warpspeed y pipe vs cattman y pipe

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-14-2003, 12:10 AM

David89Max

Senior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 395

warpspeed y pipe vs cattman y pipe

I just need to know if ones better than the other or like most of the time they are just about the same and its up to me and my bank account to choose whos better

08-14-2003, 01:55 AM

Aaron92SE

NWP Engineering.com

iTrader: (128)

Join Date: Jul 2001

Location: Walstonburg, NC

Posts: 14,066

Re: warpspeed y pipe vs cattman y pipe

Only go with WSP. I've heard about WAY too many stories about fitment issues with Cattman. Also, you save money with WSP I believe. I got my Ypipe for about $240 shipped. It was the best mod I've done except for my VB mod.

08-14-2003, 01:59 AM

DARHAW-MAX

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 554

"14.83 @ 92.28 mph at 100 feet in Fayetteville, NC"

In a 100 feet?

08-14-2003, 02:02 AM

Aaron92SE

NWP Engineering.com

iTrader: (128)

Join Date: Jul 2001

Location: Walstonburg, NC

Posts: 14,066

Quote:

Originally posted by DARHAW-MAX
"14.83 @ 92.28 mph at 100 feet in Fayetteville, NC"

In a 100 feet?

I'm sorry. I don't understand your question.

08-14-2003, 02:36 AM

crazy4maxima

Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: NYC NY

Posts: 6,273

100foot elevation

08-14-2003, 02:37 AM

crazy4maxima

Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: NYC NY

Posts: 6,273

yes go with wsp cheaper$$ and better quality

08-14-2003, 02:45 AM

Aaron92SE

NWP Engineering.com

iTrader: (128)

Join Date: Jul 2001

Location: Walstonburg, NC

Posts: 14,066

Quote:

Originally posted by crazy4maxima
100foot elevation

I knew he meant 100 feet elevation. But my question was... "what about it?". Yes I ran 14.83 at a track at 100 feet above sea level.

08-14-2003, 07:50 AM

DARHAW-MAX

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 554

Quote:

Originally posted by Aaron92SE

I knew he meant 100 feet elevation. But my question was... "what about it?". Yes I ran 14.83 at a track at 100 feet above sea level.

Duhhh

That was my bad. I did not realize that you were referring to elevation. When I first read it, I was thinking that you meant you ran that time and speed in 100 feet; therefore, I was just trying to point out a typo. However, my ignorant, lesser half showed it ugly head

Learn something new everyday.