4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Throttle linkage tricking us to think our VQ's are faster ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 09:02 AM
  #1  
Craig Mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Throttle linkage tricking us to think our VQ's are faster ?

I've read my share of reviews on the 95-99 Maxima. I always hear about how the Maxima has great throttle response and linkage. I've also heard that 95 Maxima's 0-60 times (stock) of 7.3-7.7.

Now, my Maxima doesn't feel like a mid 7, close 8 second car. I've been in those kinda cars, and the Maxima feels more peppy, like a low 7 second car.

Could the fact that we (automagics) have nice tight throttle cable linkage be fooling us into thinking we are going faster than we actually are
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 09:08 AM
  #2  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
That could be it. Of course, my stock auto turned 0-60 in 6.7 last week according to the G-tech...
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 09:11 AM
  #3  
Craig Mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by mzmtg
That could be it. Of course, my stock auto turned 0-60 in 6.7 last week according to the G-tech...


I need to get me one of those! Of course my dumb friends will believe it and start given my car more respect.

Any idea how Nissan made our throttle response so good ? Or are our cars really faster than the Mag's give us credit for.
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Originally posted by mzmtg
That could be it. Of course, my stock auto turned 0-60 in 6.7 last week according to the G-tech...
have you used that when you go to the 1/4 mile track? if so was it close?

thinking about hooking that thing up to my car and see what it says... you gonna be around sat?
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:08 AM
  #5  
dwapenyi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,998
Re: Throttle linkage tricking us to think our VQ's are faster ?

No, no fooling here. You ever driven those underpowered GM cars?? I had a chevy citation with the "iron duke" 4 banger. Throttle tip in repsonse was fantastic. If you only pushed the throttle 1/5 of the way, you'd swear that the engine was bigger than it was. But once you floored it, you saw there was nothing much left after that.

On the Max, throttle tip reponse is very good, and the more you push the pedal the more the car responds. The VQ motor just plain rocks.

DW

Originally posted by Craig Mack
I've read my share of reviews on the 95-99 Maxima. I always hear about how the Maxima has great throttle response and linkage. I've also heard that 95 Maxima's 0-60 times (stock) of 7.3-7.7.

Now, my Maxima doesn't feel like a mid 7, close 8 second car. I've been in those kinda cars, and the Maxima feels more peppy, like a low 7 second car.

Could the fact that we (automagics) have nice tight throttle cable linkage be fooling us into thinking we are going faster than we actually are
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:12 AM
  #6  
Craig Mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Re: Re: Throttle linkage tricking us to think our VQ's are faster ?

Originally posted by dwapenyi
No, no fooling here. You ever driven those underpowered GM cars?? I had a chevy citation with the "iron duke" 4 banger. Throttle tip in repsonse was fantastic. If you only pushed the throttle 1/5 of the way, you'd swear that the engine was bigger than it was. But once you floored it, you saw there was nothing much left after that.

On the Max, throttle tip reponse is very good, and the more you push the pedal the more the car responds. The VQ motor just plain rocks.

DW

Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:15 AM
  #7  
Vyrus's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,442
Re: Re: Throttle linkage tricking us to think our VQ's are faster ?

Originally posted by dwapenyi
If you only pushed the throttle 1/5 of the way, you'd swear that the engine was bigger than it was. But once you floored it, you saw there was nothing much left after that.

DW
Haven't you ever driven a Civic?
-Cyrus
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:27 AM
  #8  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally posted by bags533


have you used that when you go to the 1/4 mile track? if so was it close?

thinking about hooking that thing up to my car and see what it says... you gonna be around sat?
On the run I where I used the G-tech, it said I ran a 15.28@92.4mph, but the timeslip said 15.35@88.9.
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:34 AM
  #9  
Craig Mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by mzmtg


On the run I where I used the G-tech, it said I ran a 15.28@92.4mph, but the timeslip said 15.35@88.9.
I can't believe how much the cold weather is helping out. That is 5spd territory.
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:39 AM
  #10  
njmaxseltd's Avatar
Member who somehow became The President of The SE-L Club
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 16,024
Originally posted by Craig Mack

Any idea how Nissan made our throttle response so good ? Or are our cars really faster than the Mag's give us credit for.
If that was the case with throttle response, but not with our VQ's, it's the cam plate that the cable ties onto which opens the butterfly. The more radical the rise, the quicker the butterfly opens. Thus making the car feel very peppy. After that initial snap open of the butterfly, there's not much left. On our cars, there's PLENTY more power comming when you push the pedal more.
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 10:40 AM
  #11  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally posted by Craig Mack


I can't believe how much the cold weather is helping out. That is 5spd territory.
Surprised the hell out of me too. My best ET of the night was 15.25, but the there was no MPH listed on the slip, so I dont count that one. The car was launching hard as hell too. On my first run, it launched so hard the CDs came flying of the dash pocket into my lap. That never happened before...

I knew it was a good might when I found myself throwing away all the timeslips that didnt have 15.2xx on them...
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 11:02 AM
  #12  
Craig Mack's Avatar
Thread Starter
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by mzmtg


Surprised the hell out of me too. My best ET of the night was 15.25, but the there was no MPH listed on the slip, so I dont count that one. The car was launching hard as hell too. On my first run, it launched so hard the CDs came flying of the dash pocket into my lap. That never happened before...

I knew it was a good might when I found myself throwing away all the timeslips that didnt have 15.2xx on them...
Is there a certain time of year that all the mags/pro's test drive all the cars ? How can it be fair when it all depends on the weather conditions ?
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 11:05 AM
  #13  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally posted by Craig Mack


Is there a certain time of year that all the mags/pro's test drive all the cars ? How can it be fair when it all depends on the weather conditions ?
Well, I know C/D tests with a full tank of gas and then corrects the times to standard temps and conditions...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justin Kroll
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Oct 1, 2015 07:03 PM
I<3 A32's
All Motor
1
Sep 10, 2015 11:07 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:45 AM.