13.064
13.064
Yet another new best time!
13.064et @ 109.74mph
Dagblasted 12's soooo elusive!
This was run on my street tires with tire pressure set at god knows what and my AGX's set on my stret setting of 1f/5r. I went to the track to see an 11 second Miata run (he didnt run) and really was just playing around. I had the spare and jack out. I used the spray also. The track was hooking sooooo good, 2.079 60' and a 5.674 330'. I really think that the height of my 225/50-16 Dunlop SP5k's at 24" is optimal for a five speed max. The 205/50-15 drag radials could never pull 330' times like that! I kill the DR's in the second gear shift. My clutch is on its way out for sure, it can only take a few back to back runs before it slips, time for an upgrade!
See the slip here...
http://members.***.net/matchou/DragTimes.htm
13.064et @ 109.74mph
Dagblasted 12's soooo elusive!
This was run on my street tires with tire pressure set at god knows what and my AGX's set on my stret setting of 1f/5r. I went to the track to see an 11 second Miata run (he didnt run) and really was just playing around. I had the spare and jack out. I used the spray also. The track was hooking sooooo good, 2.079 60' and a 5.674 330'. I really think that the height of my 225/50-16 Dunlop SP5k's at 24" is optimal for a five speed max. The 205/50-15 drag radials could never pull 330' times like that! I kill the DR's in the second gear shift. My clutch is on its way out for sure, it can only take a few back to back runs before it slips, time for an upgrade!
See the slip here...
http://members.***.net/matchou/DragTimes.htm
...sweet time!...congratulations...guess it's time to update your sig now
Damn that is good. I just dont know why you cant get into the 12's with the juice. You are almost there. How big a shot do you have? Dont get me wrong, that is insane...Very fast for a Maxima, I cant imagine the pull on that thing.
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 443
As far as I'm concerned you have a 12 second car!
You're close enough for me. I think your car is a 12 second car depending on the conditions of the track, day, and driver. Hey if you really want 12's take out the back seat and passenger seat and see what you run then. I'm sure it'll be in the 12's.
I guess I'm happy with potential, and your car definitely has it.
You've worked hard to get here.
Congrats Mardigras!!!!!
I guess I'm happy with potential, and your car definitely has it.
You've worked hard to get here.
Congrats Mardigras!!!!!
Originally posted by max'n out
Is that with or without juice.
Is that with or without juice.
13.064et @ 109.74mph
Dagblasted 12's soooo elusive!
This was run on my street tires with tire pressure set at god knows what and my AGX's set on my stret setting of 1f/5r. I went to the track to see an 11 second Miata run (he didnt run) and really was just playing around. I had the spare and jack out. I used the spray also. The track was hooking sooooo good, 2.079 60' and a 5.674 330'. I really think that the height of my 225/50-16 Dunlop SP5k's at 24" is optimal for a five speed max. The 205/50-15 drag radials could never pull 330' times like that! I kill the DR's in the second gear shift. My clutch is on its way out for sure, it can only take a few back to back runs before it slips, time for an upgrade!
See the slip here...
http://members.***.net/matchou/DragTimes.htm
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,443
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
Yet another new best time!
13.064et @ 109.74mph
Dagblasted 12's soooo elusive!
This was run on my street tires with tire pressure set at god knows what and my AGX's set on my stret setting of 1f/5r. I went to the track to see an 11 second Miata run (he didnt run) and really was just playing around. I had the spare and jack out. I used the spray also. The track was hooking sooooo good, 2.079 60' and a 5.674 330'. I really think that the height of my 225/50-16 Dunlop SP5k's at 24" is optimal for a five speed max. The 205/50-15 drag radials could never pull 330' times like that! I kill the DR's in the second gear shift. My clutch is on its way out for sure, it can only take a few back to back runs before it slips, time for an upgrade!
See the slip here...
http://members.***.net/matchou/DragTimes.htm
Yet another new best time!
13.064et @ 109.74mph
Dagblasted 12's soooo elusive!
This was run on my street tires with tire pressure set at god knows what and my AGX's set on my stret setting of 1f/5r. I went to the track to see an 11 second Miata run (he didnt run) and really was just playing around. I had the spare and jack out. I used the spray also. The track was hooking sooooo good, 2.079 60' and a 5.674 330'. I really think that the height of my 225/50-16 Dunlop SP5k's at 24" is optimal for a five speed max. The 205/50-15 drag radials could never pull 330' times like that! I kill the DR's in the second gear shift. My clutch is on its way out for sure, it can only take a few back to back runs before it slips, time for an upgrade!
See the slip here...
http://members.***.net/matchou/DragTimes.htm
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Matt,
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Matt,
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
Matt,
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Matt,
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
Matt,
I asked this in one of your other new best time threads but it seems you've deleted them.
Don't 5-speed SC 4th Gen Maxima's run high 4's low 5's 0-60? (w/bolt-ons, fat performance tires, ect) ? Any idea of what you run 0-60 with your SC ?
Originally posted by Craig Mack
HAHAHA! Damn! Man, theres NOTHING funnier than asking the 0-60 times of a 5spd SC max is there!
HAHAHA! Damn! Man, theres NOTHING funnier than asking the 0-60 times of a 5spd SC max is there!
Oh BTW, 0-60 according to stillen for the s/c is 5.9 ;-)
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally posted by gtr_rider
4 seconds sounds like a super car, I doubt it that a max will do 0-60 in 4 seconds...
Oh BTW, 0-60 according to stillen for the s/c is 5.9 ;-)
4 seconds sounds like a super car, I doubt it that a max will do 0-60 in 4 seconds...
Oh BTW, 0-60 according to stillen for the s/c is 5.9 ;-)
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by gtr_rider
4 seconds sounds like a super car, I doubt it that a max will do 0-60 in 4 seconds...
4 seconds sounds like a super car, I doubt it that a max will do 0-60 in 4 seconds...
Oh BTW, 0-60 according to stillen for the s/c is 5.9 ;-)
and I doubt it is boosted as much as Matt's max.
That is awesome
That is an awesome time. Maybe next time instead of driving in reverse you should try going forward down the track... R isn't race beyond popular belief. But serious I can't wait to see the 12 time slip. Just right around the corner.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: NJ
Great time Matt. I cant wait to see what you are capable of running once a new clutch is in.
BTW-Just remember, because you run teh same q-mile time DOES NOTmean that you run the same 0-60. Example, at the track i have lined up with a WRX, I would get smoked off the line but i would real him in and actually pass him. I had a faster 1/4 mile time but that does not mean i am faster 0-60. Some cars launch better and are faster off the line but have less power top end. Usually a car with more torque will be fast off the line. Cars with higher HP have more top end and will show that with high trap speeds.
BTW-Just remember, because you run teh same q-mile time DOES NOTmean that you run the same 0-60. Example, at the track i have lined up with a WRX, I would get smoked off the line but i would real him in and actually pass him. I had a faster 1/4 mile time but that does not mean i am faster 0-60. Some cars launch better and are faster off the line but have less power top end. Usually a car with more torque will be fast off the line. Cars with higher HP have more top end and will show that with high trap speeds.
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Synki
Great time Matt. I cant wait to see what you are capable of running once a new clutch is in.
BTW-Just because you run teh same q-mile time DOES NOT mean that you run the same 0-60. Example, at the track i have lined up with a WRX, I would get smoked off the line but i would real him in and actually pass him. I had a faster 1/4 mile time but that does not mean i am faster 0-60. Some cars launch better and are faster off the line but have less power top end. Usually a car with more torque will be fast off the line. Cars with higher HP have more top end and will show that with high trap speeds.
Great time Matt. I cant wait to see what you are capable of running once a new clutch is in.
BTW-Just because you run teh same q-mile time DOES NOT mean that you run the same 0-60. Example, at the track i have lined up with a WRX, I would get smoked off the line but i would real him in and actually pass him. I had a faster 1/4 mile time but that does not mean i am faster 0-60. Some cars launch better and are faster off the line but have less power top end. Usually a car with more torque will be fast off the line. Cars with higher HP have more top end and will show that with high trap speeds.
The main thing you forgot Synki is AWD vs. FWD....how unfair!
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: NJ
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Our cars are torquey with lots of low end grunt.
The main thing you forgot Synki is AWD vs. FWD....how unfair!
Our cars are torquey with lots of low end grunt.
The main thing you forgot Synki is AWD vs. FWD....how unfair!
AWD vs FWD is def not fair but thank god the new ride coming is AWD.
I dont think the VQ and VEs are that tourqey either....I've seen plenty videos of the older VGs pull the VQs(5spd and auto) off the line...mostly because of that low torque curve the VG motor has enabling it to pull mid/high 2.3-mid 2.4 60ts. STOCK(unfortunately power after 5k is some **** 
so they ultimately lose the race)...as for the n/a VE/VQs I think they are more mid/top end killers than torque monsters.
so they ultimately lose the race)...as for the n/a VE/VQs I think they are more mid/top end killers than torque monsters.
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,451
From: Near Archer High School, Ga
Originally posted by DA-MAX
I dont think the VQ and VEs are that tourqey either....I've seen plenty videos of the older VGs pull the VQs(5spd and auto) off the line...mostly because of that low torque curve the VG motor has enabling it to pull mid/high 2.3-mid 2.4 60ts. STOCK(unfortunately power after 5k is some **** so they ultimately lose the race)...as for the n/a VE/VQs I think they are more mid/top end killers than torque monsters.
I dont think the VQ and VEs are that tourqey either....I've seen plenty videos of the older VGs pull the VQs(5spd and auto) off the line...mostly because of that low torque curve the VG motor has enabling it to pull mid/high 2.3-mid 2.4 60ts. STOCK(unfortunately power after 5k is some ****
so they ultimately lose the race)...as for the n/a VE/VQs I think they are more mid/top end killers than torque monsters.
