Pics of a ASP Pulley with Sleeve installed
#1
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Pics of a ASP Pulley with Sleeve installed
:w00t: finally got it!
I thought the UPS truck was bringing me Blehmco toys 2 days earily (Fedex would ) but instead I got my pulley finally!
I'm not going to install it until I can drive my car again, I wanna really feel the difference
the timing marks spacing is kind of off though
I thought the UPS truck was bringing me Blehmco toys 2 days earily (Fedex would ) but instead I got my pulley finally!
I'm not going to install it until I can drive my car again, I wanna really feel the difference
the timing marks spacing is kind of off though
#4
Oh nice one. But mine's already fast. Actually while it was summer time, I liked the colder AC. I noticed it wasn't as cold when the UDP was one.
Originally Posted by MrGone
knowing you it will sit 3 months before you touch it again
#9
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Forget it. I got mine today too. When did you send yours back shawn? My turn around was about 1.5 weeks. Not bad when 90% of that is shipping to/from
Originally Posted by KLoWnPR109
mine is red which makes mine > shawn's
ricer
#10
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Originally Posted by mtcookson
since its an underdrive pulley wouldn't they need to mess with the timing marks due to the decreased size?
The space between 5-10* is alot wider than the space between say 0-5* and esp. between 15-20*.
Doesn't really matter, I marked 15 and 20 degrees on my CPS so I can retard my timing on a moments notice incase it starts pinging or I get a sudden urge to fill up with 87 , hasn't happened yet, but atleast its there.
#12
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
What is this sleeve? Why is it needed? My ASP UDP works just fine the way it is.
mine has been sitting in my room since i got it and i sent it out while i was building the motor and got one back with the steel sleeve on it
hope my A/C doesnt suck in the summer now...
#13
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
What is this sleeve? Why is it needed? My ASP UDP works just fine the way it is.
Appearantely with a ASP pulley being aluminum, over time the seal will wear a groove into the pulley. This sleeve (which I think is steal) will help prevent premature wear of the pulley.
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
#14
Originally Posted by CandiMan
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
#18
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Originally Posted by KLoWnPR109
Yeah, but I got mine for 30 cheaper and you still have to buy belts
Originally Posted by dragon_m
where did you got your part MRGONE. I think mrgone got it for $25
#19
Originally Posted by CandiMan
That's what I was thinking, is there anyone with a ASP and no leakage from the seal? I've had my ASP for over 4 years and my seal in not leaking.
Appearantely with a ASP pulley being aluminum, over time the seal will wear a groove into the pulley. This sleeve (which I think is steal) will help prevent premature wear of the pulley.
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
Appearantely with a ASP pulley being aluminum, over time the seal will wear a groove into the pulley. This sleeve (which I think is steal) will help prevent premature wear of the pulley.
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
#20
I've had to hammer mine in and I replaced the seal also when I installed and its been about 2 years and no leaks.
A/C does not get affected at all, mine still works and it has the same crap in there since factory, never had to charge it.
A/C does not get affected at all, mine still works and it has the same crap in there since factory, never had to charge it.
#21
In theory the AC should be affected. The compressor turns slower. You can't really get around that fact. Maybe mine is not in tip top shape but the above fact still holds true.
BTW. I just tapped mine on until I could get the bolt/washer on. Then just pressed it on by tightening the bolt
BTW. I just tapped mine on until I could get the bolt/washer on. Then just pressed it on by tightening the bolt
#22
I still have the prototype UR UDP on my max and have had zero leak issues, I think its almost three years now, definitly over two. I have to goto UR and swap it for a production model, after my experience with them I'd be a lot happier buying an ASP UDP and taking a hammer to the UR.
#23
Originally Posted by CandiMan
That's what I was thinking, is there anyone with a ASP and no leakage from the seal? I've had my ASP for over 4 years and my seal in not leaking.
Appearantely with a ASP pulley being aluminum, over time the seal will wear a groove into the pulley. This sleeve (which I think is steal) will help prevent premature wear of the pulley.
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
Appearantely with a ASP pulley being aluminum, over time the seal will wear a groove into the pulley. This sleeve (which I think is steal) will help prevent premature wear of the pulley.
They really need to enlarge the inner diameter of the pulley. How many of you had to force the pulley on? (very carefully of course)
MIKE
#24
It's no secret we all had to use some sorta hammer or 2x4 to get the pulley on. The same way you gonna have to use a puller or pry bar to get it off, that's just the way it is. Couple of things I've notice since installing my UDP
1) When I installed my UDP I was curious to see if it would effect my charging system. So I did a complete alternator voltage and amp rating test before and after the UDP. I was happy to see there was absolutely no difference in the numbers. Even with the acessories turning slower the alternator was still performing the same.
2) My AC also doesn't seem to have been effected either. Since I've owned this car my windows have never been tinted, but yet there are times I find myself turning a AC blower down to the #1 position because it was gotten cool enough in the cabin. It doesn't matter if I'm in bumper to bumper, cruising the hwy, northern or southern Cali, south Florida the blower speed button is usually in the #1 position. Maybe my AC system has been that efficient over the years.
3) When I did my VTC rebuild I was curious to see how accurate the timing marks were on the UDP. Using my OEM crank pulley I set my timing to 15*, stop the motor, removed the OEM pulley, installed the UDP and started the motor. The timing mark was dead on 15* with the UDP. At that point i was convinced the graduation marks on the UDP were correct, but i didn't look close enough to see if there were evenly spaced. so I'll just leave it at that.
4) I also didn't feel any noticeable gains with the butt dyno like some others were posting. I got mine in hopes of helping the auto VE bottom end but since I'm a auto maybe that's the reason the butt dyno didn't feel anything.
MIKE
1) When I installed my UDP I was curious to see if it would effect my charging system. So I did a complete alternator voltage and amp rating test before and after the UDP. I was happy to see there was absolutely no difference in the numbers. Even with the acessories turning slower the alternator was still performing the same.
2) My AC also doesn't seem to have been effected either. Since I've owned this car my windows have never been tinted, but yet there are times I find myself turning a AC blower down to the #1 position because it was gotten cool enough in the cabin. It doesn't matter if I'm in bumper to bumper, cruising the hwy, northern or southern Cali, south Florida the blower speed button is usually in the #1 position. Maybe my AC system has been that efficient over the years.
3) When I did my VTC rebuild I was curious to see how accurate the timing marks were on the UDP. Using my OEM crank pulley I set my timing to 15*, stop the motor, removed the OEM pulley, installed the UDP and started the motor. The timing mark was dead on 15* with the UDP. At that point i was convinced the graduation marks on the UDP were correct, but i didn't look close enough to see if there were evenly spaced. so I'll just leave it at that.
4) I also didn't feel any noticeable gains with the butt dyno like some others were posting. I got mine in hopes of helping the auto VE bottom end but since I'm a auto maybe that's the reason the butt dyno didn't feel anything.
MIKE
#25
Originally Posted by CandiMan
4) I also didn't feel any noticeable gains with the butt dyno like some others were posting. I got mine in hopes of helping the auto VE bottom end but since I'm a auto maybe that's the reason the butt dyno didn't feel anything.
MIKE
MIKE
When I finally hit the track to compare times, my 60' dropped exactly one tenth from 2.55 to 2.45. Yes, 2.55 is bad, but I was in some high altitude at the time. My 1/4 mile decreased by slightly over 2 tenths. So it's not a monster gain, but well worth the money IMO.
#28
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
What is this sleeve? Why is it needed? My ASP UDP works just fine the way it is.
joining klown and mrgone,
my specific pulley > both of yours
#29
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Originally Posted by MaDMaX024
never had a problem here either...i dont see a need for this sleeve. my pulley was on for 2 years before i had the motor rebuilt, it looked brand new when taken off. as far as installation goes i didnt have any trouble taking the old pulley off, i just whacked it with a rubber mallet once and it popped loose then i just wiggled it off the crank.
joining klown and mrgone,
my specific pulley > both of yours
joining klown and mrgone,
my specific pulley > both of yours
#31
did ASP produce pullies without the sleeve and then fix it after problems occured? Or is this a part someone else cale up with? I have a differnt brand pully without a sleeve and would like to have one installed. Of course I have a differnt engine too....
#32
Olds = no sleeve. New ones = w/ sleeve. You can send the olds ones in for the sleeve install. And for n/c other than shipping to them. They even cover the cost of shipping to you. Pretty good service. If you talk to them, they might do it. Probably not for free either.
#33
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Olds = no sleeve. New ones = w/ sleeve. You can send the olds ones in for the sleeve install. And for n/c other than shipping to them. They even cover the cost of shipping to you. Pretty good service. If you talk to them, they might do it. Probably not for free either.
#34
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 40,647
Originally Posted by dmontzsta
Well RPM do it?
Originally Posted by dmontzsta
or did you guys go directly to ASP?
Originally Posted by dmontzsta
How long did it take?
Originally Posted by dmontzsta
and does it feel heavier at all?
#35
regarding the A/C difference, i did some calculations..
using v = w x r, where v = velocity of the belt on the pulley, w = angular velocity of the pulley, and r = radius of the pulley
stock pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 6 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 3.22"
ASP pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 5 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 2.72"
A/C pulley diameter is about 5 7/16" --> r = 2.72 (~same as ASP)
so we have a simple 2 pulley system, i eliminated the tensioner pulley in the calculation since it is not a variable factor in the experiment
say the motor is at idle, ~750rpm --> 78.5 rad/s
STOCK PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(stock pulley) x r(stock pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 3.22 in
v(belt) = 252.77 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 252.77 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 92.9 rad/s --> 887rpm
ASP PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(ASP pulley) x r(ASP pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 2.72 in
v(belt) = 213.52 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 213.52 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 78.5 rad/s --> 750 rpm (same as ASP since theyre approx equal radius)
(100-%)/100 = 750rpm/887rpm
% = 15.45, so the A/C is turning approx 15% slower with the ASP pulley versus the stock pulley
using v = w x r, where v = velocity of the belt on the pulley, w = angular velocity of the pulley, and r = radius of the pulley
stock pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 6 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 3.22"
ASP pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 5 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 2.72"
A/C pulley diameter is about 5 7/16" --> r = 2.72 (~same as ASP)
so we have a simple 2 pulley system, i eliminated the tensioner pulley in the calculation since it is not a variable factor in the experiment
say the motor is at idle, ~750rpm --> 78.5 rad/s
STOCK PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(stock pulley) x r(stock pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 3.22 in
v(belt) = 252.77 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 252.77 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 92.9 rad/s --> 887rpm
ASP PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(ASP pulley) x r(ASP pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 2.72 in
v(belt) = 213.52 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 213.52 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 78.5 rad/s --> 750 rpm (same as ASP since theyre approx equal radius)
(100-%)/100 = 750rpm/887rpm
% = 15.45, so the A/C is turning approx 15% slower with the ASP pulley versus the stock pulley
#39
Originally Posted by Maximan190
regarding the A/C difference, i did some calculations..
using v = w x r, where v = velocity of the belt on the pulley, w = angular velocity of the pulley, and r = radius of the pulley
stock pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 6 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 3.22"
ASP pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 5 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 2.72"
A/C pulley diameter is about 5 7/16" --> r = 2.72 (~same as ASP)
so we have a simple 2 pulley system, i eliminated the tensioner pulley in the calculation since it is not a variable factor in the experiment
say the motor is at idle, ~750rpm --> 78.5 rad/s
STOCK PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(stock pulley) x r(stock pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 3.22 in
v(belt) = 252.77 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 252.77 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 92.9 rad/s --> 887rpm
ASP PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(ASP pulley) x r(ASP pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 2.72 in
v(belt) = 213.52 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 213.52 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 78.5 rad/s --> 750 rpm (same as ASP since theyre approx equal radius)
(100-%)/100 = 750rpm/887rpm
% = 15.45, so the A/C is turning approx 15% slower with the ASP pulley versus the stock pulley
using v = w x r, where v = velocity of the belt on the pulley, w = angular velocity of the pulley, and r = radius of the pulley
stock pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 6 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 3.22"
ASP pulley diameter (where the A/C belt sits) is about 5 7/16" --> r = d/2 = 2.72"
A/C pulley diameter is about 5 7/16" --> r = 2.72 (~same as ASP)
so we have a simple 2 pulley system, i eliminated the tensioner pulley in the calculation since it is not a variable factor in the experiment
say the motor is at idle, ~750rpm --> 78.5 rad/s
STOCK PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(stock pulley) x r(stock pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 3.22 in
v(belt) = 252.77 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 252.77 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 92.9 rad/s --> 887rpm
ASP PULLEY & A/C:
v(belt) = w(ASP pulley) x r(ASP pulley)
v(belt) = 78.5 rad/s x 2.72 in
v(belt) = 213.52 in/s
w(A/C) = v(belt) / r(A/C)
w(A/C) = 213.52 in/s / 2.72 in
w(A/C) = 78.5 rad/s --> 750 rpm (same as ASP since theyre approx equal radius)
(100-%)/100 = 750rpm/887rpm
% = 15.45, so the A/C is turning approx 15% slower with the ASP pulley versus the stock pulley