General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.
View Poll Results: Loss in LOW END power?
Yes
23
52.27%
No
12
27.27%
What's a Maxima?
9
20.45%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

AUTOMATIC cone filter/Popcharger owners, please answer this poll.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 06:16 AM
  #1  
Sonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Is there a loss in low end power using these compared to using the stock airbox?
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:07 AM
  #2  
Micah95GLE's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,931
I didn't notice a difference, but I didn't do a scientific A/B comparison, so I don't know.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:13 AM
  #3  
SkyMax Jr.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 292
I know there's a loss, but I dont notice it all.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:19 AM
  #4  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
i absolutely positively 100% guaran-damn tee that when you let off the gas at low speeds and try to speed up a little, youre not successful.. off the line if you stomp it the power i there, if you stomp it at any time the power is there... its when youre just trying to gain a little speed without pushing like 5k or so rpms
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:49 AM
  #5  
SkyMax Jr.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 292
Originally posted by JoesMAX
i absolutely positively 100% guaran-damn tee that when you let off the gas at low speeds and try to speed up a little, youre not successful.. off the line if you stomp it the power i there, if you stomp it at any time the power is there... its when youre just trying to gain a little speed without pushing like 5k or so rpms
Even so, a small sacrifice low end power is made up by the nice sound generated by the intake IMO.
I bought my intake because i wanted the sound mostly.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:55 AM
  #6  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
maybe its different on a 5th gen but i doubt it would be.. it wasnt like a small loss for me, it was a decent amount
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 08:56 AM
  #7  
yongjun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,243
What's a "maxima"?
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:14 AM
  #8  
Ravq's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,857
Felt like a slight loss to me but probably all mental.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:22 AM
  #9  
MaXAnDy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 327
everyone says u loose very little low end power but it sounds awesoem, so it evens out.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:39 AM
  #10  
MaineI30's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,604
confused

i'm highly confused about your question.

what is this "maxima" you all speak of?
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:57 AM
  #11  
Sonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Re: confused

Originally posted by MaineI30
i'm highly confused about your question.

what is this "maxima" you all speak of?
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 10:04 AM
  #12  
MaineI30's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,604
madness

I do agree that there is a little bit of low-end loss...

btw

Old Sep 2, 2001 | 10:45 AM
  #13  
NYCe MaXiMa's Avatar
...needs to please stop post whoring.
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,284
Re: Re: confused

Originally posted by medicsonic


hey, that's the 2nd time you used that
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 10:50 AM
  #14  
Sonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY


Good to see that you noticed. I've used this one before too.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 11:58 AM
  #15  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,755
From: Lake Orion, MI
WELL this "maxima" ??????

i like ur sig but i did not know ur car was that slow
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 12:23 PM
  #16  
matt92gxe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 536
i noticed a little loss in low end power on mine, but it also feels faster when i get on it. i really just wanted it for the sound. just like it says in DA-MAX's sig, "my car isn't that fast, but thanks to jwt it sure sounds fast"
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 12:42 PM
  #17  
Craig Mack's Avatar
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
No low end loss for me

It's all mental. I feel no loss, and it sounds nice.

Paramedic, did you start this thread b/c of my other post when I said "I didn't notice any low end loss" ?

..Oh, I'm soo flatered.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 02:30 PM
  #18  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
when you physically push on the gas and the car doesnt accelerate, thats not mental... if you didnt lose low end i have no idea why, did you buy your filter used? i know the more dirt on it the less air it gets in... also the stillen cone is bigger than the other cones out there, who knows
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 05:55 PM
  #19  
thebigsadler's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,333
i have the stillen cone and it is proven that you lose low end torque and HPs below 2300RPMS, but as soon as you hit around that point the sound kicks in and you gain anywhere from 2-7 horses.. i hate the lag in first gear.. but there is nothing to be done.. we all no max's arent the cars that will accelerate real quick our best speed is at 30 and up..
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 06:21 PM
  #20  
Eric L.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,835
There may be a loss in low end, but I would say it's hardly noticeable, if you can even detect it at all.

Originally posted by kevlo911
WELL this "maxima" ??????

i like ur sig but i did not know ur car was that slow
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 06:26 PM
  #21  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
I still don't understand what you guys are talking about....this mythical loss of low end torque....I've seen dynos before and after the install of an SI or JWT and the bottom of the curve follows exactly until aroud 3000 rpms....there is NO REAL loss of low end. I've tested this myself by rolling at 5mph and about 1000 rpm with the clutch fully out (you guys say that my MT makes me not see the power loss....this is how I compensate) right were your supposed "power loss" is, and hit it....it breaks loose like nothing instantly at a little over 1000 rpms....before it would just grip and go. I've also driven my buddies 99 SE-L AUTO with just a popcharger...and it takes off better now than ever before. plenty of wheel spin.

JoesMAX - the thing about the dirty air filter isn't true either....K&N type oiled air filters flow BETTER when the get dirty....to a point of course.....the dirt actually helps the filter work. That's why K&N recommends only cleaning the filter every 50,000 miles....because most of the time it's pointless to clean it before that.

For all the non-believers- I will try to find that dyno chart of before and after popcharger.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 07:11 PM
  #22  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
like i said... if you take off its fine, its when youre just chillen at like 40 and you give it a little gas
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 07:24 PM
  #23  
matt92gxe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 536
Originally posted by JoesMAX
like i said... if you take off its fine, its when youre just chillen at like 40 and you give it a little gas
my thoughts exactly.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 07:34 PM
  #24  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
heres what we can do... at the next meet, we have someone with an auto with a HAI and we test it out the way i said... do about 40 with a little gas, give it more and see if you can pick up speed a little without making the rpms jump... i guarantee it wont happen... it reminded me of my moms 97 4 cylinder accord... it was slow as hell and it would be the same thing, it wouldnt move at all till you stomped on it, but then it still barely moved unlike the max... good thing the lease was up and she got a 01 altima, keepin it in the nissan family!
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 07:36 PM
  #25  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
JoesMAX - the thing about the dirty air filter isn't true either....K&N type oiled air filters flow BETTER when the get dirty....to a point of course.....the dirt actually helps the filter work. That's why K&N recommends only cleaning the filter every 50,000 miles....because most of the time it's pointless to clean it before that.

I believe you've misunderstood K&N's marketing hype. They say it "works better" when its dirty. This could be true. The dirt in the filter will stop other dirt. But its does not flow better. That dirt blocks more dirt, but if it is blocking dirt, it can only be there to block air too. Th dirty filter does not flow more air, it stops more dirt.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 10:25 PM
  #26  
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
Originally posted by JoesMAX
maybe its different on a 5th gen but i doubt it would be.. it wasnt like a small loss for me, it was a decent amount
it will be different on the 5th gen because they have that damn variable intake plenum.
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 01:40 AM
  #27  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
Originally posted by mzmtg



I believe you've misunderstood K&N's marketing hype. They say it "works better" when its dirty. This could be true. The dirt in the filter will stop other dirt. But its does not flow better. That dirt blocks more dirt, but if it is blocking dirt, it can only be there to block air too. Th dirty filter does not flow more air, it stops more dirt.
Regardless, I don't think the "dirt" on the air filter has ANYTHING to do with it.
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 08:18 AM
  #28  
sascuderi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
WHY ???

Why a loss in low end power with this mod???
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 03:43 PM
  #29  
SupaMaxima's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 217
Maybe it's mental

I noticed a loss in low end power too. But after thinking about it... I think the reason why I thought I lost the power was because I expected a big power gain. And because I didn't get this power gain...I probably felt that it did decrease power or did nothing. This is only an excuse to make me feel that I didn't spend 100 for the JWT for nothing...hahaha
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 04:12 PM
  #30  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
There are plenty of people on this board that went back to the stock box because of the power drop in the low-end. We can't call them liar's.

Medic, don't take this the wrong way but why did you post this?
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 09:38 PM
  #31  
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
i noticed a good 10% loss in low end and i got more than half that back with the CAI. i just had an idea when i was at the track, i took out my fog light because the CAI filter is right there. it was like a ram air scoop. that area is fairly enclosed, but what if i can a tube from the front valence to that open area to provide fresh, even colder, moving air. i'll let you know the results.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 04:10 AM
  #32  
Ramius83
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I heard that there was a loss in the low end, but I didn't notice one with my pop-charger, or even with my CAI. Oh well I am happy now. Love the sound, love the power.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 06:30 AM
  #33  
Sonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Originally posted by deezo
There are plenty of people on this board that went back to the stock box because of the power drop in the low-end. We can't call them liar's.

Medic, don't take this the wrong way but why did you post this?
Someone posted a thread stating that there was no performance loss in the HAI vs. stock in the low end. I wanted a poll to see if others agreed.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 07:01 AM
  #34  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
ok, there may be no actual low end power loss. No loss can be seen on a dyno plot. But, there may be a percieved loss. This would come from a reduction in throttle response due to the lower intake air velocity.

It may feel slightly sluggish, but under load, the power is still there.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 07:19 AM
  #35  
Sonic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Originally posted by mzmtg
ok, there may be no actual low end power loss. No loss can be seen on a dyno plot. But, there may be a percieved loss. This would come from a reduction in throttle response due to the lower intake air velocity.

It may feel slightly sluggish, but under load, the power is still there.
BINGO.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 08:27 AM
  #36  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Not to change the subject, but what about the loss felt with non-OEM spark plugs? I know that's not in my head. The Bosch +4's feel a little sluggish in the low end and more powerful up top. I remember BrianV saying the same for the plugs he used. I can't remember which type he used though.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 09:04 AM
  #37  
mcros's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 170
The loss is so small. It is still worth it.
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 01:49 PM
  #38  
JoesMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,393
you should ask daniel b martin why at low rpms it is sluggish
Old Sep 4, 2001 | 02:08 PM
  #39  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally posted by JoesMAX
you should ask daniel b martin why at low rpms it is sluggish

I already mentioned why. Lower intake charge velocity. The big cone provides a much larger opening for the same amount of air to flow through. Same amount of air + larger opening = lower speed. This lower air speed doesnt fill the cylinders as well as a higher speed flow. This is mainly a problem at lower RPM and part throttle where the engine wouldnt be struggling against the OEM setup anyway. The effect is cancelled out at high RPM and high load by the sheer extra volume the big filter allows over OEM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doctorpullit
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
25
Mar 29, 2016 11:08 AM
ef9
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Oct 4, 2015 08:43 AM
Andy29
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 29, 2015 05:32 AM
lrb6805
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
0
Sep 24, 2015 05:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 PM.