z32 maf
#3
So then how can i get my car to recognize the extra air coming through? I know the question has probably been answered many times before, but at what pressure does the stock maf stop reading air? Imean at how much boost or HP?
#5
Originally Posted by Redmax
So then how can i get my car to recognize the extra air coming through? I know the question has probably been answered many times before, but at what pressure does the stock maf stop reading air? Imean at how much boost or HP?
If you are doing what most people do and go with a boost pressure referenced system (i.e. fmu) then the question is moot. With an fmu you use the maf only for NA operation and provide extra fuel when boosting by increasing the fuel pressure. In such cases the maf is maxed out, or pretty close to it.
A Z32 maf can measure flowrate good for 420 bhp. Z32 owners making more than that who want to keep a flowrate based system do things like split the intake air into two paths with two filters, and a maf in one tract and a dummy maf in the other. So they are measuring half the flowrate, and their ecu is programmed to double that number when calculating injector pulse width.
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
The z32 MAF is good for 500HP. They had this in SCC, they put it in a s13 drift car. It was between the cobra MAF, 350hp and the 300zx maf. REDMAX please reduce your sig pic. It's too damn big and if there was something good to look at it would be fine, but...
#8
Originally Posted by ivelweyz
The z32 MAF is good for 500HP. They had this in SCC, they put it in a s13 drift car. It was between the cobra MAF, 350hp and the 300zx maf. REDMAX please reduce your sig pic. It's too damn big and if there was something good to look at it would be fine, but...
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
OK here you go, june 2003 issue, page 218 and I quote
"The stock airflow meter(sr20) is only capable of 280 flywheel hp before it reaches its maximum voltage. JIM WOLF TECHNOLOGY can substitute either a FORD MUSTAN COBRA meter for up to 350hp, or a 300ZX meter for more than 500hp."...
"The stock airflow meter(sr20) is only capable of 280 flywheel hp before it reaches its maximum voltage. JIM WOLF TECHNOLOGY can substitute either a FORD MUSTAN COBRA meter for up to 350hp, or a 300ZX meter for more than 500hp."...
#11
Originally Posted by ivelweyz
Are you really interested or are you calling BS on what I said?
chill out man.....Stephen is a really cool guy
and very technical too.....he just needs to know where you get that information....nothing personal.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by [maxi-overdose]
chill out man.....Stephen is a really cool guy
and very technical too.....he just needs to know where you get that information....nothing personal.
and very technical too.....he just needs to know where you get that information....nothing personal.
#14
Originally Posted by ivelweyz
Are you really interested or are you calling BS on what I said? The issue is in my car, I'll get it if you want. It's from earlier this year...
No, I believe you, I am genuinely interested in what they did and how they tested it.
The 420 bhp number was quoted to me by JWT, but that may be based on 370 cc/min injectors maxed out at a 100% duty cycle, and not a cfm limit imposed by the Z32 maf. That's what I'm trying to figure out.
#16
Im looking for ~ 540bhp off the Z-MAF, JWT ECU, 516cc injectors, 95%duty cycle, .60bsfc. But i guess 500bhp would be ok too its been 15 weeks now waiting on JWT, they have a problem with the large injector cold start up porgram, it runs like crap till it warms up. According to JWT only two others have the 555cc program and they both have the same problem, thanks to Loren and Ferhan (I think) for working this out.
#19
Originally Posted by spanishrice
What car has 516cc injectors? Is this on the 3.5 swap. Are you keeping the 3.0 block and throwing some of the internals from the 3.5 in your engine?
#20
Originally Posted by MardiGrasMax
BTW, Z-maf can meter 520bhp MAX according to Ben.
Anyway, that makes more sense, since I dyno'd last week at 285 hp and the safc said that the maf flow was at about 55%. 285/.55 = 518 hp, so there ya go.
#21
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Huh. It was Ben that gave me the 420 hp number. He must have been talking about maxed out 370 cc/min injectors, not the maf. Or maybe he did say 520 and I heard 420. Or he said 420 and meant 520.
Anyway, that makes more sense, since I dyno'd last week at 285 hp and the safc said that the maf flow was at about 55%. 285/.55 = 518 hp, so there ya go.
Anyway, that makes more sense, since I dyno'd last week at 285 hp and the safc said that the maf flow was at about 55%. 285/.55 = 518 hp, so there ya go.
#22
You're planning on running more then 3bar of fuel pressure then, right?
At 3bar:
516/10.5*0.95/0.60*6=~467bhp
For 540bhp, you'd need:
540*0.60/6/0.95*10.5=~597cc
So, to get 597cc from injectors that flow 516cc@3bar, you'd need:
(597/516)^2*43.5=~59.2psi
You're going to have to run a boost reference setup w/JWT ECU to supply the necessary fuel, since the JWT ECU "cold start up" program definitely couldn't handle the larger injectors when running at 60psi fuel pressure.
At 3bar:
516/10.5*0.95/0.60*6=~467bhp
For 540bhp, you'd need:
540*0.60/6/0.95*10.5=~597cc
So, to get 597cc from injectors that flow 516cc@3bar, you'd need:
(597/516)^2*43.5=~59.2psi
You're going to have to run a boost reference setup w/JWT ECU to supply the necessary fuel, since the JWT ECU "cold start up" program definitely couldn't handle the larger injectors when running at 60psi fuel pressure.
Originally Posted by MardiGrasMax
Im looking for ~ 540bhp off the Z-MAF, JWT ECU, 516cc injectors, 95%duty cycle, .60bsfc. But i guess 500bhp would be ok too its been 15 weeks now waiting on JWT, they have a problem with the large injector cold start up porgram, it runs like crap till it warms up. According to JWT only two others have the 555cc program and they both have the same problem, thanks to Loren and Ferhan (I think) for working this out.
#23
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
You're planning on running more then 3bar of fuel pressure then, right?
At 3bar:
516/10.5*0.95/0.60*6=~467bhp
For 540bhp, you'd need:
540*0.60/6/0.95*10.5=~597cc
So, to get 597cc from injectors that flow 516cc@3bar, you'd need:
(597/516)^2*43.5=~59.2psi
You're going to have to run a boost reference setup w/JWT ECU to supply the necessary fuel, since the JWT ECU "cold start up" program definitely couldn't handle the larger injectors when running at 60psi fuel pressure.
At 3bar:
516/10.5*0.95/0.60*6=~467bhp
For 540bhp, you'd need:
540*0.60/6/0.95*10.5=~597cc
So, to get 597cc from injectors that flow 516cc@3bar, you'd need:
(597/516)^2*43.5=~59.2psi
You're going to have to run a boost reference setup w/JWT ECU to supply the necessary fuel, since the JWT ECU "cold start up" program definitely couldn't handle the larger injectors when running at 60psi fuel pressure.
Dumba** the factory FPR is 1:1
#25
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Why doesn't someone just come up with a MAP conversion kit and be done with it??
#26
Oh darn 500hp so what am I gonna do when I start my engine buildup on my maxima cause with all the stuff I have im looking at probably 600hp. How about a Q45 MAF. Cause im not even gonna mess with standalone. Well maybe I can try something with the greddy.
#27
Originally Posted by desertmaxima
Oh darn 500hp so what am I gonna do when I start my engine buildup on my maxima cause with all the stuff I have im looking at probably 600hp. How about a Q45 MAF. Cause im not even gonna mess with standalone. Well maybe I can try something with the greddy.
#28
Originally Posted by DA-MAX
IMO shoot for 450-500hp...cause you'll probably be disapointed when you don't hit 600(cause I doubt you will)
#30
Yea since im gonna be in Iraq longer now I can go ahead and get a wet setup when I get home and sell the dry thats on it now then just use that when I finish the motor. And thank uncle sam for keeping me in the army just that much longer so now I can finish the motor sooner than I thought yes I just love this place
#32
well the issue for me is that since i have a 99 I can not go witht the jwt setup which will allow for the z32 maf. So i will need something to meter the amount of air that the turbo is putting out. the way it is done with the emanage is through using a map signal which will be better used for our cars. I am trying to use the things that i currently have(safcII) without having to go out and buy the emanage.
Oh and Ively wise Kiss my a s s!!!
Oh and Ively wise Kiss my a s s!!!
#33
IMO and the concensus you'll find around the net...if you're going for big power you can pretty much toss the AFC idea...it'll only go so far "safely"...you better start reading up on Emanage cause that looks like your only option.
Originally Posted by Redmax
I am trying to use the things that i currently have(safcII) without having to go out and buy the emanage.
#34
Man...what a d!ck(like usual).
Hmmmmnnn...didn't know that, since I posted about the Holley 1:1 FPR and someone else posted about the Aeromotive 1:1 FPR without anyone mentioning it.
Hmmmmnnn...didn't know that, since I posted about the Holley 1:1 FPR and someone else posted about the Aeromotive 1:1 FPR without anyone mentioning it.
Originally Posted by MardiGrasMax
DURRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dumba** the factory FPR is 1:1
Dumba** the factory FPR is 1:1
#35
That's what I *THINK* Mardi is saying and if you check my NEW thread, I posted a website that agrees.
Sounds like we're the ONLY two "dumbass" that don't know that.
Sounds like we're the ONLY two "dumbass" that don't know that.
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
I'm not understanding something here. Doesn't a 1:1 ratio mean that the fpr increases fuel pressure by 1 psi for every psi of boost? I didn't think the factory fpr responded to boost pressure at all, rather you got maximum fuel pressure at zero vacuum. Or are you talking about something else?
#36
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
That's what I *THINK* Mardi is saying and if you check my NEW thread, I posted a website that agrees.
Sounds like we're the ONLY two "dumbass" that don't know that.
Sounds like we're the ONLY two "dumbass" that don't know that.
#37
Don't you see that on your Fuel Pressure gauge under boost?
You should see it rise from 43.5psi-->~54+psi at redline, right?
You should see it rise from 43.5psi-->~54+psi at redline, right?
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Dang! I tried to delete my post before anybody quoted it, but it was too late. I just talked to Ben at JWT, he said the oem fpr does indeed respond to boost, too.
#38
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Don't you see that on your Fuel Pressure gauge under boost?
You should see it rise from 43.5psi-->~54+psi at redline, right?
You should see it rise from 43.5psi-->~54+psi at redline, right?
You know, I don't think I have ever checked because I'm too busy looking at EGT and boost gauges while trying to keep one eye on the tach and a third eye on the road ahead, all the while with my fuel injector duty cycle meter trying to distract me with all the green and amber LEDs. I just assumed the fuel pressure stayed at 43 psi. I'm going to have to take a copilot along to read the fuel pressure gauge.
Of course, it is an easy matter to just connect the fpr to the pressure side of a Mityvac. I'll do that tonight.
#39
Buwahahahaha....too much fun.
Good idea on the Mityvac.
Also, do you have a MM that measures duty cycle? If so, I'd like to see if you can verify your DC meter is measuring the same thing.
Good idea on the Mityvac.
Also, do you have a MM that measures duty cycle? If so, I'd like to see if you can verify your DC meter is measuring the same thing.
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
You know, I don't think I have ever checked because I'm too busy looking at EGT and boost gauges while trying to keep one eye on the tach and a third eye on the road ahead, all the while with my fuel injector duty cycle meter trying to distract me with all the green and amber LEDs. I just assumed the fuel pressure stayed at 43 psi. I'm going to have to take a copilot along to read the fuel pressure gauge.
Of course, it is an easy matter to just connect the fpr to the pressure side of a Mityvac. I'll do that tonight.
Of course, it is an easy matter to just connect the fpr to the pressure side of a Mityvac. I'll do that tonight.
#40
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Also, do you have a MM that measures duty cycle? If so, I'd like to see if you can verify your DC meter is measuring the same thing.
Back when I had the 240 cc/min injectors and A32 maf I saw the duty cycle go up to 90-100%, which is consistent with the air flow going above what the maf could handle.