Forced Cold Air Intake?!
#1
Forced Cold Air Intake?!
So I was reading some new stuff about the concept Ford Lightning that may be coming out soon, and had an idea. First off, here is the part that got my attention:
So... It got me thinking, and. With all of the problems making VG Cold Air Intake's. What would be the effects of somehow routing air conditioning vents into the Air Intake Tube past the Ram Air Intake (high flow cone filter) It would still get it's 360 degree's worth of air coming from the filter, but the air would be chilled in the tube before entering the throttle body by the air conditioning system.
I don't think it would be extremely hard to fabricate a tube entry system from say (one/both/ spliced of the vents in the center of the dash and routed it back to a hole in the tube. Have any of you thought about this? Heard about it? And using your common sense how well it would work?
Thanks in advance...
________
UGGS
Designer John Coletti?s team fit the SVT Lightning concept with an all-aluminum, 5.4-liter DOHC supercharged and intercooled V-8 engine conservatively rated at 500 horsepower and 500 foot pounds of torque. And while they were at it, they invented and patented a speed secret for those times when even that much power just isn?t enough. Ford?s patented SuperCooler technology cleverly provides a special burst of power for the SVT Lightning concept. Traditional intercoolers dissipate heat from the supercharged air by circulating coolant through a front-mounted, air-cooled radiator. With the SuperCooler system, the vehicle?s air conditioning system is used to chill a small storage tank of coolant to about 30 degrees Fahrenheit. On demand, the SuperCooler system switches the intercooler flow from its normal circulation and dumps the chilled coolant into the engine?s intercooler. In turn, the intercooler dissipates up to 20 percent more heat from the charge air ? resulting in a denser air charge.
I don't think it would be extremely hard to fabricate a tube entry system from say (one/both/ spliced of the vents in the center of the dash and routed it back to a hole in the tube. Have any of you thought about this? Heard about it? And using your common sense how well it would work?
Thanks in advance...
________
UGGS
Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
#4
Originally Posted by DanNY
with the added power loss of the AC compressor running...IMO it's not worth it in a NA setup.
with FI you might end up slightly on the plus side...but that's still up in the air.
with FI you might end up slightly on the plus side...but that's still up in the air.
________
MEXICO CITY HOTELS
Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
#5
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Hmmm... Underdrive Pulley?
________
Vaporizer Review
Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
#6
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Hmmm... Underdrive Pulley?
instead of adding another post you can edit your previous post to add additional comments.
#9
hmm... that's true. Still think it would be interesting to see. Or maybe even something to cool it down ran off of another current besides the compressor. Not sure...
Hah, better just go with an (On top of the hood) snorkel like hummers
________
Free ****tube
Hah, better just go with an (On top of the hood) snorkel like hummers
________
Free ****tube
Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:49 AM.
#10
like dan said yea it's more power but that would consider running the a/c compressor to cool down the coolant thats ran through the ic in terms lost of hp. its bad enough that with a supercharger it takes hp to make hp theory so there is your second lost of hp. See that is ford's problem they come out with an idea and without the proper testing, into production it goes and then in long term they will have pissed of buyers that have burned up a/c compressor
Not my cup of tea
Not my cup of tea
#11
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
like dan said yea it's more power but that would consider running the a/c compressor to cool down the coolant thats ran through the ic in terms lost of hp. its bad enough that with a supercharger it takes hp to make hp theory so there is your second lost of hp. See that is ford's problem they come out with an idea and without the proper testing, into production it goes and then in long term they will have pissed of buyers that have burned up a/c compressor
Not my cup of tea
Not my cup of tea
________
Burger king gift cards
Last edited by Pearl93VE; 04-18-2011 at 12:50 AM.
#12
you misunderstood the point it a theory that applies with superchargers and blowers "It takes Hp to make Hp" and with turbos its free hp. therefore with a supercharger you loose a bit of hp, but you loose hp cuz of it being belt driven from the main pulley and when applying the a/c compressor also there is hp being lost if going to attemp that they might as well use Co2.
#13
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
Also In Florida there's only like one and a half months I can go without my A/C on anyway
#16
Originally Posted by Michael
well I didnt read this whole thread but I wanted to mention that the AC clutch cuts off at full throttle so the air would not be cold at that point.
what the OP failed to realize is the AC is really cooling the coolant that's going into the liquid to air intercooler/aftercooler. if the coolant is cold while driving around...with the AC switched off the air will still be colder going through the intercooler/aftercooler. this is not a direct charge of cold air going from the AC into the engine...it's the cooling of the liquid in the liquid to air IC after it's been heated up from being compressed by the SC.
#17
I believe there is a version of this in production. But it allows a temporary higher boost for something like 15 sec. So the benefit is not only the cooler air. It's the allowance for higher boost for that "15 sec". So na cars are pretty much out of luck.
Ice staking uphill again.
Ice staking uphill again.
#18
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
you misunderstood the point it a theory that applies with superchargers and blowers "It takes Hp to make Hp" and with turbos its free hp.
On a side note, using your A/C to cool the liquid and a water-to-air system is nothing new. While this maybe the first production car to do it, tuners (and backyard tuners) have been doing this for many years. But thats to reduce/prevent detonation at higher boost levels, the cooling it intself doesnt actualy produce signifigant HP gains
#19
Originally Posted by Maxpwer
I can see how people think this sometimes, but its simply not true. A turbo is a restriction in an otherwise open exhaust, and the engine must work harder to push the exhaust past the turbine blades.
On a side note, using your A/C to cool the liquid and a water-to-air system is nothing new. While this maybe the first production car to do it, tuners (and backyard tuners) have been doing this for many years. But thats to reduce/prevent detonation at higher boost levels, the cooling it intself doesnt actualy produce signifigant HP gains
On a side note, using your A/C to cool the liquid and a water-to-air system is nothing new. While this maybe the first production car to do it, tuners (and backyard tuners) have been doing this for many years. But thats to reduce/prevent detonation at higher boost levels, the cooling it intself doesnt actualy produce signifigant HP gains
#20
The same would go for supercharger setups... anytime you make more power you have to keep the fuel supply there to keep from detonating.
As said above, the turbo is not free power however it is the most efficient of the forced induction methods. The centrifugal type compressor being very efficient, no "parasitic losses", etc. etc.
As said above, the turbo is not free power however it is the most efficient of the forced induction methods. The centrifugal type compressor being very efficient, no "parasitic losses", etc. etc.
#22
Don't forget that the air going into an intercooler on an F/I vehicle gets much hotter than ambient due to the compressor. What you are proposing for the Max would lower the temps from what? 90 degrees on a hot day to 60 degrees maybe? Too much work for too little gain.
#23
Originally Posted by 2Legal4Me
The only problem with turbos is keeping the engine supplied with enough fuel to prevent detenation.
#25
Originally Posted by jonmandude
they tend to produce extreme amounts of heat.
Engine bay heat, yes... but compressor wise they are very efficient hence why they are able to make much more power than the superchargers are able to.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
10-17-2015 02:15 AM
Dasmith
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
09-23-2015 08:28 PM
zzznightmarezz
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
0
09-21-2015 06:32 PM
Keyno McMike
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
09-21-2015 07:18 AM
pears
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
09-18-2015 05:25 AM