3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

Forced Cold Air Intake?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2006, 09:32 AM
  #1  
I can has?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Pearl93VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 2,860
Forced Cold Air Intake?!

So I was reading some new stuff about the concept Ford Lightning that may be coming out soon, and had an idea. First off, here is the part that got my attention:

Designer John Coletti?s team fit the SVT Lightning concept with an all-aluminum, 5.4-liter DOHC supercharged and intercooled V-8 engine conservatively rated at 500 horsepower and 500 foot pounds of torque. And while they were at it, they invented and patented a speed secret for those times when even that much power just isn?t enough. Ford?s patented SuperCooler technology cleverly provides a special burst of power for the SVT Lightning concept. Traditional intercoolers dissipate heat from the supercharged air by circulating coolant through a front-mounted, air-cooled radiator. With the SuperCooler system, the vehicle?s air conditioning system is used to chill a small storage tank of coolant to about 30 degrees Fahrenheit. On demand, the SuperCooler system switches the intercooler flow from its normal circulation and dumps the chilled coolant into the engine?s intercooler. In turn, the intercooler dissipates up to 20 percent more heat from the charge air ? resulting in a denser air charge.
So... It got me thinking, and. With all of the problems making VG Cold Air Intake's. What would be the effects of somehow routing air conditioning vents into the Air Intake Tube past the Ram Air Intake (high flow cone filter) It would still get it's 360 degree's worth of air coming from the filter, but the air would be chilled in the tube before entering the throttle body by the air conditioning system.

I don't think it would be extremely hard to fabricate a tube entry system from say (one/both/ spliced of the vents in the center of the dash and routed it back to a hole in the tube. Have any of you thought about this? Heard about it? And using your common sense how well it would work?

Thanks in advance...
________
UGGS

Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
Pearl93VE is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:41 AM
  #2  
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Greeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tunasea
Posts: 64,424
Interesting..
Greeny is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:46 AM
  #3  
Ad·min·is·tra·tor
iTrader: (14)
 
DanNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 17,725
with the added power loss of the AC compressor running...IMO it's not worth it in a NA setup.

with FI you might end up slightly on the plus side...but that's still up in the air.
DanNY is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:49 AM
  #4  
I can has?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Pearl93VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 2,860
Originally Posted by DanNY
with the added power loss of the AC compressor running...IMO it's not worth it in a NA setup.

with FI you might end up slightly on the plus side...but that's still up in the air.
Hmmm... Underdrive Pulley?
________
MEXICO CITY HOTELS

Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
Pearl93VE is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:52 AM
  #5  
I can has?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Pearl93VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 2,860
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Hmmm... Underdrive Pulley?
Also In Florida there's only like one and a half months I can go without my A/C on anyway
________
Vaporizer Review

Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
Pearl93VE is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:56 AM
  #6  
Ad·min·is·tra·tor
iTrader: (14)
 
DanNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 17,725
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Hmmm... Underdrive Pulley?
slowing down the accessories will yield warmer temps at the vents and then you're back to square one.

instead of adding another post you can edit your previous post to add additional comments.
DanNY is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:03 AM
  #7  
Member
 
2Legal4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 252
isn't that the same theory as CO2 charge through the intake or on the intercooler?
2Legal4Me is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:06 AM
  #8  
Ad·min·is·tra·tor
iTrader: (14)
 
DanNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 17,725
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
isn't that the same theory as CO2 charge through the intake or on the intercooler?
pretty much...it's lowering intake temps.
DanNY is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:06 AM
  #9  
I can has?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Pearl93VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 2,860
hmm... that's true. Still think it would be interesting to see. Or maybe even something to cool it down ran off of another current besides the compressor. Not sure...

Hah, better just go with an (On top of the hood) snorkel like hummers
________
Free ****tube

Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
Pearl93VE is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:24 AM
  #10  
Member
 
2Legal4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 252
like dan said yea it's more power but that would consider running the a/c compressor to cool down the coolant thats ran through the ic in terms lost of hp. its bad enough that with a supercharger it takes hp to make hp theory so there is your second lost of hp. See that is ford's problem they come out with an idea and without the proper testing, into production it goes and then in long term they will have pissed of buyers that have burned up a/c compressor

Not my cup of tea
2Legal4Me is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:49 AM
  #11  
I can has?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
Pearl93VE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 2,860
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
like dan said yea it's more power but that would consider running the a/c compressor to cool down the coolant thats ran through the ic in terms lost of hp. its bad enough that with a supercharger it takes hp to make hp theory so there is your second lost of hp. See that is ford's problem they come out with an idea and without the proper testing, into production it goes and then in long term they will have pissed of buyers that have burned up a/c compressor

Not my cup of tea
Hmmm... Can't really say Ford has a problem with not fully testing "idea's" seeing as though they can get Horsepower to the ground probably better than any other domestic company making high horsepowered vehicles. They may have a problem in the future with A/C compressors, but I doubt that using it to cool a small coolant tank will result in that much of a problem. And if you're going with the "It takes HP to make HP" theory with Ford. The 5.4 Liter in all of it's equipped vehicles has never had a problem doing that.
________
Burger king gift cards

Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:50 AM.
Pearl93VE is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 11:14 AM
  #12  
Member
 
2Legal4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 252
you misunderstood the point it a theory that applies with superchargers and blowers "It takes Hp to make Hp" and with turbos its free hp. therefore with a supercharger you loose a bit of hp, but you loose hp cuz of it being belt driven from the main pulley and when applying the a/c compressor also there is hp being lost if going to attemp that they might as well use Co2.
2Legal4Me is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 11:20 AM
  #13  
Member
 
2Legal4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Also In Florida there's only like one and a half months I can go without my A/C on anyway
yea florida has alot of humity, but out here in arizona were its known to get over 115 degrees the a/c is a big factor to us
2Legal4Me is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 12:34 PM
  #14  
Conecarver
iTrader: (19)
 
BEJAY1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NW Chicago burbs
Posts: 3,855
As mentioned the DEI solution would be much better than the A/C for draw.
BEJAY1 is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:26 PM
  #15  
Back in a 3rd Gen.
iTrader: (21)
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,944
well I didnt read this whole thread but I wanted to mention that the AC clutch cuts off at full throttle so the air would not be cold at that point.
Michael is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:56 PM
  #16  
Ad·min·is·tra·tor
iTrader: (14)
 
DanNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 17,725
Originally Posted by Michael
well I didnt read this whole thread but I wanted to mention that the AC clutch cuts off at full throttle so the air would not be cold at that point.
correct.

what the OP failed to realize is the AC is really cooling the coolant that's going into the liquid to air intercooler/aftercooler. if the coolant is cold while driving around...with the AC switched off the air will still be colder going through the intercooler/aftercooler. this is not a direct charge of cold air going from the AC into the engine...it's the cooling of the liquid in the liquid to air IC after it's been heated up from being compressed by the SC.
DanNY is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:00 PM
  #17  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
I believe there is a version of this in production. But it allows a temporary higher boost for something like 15 sec. So the benefit is not only the cooler air. It's the allowance for higher boost for that "15 sec". So na cars are pretty much out of luck.

Ice staking uphill again.
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 09:00 PM
  #18  
No turbo, no care!
iTrader: (7)
 
Maxpwer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
you misunderstood the point it a theory that applies with superchargers and blowers "It takes Hp to make Hp" and with turbos its free hp.
I can see how people think this sometimes, but its simply not true. A turbo is a restriction in an otherwise open exhaust, and the engine must work harder to push the exhaust past the turbine blades.

On a side note, using your A/C to cool the liquid and a water-to-air system is nothing new. While this maybe the first production car to do it, tuners (and backyard tuners) have been doing this for many years. But thats to reduce/prevent detonation at higher boost levels, the cooling it intself doesnt actualy produce signifigant HP gains
Maxpwer is offline  
Old 11-14-2006, 10:58 PM
  #19  
Member
 
2Legal4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by Maxpwer
I can see how people think this sometimes, but its simply not true. A turbo is a restriction in an otherwise open exhaust, and the engine must work harder to push the exhaust past the turbine blades.

On a side note, using your A/C to cool the liquid and a water-to-air system is nothing new. While this maybe the first production car to do it, tuners (and backyard tuners) have been doing this for many years. But thats to reduce/prevent detonation at higher boost levels, the cooling it intself doesnt actualy produce signifigant HP gains
exactly my point it's useless a waist of effort. At idle with a turbo the engine is not being harmed at all. You have to remember a turbo spins 10 times the rate of the engines rpm the engine is getting the sufficient air it needs. The only problem with turbos is keeping the engine supplied with enough fuel to prevent detenation.
2Legal4Me is offline  
Old 11-15-2006, 10:51 PM
  #20  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mtcookson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,615
The same would go for supercharger setups... anytime you make more power you have to keep the fuel supply there to keep from detonating.

As said above, the turbo is not free power however it is the most efficient of the forced induction methods. The centrifugal type compressor being very efficient, no "parasitic losses", etc. etc.
mtcookson is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 08:14 PM
  #21  
Newbie - Just Registered
 
1994maximagxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 13
i am wanting to put one in but i cant find anything that will fit mine.
1994maximagxe is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 09:18 AM
  #22  
Getting back to his roots
iTrader: (9)
 
Mizeree_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,549
Don't forget that the air going into an intercooler on an F/I vehicle gets much hotter than ambient due to the compressor. What you are proposing for the Max would lower the temps from what? 90 degrees on a hot day to 60 degrees maybe? Too much work for too little gain.
Mizeree_X is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 11:10 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jonmandude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The dreaded snow/rust belt
Posts: 1,032
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
The only problem with turbos is keeping the engine supplied with enough fuel to prevent detenation.
That is not the only problem with turbos. What about heat? Since turbos run off the heated exhaust gases, and since compressing air also produces heat, they tend to produce extreme amounts of heat.
jonmandude is offline  
Old 12-14-2006, 12:21 PM
  #24  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A proper turbo setup deals with that. Heat shields, wraps and coatings, with coatings being very effective.

~Alex
 
Old 12-14-2006, 03:47 PM
  #25  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mtcookson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,615
Originally Posted by jonmandude
they tend to produce extreme amounts of heat.
Turbochargers have some of the highest adiabatic efficiencies of the compressors out there.

Engine bay heat, yes... but compressor wise they are very efficient hence why they are able to make much more power than the superchargers are able to.
mtcookson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
10-17-2015 02:15 AM
Dasmith
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
09-23-2015 08:28 PM
zzznightmarezz
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
0
09-21-2015 06:32 PM
Keyno McMike
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
09-21-2015 07:18 AM
pears
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
09-18-2015 05:25 AM



Quick Reply: Forced Cold Air Intake?!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 AM.