324.6 hp 317 tq on the dyno

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:10 PM

SteveChicagoSC

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 311

From: Algonquin, IL

324.6 hp 317 tq on the dyno

Just got back from the dyno
and thought I would SHARE the results!!.

Somebody asked me why do you share with everybody your performance gains that costs so much money to develop?

I told him that sharing makes everybody faster and drives up the maxima performance market. In turn that helps me and the maxima realm.

Baseline with SC(10lbs intercooled)was 277.7 hp 253.7 tq,
with a .028 nos jet 324.6 hp 317.5 tq.

I'll scan it next week.

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:13 PM

mAdD MAX

Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 1,677

WICKED!! Congrats man!!

Is this on stock engine internals?? What do you run in the 1/4mi??

Wow!

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:14 PM

SteveChicagoSC

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 311

From: Algonquin, IL

Stock internal/injectors!!!! I have yet to get it to the
track with the NOS.

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:18 PM

Craig Mack

All YOUR grammer belong to me

Joined: Jul 2001

Posts: 7,400

Quote:

Originally posted by SteveChicagoSC
Stock internal/injectors!!!! I have yet to get it to the
track with the NOS.

I PITY THA FOO WHO DOUBTS THE POWER OF THE M A X I M A

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:25 PM

s1rch

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 346

Re: 324.6 hp 317 tq on the dyno

DAMMMMMMNNNNNNNNN !

Quote:

Originally posted by SteveChicagoSC

Baseline with SC(10lbs intercooled)was 277.7 hp 253.7 tq,
with a .028 nos jet 324.6 hp 317.5 tq.

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:29 PM

1MAX2NV

Moderator running more PSI than all the boosted Maximas... combined

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 6,344

It's an auto too...

Automagic rules!!!!

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:32 PM

DA-MAX

Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 13,978

HOT DAMN!!!!!!!

automagic SC/NOS power baby!!!!!!!!!!

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:33 PM

infinitiblast

Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 2,166

hmmm I guess him being auto explains the lower tq, I think sxr7 ( is that right) is running 100 shot nos. Well whatever he is running he got 385 tq and 285hp. But I'll never get my max as high as yours. Thats one sleeper you gots there..

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:44 PM

slick

Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 773

now we want the track results

what do you think your car will run at the track? less than 13 sec? low 12's?

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:44 PM

#10

emax02

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 8,162

Very impressive Steve! I think that's the most FWHP I have ever heard of for a max.

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:53 PM

#11

fnkmaster

Donating Maxima.org Member

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 750

Re: HOT DAMN!!!!!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by DA-MAX
automagic SC/NOS power baby!!!!!!!!!!

daaaaayyyuuuuummmmmnnn!!!! good ****!

Dec 12, 2001 | 07:57 PM

#12

Jeff92se

I'm needing a caw

iTrader: (82)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 34,127

Wow! On stock injectors and stock internals? I say again wow and congrats.

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:07 PM

#13

MardiGrasMax

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 4,491

Re: 324.6 hp 317 tq on the dyno

Quote:

Originally posted by SteveChicagoSC
Somebody asked me why do you share with everybody your performance gains that costs so much money to develop?

I told him that sharing makes everybody faster and drives up the maxima performance market. In turn that helps me and the maxima realm.

Yea!!!! What he said!!!

Steve u da man!!!

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:07 PM

#14

SmoothMax

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 1,594

From: Jersey

Impressive indeed! Gives us auto folks some hope after all!!

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:10 PM

#15

Y2KevSE

Rice Boy in Denial =)

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 25,356

Automagic baby!

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:14 PM

#16

BriGuyMax

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 2,844

From: North Aurora, IL

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff92se
Wow! On stock injectors and stock internals? I say again wow and congrats.

he's running a wet kit....that's how he's using stock injectors

I've seen the car in person

I call first dibs on a ride steve

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:20 PM

#17

MardiGrasMax

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 4,491

Quote:

Originally posted by BriGuyMax

he's running a wet kit....that's how he's using stock injectors

I've seen the car in person

I call first dibs on a ride steve

I dont think he is using the wet part of the kit...

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:21 PM

#18

RedMax95

Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,760

i want 324.6 fwhp

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:21 PM

#19

SteveChicagoSC

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 311

From: Algonquin, IL

It is a wet kit with no extra fuel being added through
the fogger. I ran into difficulty running so much fuel
pressure to the fogger with such a small nos jet.

I'm adding the extra fuel through the injectors. Just like a
dry kit.

Dec 12, 2001 | 08:47 PM

#20

Cumalot

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Sep 2000

Posts: 7,113

From: Louisiana

Not bad Steve. I'll go beyond that someday with my new project(just a matter of when, not if).

Dec 12, 2001 | 09:12 PM

#21

max'n out

Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,443

277 with 10psi and an intercooler???? Seems disapointing to me

Dec 12, 2001 | 09:16 PM

#22

Shadow

Senior Member

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 4,145

It's an AUTOMATIC and it's a 4th gen. The car dynoes at like 150hp stock, so 277hp is pretty good.

Quote:

Originally posted by max'n out
277 with 10psi and an intercooler???? Seems disapointing to me

Dec 12, 2001 | 09:18 PM

#23

emax02

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 8,162

Quote:

Originally posted by max'n out
277 with 10psi and an intercooler???? Seems disapointing to me

Intercoolers only really help when you are moving, so on a dyno they should not make a big difference.

Dec 12, 2001 | 09:21 PM

#24

max'n out

Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 3,443

Sorry din't relize it was a 4th gen...my bad. But I would still think more like 290ish but yeh I know when it's moving it's better.

Dec 12, 2001 | 10:06 PM

#25

Nealoc187

SLOW

iTrader: (23)

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 14,617

From: West burbs, Chicago

Quote:

Originally posted by max'n out
Sorry din't relize it was a 4th gen...my bad. But I would still think more like 290ish but yeh I know when it's moving it's better.

277 vs. 290... 13 hp difference. What makes one ok and the other "dissappointing." I'd say 277 is pretty impressive.

Dec 12, 2001 | 10:28 PM

#26

sx7r

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 1,998

From: TX

Quote:

Originally posted by Nealoc187

277 vs. 290... 13 hp difference. What makes one ok and the other "dissappointing." I'd say 277 is pretty impressive.

when i dyno'd and got 295hp... 5hp away from 300... i was disappointed. just 5 more, and i would have been in the 300hp club.

Dec 12, 2001 | 11:10 PM

#27

PhatGuy

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Automagic baby!

Those are crazzzzy numbers!

Hey Kev what does your car dyno at since the smaller pulley and Greddy Exhaust?

Dec 12, 2001 | 11:37 PM

#28

hlh0501

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2000

Posts: 2,371

Steve, that is AWESOME ! ! Congrats...

do you have pics of your car? the webpage isnt working.

Dec 13, 2001 | 02:43 AM

#29

black019

Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 4,317

put some 19's on your ride now!!!

anyone think its funny that the confirmed fastest maximas are automatics?

Dec 13, 2001 | 03:54 AM

#30

UMD_MaxSE

Got Bent?

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2000

Posts: 11,516

woah... great numbers

Dec 13, 2001 | 03:58 AM

#31

ToYLeT902

JET Speed Lab

iTrader: (12)

Joined: Jun 2001

Posts: 11,143

From: NYC

cool.

Dec 13, 2001 | 04:59 AM

#32

Synki

Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2000

Posts: 5,631

From: NJ

Holy Cow! That is come freat numbers! When you ran your 13.5, was that w/ NOS or w/o it?

Dec 13, 2001 | 05:03 AM

#33

mzmtg

Minister of Silly Walks

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 13,772

Quote:

Originally posted by black019
put some 19's on your ride now!!!

anyone think its funny that the confirmed fastest maximas are automatics?

Them's fightin' words!

Dec 13, 2001 | 05:34 AM

#34

SteveChicagoSC

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 311

From: Algonquin, IL

I havent run at the track with the nos.

My webpage is apparently down due to AT&T screwups.

Dec 13, 2001 | 06:32 AM

#35

Y2KevSE

Rice Boy in Denial =)

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 25,356

Quote:

Originally posted by PhatGuy

Those are crazzzzy numbers!

Hey Kev what does your car dyno at since the smaller pulley and Greddy Exhaust?

Haven't dynoed the force fed version yet, but my estimates are pretty close to what Steve puts down.

Dec 13, 2001 | 06:38 AM

#36

Sprint

Administrator

iTrader: (10)

Joined: Feb 2001

Posts: 26,943

Quote:

Originally posted by Y2KevSE

Haven't dynoed the force fed version yet, but my estimates are pretty close to what Steve puts down.

in your dreams..

Dec 13, 2001 | 06:43 AM

#37

PhatGuy

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally posted by Y2KevSE

Haven't dynoed the force fed version yet, but my estimates are pretty close to what Steve puts down.

I'll pay a couple of bucks towards the "go get your car dynoed already since you have all these mods and you make estimates" fund! You must be curious but are you afraid?

Dec 13, 2001 | 06:46 AM

#38

Y2KevSE

Rice Boy in Denial =)

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 25,356

Quote:

Originally posted by SprintMax
in your dreams..

jOO fear me.

Dec 13, 2001 | 06:48 AM

#39

Y2KevSE

Rice Boy in Denial =)

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 25,356

Quote:

Originally posted by PhatGuy

I'll pay a couple of bucks towards the "go get your car dynoed already since you have all these mods and you make estimates" fund! You must be curious but are you afraid?