Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

Couple quick questions about my SC 3.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2010, 05:05 PM
  #1  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Couple quick questions about my SC 3.5

I really didn't want to post a new thread, but since this is still a fairly rare thing to do I'm having a hard time getting the answers I need.

I currently am running a 10psi (3.25) pulley on a V2 setup on my 3.5 with a walbro 255, DE-k injectors, FPR/FMU and I have a couple issues.

First: The car is starting to run lean about 4500-5000rpm. I first thought that I might be maxing out either the injectors or the MAF. Based on the output from the VAFC, the "pressure" reading seemed to stop in that area (hence my thought the MAF was maxed out). I just installed my Z32 MAF, haven't had a chance to take the car out due to family stuff today.

Second: I was reading over several threads to see whether or not my injectors can support the 10psi or not. I know it isn't ideal, and the pressures are getting up to the 75psi range, but from what I can tell they should support 10psi at that fuel pressure. I was wondering if maxing out the MAF would cause the lean condition or if it was truly a combination of undersized injectors and maxed out MAF.

This last part might be a "duh" question, but I'll go ahead and ask anyways. By changing my VAFC settings to go from the Z32 MAF to A32 MAF, will that help with a maxed out MAF? I mean, if it's using a voltage interpolation between the two, am I actually gaining the ability to meter more air to the motor?
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:10 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
streetzlegend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,097
You already gained the ability to gain more air by putting the z32, so no need to go with a32 settings. (unless i didnt understand your question)

It is possible that you were running lean because of maxed out maf, once the maf no longer reading higher voltage, then anything above that max airflow is not going to be taken into account by the ECU, therefore no additional fuel would be provided. However, even if a maf is maxed out, you can still add corrections ontop of it, now you have a z32 so thats good. As far as injectors, I really dont know, but just dont try to test your luck with small injectors, id get bigger asap.
streetzlegend is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
JAMAICANLOVRBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: beltsville MD
Posts: 712
i have six toyota 370cc injectors (i went 440cc), they are side feed not sure if they would work for you, but you never know
JAMAICANLOVRBOY is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:44 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
aic96max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami , FL
Posts: 1,372
this site helps at times

http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.php4

looks like 290 ccs will be at 100% duty cycle at about 275 flywheel hp, so if your not maxing them out, then you arent making the power. excessive psi will help run that number up a little. another way to help add fuel is meth injection. id also recommend injectors asap
aic96max is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 07:58 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
MaximaSpd85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 2,637
^whats that mean? the injectors max out at 275 flywheel hp? almost all modded 5.5 gens make way more than that on stock 3.5 injectors so i dont see that. or maybe i understand that wrong...
MaximaSpd85 is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:42 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
aic96max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami , FL
Posts: 1,372
Originally Posted by MaximaSpd85
^whats that mean? the injectors max out at 275 flywheel hp? almost all modded 5.5 gens make way more than that on stock 3.5 injectors so i dont see that. or maybe i understand that wrong...
check the link, injector size is calculated diff for na, sc, turbo.. diff *

* Brake Specific Fuel Consumption: is the amount of fuel consumed (in lbs. per hour) for each horsepower made. This should be .45 to .50 for naturally aspirated engines, .55 to .60 for supercharged engines, and .60 to .65 for turbocharged engines.

as used on this calculator for an na car @ 100% duty 290s can in theory be maxed out arouund 350 flywheel, and usually its recommended to run 80% duty max

"way more" ???

Last edited by aic96max; 11-24-2010 at 08:49 PM.
aic96max is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:47 PM
  #7  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by aic96max
check the link, injector size is calculated diff for na, sc, turbo.. diff *

* Brake Specific Fuel Consumption: is the amount of fuel consumed (in lbs. per hour) for each horsepower made. This should be .45 to .50 for naturally aspirated engines, .55 to .60 for supercharged engines, and .60 to .65 for turbocharged engines.

as used on this calculator for an na car @ 100% duty 290s can in theory be maxed out arouund 350 flywheel, and usually its recommended to run 80% duty max
Yeah, but that is based off static fuel pressure of 3.0 bar, when you're running a FMU and raising the pressure to roughly 75psi, things change...

If you use the CC rating at a given pressure (295cc@43.5psi) then put it into the lower formula on the page at the peak fuel pressure it will give you a more accurate idea of what CC's the injectors are flowing at that point...

You had the right idea aic996max, you just forgot about the other part of the equation.

My fuel setup can basically handle 360chp, and at 10psi I'm either very close or surpassing that mark... edit: I should be well beyond that (was thinking wheel HP) or i will be disappointed...

Last edited by Mad-MAX_SE; 11-24-2010 at 08:58 PM.
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:55 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
aic96max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami , FL
Posts: 1,372
Originally Posted by Mad-MAX_SE
Yeah, but that is based off static fuel pressure of 3.0 bar, when you're running a FMU and raising the pressure to roughly 75psi, things change...

If you use the CC rating at a given pressure (295cc@43.5psi) then put it into the lower formula on the page at the peak fuel pressure it will give you a more accurate idea of what CC's the injectors are flowing at that point...
this is a well known fact, i have seen people run crazy psi, via fmu, i guess log with the new maf and take it from there. have you gone through dynos and seen where others runs these out?
aic96max is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 08:57 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
MaximaSpd85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 2,637
Originally Posted by aic96max
check the link, injector size is calculated diff for na, sc, turbo.. diff *

* Brake Specific Fuel Consumption: is the amount of fuel consumed (in lbs. per hour) for each horsepower made. This should be .45 to .50 for naturally aspirated engines, .55 to .60 for supercharged engines, and .60 to .65 for turbocharged engines.

as used on this calculator for an na car @ 100% duty 290s can in theory be maxed out arouund 350 flywheel, and usually its recommended to run 80% duty max

"way more" ???
dang it, i overlooked that asterisk for the n/a guys lol. my bad

way more? idk, i figured theres a lot of modded guys at 250 whp or more, thats a bit more than 275 flywheel hp. fine, not way more, but more for sure.
MaximaSpd85 is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:01 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
aic96max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami , FL
Posts: 1,372
Originally Posted by Mad-MAX_SE
Yeah, but that is based off static fuel pressure of 3.0 bar, when you're running a FMU and raising the pressure to roughly 75psi, things change...

If you use the CC rating at a given pressure (295cc@43.5psi) then put it into the lower formula on the page at the peak fuel pressure it will give you a more accurate idea of what CC's the injectors are flowing at that point...

You had the right idea aic996max, you just forgot about the other part of the equation.

My fuel setup can basically handle 360chp, and at 10psi I'm either very close or surpassing that mark... edit: I should be well beyond that (was thinking wheel HP) or i will be disappointed...

youre right, forgot to that part. looks like it says 370 @ 75 psi and 100% duty cycle. thats flywheel hp. not sure about sc, but i know a tc 3.5 makes that kinda power @ 5 psi so you may be there, let us know how the logs look, bc based off what streetz has mention iirc thats about when the stock maf gives out also.

Last edited by aic96max; 11-24-2010 at 09:03 PM.
aic96max is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:05 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
aic96max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami , FL
Posts: 1,372
Originally Posted by MaximaSpd85
dang it, i overlooked that asterisk for the n/a guys lol. my bad

way more? idk, i figured theres a lot of modded guys at 250 whp or more, thats a bit more than 275 flywheel hp. fine, not way more, but more for sure.
yea i heard one dude running 290 whp so yeah they def have more in there for na
aic96max is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:52 PM
  #12  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by aic96max
youre right, forgot to that part. looks like it says 370 @ 75 psi and 100% duty cycle. thats flywheel hp. not sure about sc, but i know a tc 3.5 makes that kinda power @ 5 psi so you may be there, let us know how the logs look, bc based off what streetz has mention iirc thats about when the stock maf gives out also.
I guess the ideal injector size would be in the 440-500cc range. 440's are readily available, however, the next size up I have been able to find is roughly 600cc's. I honestly think that might be overkill. I know that in the past, using 510's with a Z32 MAF basically got rid of the need for a FPR cause of how close it is to double everything stock on the 3.0's. 600's would allow me to lower my FP to like 30psi and lower my rise rate to about 2:1 versus the 5-6:1 I have it set to now. 440's are still more than adequate, just requiring a slightly higher gain and a little bit higher base FP. My concern is what kind of HP is the car putting out. Meximax's car put out 440+whp @13psi on his setup. I would venture to say that I should put out somewhere in the 350-370whp range @10psi (if not slightly more) which correlates to approx 450ish chp. The 600's would really only need a FPR to maintain that (assuming it can handle a 1:1 rise rate with boost). A FMU would help in allowing the base fuel pressure to be lowered and still build enough pressure (roughly 55psi for ~475chp @ 80% DC, 65psi for 70% DC) for the top end.

Guess, going by that logic, not only are my injectors maxed out, but i need ones twice the size to even be safely on track...
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-24-2010, 09:58 PM
  #13  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
This project is getting really freaking expensive at the end...
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 06:12 AM
  #14  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (24)
 
nismomaxct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sagamore Beach, MA
Posts: 694
Originally Posted by Mad-MAX_SE
This project is getting really freaking expensive at the end...
Welcome to the world of boost. Everything ends up costing much more than expected. I might have a set of 440cc's for sale. I will know more tomorrow.
nismomaxct is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 08:29 AM
  #15  
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 7,796
If your lookinh to make over 400hp then just get some 600cc injectors and ditch the fmu
t6378tp is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 08:31 AM
  #16  
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 7,796
Forgot to add sc setups require more fuel than tc setups at the same power level due to the extra hp needed to spin the sc
t6378tp is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 09:15 AM
  #17  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by nismomaxct
Welcome to the world of boost. Everything ends up costing much more than expected. I might have a set of 440cc's for sale. I will know more tomorrow.
let me know
Originally Posted by t6378tp
If your lookinh to make over 400hp then just get some 600cc injectors and ditch the fmu
I'm hoping to make about 350-375hp. Based on the calculator, I'll still need a FMU to keep the duty cycle down on the injectors (and being that my FMU is built into my FPR, that it isn't an issue).
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 10:06 AM
  #18  
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
t6378tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 7,796
You won't have duty cycle issues with 440 or 600's with a 1-1 rate

Forcing smaller injectors to spray more fuel by increasing the fuel psi is not the ideal way to make power
t6378tp is offline  
Old 11-25-2010, 09:31 PM
  #19  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by t6378tp
You won't have duty cycle issues with 440 or 600's with a 1-1 rate

Forcing smaller injectors to spray more fuel by increasing the fuel psi is not the ideal way to make power

Yeah, i know. I'm thinking 440's will probably be adequate. Meximax was using 440's and pulled over 400whp. He had some leaning out in the upper RPM's at ~65psi of FP, but I'm not pushing 13psi like he was/is and don't mind running ~70ish psi of FP.

Hoping Nismomaxct will get back with me about his injectors. If not, I'm going to go with some new Deatchwerks 440's, since the price is pretty reasonable and it's a company I know has great products.

Only part that kinda sucks is I'm going to have to hold off on an EU for now. I can afford one or the other before I go to the dyno on December 11th, just not both... Hoping I can talk NCSU_Max into letting me borrow his EU till after Christmas (and buying the boost and AF option wires...) till I can get my own.
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 11-27-2010, 10:07 AM
  #20  
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
mastercater7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 823
Welcome to the S/C 3.5 world, it is definitely not a cheap setup to maintain. I would recommend going with the Deatschwerks 600's, that's what I am running. I also have an AFPR instead of an FMU, I have never used an FMU but I will say that when tuning the AFPR is a great piece to have. I keep my fuel pressure at 43.5 at idle and everything stays in line through the rpms. I am also running the 2.87 pulley. Are you running a 3.0 idler pulley or a 3.5 idler?
mastercater7 is offline  
Old 11-27-2010, 10:35 AM
  #21  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Originally Posted by mastercater7
Welcome to the S/C 3.5 world, it is definitely not a cheap setup to maintain. I would recommend going with the Deatschwerks 600's, that's what I am running. I also have an AFPR instead of an FMU, I have never used an FMU but I will say that when tuning the AFPR is a great piece to have. I keep my fuel pressure at 43.5 at idle and everything stays in line through the rpms. I am also running the 2.87 pulley. Are you running a 3.0 idler pulley or a 3.5 idler?
I'm not currently planning on going above 10psi (3.25 pulley) with this motor just yet (stock head/rod bolts). It's already a handful at 8psi (since I can't really red-line the motor until I get bigger injectors...) so I think 440's should be fine for now. I have an AFPR, it's a rail mounted unit by Synapse that has an integrated FMU. It has a simple adjustment **** that allows for fine tuning from 2:1 - 12:1 rise rates (or disconnect its vacuum source and it's 1:1) and can adjust static FP from 20-100psi.

As far as the idler (I think you mean tensioner...), I'm running a 3.0 tensioner.
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 12-03-2010, 11:01 AM
  #22  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Update:

I just got in some 530cc injectors, and have a few questions still. I tried setting the MAF to 2in/2out and it won't idle at all, tried changing the output from 4 to 2 after the car was started and as soon as I got on the gas it leaned out like crazy. Tried 4in/4out, same deal. 2in/4out works great but I'm still maxing the theoretical voltage of the A32 MAF so I still have the lean condition in the upper RPM. I figured, according to this post I30tMikeD - 550's, Z32, Stock ECU, I could change the in/out settings from the current 2in/4out to 4in/4out and due to the size of the injectors and be back close to a stock AFR.

Anyone have any ideas?
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 12-03-2010, 11:33 AM
  #23  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
The only logical explanation is that the injectors aren't what I was told they are. I would have predicted a very rich condition on initial start-up using the same FP as before on my DE-K's, but there was no change (as if there wasn't any more fuel flowing from the injectors than before)...
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 01:50 PM
  #24  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (24)
 
nismomaxct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sagamore Beach, MA
Posts: 694
I sent you a PM.
nismomaxct is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 09:31 PM
  #25  
Still kickin'
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Mad-MAX_SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 3,662
Ended up having to order 600's from Deatschwerks, and they're fantastic. I think the guy I bought the injectors from either got lied to when he purchased them or accidentally sent the wrong ones to me. Either way, they weren't/aren't 530cc.

Going to the dyno tomorrow, we'll see how she does
Mad-MAX_SE is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 09:45 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
MIKERNM1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 424
Originally Posted by Mad-MAX_SE
Ended up having to order 600's from Deatschwerks, and they're fantastic. I think the guy I bought the injectors from either got lied to when he purchased them or accidentally sent the wrong ones to me. Either way, they weren't/aren't 530cc.

Going to the dyno tomorrow, we'll see how she does
i hope u'll get over 400 whp or engine build 450 whp?
MIKERNM1990 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jcof88
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
7
09-09-2015 03:11 PM
Johnny9595
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
09-03-2015 05:18 AM
maximusrising
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
09-02-2015 09:55 AM
soloist3
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
29
09-01-2015 03:47 PM
classymax420
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
6
08-06-2015 06:35 PM



Quick Reply: Couple quick questions about my SC 3.5



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:28 AM.