General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Stock VE 5-speed dyno.... (pic)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2002 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,851
From: Burbank, CA
Stock VE 5-speed dyno.... (pic)

For anyone that is interested....

Click me

No power mods, stock wheels, etc.

Old May 20, 2002 | 04:55 PM
  #2  
Bryan H's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
hmm, wowies
nice rough line
hehehe

new plugs and timing advance will do wonders.
Old May 20, 2002 | 05:35 PM
  #3  
DaBoxSE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,525
anyone have a stock VG 5 speed dyno chart? it would be very lovely.
Old May 20, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #4  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Old May 20, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #5  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,851
From: Burbank, CA
Originally posted by Bryan H
hmm, wowies
nice rough line
hehehe

new plugs and timing advance will do wonders.
Yeah, and I have to clean out the TB. I'm sure it's pretty bad in there.

Old May 20, 2002 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
Bryan H's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
actually, this is wierd

the lines on my old ve looked about the same, put a new alternator on. smoothed right out. once of the smoothest i have ever seen actually

this was also at the same time i did the tb boring and port matching. so who knows.
Old May 20, 2002 | 06:34 PM
  #7  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,851
From: Burbank, CA
Strange. Well I'm going to do a ton of regular maint. stuff before I dyno again, or mod.

Belts
Plugs
Fuel filter
Clean TB
etc.

Old May 20, 2002 | 06:37 PM
  #8  
Bryan H's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
dump the a/c belt
timing mod

remove the silencer. helps even with the stock air box
plugs, and other funky things should be closer to 170
Old May 20, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #9  
MaDMaX024's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,106
Originally posted by Bryan H
dump the a/c belt
timing mod

remove the silencer. helps even with the stock air box
plugs, and other funky things should be closer to 170
hmm...bryan, did your VE ever have a situation where around redline, the lights would dim? mine does it...i thought it would've changed when i installed a new belt, but its just the same...alternator?
Old May 20, 2002 | 07:53 PM
  #10  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
Very nice baseline.
Old May 21, 2002 | 12:50 AM
  #11  
Turbo95Max's Avatar
Turtle turtle... Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,857
From: San Bruno, Petaluma, SF Bay area
Hey Randy

try a 4th gear pull next time! heeh
Old May 21, 2002 | 12:45 PM
  #12  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,851
From: Burbank, CA
Originally posted by Turbo95Max
Hey Randy

try a 4th gear pull next time! heeh
Doh! I should have had them do one for the last pull, just for fun.

Old May 21, 2002 | 01:00 PM
  #13  
DA-MAX's Avatar
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,978
Originally posted by DaBoxSE
anyone have a stock VG 5 speed dyno chart? it would be very lovely.
I haven't seen a 5spd but I've seen a "baaically" stock auto(except for 2.5" catback)...Hojo put down 127hp in his so you know the 5spd is probably in the mid/upper 130s if not 140s I guess!
Old May 21, 2002 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
Bryan H's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
sounds like the belt is slipping on the alternator causing high end power loss IE: lights going dim or flashing

might try tightening the belt or just putting a new alternator on.
Old May 21, 2002 | 05:11 PM
  #15  
DaBoxSE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,525
Originally posted by DA-MAX


I haven't seen a 5spd but I've seen a "baaically" stock auto(except for 2.5" catback)...Hojo put down 127hp in his so you know the 5spd is probably in the mid/upper 130s if not 140s I guess!
I got 138 on a G-Tech
Old May 21, 2002 | 06:33 PM
  #16  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Not to sound like an a$$ nor am I trying to start another VE vs VQ thread, but I have still yet to see this "mad" topend power of the VE. All I'm seeing here is that the VE peaks at 5700rpms vs the VQ's 5400 peak. Everyone with a VE proclaims this motor pulls hard to redline (6500). What I'm seeing here is a motor that only pulls to 5700 and then starts to fall quite dramatically after 6000.

BTW, don't tell me that adding a Y-pipe/intake/exhaust/etc will increase peak power rpm because it doesn't. The only way to increase peak power rpm is to rework the intake manifold/cam/heads.


Dave
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:13 PM
  #17  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
I guess you would have to drive one to see what everyone is talking about. I quote Brian V on this, he drives a 97 SE 5 speed with every mod possible and a S/C. He drove the bone stock VE 5 speed. "Man this thing has mad top end, it should be able to hang with, if not beat pretty much any VQ 5 speed." Please, no more VE vs. VQ Lets kill it now.
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:29 PM
  #18  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
My modded ve pulls right into the rpm cutoff. I actually hit the rev limiter all the time because it doesn't feel like it's run out of breath. I raced a stock 5-sp VQ w/ 17" rims. He would get the jump but he would have to shift earlier than me.


Originally posted by Dave B
Not to sound like an a$$ nor am I trying to start another VE vs VQ thread, but I have still yet to see this "mad" topend power of the VE. All I'm seeing here is that the VE peaks at 5700rpms vs the VQ's 5400 peak. Everyone with a VE proclaims this motor pulls hard to redline (6500). What I'm seeing here is a motor that only pulls to 5700 and then starts to fall quite dramatically after 6000.

BTW, don't tell me that adding a Y-pipe/intake/exhaust/etc will increase peak power rpm because it doesn't. The only way to increase peak power rpm is to rework the intake manifold/cam/heads.


Dave
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:39 PM
  #19  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
So what was the outcome? geeez....you leave us in suspense. SHAME ON YOU!
Old May 21, 2002 | 08:48 PM
  #20  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally posted by Jeff92se
My modded ve pulls right into the rpm cutoff. I actually hit the rev limiter all the time because it doesn't feel like it's run out of breath. I raced a stock 5-sp VQ w/ 17" rims. He would get the jump but he would have to shift earlier than me.


My VQ pulls right to redline with no problem. My calculated shift points are: 1-2 6500, 2-3 6200, and 3-4 6000 which shows that the VQ is really no slouch on the top end. I was just trying to point out that the VE only breathes about 200rpms longer than the VQ. IMO, that's not proof that this machine is truely superior in the topend. I dare that the VE seems to die off quicker after peak power than the VQ does.

I'll drop it right here so that a worthless thread doesn't get started.


Dave
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:26 PM
  #21  
DA-MAX's Avatar
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,978
Originally posted by DaBoxSE
I got 138 on a G-Tech
damn, sounds like I'm about right then...
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:53 PM
  #22  
PATRICK94SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 886
Originally posted by Dave B
BTW, The only way to increase peak power rpm is to rework the intake manifold/cam/heads.
Dave
We add the I/Y/E.....Ve takes care of the Manifold and cams
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #23  
PATRICK94SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 886
And to throw my 2 cents into the whole what engine is better argument I would say the VE sucks in stock form. It's fairly inefficient stock. However therefore it responds amazingly to mods that make it more efficient. An inefficient engine that makes 190 hp has some Bad A$$ potential
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:25 PM
  #24  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
Bah.. my auto VG dyno'd 135 with intake and Y pipe.

Dave, I'll let you drive my VE next time I'm in KC. you'll see what we're talking about.
smooth, almost constant acceleration from about 2500rpm to redline.
Old May 23, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #25  
Bryan H's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 886
dave, here is a scenerio for ya, since you were there when it happened

comming back from a car show in KS that i was at with ya when i had my max {where you beat me at}

on the freeway, we were even in second gear, hit third and i walked away, you had the same mods you do now, except you had the hks muffler then.

also on 95th street when i first met ya.

ahhhh the memories of the good ole days.
Old May 23, 2002 | 02:39 PM
  #26  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally posted by Bryan H
dave, here is a scenerio for ya, since you were there when it happened

comming back from a car show in KS that i was at with ya when i had my max {where you beat me at}

on the freeway, we were even in second gear, hit third and i walked away, you had the same mods you do now, except you had the hks muffler then.

also on 95th street when i first met ya.

ahhhh the memories of the good ole days.
Nice try Fruitcake, but at the time (car show and when I met you) my only mods were the HKS intake and muffler and my heavy 17" Locos. Now I've got a Y-pipe, b-pipe, UDP, and a wheel tire combo that's 8lbs lighter. My 70mph+ acceleration is far better than it was back in 99

Matt-
Next time I see you I'll let you drive my VQ. Of course it will have the VI by then and it will pull strongly to redline Jeff's edit:::*bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* *bleepity bleep* hehe

Dave
Old May 23, 2002 | 02:44 PM
  #27  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
Too bad the VI for the VQ will not perform as efficient as the stock VE's. I hear they are wired into a rpm switch?
Old May 23, 2002 | 02:46 PM
  #28  
Craig Mack's Avatar
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Jeff92se
. He would get the jump

Ahh the beauty of torque Jeffrey.

chicks and car dummy's think your car is fast if it "pushes you back into the seat" off the line...with the VQ our little V6's give them that, AND the enthusiasts highway power.
Old May 23, 2002 | 02:49 PM
  #29  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
No the beauty of my crap Nissan Key value clutch kit that was so weak, it wasn't even strong enough to hold my near stock VE power. WE actually went from stop but I couldn't push it. So he would pull away. But by the middle of 3rd I was back even and starting to pull. Then we had to shut down. I had the Y and intake I think. He was 100% stock but with some 17" Borbets.

Originally posted by Craig Mack


Ahh the beauty of torque Jeffrey.

chicks and car dummy's think your car is fast if it "pushes you back into the seat"...with the VQ our little V6's give them that, AND the enthusiasts highway power.
Old May 23, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #30  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,851
From: Burbank, CA
My poor poor thread.



Old May 23, 2002 | 06:42 PM
  #31  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
why don't you guys take some VEs AND VQs, go ROMP on some camrys, and stop arguing about which MAXIMA is faster....it's not nice to pick on your own family
Old May 23, 2002 | 07:44 PM
  #32  
Craig Mack's Avatar
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by Lordrandall
My poor poor thread.



You can thank mr. Dave for gettin everyone rieled up again.
Old May 23, 2002 | 08:24 PM
  #33  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally posted by dmontzmax
Too bad the VI for the VQ will not perform as efficient as the stock VE's. I hear they are wired into a rpm switch?
Have you looked at the VI dynos? The motor pretty much carrys the peak power from 5800rpms ALL the way too 6500rpms I wish there were a few VEs in our Kansas City group. Unforunately the only guy we have is Matt93SE and he'll be turboed soon. Maybe BryanH will get another VE Seriously, I do have a lot of respect for the VE. It's a sweet motor in a very nice body. I just don't see how people swear this motor is such the topend performer when the dyno plots (not just this one) show the motor dying off after 5700-5800rpms. IMO, "pulling strongly" to the 6500rpm redline means the motor is continuing to make power to near redline, not 5700-5800rpms.


Dave
Old May 23, 2002 | 09:16 PM
  #34  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
why don't you guys take some VEs AND VQs, go ROMP on some camrys, and stop arguing about which MAXIMA is faster....it's not nice to pick on your own family
I hear ya! It is pretty stupid, because just by looking at the dynos, the 2 motors are sooo similar, we have to start talking about them with mods, and doing this and this...STOCK for STOCK THEY ARE JUST ABOUT INDETICAL, WITH SOME MINOR DIFF...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James92SE
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
142
Jan 2, 2024 09:23 AM
9aj9
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
5
Apr 5, 2020 12:11 AM
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
bumpypickle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Sep 20, 2015 08:22 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 AM.