Turning radius
Turning radius
Is it just me or does the turning radius suck? I have to swing wide and cut the wheel all the way to maneuver into a spot. I had to go up a row the wrong way one day and it took 3 corrections to get it in.
Nah, its fine. I never have problems maneuvering in tight areas. Just get to know your car better so you know where it starts and ends, then park and drive with tighter margins.
My passengers are always nervous like I'm about to hit something but they just dont have a feel for the precise size of the car, and then marvel at the parallel spots I can fit into with no effort.
My passengers are always nervous like I'm about to hit something but they just dont have a feel for the precise size of the car, and then marvel at the parallel spots I can fit into with no effort.
Originally Posted by mikekantor
Nah, its fine. I never have problems maneuvering in tight areas. Just get to know your car better so you know where it starts and ends, then park and drive with tighter margins.
My passengers are always nervous like I'm about to hit something but they just dont have a feel for the precise size of the car, and then marvel at the parallel spots I can fit into with no effort.
My passengers are always nervous like I'm about to hit something but they just dont have a feel for the precise size of the car, and then marvel at the parallel spots I can fit into with no effort.
3'rd gens' front overhang is decent for a FWD mid-size sedan. BMWs generally have a very short front overhang compared to other manufacturers, but that still doesnt stop their owners from bumping and scratching because it always comes down to awareness.
Yes, I remember when I bought this car that the reviews mentioned a large turning radius. Now that I've got a 2005 SE, the turning radius on the '92 seems nice and tight. The 2005's got the turning radius of the Graf Spee.
Originally Posted by 94maxshima
This Thread = 

not really the major issue, but it might play a factor.
honda accord 4 cyl and V6 are both the same radius and frame, but they are both better than the Maxima.
a lot of it simply has to do with suspension geometry and tire size.
If you go to a narrower tire or a smaller overall diameter, you can get more steering angle out of it.
Just be glad you're not running tires as wide as I am. (255/45/17)
my front tires rub the frame rails at 1/2 turn before the wheel hits the stops!
honda accord 4 cyl and V6 are both the same radius and frame, but they are both better than the Maxima.
a lot of it simply has to do with suspension geometry and tire size.
If you go to a narrower tire or a smaller overall diameter, you can get more steering angle out of it.
Just be glad you're not running tires as wide as I am. (255/45/17)
my front tires rub the frame rails at 1/2 turn before the wheel hits the stops!
Maxima turning circle is pretty large. I never noticed it until I bought a Trailblazer. I can easily park in spaces with just one turn that would require cutting out and backing up once in the Maxima.
Originally Posted by gapboi210
Is it just me or does the turning radius suck? I have to swing wide and cut the wheel all the way to maneuver into a spot. I had to go up a row the wrong way one day and it took 3 corrections to get it in.
Originally Posted by capedcadaver
well it's not entirely illegitimate or untrue. My brother noticed the wider turning circle the first time he drove my car. It's just because our fatter V6 engine sits wide in the bay and takes up turning room, isn't it? Such that a 4cyl of the same size would be able to have a more compact drivetrain thus allowing for more angulation of the wheels? Likewise, a FR layout should have a similar advantage, especially on an inline engine.
Originally Posted by Matt93SE
it's a nissan thing. my 240 is the same way.
if you want better turning radius, buy a honda.
if you want better turning radius, buy a honda.
When I first got my max I was like holy SHHHHHHHHHHHHh the turning radius suck A$$ compared to my old 88/89 honda accord. but I got used to it and can manage to park in most spots that are lightly longer than the car itself so I'm not complaning.
Now on the g.fs max *89 SE* her radius isnt only crappier but stiffer steering. Is this normal for the 89-91 SEs VS the 92+ GXEs such as mine?
Now on the g.fs max *89 SE* her radius isnt only crappier but stiffer steering. Is this normal for the 89-91 SEs VS the 92+ GXEs such as mine?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Dec 20, 2021 06:57 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
RealityCheck
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
7
Oct 2, 2015 06:34 PM





oops
