5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Low or normal HP results?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #1  
jdmaxima89's Avatar
Thread Starter
On the pedobear bandwagon
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 480
Low or normal HP results?

Ok... so my buddy and I bought a beltronics FX-1 performance meter... and we were testing it out on my car tonight. I have a 2000 max, and the only mods are a flowmaster muffler, and a stillen intake. I know that nissan says this car is 222hp... but that is at the flywheel. From what the FX1 told us... which is a very accurate device from reviews that I have read... I had peak hp at 145... and my best 1/4 time was 15.77. I thought that the wheel hp being 145 sounded really low... but I'm not sure. I havn't gotten around to checking my VIAS... could that be my problem. Is there anything else I need to check into? Thanks!
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #2  
spdfreak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,113
From: NY
I would say that you should buy some dyno time, but thats your call. Although the car loses some power over time, I don't think it should lose from 222hp to 145hp..........But thats just my thoughts.
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #3  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,285
From: Burke, VA
are you 5sp or automatic?
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
jdmaxima89's Avatar
Thread Starter
On the pedobear bandwagon
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 480
Automatic... sorry I meant to put that
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #5  
spdfreak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,113
From: NY
I don't think that the HP rating should be that much of a differance between an automatic and a manual, but the 1/4 Mile times will be longer on the automatic.
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #6  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by spdfreak
I don't think that the HP rating should be that much of a differance between an automatic and a manual, but the 1/4 Mile times will be longer on the automatic.
there is quite a difference in the drivetrain loss as measured in a percentage. the manual equipped cars are also lighter due the transmission itself compared to an auto. if your vias broke loose in the low end setting then i could see a 3.0 auto with those two mods only putting around 150 to the wheels. i personally would not trust that dohicky and i would have 3 pulls on a dyno to see for yourself. you can see where peak power is, which should be redline if your vias is working and also your a/f.
Old Mar 25, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Derrick2k2SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,501
From: Pensacola, FL
THe FX is gives a very accurate measure of acceleration but for HP readings there are too many variables. I wouldn't put too much stock in that number. The 1/4 time seems right for a mostly stock 5th gen auto.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
user 11122324
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
42
Jul 18, 2022 03:35 PM
Miket2006
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
Mar 1, 2021 03:55 AM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
Mar 12, 2018 06:48 PM
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 AM.