Porting out Throttle body, have question?
Porting out Throttle body, have question?
Porting out Throttle body, have question?
I just started looking into this (friends suggestion) and wanted to see what the anyone thought.
I believe our stock throttle body is 60mm and was told to bore or port it to 63mm or 64mm.
Can you guys shed some light on the pros and cons of doing this mod.
I just started looking into this (friends suggestion) and wanted to see what the anyone thought.
I believe our stock throttle body is 60mm and was told to bore or port it to 63mm or 64mm.
Can you guys shed some light on the pros and cons of doing this mod.
Wouldn't this be pointless unless you also get a bigger butterfly plate? You can bore it out before the plate and after the plate but the airflow coming in would still be the same since the butterfly opening the same size. Am I right? Or would the butterfly plate not even matter since you can change the idle with the IACV screw? Sorry to write all this Ceasar but I was planning on doing the same thing. I don't see any cons to this anyway, only maybe if you made the whole thing bigger and the air would go around the plate and the IACV couldn't correct it.
He'll need to make his own mounting bracket for that. New hoses and I think even new throttle cables. I don't think the dude that did this made any templates or anything. The PF TB is huge but costs A LOT more.
Originally Posted by Big D
He'll need to make his own mounting bracket for that. New hoses and I think even new throttle cables. I don't think the dude that did this made any templates or anything. The PF TB is huge but costs A LOT more.
I sold them to mike recently if he doesnt mind maybe he could post pics to help you guys out.
Another thing is if you guys ever have plans to put a 2000 manifold on the pathfinder TB is useless ,because you cant port match the 2000 manifold.I will have my adapter block turned out about 65 mm and use the venturi effect. Kind of like a funnel after the TB.
Originally Posted by Big D
He'll need to make his own mounting bracket for that. New hoses and I think even new throttle cables. I don't think the dude that did this made any templates or anything. The PF TB is huge but costs A LOT more.
it's not really an expensive mod at all. It's gonna cost me less than $200 for everything. having a shop do porting is expensive.
i have a stock throttle body laying around that has been mildly ported, polished, and the lower butterfly rod has be trimmed off. Send me a PM if you want it cheap Ceasar. I don't think it will give gains like a Pathfinder TB, but its better than stock.
I tried a 64mm one last year and didn't show much dyno gain so I went back to stock.
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....light=throttle
IMO the 70mm PF solution is a much better investment. I just can't do it to my ride
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....light=throttle
IMO the 70mm PF solution is a much better investment. I just can't do it to my ride
Originally Posted by maximabebe
out of curiosity, what years pathfinder throttle bodies would be "compatible" for a 95 max SE?
Originally Posted by Ceasars Chariot
bejay why would you go back to stock though ? what kind of gain 1-5 hp ?
Originally Posted by Big D
Wouldn't this be pointless unless you also get a bigger butterfly plate? You can bore it out before the plate and after the plate but the airflow coming in would still be the same since the butterfly opening the same size. Am I right? Or would the butterfly plate not even matter since you can change the idle with the IACV screw? Sorry to write all this Ceasar but I was planning on doing the same thing. I don't see any cons to this anyway, only maybe if you made the whole thing bigger and the air would go around the plate and the IACV couldn't correct it.
Originally Posted by BEJAY1
-3.5hp and +3.2tq using 64mmTB
if not thats a crazy gain a small decrease in hp and a small increase in torque
Wouldn't this be pointless unless you also get a bigger butterfly plate? You can bore it out before the plate and after the plate but the airflow coming in would still be the same since the butterfly opening the same size.
Big D you are right in saying this.
Have any of you ever thought of the 90-92 pre-trac control Q45 TB's? It's a whopping 85mm. If somebody could get this monster to fit and fab up a kit for cheap i'd definately be in for one of those.
LEMAR
Big D you are right in saying this.
Have any of you ever thought of the 90-92 pre-trac control Q45 TB's? It's a whopping 85mm. If somebody could get this monster to fit and fab up a kit for cheap i'd definately be in for one of those.
LEMAR
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Well the gains from a pathfinder TB must be awesome if Krismax is making almost 200FWHP without a MEVI!!!



Originally Posted by 96sleeper
He dynoed on a dynapack, not a dynojet. They always read high, so you can't compare directly.
I don't think TBs will do much for our NA 4th gens. Most other NA cars on the market are lucky to see 2-3 peak hp with a larger TB. I'm talking about Hondas, GMs, other Nissans, Fords, BMWs, etc. The 60mm TB on the 4th gen is the same size as the one used on the 4.6 SOHC Mustang V8. I think 60mm is probably plenty. The reason guys feel better throttle response with the 70mm TBs is because more air is coming introduced at every throttle input compared to the 60mm TB. Just because the TB is bigger doesn't mean the engine can use it. Bigger is not always better. If that was the case we'd all be running 80mm TBs and 4" bus exhausts.
Dave
Dave
You can make a throttle plate out of a piece of copper sheet.
You gonna port the MAF also? Otherwise it's not worth. If you do then good luck recalibrating the MAF sensor signal to the ECU. Maybe work with Jim Wolfe?
You gonna port the MAF also? Otherwise it's not worth. If you do then good luck recalibrating the MAF sensor signal to the ECU. Maybe work with Jim Wolfe?
Originally Posted by 96sleeper
He dynoed on a dynapack, not a dynojet. They always read high, so you can't compare directly.
I guess then those #'s are to high to then.
Originally Posted by Scruit
You can make a throttle plate out of a piece of copper sheet.
You gonna port the MAF also? Otherwise it's not worth. If you do then good luck recalibrating the MAF sensor signal to the ECU. Maybe work with Jim Wolfe?
You gonna port the MAF also? Otherwise it's not worth. If you do then good luck recalibrating the MAF sensor signal to the ECU. Maybe work with Jim Wolfe?
When a b-16 honda goes to the type -r TB ,there is about a gain of 7 fwhp
Just port your stocker. Cheap and effective. Yes there is the arguement on if the butterfly plate diameter doesnt change then it doesn't do any good, but my experience has been otherwise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bryants95max
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Oct 2, 2015 12:52 PM
97_GXE
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
Sep 15, 2015 06:47 AM






