVO VIII Coming Soon...::.
PMPN' 1994 Miata 5Spd - Turbo'd
F/S: Parting Out The Whole Car. Lots of Parts Still Up For Grabs!!!
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #107  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,919
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Originally Posted by MAX2000JP
I see what you are tryin to say....MPH is a standard measure at all 1/8 and 1/4 tracks I know of. I don't know why people say that you cant compare different types of boost etc. Thats why people go to drapstrips, to get various measurements from a standardized system. I compare traps to see what vehicle is ultimately faster.

MPH is not the standard of measure, time is the standard of measure, speed is just a byproduct.

The 1/4 mile is all about TIME, speed is irrelevent, its how quick you get there not how fast you go that its all about. If you want to go 150 mph at the end of the 1/4 and I go 100 and get there first I still win.

I am not a believer in trap speeds to determine ET's. Don't compute for me. The quickest is the quickest is the quickest no matter the speed.

Nitrous is different from other forms of boost because it gives the same HP boost at all engine RPM. The same amount of fuel and nitrous is being fed throughout the RPM range. The same is not true for S/C and Turbo, they feed more fuel and more air as the RPM increases, thats why you cannot try and compare trap speeds between them.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:35 PM
  #108  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Jime
MPH is not the standard of measure, time is the standard of measure, speed is just a byproduct.

The 1/4 mile is all about TIME, speed is irrelevent, its how quick you get there not how fast you go that its all about. If you want to go 150 mph at the end of the 1/4 and I go 100 and get there first I still win.

I am not a believer in trap speeds to determine ET's. Don't compute for me. The quickest is the quickest is the quickest no matter the speed.

Nitrous is different from other forms of boost because it gives the same HP boost at all engine RPM. The same amount of fuel and nitrous is being fed throughout the RPM range. The same is not true for S/C and Turbo, they feed more fuel and more air as the RPM increases, thats why you cannot try and compare trap speeds between them.
so true so true
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #109  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Trap speed is really just a good display of hp. ET is a display of how well you put that hp to the ground. Like Jime said, drag racing is all about the time it takes you to cross the line. Not how fast you went when you got there. But it is nice to see a high trap speed for some other good reasons.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #110  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Jime
MPH is not the standard of measure, time is the standard of measure, speed is just a byproduct.

The 1/4 mile is all about TIME, speed is irrelevent, its how quick you get there not how fast you go that its all about. If you want to go 150 mph at the end of the 1/4 and I go 100 and get there first I still win.

I am not a believer in trap speeds to determine ET's. Don't compute for me. The quickest is the quickest is the quickest no matter the speed.

Nitrous is different from other forms of boost because it gives the same HP boost at all engine RPM. The same amount of fuel and nitrous is being fed throughout the RPM range. The same is not true for S/C and Turbo, they feed more fuel and more air as the RPM increases, thats why you cannot try and compare trap speeds between them.
The only time I really care about ET's is during bracket racing. Other than that traps is what tells you how the car is performing. I guess traction plays an important role also. Most people that are drag racing aren't using slicks, so the trap gives them a realisic model of how the car will perform on the street. Arguing about drag racing a Maxima is kinda pointless....I agree to disagree, back on topic.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #111  
max95q's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 5,209
This isnt pertaining to the drag racing deal thats going on right now but to answer the top Question. Ill give up on the maxima after I own a 4th gen and mod it gradually and get that nice s/c and fulfill my dreams of owning and driving a modified 4th gen. Which owning a 4th gen may be happening this coming year so my dream will hopefully start then.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #112  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Trap speed is really just a good display of hp. ET is a display of how well you put that hp to the ground. Like Jime said, drag racing is all about the time it takes you to cross the line. Not how fast you went when you got there. But it is nice to see a high trap speed for some other good reasons.
Yep, trap speed indicates the car's potential. Matt could go a whole lot quicker if he could put the power down. Unfortunately, that would require some serious suspension work. 117mph trap speeds indicate mid to low 11s, not upper 11s like he's running now. From any sort of roll, Matt's Max would make quick work of any Maxima in here except for Hal's turbo Max.

Slicks are for bragging rights. There are quite a few potential 12/13-second Maximas in this Org, it's just many guys aren't willing to spend the money on tires that they can't use on the street and/or tires that bump them into more competitve racing classes where they'll get smoked.


Dave
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 04:21 PM
  #113  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,919
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Slicks aren't for bragging rights. Thats pure BS. Slicks are for traction. I happen to race my Maxima and traction gives me consistant and quick ET's. If you run on a race track you use race tires very simple.

If you are dyno queen and want bragging rights then yes ET will give you lots to feed that void in your life.

I am interested in racing and HP don't mean diddly if you can't put it down. Racing is about a whole lot of things besides HP, heck you can race your lawnmower if you want. Making HP is just one ingredient to a whole bunch of items you need to race. One item often overlooked is being able to perform under pressure and do consistently quick R/T's and consistent times. I just love racing I have done it all my life, including flat track, snowmobiles, trials, ultra marathons, triathlons etc etc. I have also been very lucky and have won my share of events.

Racing is a way of life, its not about numbers its about competing and doing your best regardless of how you sometimes stack up against your competitor.

ET's give actual peformance, hypothetical times using trap speeds is just playing head games.

What I don't understand is how someone can spend THOUSANDS on their cars performance and won't spend a couple of hundred on tires to really judge what they have done.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #114  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Jime
What I don't understand is how someone can spend THOUSANDS on their cars performance and won't spend a couple of hundred on tires to really judge what they have done.
I would say that most people don't because they want to get a real estimate of what their car does on the street/everyday.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #115  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,919
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Now we got to the heart of the matter in your mind anyway, what we are really comparing is some punk out on the street trying to kill someone vs someone who actually races their car.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #116  
MAX2000JP's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally Posted by Jime
Now we got to the heart of the matter in your mind anyway, what we are really comparing is some punk out on the street trying to kill someone vs someone who actually races their car.
No, what im talking about is getting on the car every now and then. Steet racing is dumb and I have quit doing it. I have quit drag racing pretty much because it isn't challenging.
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #117  
DTR Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,867
i gave up on my max about 6 months ago. actually i just sold me max yesterday.

its time for something newer, nicer and an all around blast to drive car.

lets just say.

227 turbo charged HP, the sound of 2 pistons firering at once, and the beauty of subaru all-wheel drive
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 08:55 PM
  #118  
Ninos_Maxima's Avatar
be the change u want2C
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,208
From: tampa bau
The reason why that forester runs 13.8 is because it has STI inside!!! Maxima has best V6
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 01:17 AM
  #119  
cwally's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,067
8 months ago
Old Oct 9, 2003 | 04:28 AM
  #120  
BioMaxDDS's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,442
the day i graduate from dental school



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:35 PM.