Audio and Electronics Discuss in-car entertainment systems, audio and video systems, car alarms and other electronics topics.

Alpine CDA-9835 vs 9855

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #1  
esc92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 171
Alpine CDA-9835 vs 9855

I'm looking to upgrade my 9827 and I wanted to know if they have improved the IPOD interface in the 9855? I hear it was slow on the 9835. I'm familiar with the glide touch. I already have satelite radio adapter. Just wondering if its worth buying? Or if I should just go with the 9851.
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
kpr10is's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,598
Get an Eclipse
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #3  
f550maranello2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,496
i personally hate the 9855... i had it for 2 days...
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 01:07 PM
  #4  
skierxx5556's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,086
From: MA
Out of those 2 I would get the 9835...
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
sodie14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
i own the 9855 and i like mine. i would say that the over all SQ is slightly better on the 9835, but the iPod interface is TONS better on the 9855...so whatever you are looking for. if you dont mind the glide-touch, i would personally recommend the 9855
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #6  
willis's Avatar
My heroine
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
From: New Jersey
i have the 9855 (got it recently) and while the ipod interface is nice, it's not perfect.. it works fast enough, my only gripe is only being able to search music by artist or album.. no genre is annoying me.. and the display options are dumb.. no artist - title option in the ipod display ftl
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
esc92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 171
I don't care about the Glide touch personally. But not having the "genre" search option is annoying. i hear that the display is not really visible during the day if they're a glare. But the display on my 9827 has that same probably.

Would anyone know if it's an easy swap from 9827 to 9855?
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 06:01 AM
  #8  
esc92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 171
Those who have the ipod adapter. Does the display on the 9855 show the whole song and artist?
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #9  
sachmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 168
9855 sucks with that glide touch i went to the store with an mp3 cd and tried out how easy the navigation through the cd is and it sucks. i would go for the 9835 for sure.
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #10  
willis's Avatar
My heroine
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by esc92
Those who have the ipod adapter. Does the display on the 9855 show the whole song and artist?
it shows whatever you have typed into the id3 tag on the headunit..

but unfortunately you can't get title and artist at the same time..

album - title, artist - album, and another combo that sucks a** just as much..
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
willis's Avatar
My heroine
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by sachmo
9855 sucks with that glide touch i went to the store with an mp3 cd and tried out how easy the navigation through the cd is and it sucks. i would go for the 9835 for sure.
it's a lot easier once you have used it more than two minutes in the store..

it would still be nicer if the remote could scroll thru the menu's though.. :
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #12  
BBOYSTEVIE's Avatar
Back from Hibernation
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,100
Yeah the glide touch grows on some with time.
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #13  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by sodie14
i own the 9855 and i like mine. i would say that the over all SQ is slightly better on the 9835, but the iPod interface is TONS better on the 9855...so whatever you are looking for. if you dont mind the glide-touch, i would personally recommend the 9855
I dont see how there could be SQ differences...same transport, same processing tools, same 1 bit dacs, same outputs...just a new ergos(glidetouch)_
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #14  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
i agree with Manny. no difference in sq imo between the units.
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #15  
esc92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 171
So you mean you can't change the song (from the ipod) by the remote?
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #16  
TheBigDu's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,427
Originally Posted by slickrick
i agree with Manny. no difference in sq imo between the units.
This is assuming he's running external amps. The internal amp on the 9855 is a 50x4 peak (not sure RMS). The internal on the 35 is the old V-Drive (60 peak, 27 rms). If this guy's using the internal amp, it may actually sound better on the 9835. Just a thought...
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 02:50 AM
  #17  
willis's Avatar
My heroine
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 816
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by esc92
So you mean you can't change the song (from the ipod) by the remote?
yes you can. I meant you can't scroll thru menu options with the remote, you can only use the glide touch for that.
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #18  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
9815........
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #19  
TheBigDu's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,427
Originally Posted by 505max94se
9815........
That's true, too. Apparently they'd already started the downhill trend by the 35. What a shame...
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #20  
NisAznMonk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 58
Would it be easier just to control your Ipod functions from the actual Ipod?
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by NisAznMonk
Would it be easier just to control your Ipod functions from the actual Ipod?
Maybe but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of having Ipod controls on the deck.
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #22  
1996blackmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,532
From: San Diego, Ca
Originally Posted by willis
it's a lot easier once you have used it more than two minutes in the store..

it would still be nicer if the remote could scroll thru the menu's though.. :

I have actually sat in the store and annoyed the sales people by messing with it for so long "without needing any help", they would keep coming around and asking if I was sure that I did not need any help. I have done this a few times and my conclusion is that it is a wasted function/gimmick. Alpine should have used their time and energy for something that would actually make the product better...................... how about better internal components.
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #23  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
The glidestrip is a mp3 oriented designed tool...supposedly its the quickest once used to it to navigate Ipod...They should've kept all other audio menus isolated to buttons IMO, tuning is a bytch..

And worst of all you cannot adjust volume real time while under the tuning menu. WTF, dont you want to hear what your boosts or cuts sounds like across the volume scale before you back out of the menu and it takes you 2 minutes to get back into it to make adjustments- f'n RETARDED...

Needless to say, it wasnt designed for the audiophile's needs in the ergo's dept...
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #24  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
buahaha...was just outside trying to help my brother tune his 9855 a bit...
WHY would they offer a deck with on-board EQ that doesn't list the frequency each band represents ?Truly genius...
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #25  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by MannyNJ2k2max
buahaha...was just outside trying to help my brother tune his 9855 a bit...
WHY would they offer a deck with on-board EQ that doesn't list the frequency each band represents ?Truly genius...

Been there, done that already. Definately a real PITA.

Alpine is obviously targeted towards the form over function guys. But we knew that already.
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #26  
1996blackmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,532
From: San Diego, Ca
It is sad when my old 1998 Alpine HU and processor is still better than the new gear in function. Did not have as many bells and whistles, but man did it sound good and it was very easy to use. We will see what the future brings.
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #27  
sodie14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
sorry TheBigDu...one bit is incorrect...the 9855's internal amp is 60x4 max...listed as 18x4 rms right on the box...i also agree that not being able to change volume while in the menus does suck...but i find scrolling through songs both on a disc and on my iPod to be rather easy.
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #28  
Pearl96Max's Avatar
I tend to get a bit irritable
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 17,672
From: Central Jersey
Originally Posted by sodie14
sorry TheBigDu...one bit is incorrect...the 9855's internal amp is 60x4 max...listed as 18x4 rms right on the box...i also agree that not being able to change volume while in the menus does suck...but i find scrolling through songs both on a disc and on my iPod to be rather easy.
Actually it is 1-bit, where did you hear otherwise Im very curious to know.

Although what that has to do with the intenal amp is beyond me. BTW ...according to Alpines info its a claimed 50W X 4
Old Nov 8, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #29  
MannyNJ2k2max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,528
Originally Posted by Pearl96Max
Actually it is 1-bit, where did you hear otherwise Im very curious to know.

Although what that has to do with the intenal amp is beyond me. BTW ...according to Alpines info its a claimed 50W X 4
Actually there are claims that it has SIX(6) 1-bit DAC's
Like the 9813, 9815, 9833, 9835...But not listed on website under the 9855 specs. So who knows, I asked a Alpine tech suppport member and he said there was only one- but apparently he posssibly may not know his head from his ***.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
melteye
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
12
May 16, 2016 12:02 AM
Kyle Lee Cleveland
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
3
Sep 28, 2015 07:58 AM
MaineI30
Audio and Electronics
2
Oct 22, 2000 07:39 PM
MaineI30
Audio and Electronics
6
Oct 22, 2000 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 PM.