1/4 and 1/8 Mile Racing Talk about track times, launch techniques, strategies, etc. Check out the "Timeslips" subforum for posted times.No discussion of street racing will be tolerated.

14.356 @ 95.41 W/my girl driving

Old Oct 16, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
14.356 @ 95.41 W/my girl driving

Our club Eclectic Customs went to Island Dragway this sunday my car pulled a 14.356 with my girl driving.
My '03SE is AUTO, I have has Headers, /Y-pipe, Axelback w/Borla muffler, and Injen intake. Tien S-Techs with Tokico HP's and VIS CF hood.
Best part is I was running The stock potenzas on the stock rims.
Heres the time slip, what do u guys think?
(my cars in the left lane)

Old Oct 16, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
I think your trap looks extremely low, decent time though.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
Jason R's Avatar
aka UNCDooD
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,239
From: Aylett, VA
nice driving on your girl's part. what headers do you have?
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #4  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by Glude
I think your trap looks extremely low, decent time though.
The trap is low because it's an auto and because she pulled a good 60 foot for street tires (2.17). The trap looks low for the ET when the 60 ft is good.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #5  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
congrats on your times but how the hell did the other car run 15.3@82mph
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
Originally Posted by Jason R
nice driving on your girl's part. what headers do you have?
SS Autochrome headers.

Originally Posted by Zack342
congrats on your times but how the hell did the other car run 15.3@82mph
The other car was a supercharged 2000 SE. He said he mis shifted went into 5th instead of 3rd. and he spun all the way through 1st gear.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #7  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
Originally Posted by JClaw
The trap is low because it's an auto and because she pulled a good 60 foot for street tires (2.17). The trap looks low for the ET when the 60 ft is good.
I understand that, but most autos with bolt ons trap in the 99-100 mph area correct?
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #8  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by paul5:14
SS Autochrome headers
Get real headers, be in the 13's.

Originally Posted by JClaw
The trap is low because it's an auto and because she pulled a good 60 foot for street tires (2.17). The trap looks low for the ET when the 60 ft is good.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #9  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Glude
I understand that, but most autos with bolt ons trap in the 99-100 mph area correct?
no, but they do trap a little higher. my 14.34 was at 96.45
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #10  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
A33B (2002/3) 4AT (4 speed automatic) bolt on trap speeds.


juice

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=439733 = 100.31
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=387573 = 98.47
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=356066 = 100.02
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=355085 = 97.83

Blu
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=165123 98.40
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=165776 97.33
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #11  
big dave's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 83
Nice time and a very good reaction time.
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #12  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
Originally Posted by big dave
Nice time and a very good reaction time.
Was that sarcastic? That reaction time was horrible. lol
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #13  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Yeah it's probably a .000 tree, not a .500.
Old Oct 19, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #14  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC

lol those are my pre header runs, I trapped a consistant 100-101 with headers on my 18's.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #15  
C MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,041
Originally Posted by Hoooper
no, but they do trap a little higher. my 14.34 was at 96.45
a 95 trap is about right, maybe 98 would be the best with those mods. when i use to run 14.5 i use to trap around 96-98 mph with a auto.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #16  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by C MAX
a 95 trap is about right, maybe 98 would be the best with those mods. when i use to run 14.5 i use to trap around 96-98 mph with a auto.
if he had real headers IE cattman or hotshot with his other mods, should trap at least 97 in decent weather. I trapped 100+ consistantly with headers, b pipe, GAB, and UDP.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #17  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
You forgot to mention you were running slicks n pulling 2.0 60Ft, that makes a big difference in you E.T and MPH. I was runing the stock, OEM tires. All the tire spin off the line lowers you trap speed.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #18  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by paul5:14
You forgot to mention you were running slicks n pulling 2.0 60Ft, that makes a big difference in you E.T and MPH. I was runing the stock, OEM tires. All the tire spin off the line lowers you trap speed.
like I said the threads posted here were my pre header runs. After headers I ran consistant 13.8's@100-101 with 2.1x 60's on my 18" street tires and 13.6's on slicks pulling 2.0x 60's.

If anything spinning helps your traps speeds, it sure doesn't lower it.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
if you spin the first 60FT, thats 60ft less that you are getting your full acceleration down the track how would that help?
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #20  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by paul5:14
if you spin the first 60FT, thats 60ft less that you are getting your full acceleration down the track how would that help?
A little research will answer this for you.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #21  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
I been racing my whole life I own a 81 Malibu that runs Consistant 11.50's & a 1971 Chevelle that runs 12.80. I don't need to research.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:34 AM
  #22  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
Originally Posted by Blu←
like I said the threads posted here were my pre header runs. After headers I ran consistant 13.8's@100-101 with 2.1x 60's on my 18" street tires and 13.6's on slicks pulling 2.0x 60's.

If anything spinning helps your traps speeds, it sure doesn't lower it.
My thoughts exactly, thats why I said I thought it should be trappin 99+. Someone comented about the good 60ft and that just made me more boggled because I know good 60ft=lower trap speeds.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #23  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
FWD sucks, thats the bottom line.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #24  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by paul5:14
I been racing my whole life I own a 81 Malibu that runs Consistant 11.50's & a 1971 Chevelle that runs 12.80. I don't need to research.
ok, good for you...

I was just passing along Maxima advice as Ive been there and done that 3 years ago. Spinning doesn't make your trap speed go down unless you are one of the guys that floors it and does a burnout half way down the track. Also the only way slicks would raise your trap speed is if they are a different size height to help the gearing of the car. Remember I am giving info on NA Maximas not these so called "hot rods" you own.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #25  
Ceasars Chariot's Avatar
Old Maxima Legend
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,058
From: Paraparaumu, NZ
FWD is challenging ! nice run though
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #26  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Glude
My thoughts exactly, thats why I said I thought it should be trappin 99+.
it would be if he actually had a nice set of headers and good cool weather. SS autochrome will not make the power of the cattman and hotshot headers.

Originally Posted by Glude
Someone comented about the good 60ft and that just made me more boggled because I know good 60ft=lower trap speeds.
Exactly but the guy thats been racing all his life doesn't seem to agree with this proven logic. Actually he says the complete opposite.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #27  
Ceasars Chariot's Avatar
Old Maxima Legend
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,058
From: Paraparaumu, NZ
Originally Posted by Blu←
Remember I am giving info on NA Maximas not these so called "hot rods" you own.
what tha ? who says a Maxima isnt a HOT ROD ? rofl, in 10 years it will be an old japanese muscle car in some old documentary about the import car scene that hit.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #28  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Ceasars Chariot
what tha ? who says a Maxima isnt a HOT ROD ? rofl, in 10 years it will be an old japanese muscle car in some old documentary about the import car scene that hit.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:24 AM
  #29  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
Originally Posted by Blu←
it would be if he actually had a nice set of headers and good cool weather. SS autochrome will not make the power of the cattman and hotshot headers.

Exactly but the guy thats been racing all his life doesn't seem to agree with this proven logic. Actually he says the complete opposite.
Well with my muscle cars Ive never equated tire spin to higher trap speed. With those real cars its the complete opposite.

And to the " unless you are one of the guys that floors it and does a burnout half way down the track" comment. I let my girl run my car because she's always wanted to race n never had the chance.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #30  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
Originally Posted by Blu←
it would be if he actually had a nice set of headers and good cool weather. SS autochrome will not make the power of the cattman and hotshot headers.



Exactly but the guy thats been racing all his life doesn't seem to agree with this proven logic. Actually he says the complete opposite.
ahh, theres the answer. I seem to overlook the obvious half the time.
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #31  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
But the SS autochrome do make more than stock n give me the sound i was after. I'm not trying to make my car the fastest max, its my daily driver. i have other toys.. Just want it to sound nice.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #32  
ghostmax301's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,524
Originally Posted by JClaw
Yeah it's probably a .000 tree, not a .500.
lol....He might be good I got a .498 once on a .500 tree..
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #33  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ghostmax301
lol....He might be good I got a .498 once on a .500 tree..
uhhh, what? thats a redlight and a loss at any track. not good. could just be a good driver, its possible. many people cut good lights. i consistently cut .100> lights when i race.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #34  
ghostmax301's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,524
Originally Posted by Hoooper
uhhh, what? thats a redlight and a loss at any track. not good. could just be a good driver, its possible. many people cut good lights. i consistently cut .100> lights when i race.
I know, i was just talking about how close i got to a .500 light


P.S. not to many people like that bodykit you have, IMO looks good, kind of weird without the spoiler at the bottom corners of it but still nice, 1st 5th gen I've seen with a kit in that color, looks good..
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #35  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ghostmax301
P.S. not to many people like that bodykit you have, IMO looks good, kind of weird without the spoiler at the bottom corners of it but still nice, 1st 5th gen I've seen with a kit in that color, looks good..
thanks, yeah ppl dont like it, but i do and thats all that matters. thanks for the compliment.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #36  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Blu←
lol those are my pre header runs, I trapped a consistant 100-101 with headers on my 18's.
Damnit... edited my post.

But again, just to reinforce the fact... HS/CM > SSAC.
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 11:45 PM
  #37  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
HS/CM > SSAC.
what?

10char
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #38  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
HS/CM > SSAC
He meant :
HS=Hotshot/CM=Cattman > SSAC=SS AutoChrome
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #39  
Hoooper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
oooo, ok. now it makes sense and is true
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #40  
paul5:14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 278
How u know its true? have tyou ever dynoed a stock max with each of the three headers n y-pipe n no other mods?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:56 AM.