All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Stroker Question ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
krashkid0305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 179
From: Pawtucket
Stroker Question ...

Planning on doing a 3.5 crank in a 3.0 hence making a 3.3

do i really need to do the 3.5 rods or will the 3.0 rods work?

3.0 rod length = 5.822"
3.5 rod length = 5.680"

3.0 stroke = 73.3mm
3.5 stroke = 81.4mm

can someone plz do the math and let me know which rod would be better? id love to use the 3.5 rods because the longer rod means higher c/r but will it be too high? planning on running a VAFC to add air and play w/ ignition timing. also are there any problems with running 4.0 cams in 3.0 heads?

Last edited by NmexMAX; Oct 14, 2010 at 06:05 AM.
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
krazy6's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,565
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Can I ask why you don't want to do a full 3.5 swap?

VQ35 heads flow very well. Take advantage of that!
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #3  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
spend more money and do more work, end up with less power than if you'd just have done a 3.5 swap. hmmm.
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:24 AM
  #4  
SteveB123's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,023
From: Ottawa Ontario
Originally Posted by krashkid0305
id love to use the 3.5 rods because the longer rod means higher c/r

No.
Smaller combustion chambers make higher c/r's.

Using 3.5 rods, piston height will be lowered by 4.055-3.6mm = .455mm.
Using 3.0 rods, piston height will be raised 4.055mm. Chamber size less than zero. Crunch.

(4.055 is 1/2 stroke delta.
3.6mm is rod length delta.)

Nissan did a fair bit of math when they designed and built the 3.5, why wouldn't you utilize that?
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 04:37 AM
  #5  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
Originally Posted by SteveB123
No.
Smaller combustion chambers make higher c/r's.

Using 3.5 rods, piston height will be lowered by 4.055-3.6mm = .455mm.
Using 3.0 rods, piston height will be raised 4.055mm. Chamber size less than zero. Crunch.

(4.055 is 1/2 stroke delta.
3.6mm is rod length delta.)

Nissan did a fair bit of math when they designed and built the 3.5, why wouldn't you utilize that?
the same reason 383's are so bad *** in the chevy world. sometimes people just like to try different things if they didnt maxima's would still be running 14's

true is would be easier to just drop a 3.5 in but at the sametime why not just buy a 5.5gen instead of a full swap 3rd or 4gen swap, why cause he feels like it
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 04:40 AM
  #6  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
do i really need to do the 3.5 rods or will the 3.0 rods work?

3.0 rod length = 5.822"
3.5 rod length = 5.680"

3.0 stroke = 73.3mm
3.5 stroke = 81.4mm
like stated above I don't think the valve will clear if you use a 3.5 crank and 3.0 rods but anyway you go with this I suggest putting the motor together turn it over by hand and check all your clearances
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 08:30 AM
  #7  
krashkid0305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 179
From: Pawtucket
Thanks SteveB123! So 3.5 rods are next on the list of ish to buy! Possibly eagles because I would eventually like to spray a 75/100 shot....EVENTUALLY lol

And to answer why....like t6378tp said cuz I feel like it. Plus how many people have a vq33 in a maxima? I don't want the 3.5 cuz. Everybody wants to do that. And even if I did that swap id want to bore it out to a 3.7/3.8 just to have something alil diff. Id love to go the boosted route but its alil out of my price range at the moment. And with a stroker I can get used to how my car handles with the extra power.

Does anybody know an estimate of what my c/r would be? J/w
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #8  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
http://forums.maxima.org/all-motor/2...bolt-pics.html

Last edited by NmexMAX; Oct 14, 2010 at 09:29 AM.
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #9  
krashkid0305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 179
From: Pawtucket
....and i read that thread like 3 times......apparently i need to pay more attn. thanks again! def sparked my motivation again to getting this build accomplished
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #10  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by t6378tp
the same reason 383's are so bad *** in the chevy world. sometimes people just like to try different things if they didnt maxima's would still be running 14's

true is would be easier to just drop a 3.5 in but at the sametime why not just buy a 5.5gen instead of a full swap 3rd or 4gen swap, why cause he feels like it
neither of those are apples to apples.

doing a 3.3 stroker will - no questions asked - make less power than a vq35 swap (assuming all other variables are kept equal, tuning, other mods, etc). that's just simple math. people build 383s because they are rebuilding their 350s and going .030 over anyways, why not throw a 3.75 crank in there and make it a 383 stroker. they do it because it's easy and cheap to get that extra displacement. if 400s were more readily available and didn't often have cooling issues, more guys would be doing 400s. it's because there's a tradeoff between money, availability, reliability, etc. doing a 3.3 stroker out of a 3.0 doesn't make sense with any sort of reasoning except just to say you did it (which is interesting and cool to some degree, but it's still just slower than what it would have been in the end, and you spent more money/time/effort on it).

doing a 3.5 swap in a 4th gen results in a faster car than a 5.5gen because it's lighter, that's why. also it's way cheaper to swap in a $500 engine than buy a whole new car, that's the other reason.

it just doesn't make sense to me personally. I like a good return on investment. this isn't one. the mechanical mixing and matching of it is cool to me (i love doing that ****) but the end result having no chance of being better than what's already more easily available just sours it for me.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Apr 2, 2016 05:42 AM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Sep 26, 2015 12:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.