ATTN: Cheston & Anyone with dons VB Mod..
#1
I'm growing interested in Don's VB mod since the likeleyhood of me finding a 5-speed is growing slim. How much should this take off the 1/4?? And cheston are you still selling your friends or did you sell it already? Thanks in advance.
#7
Originally posted by Nine7Max
I'm growing interested in Don's VB mod since the likeleyhood of me finding a 5-speed is growing slim. How much should this take off the 1/4?? And cheston are you still selling your friends or did you sell it already? Thanks in advance.
I'm growing interested in Don's VB mod since the likeleyhood of me finding a 5-speed is growing slim. How much should this take off the 1/4?? And cheston are you still selling your friends or did you sell it already? Thanks in advance.
#8
I'm getting Don's VB upgrade too. So, does this mean when I get the new VB into my car, I don't have to manually shift anymore? Since I assume leaving it in D with the VB upgrade, my car will shift hard in every gear.
#9
Originally posted by Synki
... With the VB, you may be as fast as the 5 speeds but remember... they have 1 more gear then us and they have a stronger power band.
... With the VB, you may be as fast as the 5 speeds but remember... they have 1 more gear then us and they have a stronger power band.
#10
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
5-speed cars and automatics have the same engine. How is it possible for 5-speed cars to have a stronger power band?
Originally posted by Synki
... With the VB, you may be as fast as the 5 speeds but remember... they have 1 more gear then us and they have a stronger power band.
... With the VB, you may be as fast as the 5 speeds but remember... they have 1 more gear then us and they have a stronger power band.
#11
Originally posted by Synki
Gearing? By the time your into or out of your powerband, they will be in theirs. Just my thought on it. Same motor, yes, more gears and closer gears = more power to wheels. Yes? No? The autos do drop in power. Dyno them. Stock stick vs stock auto. [/I]
Gearing? By the time your into or out of your powerband, they will be in theirs. Just my thought on it. Same motor, yes, more gears and closer gears = more power to wheels. Yes? No? The autos do drop in power. Dyno them. Stock stick vs stock auto. [/I]
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.cartrackers.com/auto_glossary/pq/#power-band
offers this definition:
<font color='blue'>Power Band
The subjectively defined rpm range over which an engine delivers a substantial fraction of its peak power. The power band usually extends from slightly below the engine's torque peak to slightly above its power peak. </font>
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.dakineracing.com/racing/r...lossary.html#p
offers this definition:<font color='blue'>
POWER BAND: An rpm range where the majority of the engine's peak power is achieved. Usually starts at engine's peak torque and ends near the engine's peak power.</font>
Now you may argue that one transmission or another makes good use of an engine's powerband. That doesn't change the fact that powerband is an engine term.
#15
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
I believe "powerband" is a descriptive term for an engine and has nothing to do with the transmission.
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.cartrackers.com/auto_glossary/pq/#power-band
offers this definition:
<font color='blue'>Power Band
The subjectively defined rpm range over which an engine delivers a substantial fraction of its peak power. The power band usually extends from slightly below the engine's torque peak to slightly above its power peak. </font>
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.dakineracing.com/racing/r...lossary.html#p
offers this definition:<font color='blue'>
POWER BAND: An rpm range where the majority of the engine's peak power is achieved. Usually starts at engine's peak torque and ends near the engine's peak power.</font>
Now you may argue that one transmission or another makes good use of an engine's powerband. That doesn't change the fact that powerband is an engine term. [/I]
Originally posted by Synki
Gearing? By the time your into or out of your powerband, they will be in theirs. Just my thought on it. Same motor, yes, more gears and closer gears = more power to wheels. Yes? No? The autos do drop in power. Dyno them. Stock stick vs stock auto.
Gearing? By the time your into or out of your powerband, they will be in theirs. Just my thought on it. Same motor, yes, more gears and closer gears = more power to wheels. Yes? No? The autos do drop in power. Dyno them. Stock stick vs stock auto.
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.cartrackers.com/auto_glossary/pq/#power-band
offers this definition:
<font color='blue'>Power Band
The subjectively defined rpm range over which an engine delivers a substantial fraction of its peak power. The power band usually extends from slightly below the engine's torque peak to slightly above its power peak. </font>
The on-line automotive glossary
http://www.dakineracing.com/racing/r...lossary.html#p
offers this definition:<font color='blue'>
POWER BAND: An rpm range where the majority of the engine's peak power is achieved. Usually starts at engine's peak torque and ends near the engine's peak power.</font>
Now you may argue that one transmission or another makes good use of an engine's powerband. That doesn't change the fact that powerband is an engine term. [/I]
To me, there is a diff in auto vs stick. Stick has always made more power... either due to gearing or whatever of the fact. Just add my 2 cents.
#16
Definitions are good
Originally posted by Synki
How did i know you were going to use the "definition" on this one. Ok, so maybe the word "powerband" was wrong. Maybe i should say power to the wheels then?
To me, there is a diff in auto vs stick. Stick has always made more power... either due to gearing or whatever of the fact. Just add my 2 cents. [/I]
How did i know you were going to use the "definition" on this one. Ok, so maybe the word "powerband" was wrong. Maybe i should say power to the wheels then?
To me, there is a diff in auto vs stick. Stick has always made more power... either due to gearing or whatever of the fact. Just add my 2 cents. [/I]
Stick doesn't "make" more power. The engine makes power. The transmission gets it to the drive wheels. The tires get it to the road.
Automatic Maximas are slightly slower than 5-speed Maximas. The reasons are
- the automatic cars weigh more
- there is some power loss through the torque converter
- the final drive ratios are not the same
A stick-shift transmission also has losses, but they are less than the losses in an automatic.
The Continuously Variable transmission which Nissan already sells in some countries is claimed to have better efficiency than either automatics or 5-speeds.
#17
Re: Definitions are good
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
I rely on published definitions so we don't get into silly disputes about "my definition" versus "your definition".
Stick doesn't "make" more power. The engine makes power. The transmission gets it to the drive wheels. The tires get it to the road.
Automatic Maximas are slightly slower than 5-speed Maximas. The reasons are
- the automatic cars weigh more
- there is some power loss through the torque converter
- the final drive ratios are not the same
A stick-shift transmission also has losses, but they are less than the losses in an automatic.
The Continuously Variable transmission which Nissan already sells in some countries is claimed to have better efficiency than either automatics or 5-speeds. [/I]
Originally posted by Synki
How did i know you were going to use the "definition" on this one. Ok, so maybe the word "powerband" was wrong. Maybe i should say power to the wheels then?
To me, there is a diff in auto vs stick. Stick has always made more power... either due to gearing or whatever of the fact. Just add my 2 cents.
How did i know you were going to use the "definition" on this one. Ok, so maybe the word "powerband" was wrong. Maybe i should say power to the wheels then?
To me, there is a diff in auto vs stick. Stick has always made more power... either due to gearing or whatever of the fact. Just add my 2 cents.
Stick doesn't "make" more power. The engine makes power. The transmission gets it to the drive wheels. The tires get it to the road.
Automatic Maximas are slightly slower than 5-speed Maximas. The reasons are
- the automatic cars weigh more
- there is some power loss through the torque converter
- the final drive ratios are not the same
A stick-shift transmission also has losses, but they are less than the losses in an automatic.
The Continuously Variable transmission which Nissan already sells in some countries is claimed to have better efficiency than either automatics or 5-speeds. [/I]
I dont know where this is going but if you wish to continue you can. There is no reason any of us should be mad or flame one another. After all, we are here to help correct?
#19
Flaming
Originally posted by Synki
I dont know where this is going but if you wish to continue you can. There is no reason any of us should be mad or flame one another. After all, we are here to help correct? [/I]
I dont know where this is going but if you wish to continue you can. There is no reason any of us should be mad or flame one another. After all, we are here to help correct? [/I]
This forum is a voluntary information exchange. Yes, we are here to help each other. The medium of information exchange is the written word, and that's why published standard definitions are so important.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less." -- Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Violator
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
1
09-09-2015 10:14 AM
JoshG
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
17
09-05-2015 10:10 PM