Meccanoble Has Just Got Into A Major Accident!!!!!
#41
Re: AW DAM, neck pain :(
Originally posted by meccanoble
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
#42
Don't feel bad. The other day on the way to school some lady blew a stop sign and cause me to hit her. Now my car is in the shop and God only knows how long it will take to get fixed. But you didnt get hurt,(neither did I) so be happy
#44
Re: AW DAM, neck pain :(
Originally posted by meccanoble
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
First of all for you own health, and second if you do have serious neck strain (whiplash) you will need to have this documented by a doctor in case you need to make a claim for pain and suffering.
#45
Also for anyone involved in an accident,
The insurance companies will try to get a recorded statment from you regarding the accident.
Don't give them a recorded statement!!
There is too great a chance that you will mis-speak and say something that might make the accident sound like your fault.
Instead give them a statement in writing.
The insurance companies will try to get a recorded statment from you regarding the accident.
Don't give them a recorded statement!!
There is too great a chance that you will mis-speak and say something that might make the accident sound like your fault.
Instead give them a statement in writing.
#46
Originally posted by meccanoble
thanks guys, i'm really looking for input on how the scenario goes when u just been in an accident. How long it takes for insurance to come see car (the other person's insurance) and all. Chances of it going my way. I only have liability and everyone says it may take a year to get money, some say it may take a few months, some say a few weeks...someone give me some positive and negative feedback on this from personal knowledge and experience
thanks guys, i'm really looking for input on how the scenario goes when u just been in an accident. How long it takes for insurance to come see car (the other person's insurance) and all. Chances of it going my way. I only have liability and everyone says it may take a year to get money, some say it may take a few months, some say a few weeks...someone give me some positive and negative feedback on this from personal knowledge and experience
1)Use your insurance agent as just that; an agent acting on your behalf. You don't have to pay them for the service like you will with option 2.
2)Get a lawyer.
What you'll be facing. They'll need to make a determination of fault for the accident. The police will issue citations based on their findings since happened on a public road. You'll likely find that the victories won by insurance companies mean that they assign some portion of blame to you (failure to control speed of vehicle to avoid a collision or something similar). If you're fortunate and it's clear-cut, you won't get any blame/culpability in this.
You will speak with a claim adjuster for the woman's insurance. DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING REGARDELESS OF WHAT THEY TELL YOU IT SAYS! If you're unlucky and get partial fault assigned your award will be reduced by your percentage of fault. If they'd give you $10,000 for the car but find you to be 30% at fault, you will get $7,000. The decision to total or not total the car is generally based on the value of the vehicle. I had a jacka$$ hit my trunk to the tune of $2700 in damage. It was repaired without question so that $2,000 remark from the cop is rubbish.
Do not accept any first offers. Fight for what you want. Threaten legal action, pain and suffering, etc. Often times back and neck pain don't show for a day or two after a trauma. I thought I was going to feel fine after my motorcycle accident but after a night of sleep I woke up unable to turn or bend my torso in any direction without excruciating pain. Don't rule out the possibility of this and don't volunteer that you didn't have your seatbelt on. If you're asked, be truthful, but don't volunteer it. Disclosure of this will likely severely limit damages for physical injury claim though it won't eliminate it.
Rule 1 is: Don't sign anything until you've read it thoroughly and had clarification of anything you question.
Rule 2 is: Fight for what you feel is fair. You can accomplish this on your own, with an agent or with a lawyer.
Cheers and good luck,
Joaquin
#47
Originally posted by meccanoble
thanks all. I just called police and it will take 3 days for police report to go through. I'm about to call my insurance (dam i missed 2 quizzes and a whole day of school for this )
i was so confused and didn't know what i was doing (first accident) i just stood near my car and examined it the whole time. Didn't do all u guys told me to do (get her insurance company and whatnot) the police that were there all like felt for me and kind of felt it was her fault from what i was getting. Witnesses were they saying it was her fault too. I was going a good 30 mph when i got hit (seriously) but my tires are bad and most importantly, my car stalled when i got hit or something and i guess it locked my tires and caused the car to spin. I seriously, seriously wasn't going faster than 40 and it was a 35 or 40 mph zone. Its not a residential street. I do 40 all the time, sometimes even faster with no complaints. When i hit intersection i was going around 30 or less though.
i'm going to call my insurance for some advice and all but you guys keep involving them in the situation as if i had FULL COVERAGE! i only have liability. Can they even do anything for me in this situation? Also, my insurance is real high. We're talking 2,000 dollars UNDER my parents name for ONLY LIABILITY. One of u said u were paying 1100 for full coverage under your own name?! crazy.
i'll keep u guys updated on what's going on...definitely a difficult time for me in my life....no other car to drive
thanks all. I just called police and it will take 3 days for police report to go through. I'm about to call my insurance (dam i missed 2 quizzes and a whole day of school for this )
i was so confused and didn't know what i was doing (first accident) i just stood near my car and examined it the whole time. Didn't do all u guys told me to do (get her insurance company and whatnot) the police that were there all like felt for me and kind of felt it was her fault from what i was getting. Witnesses were they saying it was her fault too. I was going a good 30 mph when i got hit (seriously) but my tires are bad and most importantly, my car stalled when i got hit or something and i guess it locked my tires and caused the car to spin. I seriously, seriously wasn't going faster than 40 and it was a 35 or 40 mph zone. Its not a residential street. I do 40 all the time, sometimes even faster with no complaints. When i hit intersection i was going around 30 or less though.
i'm going to call my insurance for some advice and all but you guys keep involving them in the situation as if i had FULL COVERAGE! i only have liability. Can they even do anything for me in this situation? Also, my insurance is real high. We're talking 2,000 dollars UNDER my parents name for ONLY LIABILITY. One of u said u were paying 1100 for full coverage under your own name?! crazy.
i'll keep u guys updated on what's going on...definitely a difficult time for me in my life....no other car to drive
#48
Re: AW DAM, neck pain :(
Originally posted by meccanoble
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
aw man, yesterday they asked me if i need ambulance and they came and i signed something waiving them off plus i repeatedly told police officers i was ok. Now i wake up and i SERIOUSLY have this disturbing neck pain like whiplash or something. I can survive but its very uncomfortable. I don't knwo what to do and i feel too lazy to go to doctors. Might be good chance to sue or something but i don't want to take more than what's rightfully mine plus i waived so many people off they might think i'm lying.....
At a minimum a report will assist you in fighting for medical claims.
And I don't mean to PW here, just several very different items to respond to within this thread.
#49
you shouldn't have been speeding, but atleast you came out alright.
I had my Maxima totalled and I can say that yes they are safe, but they just get destroyed on impact. If you do end up getting it back, don't try and fix it up, just use it as a spare. Insurance companies suck what can I say. Make sure her insurance (if she has any) takes care of the situation (your insurance should help you fight it out).
I had my Maxima totalled and I can say that yes they are safe, but they just get destroyed on impact. If you do end up getting it back, don't try and fix it up, just use it as a spare. Insurance companies suck what can I say. Make sure her insurance (if she has any) takes care of the situation (your insurance should help you fight it out).
#50
sorry to hear
do not try and fix the car. I am still suffering from an accident 5 years ago that insurance at the time decided not to total the car and instead repair it ( even though I paid out of pocket while insurance things were worked out, but never ended getting reimbursed because there was no way to decide who was liable for how much) -by the way- I was rear ended by five cars on central expressway in dallas. it sucked. since basically getting an entirely new rear clip ( behind the front seats back) I have had to replace everything to the front of the car...stereo, transmission, etc. My engine is still leaking oil and it is the LAST thing to fix, but I don't feel like dealing with it until it gets bad enough. The car has never been the same as before the accident, but it's still my max
do not try and fix the car. I am still suffering from an accident 5 years ago that insurance at the time decided not to total the car and instead repair it ( even though I paid out of pocket while insurance things were worked out, but never ended getting reimbursed because there was no way to decide who was liable for how much) -by the way- I was rear ended by five cars on central expressway in dallas. it sucked. since basically getting an entirely new rear clip ( behind the front seats back) I have had to replace everything to the front of the car...stereo, transmission, etc. My engine is still leaking oil and it is the LAST thing to fix, but I don't feel like dealing with it until it gets bad enough. The car has never been the same as before the accident, but it's still my max
#51
sorry to hear
do not try and fix the car. I am still suffering from an accident 5 years ago that insurance at the time decided not to total the car and instead repair it ( even though I paid out of pocket while insurance things were worked out, but never ended getting reimbursed because there was no way to decide who was liable for how much) -by the way- I was rear ended by five cars on central expressway in dallas. it sucked. since basically getting an entirely new rear clip ( behind the front seats back) I have had to replace everything to the front of the car...stereo, transmission, etc. My engine is still leaking oil and it is the LAST thing to fix, but I don't feel like dealing with it until it gets bad enough. The car has never been the same as before the accident, but it's still my max- my suggestion - tell them about your neck/back ($5-10K) plus your car ($5-7K) = another 4th gen w/ some left over $ for mods
do not try and fix the car. I am still suffering from an accident 5 years ago that insurance at the time decided not to total the car and instead repair it ( even though I paid out of pocket while insurance things were worked out, but never ended getting reimbursed because there was no way to decide who was liable for how much) -by the way- I was rear ended by five cars on central expressway in dallas. it sucked. since basically getting an entirely new rear clip ( behind the front seats back) I have had to replace everything to the front of the car...stereo, transmission, etc. My engine is still leaking oil and it is the LAST thing to fix, but I don't feel like dealing with it until it gets bad enough. The car has never been the same as before the accident, but it's still my max- my suggestion - tell them about your neck/back ($5-10K) plus your car ($5-7K) = another 4th gen w/ some left over $ for mods
#52
Originally posted by DaddyMac
you shouldn't have been speeding, but atleast you came out alright.
I had my Maxima totalled and I can say that yes they are safe, but they just get destroyed on impact. If you do end up getting it back, don't try and fix it up, just use it as a spare. Insurance companies suck what can I say. Make sure her insurance (if she has any) takes care of the situation (your insurance should help you fight it out).
you shouldn't have been speeding, but atleast you came out alright.
I had my Maxima totalled and I can say that yes they are safe, but they just get destroyed on impact. If you do end up getting it back, don't try and fix it up, just use it as a spare. Insurance companies suck what can I say. Make sure her insurance (if she has any) takes care of the situation (your insurance should help you fight it out).
also i just came back from doctor. No bones look to be broked just a really sprained neck. Muscle sprain and stuff. I'm on this medication and i have information of me going to doctor so if the time comes that i may have to sue or whatever, this is proof that i did have problems right?
Also, i agree on the signing issue. I'm going to look up prices for 97 maxima's and work from there as far as how much i should get.
My 2k1 rims are still intact but tires are dead. I am debating on selling them or keeping them for my new maxima. Actually i will keep them.
i am hoping for a total, but everyone says i may not keep car even with a deductable taken out of how much they would have given me. So i'm going to take out the essentials tomorrow. The parts i know i'll put in my new car. If anyone in the northeast is willing to help and see the car, it would be gladly appreciated.
#55
Originally posted by meccanoble
I'm going to look up prices for 97 maxima's and work from there as far as how much i should get.
I'm going to look up prices for 97 maxima's and work from there as far as how much i should get.
Obviously, if your insurance company has a higher value on file for the vehicle (than u get at kbb.com), go with that & don't say a word.
Glad you weren't seriously injured. Sounds like you're doing all the right things to ensure you have a solid "paper-trail" for both the damage to the car and any potential damage to you. Good luck w/ both. Hope things work out for you.
Oh, and I almost forgot. . .
WEAR YOUR F'N SEATBELT, DAMMIT! (I know u know u had that coming)
Be well.
Cheers,
-KWheelzSB-
#56
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
#57
Originally posted by jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
-Sryth...
__________________________________________________ ____________________________
'98 SE 5spd, Pebble Beige, PRCAI, Stillen Y, Stillen FSTB, ACT clutch.
Pacesetter STS to be installed this week!
#58
Originally posted by jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
A) An interested party knew you were a member on these boards.
B) An interested party knew what your member name was.
Since it's unlikely he would have disclosed either of these items to any insurance company, police, or investigator, one could assume it's equally unlikely that an interested party would even have a starting point for such an inquiry.
Having said that, if it were me, and I had a "maxima.org" sticker on the glass, I'd probably razor it off before anyone (read: insurance) got a close look at the car.*
*(I'm sure most of us have said SOMETHING incriminating [by insurance agent standards, ne-way] - about our driving at one point or another: afterall, we're all here because to us, our cars are more than basic transportation from A-2-B. . .They're a source of FUUUUNNNNN! )
#59
Originally posted by jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
If anything were to be taken to court such as, who's fault the accident was or pain and suffering. Would there be any chance that they could check this forum and find any "evidence" going against mecca? I mean what he posts and so forth, not that he has posted anything self-incriminating.
I know when I was rear ended I really watched what I said just in case. I could be wrong but that was just me following my instinct
Jules
Also, i am DEFINITELY going for a stick again. This time i'm looking for SE. I would look through this forum for one but i'm worried alot of the ones here are beat up.
As far as pics are concerned, i don't plan on taking any unless they let me keep it so i can show u waht's for sale and what has been damaged. Actually i might take some anyway but i don't have a digital camera so i would have to go the disposable route.
Today i SHOULD be going to get the police report and work from there. Thanks all for your help, if i didn't have any feedback who knows what i would have done as far as getting money for my new used car. I know what i deserve.....
#60
Hey guys, i just thought of something new while coming back from my lawyer.
IF they don't let me keep the car, they are gonna give me the worth of a GLE if all things go right. Right?
So if i take all the stuff out that i added besides 5 speed, that makes my car any different from a GLe (spoiler, rims, foglight, speakers, etc.) will i get in trouble? obviously the insurance hasn't seen the car and i doubt they gonna pay me for the smaller things i added so will it hurt me in any way?
IF they don't let me keep the car, they are gonna give me the worth of a GLE if all things go right. Right?
So if i take all the stuff out that i added besides 5 speed, that makes my car any different from a GLe (spoiler, rims, foglight, speakers, etc.) will i get in trouble? obviously the insurance hasn't seen the car and i doubt they gonna pay me for the smaller things i added so will it hurt me in any way?
#61
Originally posted by meccanoble
. . .my friends are pressuring me to sue because i am NOW feeling neck pain and minor knee and hip, i'm not in it for the money, just in it for another maxima which i feel i rightfully deserve.
. . .my friends are pressuring me to sue because i am NOW feeling neck pain and minor knee and hip, i'm not in it for the money, just in it for another maxima which i feel i rightfully deserve.
-It shouldn't be your responsibility to pay for those treatments. It should be the responsibility of the person who was at fault or their insurance company.
You have to consider the possibility that the damage to your body is worse than you think, and may take considerable time to heal. You may shrug it off as tolerable a few days after the accident, but If 5 years from now, you're still living with chronic pain because of this accident and someone were to ask you:
"Having sleepless nights caused by pain, having had your physical activity limited by pain, etc., for the last 5 years - if you could go back and either have your car replaced, or be guaranteed you'd live free of any pain from the accident for the rest of your life, which would you choose?"
Trust me, I know what your answer would be.
We're not even talking about an "either fix the car or fix me" case here. This is just making sure you take steps NOW to protect your future physical and financial wellbeing. If you have an attorney involved, he should already be advising you of this.
Again, best of luck 2u.
,
PS: I see no problem with returning the car to it's original trim-level by removing items/accessories. Shouldn't be a problem 4u.
#62
Originally posted by KWheelzSB
Don't think of it as being greedy, or taking $ you feel you're not entitled to. Bottom line: living with chronic pain diminishes the quality of your life. If there are treatments available that can either help you manage/control chronic pain, or better yet, heal it altogether, then you should take advantage of those. Treatments, of course, cost $$$$$.
-It shouldn't be your responsibility to pay for those treatments. It should be the responsibility of the person who was at fault or their insurance company.
You have to consider the possibility that the damage to your body is worse than you think, and may take considerable time to heal. You may shrug it off as tolerable a few days after the accident, but If 5 years from now, you're still living with chronic pain because of this accident and someone were to ask you:
"Having sleepless nights caused by pain, having had your physical activity limited by pain, etc., for the last 5 years - if you could go back and either have your car replaced, or be guaranteed you'd live free of any pain from the accident for the rest of your life, which would you choose?"
Trust me, I know what your answer would be.
We're not even talking about an "either fix the car or fix me" case here. This is just making sure you take steps NOW to protect your future physical and financial wellbeing. If you have an attorney involved, he should already be advising you of this.
Again, best of luck 2u.
,
PS: I see no problem with returning the car to it's original trim-level by removing items/accessories. Shouldn't be a problem 4u.
Don't think of it as being greedy, or taking $ you feel you're not entitled to. Bottom line: living with chronic pain diminishes the quality of your life. If there are treatments available that can either help you manage/control chronic pain, or better yet, heal it altogether, then you should take advantage of those. Treatments, of course, cost $$$$$.
-It shouldn't be your responsibility to pay for those treatments. It should be the responsibility of the person who was at fault or their insurance company.
You have to consider the possibility that the damage to your body is worse than you think, and may take considerable time to heal. You may shrug it off as tolerable a few days after the accident, but If 5 years from now, you're still living with chronic pain because of this accident and someone were to ask you:
"Having sleepless nights caused by pain, having had your physical activity limited by pain, etc., for the last 5 years - if you could go back and either have your car replaced, or be guaranteed you'd live free of any pain from the accident for the rest of your life, which would you choose?"
Trust me, I know what your answer would be.
We're not even talking about an "either fix the car or fix me" case here. This is just making sure you take steps NOW to protect your future physical and financial wellbeing. If you have an attorney involved, he should already be advising you of this.
Again, best of luck 2u.
,
PS: I see no problem with returning the car to it's original trim-level by removing items/accessories. Shouldn't be a problem 4u.
Also i am selling my warspeed y-pipe at a super deal of 50 dollars. If anyone wants it, go to the FS forum and see for details. Great deal, just takes a little installing and uninstalling
#63
whether you were or weren't is not the case anymore.
did you get any air bag burns ? that **** stings like a nasty rash
Go to autotrader and look up prices for the insurance and since you are looking to replace it with another maxima, you are killing two birds with one stone.
did you get any air bag burns ? that **** stings like a nasty rash
Go to autotrader and look up prices for the insurance and since you are looking to replace it with another maxima, you are killing two birds with one stone.
Originally posted by meccanoble
i wasn't speeding. If anything i was doing the speed limit or a LITTLE over it. What is the speed limit on local roads that aren't residential? 35 mph?
also i just came back from doctor. No bones look to be broked just a really sprained neck. Muscle sprain and stuff. I'm on this medication and i have information of me going to doctor so if the time comes that i may have to sue or whatever, this is proof that i did have problems right?
Also, i agree on the signing issue. I'm going to look up prices for 97 maxima's and work from there as far as how much i should get.
i wasn't speeding. If anything i was doing the speed limit or a LITTLE over it. What is the speed limit on local roads that aren't residential? 35 mph?
also i just came back from doctor. No bones look to be broked just a really sprained neck. Muscle sprain and stuff. I'm on this medication and i have information of me going to doctor so if the time comes that i may have to sue or whatever, this is proof that i did have problems right?
Also, i agree on the signing issue. I'm going to look up prices for 97 maxima's and work from there as far as how much i should get.
#64
Originally posted by meccanoble
well i don't really care if they see this or not because the way i explained the story here is EXACTLY how i explained the story to the police. I have no reason to lie and although my friends are pressuring me to sue because i am NOW feeling neck pain and minor knee and hip, i'm not in it for the money, just in it for another maxima which i feel i rightfully deserve. I put a lot of hardwork into my first one and i'm not rich enouh like a lot of you to throw in a turbo whenever i feel like it.
well i don't really care if they see this or not because the way i explained the story here is EXACTLY how i explained the story to the police. I have no reason to lie and although my friends are pressuring me to sue because i am NOW feeling neck pain and minor knee and hip, i'm not in it for the money, just in it for another maxima which i feel i rightfully deserve. I put a lot of hardwork into my first one and i'm not rich enouh like a lot of you to throw in a turbo whenever i feel like it.
Jules
*edit* I hope you didnt tell the police officer that you werent wearing your seatbelt because you wont get anything for your pains. Just a word of advice, leave that tid bit of information out.
#65
Originally posted by jules
Calm down man, I wasnt implying that you were lying or telling two different stories. I was just using your thread to ask a relevant question. And I am not rich at all, I work very hard to mod my car. Sorry about your accident, and you deserve all the money you can get. I would feel violated if someone were to hit me and total my max
Jules
*edit* I hope you didnt tell the police officer that you werent wearing your seatbelt because you wont get anything for your pains. Just a word of advice, leave that tid bit of information out.
Calm down man, I wasnt implying that you were lying or telling two different stories. I was just using your thread to ask a relevant question. And I am not rich at all, I work very hard to mod my car. Sorry about your accident, and you deserve all the money you can get. I would feel violated if someone were to hit me and total my max
Jules
*edit* I hope you didnt tell the police officer that you werent wearing your seatbelt because you wont get anything for your pains. Just a word of advice, leave that tid bit of information out.
Also, sorry if i sounded like an a$$. Didn't mean to
#66
Originally posted by meccanoble
your right and i didn't. They didn't even ask. Also i have some parts for sale now. Parts i don't need if they total car.
Also, sorry if i sounded like an a$$. Didn't mean to
your right and i didn't. They didn't even ask. Also i have some parts for sale now. Parts i don't need if they total car.
Also, sorry if i sounded like an a$$. Didn't mean to
#67
Originally posted by naijai
hey man whats up i was also in an accident and my friends are telling me to sue the guy for money to fix my max but i have learnt that the person will be payed back in full one day so im looking for front parts if yu wanna sell dont mean to be the swooping vulture but i gotta fix my car
hey man whats up i was also in an accident and my friends are telling me to sue the guy for money to fix my max but i have learnt that the person will be payed back in full one day so im looking for front parts if yu wanna sell dont mean to be the swooping vulture but i gotta fix my car
#68
Originally posted by meccanoble
understood, my whole front is perfectly clean because i just got it replaced after my accident in early june. If they let me keep car its all yours but price shouldn't be a problem since u not even paying for it correct?
understood, my whole front is perfectly clean because i just got it replaced after my accident in early june. If they let me keep car its all yours but price shouldn't be a problem since u not even paying for it correct?
definetly
#71
just got report in and they kind of screwed up my story.
it says for her and i quote:
"i was waiting to make a left turn and the road was clear and he flew out of nowhere and i struck him"
my story and i quote:
"i was driving down the street and i saw her MAKING A LEFT TURN but i continued to go and she struck me."
i said i saw her at the intersection and she didn't move till i got in the intersection. Bout to see wha'ts up with this but the way she phrased it seems like she might want to fight this. What do u guys think?
it says for her and i quote:
"i was waiting to make a left turn and the road was clear and he flew out of nowhere and i struck him"
my story and i quote:
"i was driving down the street and i saw her MAKING A LEFT TURN but i continued to go and she struck me."
i said i saw her at the intersection and she didn't move till i got in the intersection. Bout to see wha'ts up with this but the way she phrased it seems like she might want to fight this. What do u guys think?
#72
You need to go back and make them change that report to what you ACTUALLY said.
Don't worry about her 'Flying out of nowhere' comment - that just means she wasn't looking. If she is making a left turn she is responsible to checking that the oncoming lane is clear. Unless she wishes to claim you were doing 100mph or more, then she should have seen you.
The fact she hit your SIDE is in your favor. Means she had not started to turn until you were in the intersection. If she HAD started to move before you go into the intersection then you would have hit HER side.
Make sure you talk to your attorney and file a wirtten complaint that the report misquoted you.
Don't worry about her 'Flying out of nowhere' comment - that just means she wasn't looking. If she is making a left turn she is responsible to checking that the oncoming lane is clear. Unless she wishes to claim you were doing 100mph or more, then she should have seen you.
The fact she hit your SIDE is in your favor. Means she had not started to turn until you were in the intersection. If she HAD started to move before you go into the intersection then you would have hit HER side.
Make sure you talk to your attorney and file a wirtten complaint that the report misquoted you.
#74
Originally posted by Scruit
You need to go back and make them change that report to what you ACTUALLY said.
Don't worry about her 'Flying out of nowhere' comment - that just means she wasn't looking. If she is making a left turn she is responsible to checking that the oncoming lane is clear. Unless she wishes to claim you were doing 100mph or more, then she should have seen you.
The fact she hit your SIDE is in your favor. Means she had not started to turn until you were in the intersection. If she HAD started to move before you go into the intersection then you would have hit HER side.
Make sure you talk to your attorney and file a wirtten complaint that the report misquoted you.
You need to go back and make them change that report to what you ACTUALLY said.
Don't worry about her 'Flying out of nowhere' comment - that just means she wasn't looking. If she is making a left turn she is responsible to checking that the oncoming lane is clear. Unless she wishes to claim you were doing 100mph or more, then she should have seen you.
The fact she hit your SIDE is in your favor. Means she had not started to turn until you were in the intersection. If she HAD started to move before you go into the intersection then you would have hit HER side.
Make sure you talk to your attorney and file a wirtten complaint that the report misquoted you.
The important thing to do is to get her insurance company to admit fault in the accident, have they done that yet? Have you contacted them?
#75
Originally posted by maxxed
Unless the police officer witnessed the accident the police report is considered "here say" and is not admissable is court.
The important thing to do is to get her insurance company to admit fault in the accident, have they done that yet? Have you contacted them?
Unless the police officer witnessed the accident the police report is considered "here say" and is not admissable is court.
The important thing to do is to get her insurance company to admit fault in the accident, have they done that yet? Have you contacted them?
I LOVE YOU GUYS, I TRULY DO
dam, from a fearful battle you gave me hope. I was thinking the same thing. And i wasn't going any faster than 30 mph. The speed limit i believe is 30 or the LEAST 25. Could be even 35. I'll talk to my attorney about the misquote made.
I wanted to contact her insurance company today but instead, my parents forced me to go to class which i didn't even do (as u can see i'm in the lab typing ). But when i checked the report, i didn't see a name or a number, just a policy number and some other like 3 or 4 code number showing the profile of insurance company?
is there any way to find out who the insurance company was from any of this info? also, i see no reason why she shouldn't be fully blamed. The worst thing is that i'm looking at maxima's on the internet and they are going for like 7,000 or so. And i can't find the one i want, black on black or dark blue on black. My neighbor has like a 97+ maxima (dark blue, with black leather) but it looks like it has been perfectly cared for plus its a GLE which means no stick. Dam its so hard finding a dam maxima with all the stuff i want.
I am thinking about looking into the Acura Legend coupe....they look real tight and spacy...plus i think they faster than maxima stock vs stock right? nah, gotta stay with you guys.
#76
Mecca - please read all of this HIDEOUSLY LONG message - I belive it contains very valuable advice If you disagree after you've read it, tell me to go to hell and I'll shut up.
In both of my previous accidents I was exhonorated of blame in what could have gone 'Knock-for-knock' (British insurance slang for 50/50 blame) because I did part of the accident investigation myself.
I waited until I saw the police report and saw what the other driver claimed, then I did the investigation specifically to refute that claim.
Example 1: I was in the left lane of a three lane road doing 40-ish. A driver from the stationary middle lane tried to change into my lane and I struck his rear door. He claimed that I was illegally using a Bus Lane and therefore he should not have expected me to approach from that angle. Also, he said he switched into the left land at the END of the section marked as a bus lane.
I went back to the scene of the accident with the police report and decided to refute both of those claims. Firstly I photographed the street sign that said; "Left lane = Bus lane 8am-10am, 4pm-6pm" The accident happened at 2:05pm. Claim #1 refuted. I photographed the end of the bus lane and showed a concrete wall and no sidewalk on the left side of the road. His police report said both cars drove completely onto the sidewalk so as not to block traffic while we exchanged details. The concrete wall proved that there was no sidewalk where HE claimed the accident was, therefpre he could not have joined the left lane at the ned of the bus lane. I also photographed where I said the accident happened, showing the scuffmarks from our tires as we both mounted the kerb.
His insurance company admitted liability less than a week after I sent this stuff in.
Example 2: I merged into a lane in front of an Accord. Driver of the Accord started tailgating me with his hands up in a "WTF you doing" motion for 1/8 mile. I stopped at the red light, and the driver behind was not able to stop and rearended me. His claim was that I merged too close to him and then immedately braked harshly. I went to the scene of the accident and photographed & measured the length of the lane from where I merged to where I stopped. 1/8 of a mile. He didn't refute the point at which I merged, and the accident damage was on the road under the red light. His insurance assesor agreed that after 1/8 of a mile he had plenty time to give himself a safe distance even if I DID merge too close (which I didn't!). Finally, I showed photographs taken at the scene showing that the accident damage was symmetrical on my back bumper and his front bumper, thus further proving I was fully established in the lane when the cars collided. His insurance company admitted liability (but still nickel and dimed me on the total, but I was still exhonorated and assesed a "non-chargeable accident" on my driving record, which means not my fault)
SO - Here is what I recommend you do; Play Mr.Detective. You can laugh at me if you like, but at least hear me out...
- Go back to the scene of the accident with a real (not digital) camera and take the following pictures;
1) Draw a scale diagram of the intersection -measure if you have to,
2) Drive your car following her path, and take up position to turn left just as she had done. Photograph what SHE would have seen - especially noting how far she could see down the lane you were coming from. Plot her start position accurately on your map.
3) Mark the point in the oncoming lane that you were coming from that she SHOULD have first seen you. This may be a short distance if there is some visual restriction like trees in the median. Or it may be that she could see for 1/2 a mile. Take into account the light level at the time of the accident - to take photographs at day and night of the accident was at night
4) Mark the impact point on your map.
5) Sit by the side of the road with a video camera and time how long it takes a car to drive from HER start potion to the impact point. We need to understand how long this is - is it 1 second, or 5 seconds? Take the average of ten cars, and assume that this is how fast she made her turn.
6) Calculate how far your car would have travelled during the time you calculate in 5) that it would have take her to move from her start position to the impact point. Calculate this distance at the speed you claimed you were travelling at, and also the speed she claimed you were travelling at (if any) and also an arbitrily large speed, like 75mph or 100mph.
7) The grand finale is; Using the distances you calculated in 6, plot points on your map that correspond to YOUR road position at the moment SHE started her turn. You are aiming to show that your car was within the distance SHE could SEE (measured in 3) when she STARTED her turn.
If you can get all this together, and you can scientifically prove (and show good documentation of how you arrived at your conclusions that would stand up to scrutiny in court) that your car was inside her field of vision when she started her turn, then this fact, coupled with her admission that you 'came flying out of nowhere' would be proof that she SHOULD have seen you but DIDN'T.
Even funnier would be for you to calculate the speed that you would have to have been travelling at in order to have been OUTSIDE of the area that she could have seen, yet still arrive at the intersection and collide with her. If there is a good field of vision then this numbe could easily be 150 or 200mph. In order for her to claim that she COULD NOT have seen you when she started her maneuver and that you were going so fast that the accident still happened.... she would have to claim that you were travelling at 200mph.
That, my friend, would be your SLAM DUNK.
Love & hugs
Scruit
(former law student)
Example diagram
In both of my previous accidents I was exhonorated of blame in what could have gone 'Knock-for-knock' (British insurance slang for 50/50 blame) because I did part of the accident investigation myself.
I waited until I saw the police report and saw what the other driver claimed, then I did the investigation specifically to refute that claim.
Example 1: I was in the left lane of a three lane road doing 40-ish. A driver from the stationary middle lane tried to change into my lane and I struck his rear door. He claimed that I was illegally using a Bus Lane and therefore he should not have expected me to approach from that angle. Also, he said he switched into the left land at the END of the section marked as a bus lane.
I went back to the scene of the accident with the police report and decided to refute both of those claims. Firstly I photographed the street sign that said; "Left lane = Bus lane 8am-10am, 4pm-6pm" The accident happened at 2:05pm. Claim #1 refuted. I photographed the end of the bus lane and showed a concrete wall and no sidewalk on the left side of the road. His police report said both cars drove completely onto the sidewalk so as not to block traffic while we exchanged details. The concrete wall proved that there was no sidewalk where HE claimed the accident was, therefpre he could not have joined the left lane at the ned of the bus lane. I also photographed where I said the accident happened, showing the scuffmarks from our tires as we both mounted the kerb.
His insurance company admitted liability less than a week after I sent this stuff in.
Example 2: I merged into a lane in front of an Accord. Driver of the Accord started tailgating me with his hands up in a "WTF you doing" motion for 1/8 mile. I stopped at the red light, and the driver behind was not able to stop and rearended me. His claim was that I merged too close to him and then immedately braked harshly. I went to the scene of the accident and photographed & measured the length of the lane from where I merged to where I stopped. 1/8 of a mile. He didn't refute the point at which I merged, and the accident damage was on the road under the red light. His insurance assesor agreed that after 1/8 of a mile he had plenty time to give himself a safe distance even if I DID merge too close (which I didn't!). Finally, I showed photographs taken at the scene showing that the accident damage was symmetrical on my back bumper and his front bumper, thus further proving I was fully established in the lane when the cars collided. His insurance company admitted liability (but still nickel and dimed me on the total, but I was still exhonorated and assesed a "non-chargeable accident" on my driving record, which means not my fault)
SO - Here is what I recommend you do; Play Mr.Detective. You can laugh at me if you like, but at least hear me out...
- Go back to the scene of the accident with a real (not digital) camera and take the following pictures;
1) Draw a scale diagram of the intersection -measure if you have to,
2) Drive your car following her path, and take up position to turn left just as she had done. Photograph what SHE would have seen - especially noting how far she could see down the lane you were coming from. Plot her start position accurately on your map.
3) Mark the point in the oncoming lane that you were coming from that she SHOULD have first seen you. This may be a short distance if there is some visual restriction like trees in the median. Or it may be that she could see for 1/2 a mile. Take into account the light level at the time of the accident - to take photographs at day and night of the accident was at night
4) Mark the impact point on your map.
5) Sit by the side of the road with a video camera and time how long it takes a car to drive from HER start potion to the impact point. We need to understand how long this is - is it 1 second, or 5 seconds? Take the average of ten cars, and assume that this is how fast she made her turn.
6) Calculate how far your car would have travelled during the time you calculate in 5) that it would have take her to move from her start position to the impact point. Calculate this distance at the speed you claimed you were travelling at, and also the speed she claimed you were travelling at (if any) and also an arbitrily large speed, like 75mph or 100mph.
7) The grand finale is; Using the distances you calculated in 6, plot points on your map that correspond to YOUR road position at the moment SHE started her turn. You are aiming to show that your car was within the distance SHE could SEE (measured in 3) when she STARTED her turn.
If you can get all this together, and you can scientifically prove (and show good documentation of how you arrived at your conclusions that would stand up to scrutiny in court) that your car was inside her field of vision when she started her turn, then this fact, coupled with her admission that you 'came flying out of nowhere' would be proof that she SHOULD have seen you but DIDN'T.
Even funnier would be for you to calculate the speed that you would have to have been travelling at in order to have been OUTSIDE of the area that she could have seen, yet still arrive at the intersection and collide with her. If there is a good field of vision then this numbe could easily be 150 or 200mph. In order for her to claim that she COULD NOT have seen you when she started her maneuver and that you were going so fast that the accident still happened.... she would have to claim that you were travelling at 200mph.
That, my friend, would be your SLAM DUNK.
Love & hugs
Scruit
(former law student)
Example diagram
#77
Originally posted by Scruit
Mecca - please read all of this HIDEOUSLY LONG message - I belive it contains very valuable advice If you disagree after you've read it, tell me to go to hell and I'll shut up.
In both of my previous accidents I was exhonorated of blame in what could have gone 'Knock-for-knock' (British insurance slang for 50/50 blame) because I did part of the accident investigation myself.
I waited until I saw the police report and saw what the other driver claimed, then I did the investigation specifically to refute that claim.
Example 1: I was in the left lane of a three lane road doing 40-ish. A driver from the stationary middle lane tried to change into my lane and I struck his rear door. He claimed that I was illegally using a Bus Lane and therefore he should not have expected me to approach from that angle. Also, he said he switched into the left land at the END of the section marked as a bus lane.
I went back to the scene of the accident with the police report and decided to refute both of those claims. Firstly I photographed the street sign that said; "Left lane = Bus lane 8am-10am, 4pm-6pm" The accident happened at 2:05pm. Claim #1 refuted. I photographed the end of the bus lane and showed a concrete wall and no sidewalk on the left side of the road. His police report said both cars drove completely onto the sidewalk so as not to block traffic while we exchanged details. The concrete wall proved that there was no sidewalk where HE claimed the accident was, therefpre he could not have joined the left lane at the ned of the bus lane. I also photographed where I said the accident happened, showing the scuffmarks from our tires as we both mounted the kerb.
His insurance company admitted liability less than a week after I sent this stuff in.
Example 2: I merged into a lane in front of an Accord. Driver of the Accord started tailgating me with his hands up in a "WTF you doing" motion for 1/8 mile. I stopped at the red light, and the driver behind was not able to stop and rearended me. His claim was that I merged too close to him and then immedately braked harshly. I went to the scene of the accident and photographed & measured the length of the lane from where I merged to where I stopped. 1/8 of a mile. He didn't refute the point at which I merged, and the accident damage was on the road under the red light. His insurance assesor agreed that after 1/8 of a mile he had plenty time to give himself a safe distance even if I DID merge too close (which I didn't!). Finally, I showed photographs taken at the scene showing that the accident damage was symmetrical on my back bumper and his front bumper, thus further proving I was fully established in the lane when the cars collided. His insurance company admitted liability (but still nickel and dimed me on the total, but I was still exhonorated and assesed a "non-chargeable accident" on my driving record, which means not my fault)
SO - Here is what I recommend you do; Play Mr.Detective. You can laugh at me if you like, but at least hear me out...
- Go back to the scene of the accident with a real (not digital) camera and take the following pictures;
1) Draw a scale diagram of the intersection -measure if you have to,
2) Drive your car following her path, and take up position to turn left just as she had done. Photograph what SHE would have seen - especially noting how far she could see down the lane you were coming from. Plot her start position accurately on your map.
3) Mark the point in the oncoming lane that you were coming from that she SHOULD have first seen you. This may be a short distance if there is some visual restriction like trees in the median. Or it may be that she could see for 1/2 a mile. Take into account the light level at the time of the accident - to take photographs at day and night of the accident was at night
4) Mark the impact point on your map.
5) Sit by the side of the road with a video camera and time how long it takes a car to drive from HER start potion to the impact point. We need to understand how long this is - is it 1 second, or 5 seconds? Take the average of ten cars, and assume that this is how fast she made her turn.
6) Calculate how far your car would have travelled during the time you calculate in 5) that it would have take her to move from her start position to the impact point. Calculate this distance at the speed you claimed you were travelling at, and also the speed she claimed you were travelling at (if any) and also an arbitrily large speed, like 75mph or 100mph.
7) The grand finale is; Using the distances you calculated in 6, plot points on your map that correspond to YOUR road position at the moment SHE started her turn. You are aiming to show that your car was within the distance SHE could SEE (measured in 3) when she STARTED her turn.
If you can get all this together, and you can scientifically prove (and show good documentation of how you arrived at your conclusions that would stand up to scrutiny in court) that your car was inside her field of vision when she started her turn, then this fact, coupled with her admission that you 'came flying out of nowhere' would be proof that she SHOULD have seen you but DIDN'T.
Even funnier would be for you to calculate the speed that you would have to have been travelling at in order to have been OUTSIDE of the area that she could have seen, yet still arrive at the intersection and collide with her. If there is a good field of vision then this numbe could easily be 150 or 200mph. In order for her to claim that she COULD NOT have seen you when she started her maneuver and that you were going so fast that the accident still happened.... she would have to claim that you were travelling at 200mph.
That, my friend, would be your SLAM DUNK.
Love & hugs
Scruit
(former law student)
Example diagram
Mecca - please read all of this HIDEOUSLY LONG message - I belive it contains very valuable advice If you disagree after you've read it, tell me to go to hell and I'll shut up.
In both of my previous accidents I was exhonorated of blame in what could have gone 'Knock-for-knock' (British insurance slang for 50/50 blame) because I did part of the accident investigation myself.
I waited until I saw the police report and saw what the other driver claimed, then I did the investigation specifically to refute that claim.
Example 1: I was in the left lane of a three lane road doing 40-ish. A driver from the stationary middle lane tried to change into my lane and I struck his rear door. He claimed that I was illegally using a Bus Lane and therefore he should not have expected me to approach from that angle. Also, he said he switched into the left land at the END of the section marked as a bus lane.
I went back to the scene of the accident with the police report and decided to refute both of those claims. Firstly I photographed the street sign that said; "Left lane = Bus lane 8am-10am, 4pm-6pm" The accident happened at 2:05pm. Claim #1 refuted. I photographed the end of the bus lane and showed a concrete wall and no sidewalk on the left side of the road. His police report said both cars drove completely onto the sidewalk so as not to block traffic while we exchanged details. The concrete wall proved that there was no sidewalk where HE claimed the accident was, therefpre he could not have joined the left lane at the ned of the bus lane. I also photographed where I said the accident happened, showing the scuffmarks from our tires as we both mounted the kerb.
His insurance company admitted liability less than a week after I sent this stuff in.
Example 2: I merged into a lane in front of an Accord. Driver of the Accord started tailgating me with his hands up in a "WTF you doing" motion for 1/8 mile. I stopped at the red light, and the driver behind was not able to stop and rearended me. His claim was that I merged too close to him and then immedately braked harshly. I went to the scene of the accident and photographed & measured the length of the lane from where I merged to where I stopped. 1/8 of a mile. He didn't refute the point at which I merged, and the accident damage was on the road under the red light. His insurance assesor agreed that after 1/8 of a mile he had plenty time to give himself a safe distance even if I DID merge too close (which I didn't!). Finally, I showed photographs taken at the scene showing that the accident damage was symmetrical on my back bumper and his front bumper, thus further proving I was fully established in the lane when the cars collided. His insurance company admitted liability (but still nickel and dimed me on the total, but I was still exhonorated and assesed a "non-chargeable accident" on my driving record, which means not my fault)
SO - Here is what I recommend you do; Play Mr.Detective. You can laugh at me if you like, but at least hear me out...
- Go back to the scene of the accident with a real (not digital) camera and take the following pictures;
1) Draw a scale diagram of the intersection -measure if you have to,
2) Drive your car following her path, and take up position to turn left just as she had done. Photograph what SHE would have seen - especially noting how far she could see down the lane you were coming from. Plot her start position accurately on your map.
3) Mark the point in the oncoming lane that you were coming from that she SHOULD have first seen you. This may be a short distance if there is some visual restriction like trees in the median. Or it may be that she could see for 1/2 a mile. Take into account the light level at the time of the accident - to take photographs at day and night of the accident was at night
4) Mark the impact point on your map.
5) Sit by the side of the road with a video camera and time how long it takes a car to drive from HER start potion to the impact point. We need to understand how long this is - is it 1 second, or 5 seconds? Take the average of ten cars, and assume that this is how fast she made her turn.
6) Calculate how far your car would have travelled during the time you calculate in 5) that it would have take her to move from her start position to the impact point. Calculate this distance at the speed you claimed you were travelling at, and also the speed she claimed you were travelling at (if any) and also an arbitrily large speed, like 75mph or 100mph.
7) The grand finale is; Using the distances you calculated in 6, plot points on your map that correspond to YOUR road position at the moment SHE started her turn. You are aiming to show that your car was within the distance SHE could SEE (measured in 3) when she STARTED her turn.
If you can get all this together, and you can scientifically prove (and show good documentation of how you arrived at your conclusions that would stand up to scrutiny in court) that your car was inside her field of vision when she started her turn, then this fact, coupled with her admission that you 'came flying out of nowhere' would be proof that she SHOULD have seen you but DIDN'T.
Even funnier would be for you to calculate the speed that you would have to have been travelling at in order to have been OUTSIDE of the area that she could have seen, yet still arrive at the intersection and collide with her. If there is a good field of vision then this numbe could easily be 150 or 200mph. In order for her to claim that she COULD NOT have seen you when she started her maneuver and that you were going so fast that the accident still happened.... she would have to claim that you were travelling at 200mph.
That, my friend, would be your SLAM DUNK.
Love & hugs
Scruit
(former law student)
Example diagram
i'll shoot u a AIM or PM
#79
GA DAMMIT I'M SO FREAKIN MAD!!!
Insurance companies aren't open on the weekends like i thought and instead of going to school i could have called them yesterday or called my insurance company and they could have called them! Now i gotta wait to freaking monday to get any word on anything. I hate waiting. JESUS GOODNESS CHRIST
i have her insurance code. its 962
i think mine is 012. Could anyone tell me her insurance company from that? if not, could u atleast tell me her insurance company from the policy number which i would post next if ins. code isn't enough?
Insurance companies aren't open on the weekends like i thought and instead of going to school i could have called them yesterday or called my insurance company and they could have called them! Now i gotta wait to freaking monday to get any word on anything. I hate waiting. JESUS GOODNESS CHRIST
i have her insurance code. its 962
i think mine is 012. Could anyone tell me her insurance company from that? if not, could u atleast tell me her insurance company from the policy number which i would post next if ins. code isn't enough?
#80
MORE BAD NEWS
according to my pop's, i can't sue. he says he gave me some type of low class liability insurance or something where i can't sue. She should still be paying me for a new car but as far as damages to my health, even if i had a broken leg i couldn't get a peso....there SHOULD be a way to work around this but from where i stand, i only expect money for car....sucks...
according to my pop's, i can't sue. he says he gave me some type of low class liability insurance or something where i can't sue. She should still be paying me for a new car but as far as damages to my health, even if i had a broken leg i couldn't get a peso....there SHOULD be a way to work around this but from where i stand, i only expect money for car....sucks...