Lowering springs, Auto vs Standard shift
#1
Lowering springs, Auto vs Standard shift
I am about to order lowering springs for my 95 Max. I read a while back that because of the weight of the standard tranny versus the automatic, the front spring should have a bigger drop than the back to compensate for the weight. Is that true? Somehow, I don't want a car that is higher in the front tahn the back, I prefer a leveled car. .
Thanks for any help you can provide,
Stephane
Thanks for any help you can provide,
Stephane
#5
Originally Posted by maxNYC
Better to have it lower in the front than the rears. You'd look like a lincoln car service town car otherwise
To answer the height difference, I would much rather the front lower then the max. Its more Bimmer-issh that way, which is really nice (IMO)
#6
That's what I mean. So a set of B&G or Drop-Zone which are the same drop all around might make a standard trans car look like the rear is sagging? I should be looking for springs kits that drops the front a little more than the back?
Thanks again,
Stephane
Thanks again,
Stephane
#9
Originally Posted by tweaked
That's what I mean. So a set of B&G or Drop-Zone which are the same drop all around might make a standard trans car look like the rear is sagging? I should be looking for springs kits that drops the front a little more than the back?
Thanks again,
Stephane
Thanks again,
Stephane
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Violator
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
1
09-09-2015 10:14 AM