0-60 time for stock ve 5sp
Motor Trend Oct. 1991 (Road Test)
0-60 = 7.6 seconds
Quarter mile = 15.9 @ 89.4 mph
Car and Driver Nov. 1991 (Road Test)
0-60 = 6.7 seconds
Quarter mile = 15.3 @ 91 mph
Car and Driver Aug. 1992 (Comparison Test with Camry SE and SHO)
0-60 = 7.0
Quarter Mile = 15.5 @ 91 mph
I think tires would play as big a part 0-60 as anything. For the quarter mile, basic bolt ons should get you in the upper 14s or low 15s.
0-60 = 7.6 seconds
Quarter mile = 15.9 @ 89.4 mph
Car and Driver Nov. 1991 (Road Test)
0-60 = 6.7 seconds
Quarter mile = 15.3 @ 91 mph
Car and Driver Aug. 1992 (Comparison Test with Camry SE and SHO)
0-60 = 7.0
Quarter Mile = 15.5 @ 91 mph
I think tires would play as big a part 0-60 as anything. For the quarter mile, basic bolt ons should get you in the upper 14s or low 15s.
Originally Posted by 1992maxman
with Y-pipe, high-flow cat and resonator removed + 12 years of aging I got 5.8secs 0-60 using Gtech-Comp Pro
There's no way even a modded max with na bolts ons is going to pull a legit sub 6 sec time.
A stock 240hp E36 M3 does the 0-60 in about 5.7-5.9. And they are rwd. So you are going to need a hell of alot more than 240hp. Look at what the 3.5VQ maximas are pulling and they have 260-270hp.
A stock 240hp E36 M3 does the 0-60 in about 5.7-5.9. And they are rwd. So you are going to need a hell of alot more than 240hp. Look at what the 3.5VQ maximas are pulling and they have 260-270hp.
I dont know... i read what the thing tells me, and I let up just after 60. I'll have to repeat it with someone in the car with a stop watch, cuz certainly time dilation shouldnt be a problem since we arent at relativistic speeds.
B
B
0-60 time isn't the most acurate way of judging which car will get to point B from point A first.
Car A with a 0-60 of 6.6 can be behind Car B with a 0-60 time of 7.0
Time to distance is a more accurate way of judging which is the quicker car.
Car A with a 0-60 of 6.6 can be behind Car B with a 0-60 time of 7.0
Time to distance is a more accurate way of judging which is the quicker car.
I've read MANY reviews about G-Tech and it's not that accurate. It's useful for before/after comparisons, but I wouldn't trust the times.
Do you really believe you could pull under 6 seconds 0-60? (I know - HEATED DRAG RADIALS!)
Do you really believe you could pull under 6 seconds 0-60? (I know - HEATED DRAG RADIALS!)
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have an old mag from 94' were Nissan in a commercial for the SE themselves say it does it in 7.1 sec. I'll post pics up, once I get my hands on a cam. As for the VG, my stock auto does 8.1 sec with 115K.. Was 7.6s when I just bought it at 84K
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
There's no way even a modded max with na bolts ons is going to pull a legit sub 6 sec time.
A stock 240hp E36 M3 does the 0-60 in about 5.7-5.9. And they are rwd. So you are going to need a hell of alot more than 240hp. Look at what the 3.5VQ maximas are pulling and they have 260-270hp.
A stock 240hp E36 M3 does the 0-60 in about 5.7-5.9. And they are rwd. So you are going to need a hell of alot more than 240hp. Look at what the 3.5VQ maximas are pulling and they have 260-270hp.
Ok The g tek That i have seems to be pertty good I use it three ot four times at the track and everytime I ran with in .2 to the the g tek. The g tek seem to read about .1 to .2 Higher than the time for me on my time slip.
Now why sell the VG.
I have a Vg and im doing like mid to low 6's for 0 to 60 With wheel spin in second. All stock ..........
Ok well maybe not all stock but it is close
Now why sell the VG.
I have a Vg and im doing like mid to low 6's for 0 to 60 With wheel spin in second. All stock ..........
Ok well maybe not all stock but it is close
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sonic7
7th Generation Classifieds (2009-2015)
8
Aug 20, 2015 12:23 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM
ViciousVQ30
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
Aug 5, 2015 05:40 PM





