4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

94 SE Max vs. 95-99

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2003, 11:58 AM
  #41  
Dev
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,412
Originally posted by dmontzmax
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=159145

Is 98+mph good enough?

With only about $500 in mods?
i took a look at that before...but i would consider that more heavily modded

by mildly modded i mean just intake or less (almost stock)
no doubt thats a very good time tho...ill give credit where its due
but its just easier to compare stock or near stock cars than cars with that many mods.

also a 2.01 60' without slicks
Dev is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:01 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
95emeraldgxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,659
max420 has one of those VE equipped maximas.....and he is crazzy fast i'm pretty sure he can take on most modded 4th gens(minus S/C of course)
95emeraldgxe is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:13 PM
  #43  
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
dmontzsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,598
Originally posted by Dev


i took a look at that before...but i would consider that more heavily modded

by mildly modded i mean just intake or less (almost stock)
no doubt thats a very good time tho...ill give credit where its due
but its just easier to compare stock or near stock cars than cars with that many mods.

also a 2.01 60' without slicks
What do you mean?

Dude, that is almost stock...

mods
custom intake MAF plate aka: pop charger(intake)
removed silencer(same as above intake)
timing advance(free)
a/c belt removed(free)
hollowed cat(free, classified as exhaust)
2.5 cat back to a opak race type muffler(exhaust)
bored tb to 71 mm. port matched intake manifold(intake FREE)
front lowered 2.5 inches(suspension)
rear 2.0 inches(suspension)(intake)
n/a 3z injectors
chassis lightening to total weight of 2930 lbs.(free)

tire pressure
front 21 psi
rear 39 psi (free)
dmontzsta is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:23 PM
  #44  
Dev
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,412
Originally posted by dmontzmax


What do you mean?

Dude, that is almost stock...

mods
custom intake MAF plate aka: pop charger(intake)
removed silencer(same as above intake)
timing advance(free)
a/c belt removed(free)
hollowed cat(free, classified as exhaust)
2.5 cat back to a opak race type muffler(exhaust)
bored tb to 71 mm. port matched intake manifold(intake FREE)
front lowered 2.5 inches(suspension)
rear 2.0 inches(suspension)(intake)
n/a 3z injectors
chassis lightening to total weight of 2930 lbs.(free)

tire pressure
front 21 psi
rear 39 psi (free)
you are confusing a modification with its cost.
you have 12 lines of mods so its obviously not almost stock.
lets look at it this way, a cat back exhaust is $500, suspension is $600
so that passed your $500 mark already.

weight reduction is obviously free. his weight reduction is responsible for cutting 0.2 seconds off his ET. do that to a 4th gen and it will yield the same result.

ok you know what...i don't think we have the same understanding of mildly modded...so lets just compare stock to stock.

also, just so you know, an org member (theblue) ran a 14.2 with intake/ypipe/cat-back and from what i see, no weight reduction, and street tires. i admire what he did, because he ran his car on the track the same way he would on the street.
Dev is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:38 PM
  #45  
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
dmontzsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,598
Originally posted by Dev


you are confusing a modification with its cost.
you have 12 lines of mods so its obviously not almost stock.
lets look at it this way, a cat back exhaust is $500, suspension is $600
so that passed your $500 mark already.

weight reduction is obviously free. his weight reduction is responsible for cutting 0.2 seconds off his ET. do that to a 4th gen and it will yield the same result.

ok you know what...i don't think we have the same understanding of mildly modded...so lets just compare stock to stock.

also, just so you know, an org member (theblue) ran a 14.2 with intake/ypipe/cat-back and from what i see, no weight reduction, and street tires. i admire what he did, because he ran his car on the track the same way he would on the street.
He is one too...

Suspension $600? no cut springs=Free
Catback $500? hell no, $175 custom bent at a muffler shop.
dmontzsta is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:44 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
MajesticBlueNTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,658
MajesticBlueNTO is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 12:57 PM
  #47  
Dev
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,412
Originally posted by dmontzmax


He is one too...

Suspension $600? no cut springs=Free
Catback $500? hell no, $175 custom bent at a muffler shop.
man...im sorry to say, but those are ghetto mods, no offense
cut springs are just asking for trouble...esp at 2.5 inches!
performance is good though no doubt...just seems like it lacks drivability on the streets. bouncing up and down from the cut springs and sweating without the a/c. no doubt he's also missing some seats with all that weight reduction; the passengers would probably feel uncomfortable.

and im sure he got that 2.01 with stock rubber right?

do you have any stock times for me?

neil, i see you're enjoying the entertainment...lol
Dev is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 01:25 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Mr. Nismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,947
Originally posted by Dev

weight reduction is obviously free. his weight reduction is responsible for cutting 0.2 seconds off his ET. do that to a 4th gen and it will yield the same result.
So what's the big deal?? Looks like you got your answer.
Mr. Nismo is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 01:37 PM
  #49  
Dev
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,412
Originally posted by Mr. Nismo


So what's the big deal?? Looks like you got your answer.
the thing is...if you're comparing the two cars, a major advantage of the 4th gen is its power to weight ratio.

now if you turn that advantage into a disadvantage (weight reduction on a 3rd gen, its kind of defeating the purpose of the comparison).

btw...you got mail
i need you're paypal info
Dev is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 01:53 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Bgohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 448
Re: 94 SE Max vs. 95-99

Originally posted by DanSE
My friend said that his old maxima (94 I think, maybe 93) could take any 4th gen because his is the exact same engine, but the body is lighter. By the way, he is 5-speed. Is this true? I know nothing about 3rd gens?
Thanks,
Dan

The 2 motors may have the same displacement, but only a few parts interchange. They are completely different motors. The 4th gen VQ is a much more refined motor. As far as one gen being faster than the other, all you can really go by is tests from Motor Trend or other such mags, because their tests are done in a controlled manner. Every car is tested almost exactly the same way. But, they usually only test one car instead of average the results of several.
Environmental conditions and stock tires can make their numbers vary.

Of course, the true test for the owner is on the street, side by side. The one who wins, wins, no matter what he is driving.
Bgohan is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 04:47 PM
  #51  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dwapenyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,016
He did it with weight reduction. He removed a seat or 2.

DW

Originally posted by Dev
. . . (theblue) ran a 14.2 with intake/ypipe/cat-back and from what i see, no weight reduction, and street tires. . .
dwapenyi is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 07:39 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Mr. Nismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,947
"Can't we all just get along" said Rodney King?
Mr. Nismo is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 08:08 PM
  #53  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
Originally posted by dmontzmax
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=159145

Is 98+mph good enough?

With only about $500 in mods?
Claiming that Bryan H's run is typical of a VE is lunacy and you know it. How fast is the next fastest VE?
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 08:31 PM
  #54  
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
dmontzsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,598
JohnnyMax 14.6
Czar 14.8 STOCK
Flyry 14.7
Aaron92se AUTO 14.8
There are a few other that are in the 14s with little modification.
dmontzsta is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 08:41 PM
  #55  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
Originally posted by dmontzmax
JohnnyMax 14.6
Czar 14.8 STOCK
Flyry 14.7
Aaron92se AUTO 14.8
There are a few other that are in the 14s with little modification.
Not bad. I raced with Flyry once at an event here in Michigan last summer. Czar's 14.8 stock is most impressive of all besides BryanH's.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 09:11 PM
  #56  
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
dmontzsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,598
Originally posted by Nealoc187


Not bad. I raced with Flyry once at an event here in Michigan last summer. Czar's 14.8 stock is most impressive of all besides BryanH's.
Oh sweet. How was he?
dmontzsta is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 09:48 AM
  #57  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
He was running 14.8s if I recall correctly.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 11:53 AM
  #58  
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Dave B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,555
Originally posted by dmontzmax
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?threadid=159145

Is 98+mph good enough?

With only about $500 in mods?
Man, you are really blinded by 3rd gen "love". I've got an EXCELLENT memory and I happen to personally know Bryan (the guy you referenced), I've raced him, and I got to ride in his 92. The first time I met Bryan we raced from a 30mph roll all the way to 80mph and no one pulled on each other. My mods at the time, HKS intake and muffler. I never got to see Bryan race at the track in his 92, but I have seen a lot of his slips. Most of them were mid to higher 14s with trap speeds in the 94-95mph range. Bryan has admitted my car has a bit more topend than his old 92 because his car rarely ran 95mph+. I'm usually in the 96-97mph range (WITHOUT THE MEVI). The only other 3rd gen I've raced and seen race in Matt93SE. On average, I'm .2-.3 quicker and 2-3mph faster in the topend. Where's this "killer" topend the VE is suppose to have? Aren't I suppose to be getting "walked like a dog"? I plan on getting consistent 98-99 traps and dropping .3 seconds when I get the ECU and can put the MEVI to it's use (it's doing nothing for me 0-80mph right now with a 6500rpm limiter).

Don't get me wrong, I'm not talking trash on either of these two very nice guys, their sweet 3rd gens, nor am I disgracing the VE in any way. I'm just pointing out these motors aren't the topend "freaks" you say they are. A car that has good topend will show it on the track. The modded 5 speed VEs on average are rarely breaking 94mph in the 1/4 mile. Most modded 5 speed VQs (without MEVIs) are usually 95mph. The MEVI/JWT VQs are now pushing nearly 100mph. Where's this VE topend again?


Dave
Dave B is offline  
Old 03-17-2003, 11:58 AM
  #59  
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
dmontzsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,598
This top end is there Dave. Just because a couple of owners ran the track and it didnt show much, on day to day you can tell.

Also, my whole point is, tell your VQ buddy's that the VQ will not "MURDER" a VE.

Tell them...Tell them...
dmontzsta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
01-04-2024 07:01 PM
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
04-16-2020 05:15 AM
magiconthetire
Audio and Electronics
2
10-26-2015 09:03 PM
maxima297
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
09-30-2015 03:32 PM



Quick Reply: 94 SE Max vs. 95-99



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 AM.