the best tires for the $$$
Originally Posted by upstatemax
I see your MPS and raise you Conti Extreme Contacts.
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
Very good tire, but they weigh a lot. 225/45/17 Avon's weigh in at 27lbs
While that same size on the contis weigh in at 20lbs. The slight price jump for the contis is worth it to me for the weight savings.
I guess it is really up to you...
Edit found the specs for the 235/45/17's Avon: 28lbs Conti: 25lbs. still weigh less.
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S
/thread
/thread
For the money?
Good tire, maybe a great tire. Not a good value.
Falken 512's. Look 'em up anywhere. They always rate well. They look good. And they're cheap.
Conti ExtreemContacts would be good too. Whichever's cheaper. They both satisfy.
Originally Posted by DrKlop
Pirelli PZero Nero or Toyo Proxes
Originally Posted by 00MaxSE
The Falkens are good, but they wear kinda fast from my experience. I've heard that the Toyo's are great.
Yokohama Avid V4S, the best. Go to tirerack to see them. http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....e1=yes&place=0
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
Guest
Posts: n/a
what? all season? try ultra high performance. Kumho Ecsta SPT http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...laim_uhp_c.jsp
Originally Posted by North
all season tires suck at all seasons, get dedicated tires for each, late spring/summer/fall and then a winter set. Its worth the investment, if you care at all about performance of your tires.
I got the Bridgestone Turanza LSV's from Tirerack based on reviews. Muy expensivo. Should have gone with Kumho. These tires are LOUD, they also track every single grove and curve in the road (annoying). I also think they lowered my fuel economy. They definately handle better than the lousy stock potenzas (although I think I got better gas mileage with the potenzas).
Originally Posted by North
all season tires suck at all seasons, get dedicated tires for each, late spring/summer/fall and then a winter set. Its worth the investment, if you care at all about performance of your tires.
I have experience with Falken 512s and Traction TAs.... both are decent AS tires for the money but I'll be trying Toyo Proxes next.
Originally Posted by North
if snow isnt an issue why settle for all seasons?
99 GXE with 16" Konig Reigns, Falken Ziex 512 225/55/16 (all season, Consumer Reports best choice), about $85 shipped from discounttiredirect. Put these on at 62K, now have 84K and fronts look they will need replacing soon, backs OK, only rotated once at 7K. When new they are great for anti-hydroplaning but lately I've been driving a lot slower in the rain. Looking into new tires, Goodyear FS-GS1 (? not sure if I stated it correctly) $146 for size above, not all season but could make for a fun summer. I might try the Conti's, as CR rated them number 2. Will use test results in CR and Tirerack.com to make a decision, will buy in May. (I usually only drive 20 miles a day now, down from the 100 a day 6 months ago, so these will last after rotating 1 last time). They were very good tires, but I thought they would last longer.
Originally Posted by 5thgenfan
I got the Bridgestone Turanza LSV's from Tirerack based on reviews. Muy expensivo. Should have gone with Kumho. These tires are LOUD, they also track every single grove and curve in the road (annoying). I also think they lowered my fuel economy. They definately handle better than the lousy stock potenzas (although I think I got better gas mileage with the potenzas).
Originally Posted by irish44j
....plus, A/S tires are far superior in the rain to "summer" tires....
these tires were super sticky. i could drive almost exactly the same in the rain as i could in the dry - no exceptions. these things were amazing. even through big puddles and curves, the car always stayed planted. just don't try to use them in temperatures below 40 degrees or so. they turn rock hard and slide all over the place. of course they are a "summer tire" so one expects this type of behavior.
i now have michelin pilot sport all season tires on my Maxi and even though i consider them to be one of the best "all-season" tires out there, they can't come close to what the pole position tires were capable of in the wet or dry. but again, i don't expect them to because they are not designed to be dedicated "summer tires". also, the michelins are decent in the snow if your careful.
there is no real need for me to switch tires seasonally any more because i have accepted the excellent compromise that the michelin tires provide for "all-seasons". they have worn very well too. i have over 60K miles on them and they still have enough tread left for me to make it at least up to next winter.
check out what others say here......
Originally Posted by CCS2k1Max
McFly, being up north, why not two good summer and winter sets? It's the best thing I ever did.
Originally Posted by Belteshazzar
For the money?
Good tire, maybe a great tire. Not a good value.
Falken 512's. Look 'em up anywhere. They always rate well. They look good. And they're cheap.
Conti ExtreemContacts would be good too. Whichever's cheaper. They both satisfy.
Good tire, maybe a great tire. Not a good value.
Falken 512's. Look 'em up anywhere. They always rate well. They look good. And they're cheap.
Conti ExtreemContacts would be good too. Whichever's cheaper. They both satisfy.
the pilot sport A/S seems to do alot of things very well. certainly better overall than those you mentioned based on reviews i have seen and people i have spoken with. mostly due to wear and sidewall stiffness issues.
Originally Posted by CCS2k1Max
The WRs can be sued year-round. What's your "summer" A/S set?
I am still using my stock Potenzas for the summer.
I can't wait to get rid of them but I can't bring myself to do it before I actually wear them out.
I went through the "wear out the crapenzas" phase too. I went 57K miles on them, and only once skidded into a ditch...
I just put a set of WRs on my wife's Odyssey. I expected them to be squirmy on 60 series, but they are surprisingly not. That said, I had very low expectations after my neighbor (5.5 gen SE) raved about the WR's "comfortable ride" compared to the crapenzas. In hindsight, that's because the RE92 have very stiff sidewalls so most everything else will feel "comfortable".
I just put a set of WRs on my wife's Odyssey. I expected them to be squirmy on 60 series, but they are surprisingly not. That said, I had very low expectations after my neighbor (5.5 gen SE) raved about the WR's "comfortable ride" compared to the crapenzas. In hindsight, that's because the RE92 have very stiff sidewalls so most everything else will feel "comfortable".
Originally Posted by CCS2k1Max
I went through the "wear out the crapenzas" phase too. I went 57K miles on them, and only once skidded into a ditch...
I just put a set of WRs on my wife's Odyssey. I expected them to be squirmy on 60 series, but they are surprisingly not. That said, I had very low expectations after my neighbor (5.5 gen SE) raved about the WR's "comfortable ride" compared to the crapenzas. In hindsight, that's because the RE92 have very stiff sidewalls so most everything else will feel "comfortable".
I just put a set of WRs on my wife's Odyssey. I expected them to be squirmy on 60 series, but they are surprisingly not. That said, I had very low expectations after my neighbor (5.5 gen SE) raved about the WR's "comfortable ride" compared to the crapenzas. In hindsight, that's because the RE92 have very stiff sidewalls so most everything else will feel "comfortable".
Part of the reason the WRs might be squirmy is because of the 60 series pizza cutters I have on them. In a wider 50 series it might be a different story. And you are right - my basis for comparison is the rock stiff RE92 death donuts, that could also be part of the reason I perceive the "squirminess".
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





to the Proxes 4's.
