1/4 and 1/8 Mile Racing Talk about track times, launch techniques, strategies, etc. Check out the "Timeslips" subforum for posted times.No discussion of street racing will be tolerated.

Going to the track today, gotta couple of questions

Old May 17, 2005 | 05:13 AM
  #1  
eckohb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
Going to the track today, gotta couple of questions

right now ive got my 17s on, and they are a lot heavier than my 15 in sawblades. I was wondering, how should I should do this? 15's at all fours, 17s in front, 15s in rear, vice versa...The 17s have sticky W rated tires on, and the sawblades have all-season tires. I pulled my best time with the 15s, but also couldnt get much traction. Although it was horribly prepped that day. What do you guys think?
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:06 AM
  #2  
98maximaSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 228
sawblades might help your 60' but i dont know. ive always subscribed to the thought that lighter is better
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #3  
TomV's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 142
Well, i'd say you definitely want the sawblades in back. Even though its in the rear, its still mass you have to accelerate and spin up to speed (plus drag, rolling resistance too). For the fronts, tough call, but my vote is again sawblades. Can you bring a set of the 17s and a cable lock so you can try both?

Oh, i guess this is my first post, so hi everyone... I'm tom and i drive a 96 se 5spd, used to drive/mod neons.
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #4  
eckohb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
yeah, ill be trying both. lighter is better, it gave me 1.5-2 mph better trap speeds than my 16" 5 spoke rims. Also gave me the better time. But with the 16s, I had 2.2 60', and with the sawblades, it was 2.3+ the whole day. I'll try em all out and see whats best. Thanks for the input
Old May 18, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
What's the verdict?
Old May 18, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #6  
eckohb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
15s at all four corners. 17s in front didnt do anything, 2.4 60', 17s all around gave me a 2.4 60'. 15s i was able to nab a 2.28
Old May 18, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #7  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Makes much more sense due to the added rotating mass theory, wasn't sure why you guys were suggesting otherwise ...
Old May 18, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
Seximus Maximus's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 316
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Ya i would go with the smaller size for sure. ive managed to get some damn good times on my old stock 16's with worn out all-seasons before lol.

Oh, btw Welcome Tomv. glad to have another maxima nut on the .Org
never be afraid to ask questions no matter how stupid (to a point) heh
Old May 18, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Seximus Maximus
never be afraid to ask questions no matter how stupid (to a point) heh
Might want to watch out with that comment.

Key is to read and search even if you don't have the search function there are ways to get the info you seek.



The 3.5L has good times with larger diamter wheels due to the extra tq. I've seen 3.5L with 19's run mid 14's in automatic form.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlaMark
All Motor
4
Jan 8, 2016 07:21 AM
homeyclaus
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
1
Sep 3, 2015 06:15 PM
Trin1j23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
1
Aug 12, 2015 08:31 PM
julian888
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
0
Aug 6, 2015 04:39 AM
julian888
New Member Introductions
1
Aug 5, 2015 08:26 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 AM.