St. Thomas Results - who says MEVI w/ no JWT ECU is slow??
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
St. Thomas Results - who says MEVI w/ no JWT ECU is slow??
Well, I went to the track today - Sunday October 19. The weather was perfect! Cool and sunny almost all day.
I had been complaining ever since I installed my MEVI that my car is slower. I could not get into 14.6 let alone beat my PB of 14.59... not even close. Well, the reason must have been my tranny, because what's changed since the last time I went to the track is a new tranny (with ACT stage 1 clutch and UR flywheel).
Best ET of the day is 14.49... new PB
Best trap speed of the day 97mph... no PB here
I noticed that as my ETs were getting lower, my traps were getting lower too... upto a certain point... hard to explain. I had multiple 14.6 runs and consistently at 14.7 or better.
My slip:
60': 2.241
330': 6.160
1/8: 9.421
1/4: 14.496
MPH: 95.62
I really hope that JWT can send my ECU back this week so I can run it next weekend. But I am now happy with my MEVI... I no longer hate it (not like I did before)
I had been complaining ever since I installed my MEVI that my car is slower. I could not get into 14.6 let alone beat my PB of 14.59... not even close. Well, the reason must have been my tranny, because what's changed since the last time I went to the track is a new tranny (with ACT stage 1 clutch and UR flywheel).
Best ET of the day is 14.49... new PB
Best trap speed of the day 97mph... no PB here
I noticed that as my ETs were getting lower, my traps were getting lower too... upto a certain point... hard to explain. I had multiple 14.6 runs and consistently at 14.7 or better.
My slip:
60': 2.241
330': 6.160
1/8: 9.421
1/4: 14.496
MPH: 95.62
I really hope that JWT can send my ECU back this week so I can run it next weekend. But I am now happy with my MEVI... I no longer hate it (not like I did before)
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by I30tMikeD
What was your 1/8 mile speed?
That run of mine was in the right lane.
Originally Posted by gabex
You got a 14.59 w/ just a Y-Pipe, B-Pipe, and JWT Cone? (reading that from your sig).
spd what do you have your mevi set at maybe that would explain the trap speeds.
Originally Posted by gabex
You got a 14.59 w/ just a Y-Pipe, B-Pipe, and JWT Cone? (reading that from your sig).
good times BTW.
--Paul
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Yes, he did.
spd what do you have your mevi set at maybe that would explain the trap speeds.
spd what do you have your mevi set at maybe that would explain the trap speeds.
My best trap of the day was almost 97mph... (I think that was on a 14.7 run with stock tire pressure of 38psi fronts and rear).
That's pretty good and you're probably the only person in here that's noted a significant gain with just the MEVI and JWT ECU.
I starting to dislike my car more and more. I ran 14.64@97.7mph with just a y-pipe, intake, B-pipe, and UDP. My best with the MEVI/JWT ECU is 14.45@99.5mph
My car is weak sauce. The only thing the MEVI has done for me is add mph in the final 1/8th. The ECU was responsible for my drop into the 14.4s. I'm becoming more and more convinced to yank this thing and get back my 1/4 mile torque with the US-spec manifold.
Dave
I starting to dislike my car more and more. I ran 14.64@97.7mph with just a y-pipe, intake, B-pipe, and UDP. My best with the MEVI/JWT ECU is 14.45@99.5mph
My car is weak sauce. The only thing the MEVI has done for me is add mph in the final 1/8th. The ECU was responsible for my drop into the 14.4s. I'm becoming more and more convinced to yank this thing and get back my 1/4 mile torque with the US-spec manifold.Dave
how much you want for that ECU?
Originally Posted by Dave B
That's pretty good and you're probably the only person in here that's noted a significant gain with just the MEVI and JWT ECU.
I starting to dislike my car more and more. I ran 14.64@97.7mph with just a y-pipe, intake, B-pipe, and UDP. My best with the MEVI/JWT ECU is 14.45@99.5mph
My car is weak sauce. The only thing the MEVI has done for me is add mph in the final 1/8th. The ECU was responsible for my drop into the 14.4s. I'm becoming more and more convinced to yank this thing and get back my 1/4 mile torque with the US-spec manifold.
Dave
I starting to dislike my car more and more. I ran 14.64@97.7mph with just a y-pipe, intake, B-pipe, and UDP. My best with the MEVI/JWT ECU is 14.45@99.5mph
My car is weak sauce. The only thing the MEVI has done for me is add mph in the final 1/8th. The ECU was responsible for my drop into the 14.4s. I'm becoming more and more convinced to yank this thing and get back my 1/4 mile torque with the US-spec manifold.Dave
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
If I'm not mistaken I think he wants to get rid of the MEVI not the ECU.
Dave
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Dave B
That's pretty good and you're probably the only person in here that's noted a significant gain with just the MEVI and JWT ECU.
Originally Posted by gabex
You got a 14.59 w/ just a Y-Pipe, B-Pipe, and JWT Cone? (reading that from your sig).
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Dave. I wonder if you clutch is starting to slip
1) I don't smell burned clutch
2) I can slam 3rd with no slippage
3) I launch and get no slippage.
4) Observers have noted the spin into 2nd and some tire smoke
Dave
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by deezo
One of our veteran members, theblue, hit 14.2 with the same mods.
Small differences but could play a factor. Aaron's and my traps are about the same... but he's got a freakish ET for those mods. I don't know what Nealoc had with the same mods, but I bet his were faster.
Originally Posted by speedemn
He had full intake (including midpipe) and full catback (including muffler)... I only have the pop charger and stock muffler.
Small differences but could play a factor. Aaron's and my traps are about the same... but he's got a freakish ET for those mods. I don't know what Nealoc had with the same mods, but I bet his were faster.
Small differences but could play a factor. Aaron's and my traps are about the same... but he's got a freakish ET for those mods. I don't know what Nealoc had with the same mods, but I bet his were faster.
Rudy (VQ driver) hit 14.3x with intake and y pipe. My best with JWT pop and cattman y was 14.41 and best trap 96.7. Then I got the MEVI and JWT ECU so so I never made a pass in the same configuration as theblues. regardless I dont think I could have pulled off a 14.29 but i suppose its possible if I got really lucky and took out some weight. My 14.41s and such back then were done at full weight, not seat removal or CF hood or anything like that. Aaron had something like a 2.11 60' on that run. My best 60' ever on street tires is a bunch of 2.17s so he outlaunched me pretty well.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Rudy (VQ driver) hit 14.3x with intake and y pipe. My best with JWT pop and cattman y was 14.41 and best trap 96.7. Then I got the MEVI and JWT ECU so so I never made a pass in the same configuration as theblues. regardless I dont think I could have pulled off a 14.29 but i suppose its possible if I got really lucky and took out some weight. My 14.41s and such back then were done at full weight, not seat removal or CF hood or anything like that. Aaron had something like a 2.11 60' on that run. My best 60' ever on street tires is a bunch of 2.17s so he outlaunched me pretty well.
I struggle to get into 2.2x and I have to do a 7 second burnout in the waterbox just for that!!!
If I could get 2.1x I'd love to see what my ETs would turn out to be...
Originally Posted by speedemn
Damn! How do you guys launch to get 2.1x on street tires???
I struggle to get into 2.2x and I have to do a 7 second burnout in the waterbox just for that!!!
If I could get 2.1x I'd love to see what my ETs would turn out to be...
I struggle to get into 2.2x and I have to do a 7 second burnout in the waterbox just for that!!!
If I could get 2.1x I'd love to see what my ETs would turn out to be...
Originally Posted by I30tMikeD
I don't think doing a burnout in the water box on street tires is good, it may actually hurt you.
Dave
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,403
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Dave B
Yep, burnouts on street tires isn't a wise thing to do. Street tires perform better cold, not hot. Drag tires have special rubber compounds that become sticky when a burnout is done. Street tires release oils when you do a burnout.
Dave
Dave
Next time I go to the track I will try driving through the waterbox instead of burning out or going around the box.
Originally Posted by speedemn
Hmm I used to go around the waterbox and used to struggle to get into 2.3x. Then I started going a tiny burnout ahead of the waterbox before staging, and I could get into the 2.3x if I had a good launch. But doing a burnout in the waterbox propelled me into the high 2.2x everytime. I have never got low 2.2x... leave alone 2.1x
Next time I go to the track I will try driving through the waterbox instead of burning out or going around the box.
Next time I go to the track I will try driving through the waterbox instead of burning out or going around the box.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
Mar 12, 2018 06:48 PM





