5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

How much power increase when doing full exhaust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
rosader's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 360
From: Salt Lake City, UT
How much power increase when doing full exhaust?

I was wanting to get headers because my precats are starting to get clogged but I think I want to go full exhaust all at once (Cattman headers, y-pipe, fastcat, and 3" exhaust) I will be getting my tax return in January and this is what I have my eye on. For anyone running this setup did you notice a significant increase in power? BTW how much hp do you gain from a full exhaust? I read that the headers alone give up to 26hp
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:19 PM
  #2  
HotshotVQ35's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 930
From: LI, NY
40+ with a tune
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #3  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
x2 /end thread
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #4  
luvlexus101's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,419
From: Queens Village, NY
at the wheels?
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #5  
ChrisMan287's Avatar
Got Retrofit?
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 14,761
From: NY
Originally Posted by luvlexus101
at the wheels?
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 05:57 PM
  #6  
Rood's Avatar
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
From: IL
TOO much
Old Oct 27, 2010 | 06:31 PM
  #7  
jowo9's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,022
From: Alberta, Canada
I did the full setup all at once. Honestly, I didn't notice as much in gains as I expected... but, I believe I'm running super rich because of my mods, so I'm getting my tune on for christmas (VAFCII, Wideband) Oh, and I don't have an intake, so I'm getting that too. Then hopefully I see that 35-40 or so hp that I'm supposed to see.
My point is... if you want the full gains, you usually need to tune your AFR as well. Full exhaust (esp. headers) will make our cars run pig rich... some more than others.
Old Oct 30, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
Rods03Max619's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,946
From: Diego,California
Dont have the full set up but sure you will get good gains I cant wait to get them headers from Cattman!!
Old Oct 31, 2010 | 01:21 AM
  #9  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by jowo9
I did the full setup all at once. Honestly, I didn't notice as much in gains as I expected... but, I believe I'm running super rich because of my mods, so I'm getting my tune on for christmas (VAFCII, Wideband) Oh, and I don't have an intake, so I'm getting that too. Then hopefully I see that 35-40 or so hp that I'm supposed to see.
My point is... if you want the full gains, you usually need to tune your AFR as well. Full exhaust (esp. headers) will make our cars run pig rich... some more than others.
That Oem intake is restrictive, I made 8whp peak w/that overly restrictive Injen Intake which made about 12-14 whp over the Oem (under the curve) in the midrange. The midrange was awesome with this Injen but over 6K it's a bit too long (39") to move air as fast as the engine needs it.... Make yourself a SRI or switch to a JWT popcharger and you see the difference.....
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
greymaxima's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by CMax03
That Oem intake is restrictive, I made 8whp peak w/that overly restrictive Injen Intake which made about 12-14 whp over the Oem (under the curve) in the midrange. The midrange was awesome with this Injen but over 6K it's a bit too long (39") to move air as fast as the engine needs it.... Make yourself a SRI or switch to a JWT popcharger and you see the difference.....
what is sri
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
Mr. Brett's Avatar
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by greymaxima
what is sri
Short ram intake.

OP: I'll say this...I did a few power-adder mods to my car before getting headers. Intake, exhaust, and NWP block plate, specifically. Of the four mods, I/H/E/BOP, the headers were the only "holy ****" mod as far as actually being able to feel the gains.

Coupled that with a test pipe a few months later, and I picked up a ton of midrange torque.
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #12  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
SRI stands for (Short Ram Intake).....these intakes seem to work better with the VQ35 IMO, longer intakes can't flow as fast as the shorter intake.....Maybe using a 3.5"-4.0" intake tube would work I'm not sure, but I do know Injen's Intake becomes restrictive at higher rpm's cause the systems way too long! The normal theory as usual in engine breathing dynamics short for power/ long for torque!
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #13  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by CMax03
The normal theory as usual in engine breathing dynamics short for power/ long for torque!
That's the physics behind the VIAS, right? Improved low-end torque by increasing the length of the air-flow when the VIAS is closed, and then shortening the length of the air-flow with the VIAS open at high-end.

Knowing my limitations on engineering considerations like this, I'm content enough to accept the way it works, without understanding why it works.

Last edited by Rochester; Nov 26, 2010 at 12:53 PM.
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #14  
jbbons25's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 695
From: Los Angeles, CA
Found this some time ago and it may be of some help on understanding it. Makes sense to me

When the intake valve is open on the engine, air is being sucked into the engine, so the air in the intake runner is moving rapidly toward the cylinder. When the intake valve closes suddenly, this air slams to a stop and stacks up on itself, forming an area of high pressure. This high-pressure wave makes its way up the intake runner away from the cylinder. When it reaches the end of the intake runner, where the runner connects to the intake manifold, the pressure wave bounces back down the intake runner.

If the intake runner is just the right length, that pressure wave will arrive back at the intake valve just as it opens for the next cycle. This extra pressure helps cram more air-fuel mix into the cylinder -- effectively acting like a turbocharger.
source: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question517.htm
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 01:35 AM
  #15  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
I think the order in which the mods were installed have an affect of the so called results
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #16  
Cant_Get_Ryte's Avatar
Chocolate_Boi_1Der
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,588
From: P.G.'s Finest
torque steer will be an issue lol....but definitely well worth it. i have yet to set down and tune, but its plenty quick with the additions ive made. I would have to say with the 3 inch installed first it was a big difference. and then doing the headers it was another notable/pleasant difference. should have the wideband and utec installed by the 8th of next month sooooo...let you know how it goes from there. but pull the trigger you wont be disappointed.
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #17  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
I find it has less torquesteer with ES motormounts, Xmember bushing, Illuminas, and Progress springs than when it was all OEM!
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #18  
Cant_Get_Ryte's Avatar
Chocolate_Boi_1Der
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,588
From: P.G.'s Finest
havent done the mounts yet. Waiting on summer. Coiloover install will be complete then as well.
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 01:18 AM
  #19  
BoDenKai's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 210
From: Tennessee
wow so my 300WHP goal is that easy to achieve! SWEETNESS! Throw in some cams and I'm set.
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 01:33 AM
  #20  
Cant_Get_Ryte's Avatar
Chocolate_Boi_1Der
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,588
From: P.G.'s Finest
take into account driveline losses, and your not starting at 255
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 06:32 AM
  #21  
sal210's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 81
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by BoDenKai
wow so my 300WHP goal is that easy to achieve! SWEETNESS! Throw in some cams and I'm set.
300"whp", no! Maybe 250-260 whp if your lucky
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 07:00 AM
  #22  
Maxy91's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 329
From: pelham, NY
Take into account the age of your car and the amount of miles, people always seem to ignore that fact so you wont be starting from 255hp
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 07:06 AM
  #23  
95VQ30's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 605
From: St. Charles, MO
over 9000
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
Audtatious's Avatar
Bandwagon Lover
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,023
I had no torque steer with Eibachs, Illuminas, and FSTB.

A consideration when talking Injen CAI (LRI) is that the stock Maxima can boil the tires from a start as it is. Taking away some low-range power in that aspect won't hurt 1/4-mile times that much. Regardless, I found a GAB to be better than the Injen.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lowpost99
1st & 2nd Generation Maxima (1981-1984 and 1985-1988)
9
Oct 26, 2025 06:53 PM
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
fastcarny
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Oct 6, 2015 10:42 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 06:04 PM
TheMafia
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 08:26 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 AM.