i don't know if its cuz im really tired right now but if u look here this guy has a VE in an '89

 

i dont know but the actual full body shots of his car that have "everything on it" have to be photoshopped. I mean look at his bad edges, and air brushed edges. and yeah this one escpecially looks iffy

this one either the wing looks pasted in


plus it goes from bright orange to faded glory type ish

 

yeah but i also noticed the gauges. those things r not even for our model maximas. the whole car looks photoshopped to me. looks unique as hell not my type though but everything in/on the car looks fake and what really got me was the engine in the car.

 

there was a thread on this car before i think.. supposed to be all photoshopped

 

deff photoshopped, if you look at the two different front shots, they have different color mirrors and in the second one, the front bumper is on an angle, lol, it's crooked and covering up some of the headlight on the left side

 

Bragging Rights
Quarter Mile: 12.5 s @ 163 mph->
0-60: 4.8 s
Est. Horsepower: 313

on all of the above

 

btw, that is a VQ, not a VE

 

The left mirror and right mirror are 2 different shapes in this pic.

 

It has to be Photochopped who is mean enough to punish a 3rd gen and make it look that ugly, c'mon.

 

hmm...
it's been a while since this guys car popped up...

 

definately all photochops btw...

 

LOL that is such a crappy photochop.

The lighting is a dead-giveaway. In the head-on shot the dark side of the fascia is lit in a neutral fashion from above and in front. And in the side shot, it's so easy to mask in a crappy Civic body kit and wing, and then de-saturate and colorize everything.

 

it is an ugly photochop that some one wasted a bunch of time on

 

Yea them guages look like there off of a 4th gen Maxima too

 

God the wing is the fist dead give away. That doesn't even looked like it was brushed in. He just copy and pasted it to the spot.

 

oh well i thought it was a VE. whats the difference

 

12.5 @ 163 that would require about 1000WHP

GOT TRACTION






what an idiot

 

its probably corey blades friends car who "souped it up"

 

wouldn't be surprised

 

you can't honestly expect someone to think that's real

 

you can also tell its photochopped from the side skirt...the rear door wont be able to open cause the skirt is one piece...like the veilside kit for a supra

 

that's just

 

oh dear god

 

it takes erty to make u believe that its real. silly chops

 

I would like to see the rear doors actually open up with body kit on like that.

It is a shame to see a Maxima used in such a horrible crime of nature.... A 3rd gen with a ricer body kit... and fake at that... What has the world come to?

 

thats a to 3rd gen drivers every where

 

Mos def a photoshop job, the wheels are even a compy and paste.
But if you all remember a while back i wanted to work in a early 90's accord body kit?

I saw a maxima one night here in atlanta with a accord 'r33' kit. The fitment was reeeeeeeealy close. It actautly made the front end shorter and the back end. Look a lil boxy without any drop. But if it was done right, it would look hot.

Heh... I know I offended some minds of a honda kit on a maxima.

 

his antena wouldn't be able come up with that big wing there, just thought i would add something nobody else had said.

 

Suprised no one noticed that it's a 4-GEN engine bay along with the 4-gen VQ30. I thought we had some real 3-gen owners here.

 

What is the world coming to?

 

it was so obvious that it didn't need to be pointed out.

 

And the antenna wasn't?

 

you win. as ussual

 

I never followed the link, so I only saw the pics that were posted. Have to go check this out now.

 

hahaha his car is really ricey, then again its a photoshopped ride, mostly all the cars are on that site are photoshopped...lol

 

hilarious!!

 

Daaaaeeeemmmm! This is one sick setup!!!! Did you photoshoped it? If not, then well done! might wanna get a nice set of bimmer headlights on there and this thing will be 100% unrealled!