Calculated my 0-60 time: 4.89 seconds
Calculated my 0-60 time: 4.89 seconds
I was just bored and decided to see what my rough 0-60mph time was. I used one of those 0-60mph calculators that you can find all over the internet. I tried it on a few different ones to see what they came up with. They were all the same. I got 4.89 seconds on slicks and 5.06 seconds on street tires. They use your 1/8th mile trap and ET to calculate it. The times seem quite a bit optimistic to me but who knows.
Re: Calculated my 0-60 time: 4.89 seconds
Cartest says your car pulled a 1.54 0-30 and 4.96 0-60 on slicks
! With street tires you pulled a 1.84 0-30mph and a 5.25 0-60mph. Also I was able to match your timeslip almost perfectly so the 0-30 and 0-60 are pretty accurate. I guess now you can say you have a FWD car that runs 4.9 0-60s
.
! With street tires you pulled a 1.84 0-30mph and a 5.25 0-60mph. Also I was able to match your timeslip almost perfectly so the 0-30 and 0-60 are pretty accurate. I guess now you can say you have a FWD car that runs 4.9 0-60s
.
Originally posted by Nealoc187
I was just bored and decided to see what my rough 0-60mph time was. I used one of those 0-60mph calculators that you can find all over the internet. I tried it on a few different ones to see what they came up with. They were all the same. I got 4.89 seconds on slicks and 5.06 seconds on street tires. They use your 1/8th mile trap and ET to calculate it. The times seem quite a bit optimistic to me but who knows.
I was just bored and decided to see what my rough 0-60mph time was. I used one of those 0-60mph calculators that you can find all over the internet. I tried it on a few different ones to see what they came up with. They were all the same. I got 4.89 seconds on slicks and 5.06 seconds on street tires. They use your 1/8th mile trap and ET to calculate it. The times seem quite a bit optimistic to me but who knows.
Damn thats fast. Especially for N/A. It seems a but hey who knows. I find it funny that you are running faster times than some of the supercharged maxes. Mostly because they cant get traction and dont have slicks but still...
Originally posted by Smithdogg1
Damn thats fast. Especially for N/A. It seems a but hey who knows. I find it funny that you are running faster times than some of the supercharged maxes. Mostly because they cant get traction and dont have slicks but still...
Damn thats fast. Especially for N/A. It seems a but hey who knows. I find it funny that you are running faster times than some of the supercharged maxes. Mostly because they cant get traction and dont have slicks but still...
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Neal also has lots of weight reduction, a JWT ECU, MEVI, full exhaust, ect. He's also a really good driver. His MPH suggests that he's N/A. Very sweet ride nonetheless.
Neal also has lots of weight reduction, a JWT ECU, MEVI, full exhaust, ect. He's also a really good driver. His MPH suggests that he's N/A. Very sweet ride nonetheless.
Originally posted by 96sleeper
actually he has no exhaust, just intake, ecu, y-pipe, MEVI, and test pipe.
actually he has no exhaust, just intake, ecu, y-pipe, MEVI, and test pipe.
Dang, your right, I forgot about his post on Catbacks and what their true dyno gains were to see if it was worth getting one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Aug 8, 2020 10:31 AM
TKHanson
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Nov 24, 2018 01:39 AM




