1/4 and 1/8 Mile Racing Talk about track times, launch techniques, strategies, etc. Check out the "Timeslips" subforum for posted times.No discussion of street racing will be tolerated.

1/8 times struggling in auto 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2010 | 09:48 PM
  #1  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
1/8 times struggling in auto 3.0

I went to the track today to tune. to me my times were crap. i have spacers short ram and a y-pipe done. and i am running:
10.5 second avg 1/8 mile times
trapping between 69 and 71
60ft:2.6 - 2.7
r/t: under .5
I have been practicing my launches but with the tune im not seeing much of a difference. I have g35 18's on my car w/ 245/40/18 on front.
is there any advice on what i should do cuz there are civic si's mossing me. its depressing.
i have tried rolling out the line and stepping on it but still crappy launches.
and no cels are being thrown
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #2  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Can't go to the track like that and expect any PB's I don't really see anything that should've made ur times better as you've probebly added more weight than power.... good try though, keep at it, practise makes perfect

Last edited by Grand_hustle17; Jul 10, 2010 at 09:08 AM.
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 09:03 AM
  #3  
tedo007's Avatar
faster than you think
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,765
From: Eufaula, AL
can you laydown the whole track slip
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by tedo007
can you laydown the whole track slip
Probebly went to a 1/8th mile track
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #5  
Polished2002's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 56
Have you tried just easing out from the line and see if that helps you lower your 60ft? Riding out from the line like I would a normal traffic light, usually gets me a 2.2x (all season tires), if I try to accelerate out of the line and waste time spinning I get a 2.4,2.5 or even worse. Although you practiced launching your 60ft is still too high--are you spinning terribly at the line, or wheel hopping? Still running on the motor mounts that came with the car?
Good luck.
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Lower the car, get decent tires, change from Y-pipe to headers
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 01:39 PM
  #7  
tedo007's Avatar
faster than you think
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,765
From: Eufaula, AL
What Grand hustle17 said.. I was running 9.2 9.3 1/8 mile. After I lower my car I ran 9.1 1/8 mile. Makes Difference
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #8  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
that 60' sucks horribly. I dont know what youre doing but its not right. Did you drop the pressure in the tires?
Old Jul 10, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
in a auto it shouldnt be too difficult to pull 2.2 60', lowering the tire pressure also help (22psi)... good to see you dropped times also tedo
Old Jul 11, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #10  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
i only ran an 1/8th i have the car on eibach/illumina setup and falken 912 tires all around. but i did leave the 2 tens in the trunk. but i thought i could break 10 seconds. there was an altima ser running 9.5 with just a intake.
is it safe to run tire pressure that low (22psi) on low pro tires? i have it at like 30psi. but im spinning no wheel hop at all.
when i let it roll and go down on the pedal gradually im still running slow 60ft times. since i put the y pipe i noticed my torque disappeared a bit but my top end rips through

Last edited by rayac88; Jul 11, 2010 at 10:19 PM.
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 08:25 AM
  #11  
Rhyno02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Not that I have any drag racing experiance but, maybe you should throw your stock rims on if you have them laying around and drop the pressure like Grand_hustle said. I have the same rim & tire set-up and they're pretty f'ing heavy. I know that losing unsprung weight it makes a difference. I think losing the sub's would help a lil' too, there's a rule of thumb that every 100lbs lost is about of a tenth of a second (about a car length).
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #12  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by rayac88
i only ran an 1/8th i have the car on eibach/illumina setup and falken 912 tires all around. but i did leave the 2 tens in the trunk. but i thought i could break 10 seconds. there was an altima ser running 9.5 with just a intake.
is it safe to run tire pressure that low (22psi) on low pro tires? i have it at like 30psi. but im spinning no wheel hop at all.
when i let it roll and go down on the pedal gradually im still running slow 60ft times. since i put the y pipe i noticed my torque disappeared a bit but my top end rips through
ive ran 18psi before, im not saying to daily drive on it like that

Originally Posted by Rhyno02
Not that I have any drag racing experiance but, maybe you should throw your stock rims on if you have them laying around and drop the pressure like Grand_hustle said. I have the same rim & tire set-up and they're pretty f'ing heavy. I know that losing unsprung weight it makes a difference. I think losing the sub's would help a lil' too, there's a rule of thumb that every 100lbs lost is about of a tenth of a second (about a car length).
thats the rule of thumb...

to the OP, im sure you know the basic hints and tips to running good times and ill ask, did you really think with all that weight your car was to perform better than it did stock??? if so why must i ask?
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 08:51 AM
  #13  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
What are stock times suppose to be? I would like to believe the 18's aren't that heavy. Does anyone else have a 3.0 any time comparisons?
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 09:23 AM
  #14  
Rhyno02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by rayac88
What are stock times suppose to be? I would like to believe the 18's aren't that heavy. Does anyone else have a 3.0 any time comparisons?


They're about 26 lbs each without a tire mounted (50 each with tires). Even if you stockies are "only" 5lbs lighter it'll make a difference. There's a big difference b/t unsprung and sprung weight. It's not like taking 20lbs out of your trunk. You're decreasing rotational mass, it's a whole different ballgame.
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 10:19 AM
  #15  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by Rhyno02
They're about 26 lbs each without a tire mounted (50 each with tires). Even if you stockies are "only" 5lbs lighter it'll make a difference. There's a big difference b/t unsprung and sprung weight. It's not like taking 20lbs out of your trunk. You're decreasing rotational mass, it's a whole different ballgame.
There was also a sticky somwhere stating how heavy these are....
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 10:31 AM
  #16  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
There was also a sticky somwhere stating how heavy these are....
i saw the stick it said 24. but i thought it was pretty light for a stock rim. cuz the stock 16's were in that area as well. i didnt go aftermarket cuz i dont know when rims get too light for street use. I have bent rims before and i hate dealing with bent rims. what would be a good weight to help my times but be able to take potholes and mainly sunken train track crossings.
im definitely looking into some 17's for the car now.
Old Jul 12, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #17  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by rayac88
i saw the stick it said 24. but i thought it was pretty light for a stock rim. cuz the stock 16's were in that area as well. i didnt go aftermarket cuz i dont know when rims get too light for street use. I have bent rims before and i hate dealing with bent rims. what would be a good weight to help my times but be able to take potholes and mainly sunken train track crossings.
im definitely looking into some 17's for the car now.
rims dont get too light for street use , you might be thinking a little bit too hard, and if there was such a rim you'd probebly never find it to buy it... the keonigsegg comes with carbon fiber wheels that probebly cost more your maxima yet those are good for street use lol.. get some 240 16" wheels, or if you can find some mellenia 16" wheels, those weight about 11lbs... never the less just find some 16's, whether its 4th gens or 300z ect... makes a difference
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #18  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
assuming i find a 17 inch rim what weight should i be aiming for 18 pounds? sixteens are too small for my preference. i have seen way to many bent allow rims im not looking to spend over a grand on rims.
what would be the difference in times moving from the 24lb rims to something in the area of 18lbs?
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #19  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by rayac88
assuming i find a 17 inch rim what weight should i be aiming for 18 pounds? sixteens are too small for my preference. i have seen way to many bent allow rims im not looking to spend over a grand on rims.
what would be the difference in times moving from the 24lb rims to something in the area of 18lbs?
Your only getting two 16's for the track and you shouldnt be cocerned with looks when going down the track... no one cares how good or clean your car looks (trust me) you probebly loose more respect tryna ride down the track all pretty and running crappy times.... get two 16's and when u go to the track just take ur 2 18's off and have fun..... why are you so paranoid about braking or denting or cracking rims ... its only for track use bro... calm down you can also spend a good penny on buying leightweight 17's if that floats ur boat
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #20  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
i have been through 2 sets of bent rims and i want rims for everyday use not just for the track.
Old Jul 13, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #21  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
i was really looking to see if any other 2k's are running this crappy but i guess im the only one still running a 3.0
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 06:29 AM
  #22  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by rayac88
i have been through 2 sets of bent rims and i want rims for everyday use not just for the track.
14.3 lbs per wheel / 37.5lbs per wheel/tire combo. This will be required for any auto 3.0 trying to improve track times. Also helps MPG's too. 12-15% in my case.


Old Jul 14, 2010 | 07:30 AM
  #23  
Rhyno02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
14.3 lbs per wheel / 37.5lbs per wheel/tire combo. This will be required for any auto 3.0 trying to improve track times. Also helps MPG's too. 12-15% in my case.


37.5lbs with tire? That's prettty crazy man. Those are 17's right?
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #24  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
does anyone have drag times so i can see if dropping the weight of the rims is really that beneficial? im aiming for more than .2 of a second
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #25  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by rayac88
does anyone have drag times so i can see if dropping the weight of the rims is really that beneficial? im aiming for more than .2 of a second
??????????........... i doubt people do before and after drag runs as every single race is different.... think of it like this, if you run a 100m with a bookbag with 50lbs of books in it on your back vs running that same 100m with the bookbag with 10lbs of books in it.... its moreso a common sense thing bro.... i dont see how you dont think it makes a difference , why the need for proof, prove it to yourself

Last edited by Grand_hustle17; Aug 2, 2010 at 09:08 AM.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #26  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
??????????........... i doubt people do before and after drag runs as every single race is different.... think of it like this, if you run a 100m with a bookbag with 50lbs of books in it vs running that same 100m with 10lbs of books in it.... its moreso a common sense thing bro.... i dont see how you dont think it makes a difference , why the need for proof, prove it to yourself
I'm just looking for a difference in times... I know it will make a difference but I wanted to see numbers...I'm sure those go to the track haven't had the same rims from day one and every run should be about the same with small differences....i ordered some rims already so I will find out on friday
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 09:13 AM
  #27  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Rhyno02
37.5lbs with tire? That's prettty crazy man. Those are 17's right?
17x8. Wheels are 14.3lbs, tires are the difference.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 12:14 PM
  #28  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by rayac88
does anyone have drag times so i can see if dropping the weight of the rims is really that beneficial? im aiming for more than .2 of a second

I have done this test years ago. I gained approximately .1 seconds and 0.75mph going from a 37lb combo to a 30lb combo on the front tires. You aren't going to get .2 seconds unless you are going from a really heavy setup to a really light setup.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #29  
rayac88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 172
From: miami, fl
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
I have done this test years ago. I gained approximately .1 seconds and 0.75mph going from a 37lb combo to a 30lb combo on the front tires. You aren't going to get .2 seconds unless you are going from a really heavy setup to a really light setup.
Thank you this is the info I have been asking for not all the slack I have been getting for asking. I'm moving from a 25lb wheel to a 18lb wheel so .2 should be attainable on the 1/8 mile
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #30  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Go with a far smaller diameter to effectively change your FD, that will also improve times.
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #31  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Go with a far smaller diameter to effectively change your FD, that will also improve times.
not too small though... 16's the smallest IMO
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #32  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
no, you go as small as you can go. the benefits to that go beyond changing FD, a smaller wheel focuses mass closer to the center which makes acceleration of said wheel require less power. FYI, J30 15's fit on the 5.5 gen and they weigh only ~14 lbs

Old Aug 2, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #33  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
^^ And that is VERY helpful for a 5th gen AT 3.0L vs say a 5MT or 3.5L AT.
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 05:59 PM
  #34  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by Gemner
no, you go as small as you can go. the benefits to that go beyond changing FD, a smaller wheel focuses mass closer to the center which makes acceleration of said wheel require less power. FYI, J30 15's fit on the 5.5 gen and they weigh only ~14 lbs

the times suffer with 15's, i cant get all technical and explain how but i remember hearing of it, and even seeing it.... good info on the J30's though.. does that wheel fit over the stock 5.5 caliper????
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #35  
datdude20's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,027
From: zimbabwe
Originally Posted by rayac88
I went to the track today to tune. to me my times were crap. i have spacers short ram and a y-pipe done. and i am running:
10.5 second avg 1/8 mile times
trapping between 69 and 71
60ft:2.6 - 2.7
r/t: under .5
I have been practicing my launches but with the tune im not seeing much of a difference. I have g35 18's on my car w/ 245/40/18 on front.
is there any advice on what i should do cuz there are civic si's mossing me. its depressing.
i have tried rolling out the line and stepping on it but still crappy launches.
and no cels are being thrown
...I'm sorry dude but that was funny...but I would say go with some 16s and try leaving at idle
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #36  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Was this an auto????...
May I speak???


16's
22psi
2-2.2K rpm launch
Manual shift
Thank me later
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 06:25 AM
  #37  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Jime ran 15" tires, it's a fairly simple concept. But, most 15's wont clear A33B brakes, but the OP has an A33 .. so.
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #38  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
the times suffer with 15's, i cant get all technical and explain how but i remember hearing of it, and even seeing it.... good info on the J30's though.. does that wheel fit over the stock 5.5 caliper????
15s that weight the same or less than any larger wheels, have tires that are just as sticky, and have the same diameter, will net you faster times

Anyway, yes they fit over the calipers, myself and another member, both 5.5 6mt, are using these wheels

Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Jime ran 15" tires, it's a fairly simple concept.
, theres a reason that 99% of slicks are in 15s and smaller

Last edited by Gemner; Aug 4, 2010 at 03:49 PM.
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 04:28 PM
  #39  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Jime ran 15" tires, it's a fairly simple concept. But, most 15's wont clear A33B brakes, but the OP has an A33 .. so.
jime has a 4th gen... tell me theres not a difference

Originally Posted by Gemner
15s that weight the same or less than any larger wheels, have tires that are just as sticky, and have the same diameter, will net you faster times

Anyway, yes they fit over the calipers, myself and another member, both 5.5 6mt, are using these wheels



, theres a reason that 99% of slicks are in 15s and smaller
whats your point??? go ahead and run it... watch this...
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #40  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
jime has a 4th gen... tell me theres not a difference
seriously? so theres something so fundamentally different about 2000-2003 maximas that they are different than every other car out there? even other maximas that are EXTREMELY similar to them?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:14 AM.