General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

How does a SC or NOS maxima compare to an M3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2002, 11:29 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
for sHo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 347
How does a SC or NOS maxima compare to an M3?

My friend just got a brand new 2002 M3 yesterday, and if there were any words to describe that thing I would, but there aren't so I'll refrain from doing that . So I was just wondering how does a supercharged or NOS'ed maxima compare to the new M3, in terms of speed and what not. Because I don't like feeling like I'm standing still even though I'm flooring the sh*t outta my car, so I have to do something to my max or just get an M3 somehow , so opinions/facts please, how do the 2 compare.
for sHo is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:36 AM
  #2  
BlkCat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Never sat in an M3 yet but my SC still puts a smile on my face!
 
Old 02-15-2002, 11:43 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
for sHo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 347
Originally posted by BlkCat
Never sat in an M3 yet but my SC still puts a smile on my face!
I'm afraid it might take that smile away if you ever get to sit in or better yet drive an M3 , that's why I started this thread because I want to get some facts on how they 2 compare.
for sHo is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:46 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478
After driving my friend's 2001 M3 last August, it made me put down a payment on a 2002 M3. I have to say that I doubt that an SC Max, Nos Max can compare with the new M3's. My opinion is that you can do all the suspension and engine mod's on the max, and yet it still wont compare to the newer M3's.

GC
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:50 AM
  #5  
is invisible
iTrader: (7)
 
CoolMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DFW
Posts: 11,778
Originally posted by Cisco
My opinion is that you can do all the suspension and engine mod's on the max, and yet it still wont compare to the newer M3's.

GC
My opinion is that your opinion is fact.
A Maxima shouldn't compare to a new M3.:bash:
CoolMax is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:56 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Tubbed'65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 70
I have a SC 99SE, I still like the M5's better. 396hp, RWD, 6 speed...the list is endless. However so is the price
Tubbed'65 is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:58 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
OgreDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,067
i agree. m3 would spank the max, all around. then again, you could buy like 3-4 of my car for the price of one m3
OgreDave is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 12:02 PM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
JJW95SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,138
I rode in a '99 M3 5spd. Nice car but tiny inside. FWIW, it didn't feel much faster than my SC'd 95SE. IMO, for $40-45k it should be alot more car.

Jim
JJW95SC is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 12:04 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
SuDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Originally posted by Tubbed'65
I have a SC 99SE, I still like the M5's better. 396hp, RWD, 6 speed...the list is endless. However so is the price
Yeah it is the price thing that is the problem. Everything else is so sweet though.

SuDZ
SuDZ is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 12:09 PM
  #10  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
JJW95SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,138
Originally posted by SuDZ


Yeah it is the price thing that is the problem. Everything else is so sweet though.

SuDZ
Yes, not to mention the cost of insurance, maintenance, etc.

Jim
JJW95SC is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 12:18 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
MikeyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 360
M3...

I've seen the new M3 get smoked by a slightly modded WRX.
Both good drivers.
smoked...meaning 1.5 car lengths.
Many witnesses at Purdue.
MikeyMax is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 12:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478
Re: M3...

I seriously doubt that WRX was "slightly modded". I'm baffled why people are so into the speed factor. How about reliablity? How does a SC/NOS max compare with the M3 in regards to reliablity?

GC

Originally posted by MikeyMax
I've seen the new M3 get smoked by a slightly modded WRX.
Both good drivers.
smoked...meaning 1.5 car lengths.
Many witnesses at Purdue.
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 01:20 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
craaaazzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 968
i raced my buddy's 2002 m3 w/ my basically stock 2k1 max. on the highway, from 70 to about 110. me in 3rd, him in 5th, killed him! haha. me in 3rd, him in 4th, pretty even for first second, then he left me. both in 3rd...forget about it! it was fun though, i love those cars...some day i will get an m5.
craaaazzy is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 01:26 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
MikeyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 360
Re: Re: M3...

Originally posted by Cisco
I seriously doubt that WRX was "slightly modded". I'm baffled why people are so into the speed factor. How about reliablity? How does a SC/NOS max compare with the M3 in regards to reliablity?

GC

The driver of the WRX is a technician at an import tuning shop. He just has his car tuned very well.
WRX with a gutted exhaust gets good hp gains.
Stock M3 goes 0-60 4.9sec
WRX 5.4
seems reasonable.
MikeyMax is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 04:30 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
JMAX95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 271
If it's all about speed, I'm sure there are many cars that can beat an M3. I've driven my cousin's 2k2 M3. It's fun as hell; super smooth and responsive. But I don't think it's all about the speed. When you buy and M3 you're getting:

1. the BMW name
2. the M3 name (M cars have some heritage)
3. the engine
4. the technology
5. the chasis
6. the interior (this is something the WRX or Max can't even touch).
There are probably others, but I believe the list above is sufficient. I guess the Z can somewhat fall into this category, but it's still not even close to a M car.

So people can mod the hell out of their max's and wrx's and maybe beat a M3, but I would still rather own an M3.
JMAX95 is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 04:58 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
2M0A0X2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,012
the M3 would still be better.....you might be comparable in a straight line, but on handling, you would be screwed over by the M.
2M0A0X2 is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 05:04 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
AznWontonboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by 2M0A0X2
the M3 would still be better.....you might be comparable in a straight line, but on handling, you would be screwed over by the M.
Hell yea, in twisties, Fuggetboutit. They are comparble to higher end exotic cars.. I.E. ferrari's.
AznWontonboy is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 07:57 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rwbro719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 117
Originally posted by for sHo


I'm afraid it might take that smile away if you ever get to sit in or better yet drive an M3 , that's why I started this thread because I want to get some facts on how they 2 compare.
An M3 is my choice for a stock performance vehicle under 50k
Stillen is the answer for a supercharger. They recommend a 7 PSI for quality issues. Must wait until NISMO produces upgrades in September.
I come from a similiar business and many say that they will produce parts for the upcoming 350z,g35,skyline,etc........... this is bull****!
THEY WILL PRODUCE FOR VEHICLES ON THE ROAD NOW! IT'S ALL ABOUT SELLING NOW. WHAT IS ON THE ROAD NOW. VOICE YOUR OPINION.
i ASSURE EVERYONE THAT THIS IS THE CASE. My supercharged Harley-Davidson motorcycle was a priority over the V-Rod.
They will make one for the V_Rod but not right away....
Vendors will support the road before developement~! I know this market well
rob
rwbro719 is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 07:59 PM
  #19  
is invisible
iTrader: (7)
 
CoolMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DFW
Posts: 11,778
Originally posted by JMAX95
If it's all about speed, I'm sure there are many cars that can beat an M3. I've driven my cousin's 2k2 M3. It's fun as hell; super smooth and responsive. But I don't think it's all about the speed. When you buy and M3 you're getting:

1. the BMW name
2. the M3 name (M cars have some heritage)
3. the engine
4. the technology
5. the chasis
6. the interior (this is something the WRX or Max can't even touch).
There are probably others, but I believe the list above is sufficient. I guess the Z can somewhat fall into this category, but it's still not even close to a M car.

So people can mod the hell out of their max's and wrx's and maybe beat a M3, but I would still rather own an M3.
Bravo, well said!

Is everyone on the BBS this sensible?
CoolMax is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 08:38 PM
  #20  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
theblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,150
comparing the M3 to the maxima is like comparing a mcdonalds burger to an expensive steak.

I like both of them, when I'm hungry either will fill me up but if they were both the same price I doubt a bigmac will be my choice and it won't impress anybody like a steak will. Both have their advantages, but they are not the kind of things people compare.
theblue is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 09:05 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478


GC



Originally posted by theblue
comparing the M3 to the maxima is like comparing a mcdonalds burger to an expensive steak.

I like both of them, when I'm hungry either will fill me up but if they were both the same price I doubt a bigmac will be my choice and it won't impress anybody like a steak will. Both have their advantages, but they are not the kind of things people compare.
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 09:07 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
costcowholesale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,002
Originally posted by theblue
comparing the M3 to the maxima is like comparing a mcdonalds burger to an expensive steak.

I like both of them, when I'm hungry either will fill me up but if they were both the same price I doubt a bigmac will be my choice and it won't impress anybody like a steak will. Both have their advantages, but they are not the kind of things people compare.
costcowholesale is offline  
Old 02-15-2002, 11:34 PM
  #23  
Member
 
tzuuyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64
How about a 2k2 M3 and around 95 or 96 NSX?? My cousin was asking me the question since he was looking into both of them..I will choose either one tho..Both nice cars and also 95 NSX still pretty reliable. But if going to a club, I believe NSX will get more attention than the new M3 right!! I heard NSX's handleing is like super super good, I don't know about if it compare the the new M3 which will be better??

--Richard
tzuuyang is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 10:05 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478
Do you buy a car for your own personal satisfaction, or to show off to others?

GC

Originally posted by tzuuyang
How about a 2k2 M3 and around 95 or 96 NSX?? My cousin was asking me the question since he was looking into both of them..I will choose either one tho..Both nice cars and also 95 NSX still pretty reliable. But if going to a club, I believe NSX will get more attention than the new M3 right!! I heard NSX's handleing is like super super good, I don't know about if it compare the the new M3 which will be better??

--Richard
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 12:16 PM
  #25  
Member
 
tzuuyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64
Can I do both?? If I have that money to buy these two cars, I will buy either one of them but just that it's a hard decision for me or for my cousin, that is why I ask here!!

--Richard
tzuuyang is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 12:26 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
s'il vous plâit

Originally posted by for sHo
My friend just got a brand new 2002 M3 yesterday, and if there were any words to describe that thing I would, but there aren't so I'll refrain from doing that . So I was just wondering how does a supercharged or NOS'ed maxima compare to the new M3, in terms of speed and what not. Because I don't like feeling like I'm standing still even though I'm flooring the sh*t outta my car, so I have to do something to my max or just get an M3 somehow, so opinions/facts please, how do the 2 compare.
This question just doesn't seem to go away. Well, to put it this way, a 1st gen, 2nd gen, 3rd gen, 4th gen, SC 4th gen, 5th gen Maxima does not compare with a M3. It was the pre-1984 dilemma--how does a Corvette compare with a Porsche? Ooops......sorry, most people weren't even born in 1984 yet.

All kidding aside, just test drive the E36 M3 at your local BMW dealer. Go for the worst of the M3's, the 1995. If you do the '96+ then this d*** question will come up again. how does the 95 M3 compare to Maxima? I drove a M3 Lightweight and like I said before, I see where the Integra Type R got its heart.
Frank Fontaine is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 01:06 AM
  #27  
Lyt97SC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well if you're talkin about ET's the E36 M3 was tested at 14.2, the E46 M3 at 13.3 or so. A general SC 5-speed Maxima will run high 13s or so and a auto SC maxima about low 14s.
 
Old 02-18-2002, 11:13 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Uncle Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 775
That's the first car I wanna run

When ever I get my cat out. I ran the new before I put it the shop.
We ran from a roll @ 15mile. I stayed with him in first. he started to pull in third then in third he pulled like 2 cars on me.
Then we both got pulled over for racing and got some big A$$ tickets.

Unclemax: all the boltons and Ecu except pully. i was riding solo
New M3: stock convertable, and 4 PEOPLE in the car.

So I pretty much got my bootey handed to me.

Same results running new M5 but it seemed slower than the M3 and I didn't get busted.

But that the first car I wanna run when the Turbo gets tuned.
Uncle Max is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 02:22 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
max'n out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
A 2k2 M3 against a stock boost s/c max, hands down m3 duh!


But at a point enough boost on a max,tranny mods, traction stuff, it could get close.
max'n out is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 04:59 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478
At a cost of reliability.

GC

QUOTE]Originally posted by max'n out
A 2k2 M3 against a stock boost s/c max, hands down m3 duh!


But at a point enough boost on a max,tranny mods, traction stuff, it could get close.
[/QUOTE]
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 06:07 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally posted by max'n out
A 2k2 M3 against a stock boost s/c max, hands down m3 duh!


But at a point enough boost on a max,tranny mods, traction stuff, it could get close.
My car will trounce the E36 M3 when I get my 18" rims this week......ahahahahaa

The E46 M3 does 0-60 in the 4's, there's no way any Maxima could do that without radical modification and that wouldn't be reasonable. There's simply no reason to keep asking. Anyone who asks hasn't driven an M3, it's that simple. It's as if you want to find some kind of fault in that car. The E36 basically ripped all cars in it's price range from 95-98. Yeah, some newer hardtop Vettes showed up on the scene with a mysterious sub 40k price tag. Try to buy one for that price!! Oddly enough I have only seen 1 E46 M3 and that was in Montréal. I've seen about 5 M5's though.
Frank Fontaine is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 06:20 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Cisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,478
They are extremely hard to find, and if you do find one, expect to pay $5-10k above MSRP. I've been waiting since Mid Summer 2001 to get mine.

GC

Originally posted by Frank Fontaine


My car will trounce the E36 M3 when I get my 18" rims this week......ahahahahaa

The E46 M3 does 0-60 in the 4's, there's no way any Maxima could do that without radical modification and that wouldn't be reasonable. There's simply no reason to keep asking. Anyone who asks hasn't driven an M3, it's that simple. It's as if you want to find some kind of fault in that car. The E36 basically ripped all cars in it's price range from 95-98. Yeah, some newer hardtop Vettes showed up on the scene with a mysterious sub 40k price tag. Try to buy one for that price!! Oddly enough I have only seen 1 E46 M3 and that was in Montréal. I've seen about 5 M5's though.
Cisco is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 06:27 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Supermachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 689
Originally posted by Cisco
They are extremely hard to find, and if you do find one, expect to pay $5-10k above MSRP. I've been waiting since Mid Summer 2001 to get mine.

GC

I had to wait 9 months for my 996 Carrera 4, I feel your pain.
Supermachoman is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 10:29 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
max'n out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
Originally posted by Cisco
At a cost of reliability.

GC

QUOTE]Originally posted by max'n out
A 2k2 M3 against a stock boost s/c max, hands down m3 duh!


But at a point enough boost on a max,tranny mods, traction stuff, it could get close.
[/QUOTE]

Not if done right. I"m not saying it'd be simple. Alot of work yeilds alot of results.
max'n out is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 06:21 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Maximamike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,394
I've got 3 words..

Sequantial Manual Gearbox..

*drool*
Maximamike is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 06:28 AM
  #36  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
tifosiv122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,674
I am too lazy to read the whole thread but here is my input:

I raced a new M5 when I was using my 75 shot of nitrous. I pulled on him till about 45 and then he started to pull on me. At the middle of my fourth gear he shifted into 5th and it was over. Without the top gears I doubt a Max would have a chance.

Erik
tifosiv122 is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 06:40 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Uncle Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 775
We got plenty here in Houston. Then again I saw yellow diablo and two 360 Modenaa within 10minutes of each other on Sat. I've seen plenty of the new 911 Turbos (996 I thnk) those are awsome. Galleria seems to be the area to showoff those nice cars. Finding any M is gonna be easy on my hunt for the M's. Muahahaha!! Ok i'll laughing if I still get spanked
Uncle Max is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 07:35 AM
  #38  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
HondaKiller718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 944
Originally posted by theblue
comparing the M3 to the maxima is like comparing a mcdonalds burger to an expensive steak.

I like both of them, when I'm hungry either will fill me up but if they were both the same price I doubt a bigmac will be my choice and it won't impress anybody like a steak will. Both have their advantages, but they are not the kind of things people compare.
I Like Big Mac's better
HondaKiller718 is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 02:40 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
CFster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 284
Be happy with what you have. There's always some yahoo down the street who has something faster.
CFster is offline  
Old 02-19-2002, 05:06 PM
  #40  
RIceD OuT moDErAtor
iTrader: (1)
 
Chebosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,146
just cuz u have a supercharger doesnt mean your car is magically better than say a european car. well maybe for Keving... but anyhoo.. just means that you can accelerate faster.
i think my max would be slightly faster than the old m3 circa 95-99
the brand new m3s are freakin insane-o. i'm not even going to attempt to rev on those guys.

pitty. i just want the shear brute torque that a rwd car has.. sigh...
Chebosto is offline  


Quick Reply: How does a SC or NOS maxima compare to an M3?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 AM.