3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

3.3l Ve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2007, 07:44 AM
  #1  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
3.3l Ve

Has anyone tried doing a 3.3L VE with a VG33 block and VE heads+ECU? I mean, it would basically have 10% more NA power than a regular VE, mod for mod. Not to mention that the extra 0.3L comes from bigger pistons only, not the crank, so you can rev just as much as a normal VE.

Theres also a possibility that simply putting VE heads on a 3.3L block will increase compression. Im surprised I havent heard of such a setup in a 3rd gen yet.

This could be a good budget setup for 3rd gens somewhat like the 3.5-3.0 combos that the 4th gens guys do. Its a good option to stay NA, IMO. It would be very cheap to build.
JClaw is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:14 AM
  #2  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Pervis Anathema's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by JClaw
Has anyone tried doing a 3.3L VE with a VG33 block and VE heads+ECU? I mean, it would basically have 10% more NA power than a regular VE, mod for mod. Not to mention that the extra 0.3L comes from bigger pistons only, not the crank, so you can rev just as much as a normal VE.

Theres also a possibility that simply putting VE heads on a 3.3L block will increase compression. Im surprised I havent heard of such a setup in a 3rd gen yet.

This could be a good budget setup for 3rd gens somewhat like the 3.5-3.0 combos that the 4th gens guys do. Its a good option to stay NA, IMO. It would be very cheap to build.
I bet the coolant passages don't line up for one. For two, doesn't the VG33 use a timing belt instead of chains? For three, that sounds very expensive and complicated to maybe end up with, according to your wild asz guess, ~20 more horsepower.
Pervis Anathema is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:27 AM
  #3  
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Greeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tunasea
Posts: 64,424
Drop a 454 block in it...
Greeny is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:37 AM
  #4  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (25)
 
95turbo gxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oburg S.C.
Posts: 3,385
Originally Posted by JClaw
Has anyone tried doing a 3.3L VE with a VG33 block and VE heads+ECU? I mean, it would basically have 10% more NA power than a regular VE, mod for mod. Not to mention that the extra 0.3L comes from bigger pistons only, not the crank, so you can rev just as much as a normal VE.

Theres also a possibility that simply putting VE heads on a 3.3L block will increase compression. Im surprised I havent heard of such a setup in a 3rd gen yet.

This could be a good budget setup for 3rd gens somewhat like the 3.5-3.0 combos that the 4th gens guys do. Its a good option to stay NA, IMO. It would be very cheap to build.
oh well you just cant help some!
95turbo gxe is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 10:15 AM
  #5  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Great attitude guys.
JClaw is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:05 AM
  #6  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (25)
 
95turbo gxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oburg S.C.
Posts: 3,385
3rd gen guy dont like to adventure
95turbo gxe is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:09 AM
  #7  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
T-belt to T-chain would be hard to convert. Also if the VG didn't have VTCs before, you have to rig an oil feed to it. IMHO, not that easy to do as it's part of the VE chain tensioner.
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:01 PM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
maxitech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,306
My Buick Century has a 3.3L...Maybe I'll just drop that in the ole' Max...
You can make anything fit with a big enough hammer!
maxitech is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:46 PM
  #9  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Matt93SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
It's a good concept, but the blocks are different. the timing belt to chain stuff would be the big issue, since the belt is dry on a VG and the chains and most of the oil pump is wet on the VE...
it would take a lot of custom machining to make it work.

then again, you can always bore out the VE block to make it happen... what's the bore on a VG33? 93mm?
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 12:54 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Hollywood!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 205
LS1 FTMFW lol

if a miata can swallow a 5.0 then an LSx should be able to fit in a max.
Hollywood! is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 02:29 PM
  #11  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mtcookson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,615
VG30E(T) - 13 head bolts/head
VE/VG30DE(TT) - 8 head bolts/head

'Nuff said.
mtcookson is offline  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:28 PM
  #12  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was talking about this a while back VE34

Lots of issues with the VE vs VG blocks. Doesn't mean you cant use the VH or Vk pistons or get custom ones made to go 3.3L-3.4L. Then they'd be light. Get some lighter vavles (BTW do the VQ valves fit? or VK?) better springs and custom grind cams and you on your way to some great HP.

I want a VE34 and a modded slush box for a DD. That would be pretty fun.

~Alex
 
Old 01-16-2007, 08:51 AM
  #13  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Matt93SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
no the valves form the VQ don't fit... they're about 1/2" shorter than the VE valves. stem diameter is the same, but they're just too short. they're also only about 1/2mm larger- wouldn't be worth all of the effort to install for just that slight of a change.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 01-18-2007, 04:25 PM
  #14  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
todamax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,270
Originally Posted by Alex_V
Lots of issues with the VE vs VG blocks. Doesn't mean you cant use the VH or Vk pistons or get custom ones made to go 3.3L-3.4L. Then they'd be light. Get some lighter vavles (BTW do the VQ valves fit? or VK?) better springs and custom grind cams and you on your way to some great HP.
~Alex

Just talking out of my *** here, but wouldn't just a piston swap lower the compression and limit the gains from the increased displacement?
todamax is offline  
Old 01-18-2007, 06:29 PM
  #15  
2nd Gen Boostinator
iTrader: (14)
 
Big_E-Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Diego, and all over it!
Posts: 1,990
Originally Posted by maxitech
You can make anything fit with a big enough hammer!

you say hammer others say "persuasion device"
Big_E-Dog is offline  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:00 PM
  #16  
Please. Call me John. I insist
iTrader: (7)
 
ColombianMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,948
Toda- yea your talking out of your butt lol. An over bore (which is what the VH pistons are) will always add displacement and C/R. Because the over bore is added over the entire stroke. I dont see how you'd get lower compression from a piston swap.

If it was like a turbo VG and you swapped the pistons yea but the VH pistons add compression and displacement.

~ALEX not colombo-spaz
ColombianMax is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 05:56 AM
  #17  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mtcookson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,615
Also, VH pistons are flat tops like the stock pistons.
mtcookson is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 10:57 AM
  #18  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
It also depends on the wrist pin location of the VH pistons.

Originally Posted by ColombianMax
Toda- yea your talking out of your butt lol. An over bore (which is what the VH pistons are) will always add displacement and C/R. Because the over bore is added over the entire stroke. I dont see how you'd get lower compression from a piston swap.

If it was like a turbo VG and you swapped the pistons yea but the VH pistons add compression and displacement.

~ALEX not colombo-spaz
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 01-19-2007, 12:03 PM
  #19  
Alex_V
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Any of you look at the VG34 that nissan performance mag buildup?

He used the VH pistons and he ended up with higher compression and it didnt hit the valves (he had them clearanced for the VG valves) so Im assuming as long as he pistons are clearanced for the VE vavles it wouldn't be a problem.

Since VG and VE rods are all the same it should work correct? I really wish i had some pistons from both to measure now.

~Alex
 
Old 01-27-2007, 06:40 PM
  #20  
bald aggression est 78
 
Kountz430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 680
Originally Posted by MyGreenMax94
Drop a 454 block in it...
lmao
Kountz430 is offline  
Old 01-27-2007, 06:46 PM
  #21  
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Matt93SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 18,095
Originally Posted by Alex_V
Any of you look at the VG34 that nissan performance mag buildup?

He used the VH pistons and he ended up with higher compression and it didnt hit the valves (he had them clearanced for the VG valves) so Im assuming as long as he pistons are clearanced for the VE vavles it wouldn't be a problem.

Since VG and VE rods are all the same it should work correct? I really wish i had some pistons from both to measure now.

~Alex
VG30DE and VE rods are the same.
VG30E rods have a smaller wrist pin.
VH and VK engines (Q45) have yet another size wrist pin.
you can of course make anything work with $$$$ in custom machining, but that's what you have to start with.
Matt93SE is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 05:35 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Mattster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 180
Nissan engines arent as interchangable as Chevy engines are. Just about any small block chevy V8 part is interchangable where as alot of the Import motors arent.
Mattster is offline  
Old 01-28-2007, 07:30 PM
  #23  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
mtcookson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,615
Its because they used the small block in nearly everything.
mtcookson is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 05:46 PM
  #24  
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
internetautomar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Skokie (look it up)
Posts: 19,760
Originally Posted by mtcookson
Its because they used the small block in nearly everything.
that's because they could!
internetautomar is offline  
Old 01-29-2007, 07:36 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Mattster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 180
That and the displacement sizes of the small block ranged from 4.6L to 6.6L. And why wouldnt you want a small block. I would have loved to have been a live during the 60s and 70s since a V8 was in just about everything. And the people with the 4cylinder cars were made fun of. I still make fun of them but not as many people mock them any more.
Mattster is offline  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:22 PM
  #26  
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
internetautomar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Skokie (look it up)
Posts: 19,760
Originally Posted by Mattster
That and the displacement sizes of the small block ranged from 4.6L to 6.6L. And why wouldnt you want a small block. I would have loved to have been a live during the 60s and 70s since a V8 was in just about everything. And the people with the 4cylinder cars were made fun of. I still make fun of them but not as many people mock them any more.
4.3L to 7.0 actually. (262 in 1980, 7.0 in school buses IIRC)
internetautomar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
furbiss112
Supercharged/Turbocharged
12
06-24-2012 05:26 PM



Quick Reply: 3.3l Ve



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 PM.