My car is FASTER with a stock y-pipe...WTF?!
Guest
Posts: n/a
My car is FASTER with a stock y-pipe...WTF?!
Well maybe cuz it was a Cattman 3" y-pipe...
But that shouldnt really matter much because it still had a cat and 2.5" piping + a non-straight-thru Remus muffler...
Anyway...
I sold my Cattman 3" y-pipe last week and put the stock one back on.
Now, my car feels about the same...
BUT last week (same temperature) I was running 6.5-6.6 0-60mph on the GTech...
Today I ran 6.2-6.3 0-60mph every time...
I expected my car to be slower and it's actually faster...
Before everyone comments on the accuracy of the Gtech let me say this.
(1) it may not be completely accurate, but it IS very consistent (which is what really matters when comparing before/after mods)
(2) i ran on the same stretch of flat highway in similar temperature, +/- 5 degrees.
(3) the ONLY thing i changed was the y-pipe, everything else is the same.
(4) i am comparing the averages of 6 runs on each occasion...
Now I know the y-pipe has been proven with dyno/quarter mile times, but does anyone have an explanation of this on my car?
PS: I had a check engine light with the Cattman, and i still have it with the stock y-pipe, even had the code cleared after installing the stock y-pipe and the C.E. light came right back on... The code is 3 bad O2 sensors...which should have nothing to do with full throttle acceleration anyway...
Thoughts/Comments?
But that shouldnt really matter much because it still had a cat and 2.5" piping + a non-straight-thru Remus muffler...
Anyway...
I sold my Cattman 3" y-pipe last week and put the stock one back on.
Now, my car feels about the same...
BUT last week (same temperature) I was running 6.5-6.6 0-60mph on the GTech...
Today I ran 6.2-6.3 0-60mph every time...
I expected my car to be slower and it's actually faster...
Before everyone comments on the accuracy of the Gtech let me say this.
(1) it may not be completely accurate, but it IS very consistent (which is what really matters when comparing before/after mods)
(2) i ran on the same stretch of flat highway in similar temperature, +/- 5 degrees.
(3) the ONLY thing i changed was the y-pipe, everything else is the same.
(4) i am comparing the averages of 6 runs on each occasion...
Now I know the y-pipe has been proven with dyno/quarter mile times, but does anyone have an explanation of this on my car?
PS: I had a check engine light with the Cattman, and i still have it with the stock y-pipe, even had the code cleared after installing the stock y-pipe and the C.E. light came right back on... The code is 3 bad O2 sensors...which should have nothing to do with full throttle acceleration anyway...
Thoughts/Comments?
My exhaust mechanic told me that 3" piping is way too big for a N/A car with an engine the size of the Maxima's. He said my 2.5" Y and piping he thought was still a little big but better.
I think you suffered low end loss with your Y-pipe becuase of it's diameter...but still it shouldn't be THAT bad...
Damn...I REALLY don't know what to tell you...I mean I could feel my pipe pulling me hard...you didnt' feel any of that ?
I think you suffered low end loss with your Y-pipe becuase of it's diameter...but still it shouldn't be THAT bad...
Damn...I REALLY don't know what to tell you...I mean I could feel my pipe pulling me hard...you didnt' feel any of that ?
you auto or stick? i think an auto would maybe see some 0-60 gains from a stock y pipe cuz ur not into the high end as much, and y takes a lil away from the low end especially a 3 inch. i duno dude, whats ur transmission
Guest
Posts: n/a
5-speed
Originally posted by NotNew!!NewSN!!
you auto or stick? i think an auto would maybe see some 0-60 gains from a stock y pipe cuz ur not into the high end as much, and y takes a lil away from the low end especially a 3 inch. i duno dude, whats ur transmission
you auto or stick? i think an auto would maybe see some 0-60 gains from a stock y pipe cuz ur not into the high end as much, and y takes a lil away from the low end especially a 3 inch. i duno dude, whats ur transmission
I am a man.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Craig Mack
My exhaust mechanic told me that 3" piping is way too big for a N/A car with an engine the size of the Maxima's. He said my 2.5" Y and piping he thought was still a little big but better.
My exhaust mechanic told me that 3" piping is way too big for a N/A car with an engine the size of the Maxima's. He said my 2.5" Y and piping he thought was still a little big but better.
But the only part that's 3" is the y-pipe collector!
everything else is 2.5"...
and i even have a Remus muffler (not strait-thru)...
so i dont see how i could have had too little back pressure...
3" was probably too big. But was each "downpipe" larger dia. also? If the pipes were too large, it would possibly cause a loss of exhaust velocity that wouldn't start resonating until high in the rpm range.
Guest
Posts: n/a
No...
Originally posted by Jeff92se
3" was probably too big. But was each "downpipe" larger dia. also? If the pipes were too large, it would possibly cause a loss of exhaust velocity that wouldn't start resonating until high in the rpm range.
3" was probably too big. But was each "downpipe" larger dia. also? If the pipes were too large, it would possibly cause a loss of exhaust velocity that wouldn't start resonating until high in the rpm range.
the *ONLY* difference is in the collector...
Re: No...
That might do it too. But that piece is pretty short though.
Originally posted by My 4DSC
the downpipes are the same diameter as all cattman y-pipes...
the *ONLY* difference is in the collector...
the downpipes are the same diameter as all cattman y-pipes...
the *ONLY* difference is in the collector...
My max keeps getting slower and slower as I put more and more mods on it. If it was not for the improvements made on the dyno I would yank all my mods off. I think my biggest problem now is the full second peel out on my 1-2 shift, when I was stock it was about half as long.
Originally posted by emax95
. I think my biggest problem now is the full second peel out on my 1-2 shift, when I was stock it was about half as long.
. I think my biggest problem now is the full second peel out on my 1-2 shift, when I was stock it was about half as long.
Re: My car is FASTER with a stock y-pipe...WTF?!
my only comment is..
wow.. after months and months of searching.. you finally got a stock y pipe
wow.. after months and months of searching.. you finally got a stock y pipe
Originally posted by My 4DSC
Well maybe cuz it was a Cattman 3" y-pipe...
But that shouldnt really matter much because it still had a cat and 2.5" piping + a non-straight-thru Remus muffler...
Anyway...
I sold my Cattman 3" y-pipe last week and put the stock one back on.
Now, my car feels about the same...
BUT last week (same temperature) I was running 6.5-6.6 0-60mph on the GTech...
Today I ran 6.2-6.3 0-60mph every time...
I expected my car to be slower and it's actually faster...
Before everyone comments on the accuracy of the Gtech let me say this.
(1) it may not be completely accurate, but it IS very consistent (which is what really matters when comparing before/after mods)
(2) i ran on the same stretch of flat highway in similar temperature, +/- 5 degrees.
(3) the ONLY thing i changed was the y-pipe, everything else is the same.
(4) i am comparing the averages of 6 runs on each occasion...
Now I know the y-pipe has been proven with dyno/quarter mile times, but does anyone have an explanation of this on my car?
PS: I had a check engine light with the Cattman, and i still have it with the stock y-pipe, even had the code cleared after installing the stock y-pipe and the C.E. light came right back on... The code is 3 bad O2 sensors...which should have nothing to do with full throttle acceleration anyway...
Thoughts/Comments?
Well maybe cuz it was a Cattman 3" y-pipe...
But that shouldnt really matter much because it still had a cat and 2.5" piping + a non-straight-thru Remus muffler...
Anyway...
I sold my Cattman 3" y-pipe last week and put the stock one back on.
Now, my car feels about the same...
BUT last week (same temperature) I was running 6.5-6.6 0-60mph on the GTech...
Today I ran 6.2-6.3 0-60mph every time...
I expected my car to be slower and it's actually faster...
Before everyone comments on the accuracy of the Gtech let me say this.
(1) it may not be completely accurate, but it IS very consistent (which is what really matters when comparing before/after mods)
(2) i ran on the same stretch of flat highway in similar temperature, +/- 5 degrees.
(3) the ONLY thing i changed was the y-pipe, everything else is the same.
(4) i am comparing the averages of 6 runs on each occasion...
Now I know the y-pipe has been proven with dyno/quarter mile times, but does anyone have an explanation of this on my car?
PS: I had a check engine light with the Cattman, and i still have it with the stock y-pipe, even had the code cleared after installing the stock y-pipe and the C.E. light came right back on... The code is 3 bad O2 sensors...which should have nothing to do with full throttle acceleration anyway...
Thoughts/Comments?
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Wait...so actually you are getting MORE power to the wheels, since you are spinning twice as long right? This is a good thing..you need some heavier wheels to deal with that extra power..wanna trade??
Wait...so actually you are getting MORE power to the wheels, since you are spinning twice as long right? This is a good thing..you need some heavier wheels to deal with that extra power..wanna trade??
The spinning is what kills me, when I go from first to second I get a violent tire spin session. BTW I don't really want to trade my rims
I just went out the door and did 6.13 0-60, when I was stock I did 5.96. My 1/4 mile times are a little better though and the trap speeds are up 2-3 MPH.I think my new tires need to break in a bit more too.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by emax95
My max keeps getting slower and slower as I put more and more mods on it. If it was not for the improvements made on the dyno I would yank all my mods off. I think my biggest problem now is the full second peel out on my 1-2 shift, when I was stock it was about half as long.
My max keeps getting slower and slower as I put more and more mods on it. If it was not for the improvements made on the dyno I would yank all my mods off. I think my biggest problem now is the full second peel out on my 1-2 shift, when I was stock it was about half as long.
I can't even chirp 1st!
Originally posted by My 4DSC
DAMN!
I can't even chirp 1st!
DAMN!
I can't even chirp 1st!
Ethan Hmm...you have intake and that's it performance wise, right? Possibly it's human error, but how come your slower than your stock times? Shouldn't sticky tires help your 0-60 with more grip

BTW, I thought your best time was a 5.7 ?
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Ethan Hmm...you have intake and that's it performance wise, right? Possibly it's human error, but how come your slower than your stock times? Shouldn't sticky tires help your 0-60 with more grip
BTW, I thought your best time was a 5.7 ?
Ethan Hmm...you have intake and that's it performance wise, right? Possibly it's human error, but how come your slower than your stock times? Shouldn't sticky tires help your 0-60 with more grip

BTW, I thought your best time was a 5.7 ?
With a intake I did 5.76
Check out my sig I have a RT cat and Greddy exhaust. Low profile high performance tires are not the best for launching a car hard. Low profile tires are good at taking corners but bad in aceleration. The stiff side walls do not alow the tires to flex during a hard launch, instead they tend to just spin. Cold NE weather makes summer tires not able to grip well too.
Originally posted by emax95
Stock was 5.96
With a intake I did 5.76
Check out my sig I have a RT cat and Greddy exhaust. Low profile high performance tires are not the best for launching a car hard. Low profile tires are good at taking corners but bad in aceleration. The stiff side walls do not alow the tires to flex during a hard launch, instead they tend to just spin. Cold NE weather makes summer tires not able to grip well too.
Stock was 5.96
With a intake I did 5.76
Check out my sig I have a RT cat and Greddy exhaust. Low profile high performance tires are not the best for launching a car hard. Low profile tires are good at taking corners but bad in aceleration. The stiff side walls do not alow the tires to flex during a hard launch, instead they tend to just spin. Cold NE weather makes summer tires not able to grip well too.
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Makes sense...so my less expensive H-rated will be better for launchin....save money and be faster...sweetness.
Makes sense...so my less expensive H-rated will be better for launchin....save money and be faster...sweetness.
.
Originally posted by emax95
Your tires might grip better in the cold but summer tires offer the most grip in the summer : .
Your tires might grip better in the cold but summer tires offer the most grip in the summer : .
.. it's friggen 80 degrees and humid as a **** right now..i'm already gettin my tan on..My tires are soo soft they practically melt into the road
Hell...I could probubly even beat JOO off the line if you came down here to race me.
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Bro here in Florida it is ALWAYS summer
.. it's friggen 80 degrees and humid as a **** right now..i'm already gettin my tan on..
My tires are soo soft they practically melt into the road
Hell...I could probubly even beat JOO off the line if you came down here to race me.
Bro here in Florida it is ALWAYS summer
.. it's friggen 80 degrees and humid as a **** right now..i'm already gettin my tan on..My tires are soo soft they practically melt into the road
Hell...I could probubly even beat JOO off the line if you came down here to race me.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lakersallday24
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
10
Jun 16, 2019 01:35 AM
jskirwin
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
7
Jun 8, 2016 08:49 AM
MAXSE5SPD
Other For Sale/Wanted
2
Aug 23, 2015 12:06 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM




