4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Help with 1999 vs 2000 Max buying needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2004, 08:04 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
corruptone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 102
Help with 1999 vs 2000 Max buying needed

My 95 Max was totalled and I'm going today to look at a 1999 Maxima SE Limited Edition today with 108K miles on it that I can buy for $6,500...maybe less. Supposedly this car is in very good condition and still owned by the original owner. Never modded. Or, I could possibly buy a 5th generation Max, probably a 2000 model, with 70-80K miles on it for $9,500 in similar condition. Would it be worth it to be a 5th gen model over the 4th Gen SE? Let's say that the mileage was the same on either the 4th & 5th Gen. Money is the only difference. Would you still fork out the extra money for the 5th gen and if so why? I'm really having a tough time on this one.
corruptone is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 08:20 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
95MaxSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 119
Originally Posted by corruptone
My 95 Max was totalled and I'm going today to look at a 1999 Maxima SE Limited Edition today with 108K miles on it that I can buy for $6,500...maybe less. Supposedly this car is in very good condition and still owned by the original owner. Never modded. Or, I could possibly buy a 5th generation Max, probably a 2000 model, with 70-80K miles on it for $9,500 in similar condition. Would it be worth it to be a 5th gen model over the 4th Gen SE? Let's say that the mileage was the same on either the 4th & 5th Gen. Money is the only difference. Would you still fork out the extra money for the 5th gen and if so why? I'm really having a tough time on this one.
I have read many reviews (C&D included), and they all reported that 2000 model are slower than the 4th gen, by around 1 second. They were testing models with manual transmission.

Sam
95MaxSE is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 08:38 AM
  #3  
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
MrEous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Garland (DFW), TX
Posts: 3,775
I've raced an auto '00 Maxima and it really wasn't a race, I pulled from the start. The extra hp they gave the '00-01 doesn't make up for the extra weight.
MrEous is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 08:57 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
corruptone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 102
Originally Posted by MrEous
I've raced an auto '00 Maxima and it really wasn't a race, I pulled from the start. The extra hp they gave the '00-01 doesn't make up for the extra weight.

OK, I think it is safe to say now that the 4th Gens are faster, but does the 5th gens have ANY advantages other than style and resale value?
corruptone is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:01 PM
  #5  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Just go with your gut feeling. You posted in the 4th gen forum so yeah, we're biased, at least I'm admitting it, but if it were a 02-03 I'd get it, but as far as 1995-2001, I'd get the 4th gen. And in 2000, there are still a few bugs with the, then "new" model that were worked out in 01.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:10 PM
  #6  
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Ukyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 78
Probably get flamed for this but I would get the newer model as I like the style better... and the first thing I would change would be the headlights to the later models... 02 or 03... forgot which one but it's the one w/ the dual bulbs.
Ukyo is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:19 PM
  #7  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
ThunderMaxi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Ukyo
Probably get flamed for this but I would get the newer model as I like the style better... and the first thing I would change would be the headlights to the later models... 02 or 03... forgot which one but it's the one w/ the dual bulbs.
I have a 99, and partner has a 2000. The 2000 is nice and all, but it feels a tad state-womansly when I am feeling like slamming on the accelerator. The 99 is the best that they could have done with the 4th gen and the 2000 is the basic slate.

Also, SE Limiteds have traction control, heated seats and side airbags... or at least mine does.
ThunderMaxi is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:19 PM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
007max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,127
it's a biased opinion but i think the 4th gen are much better looking than the Y2K cars. plus they are much faster AND cheaper!!!
007max is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:20 PM
  #9  
be the change u want2C
iTrader: (5)
 
Ninos_Maxima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: tampa bau
Posts: 2,214
Get a 98, 99-01 have the coil pack Issue, Get a 5spd dont get auto, But if you want a 5th Gen, I say you get a 01 5spd, There nice when fully loaded!
Ninos_Maxima is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:20 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
BadKarma99-4spd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,119
5gen has a much better interior imo. i have had a 3gen a 4gen and i drive my gf 5gen regularly and 5gen has the best interior, 4gen the worst.

5gen has better handling stock

4gen has better low end power

5gen has better high end, and also feels a lot smoother accelerating

as far as which one is more powerful its a toss up- jeremysride2000 has a 2k1 with the same mods as my 99 except i have a y-pipe. on the highway i SLOWLY walk him, and i imagine that when he gets his y pipe he will own me because the 5gen high end from the (variable intake?) is sweet. and also he ran a 15.6-15.7 with an intake only, which is right in with all the other 4gen autos.

just some of the things i noticed.
good luck
BadKarma99-4spd is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 12:21 PM
  #11  
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Ukyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 78
Originally Posted by 007max
it's a biased opinion but i think the 4th gen are much better looking than the Y2K cars. plus they are much faster AND cheaper!!!
I don't know bout the speed difference but I can definitely attest to them being cheaper... hehehe
Ukyo is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ohannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,765
So your options are 99 for $6500 or a 2K for $9500.

If it were me Id buy the 99 and put 3K worth of mods on it


ohannon7 is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 01:53 PM
  #13  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by ohannon7
So your options are 99 for $6500 or a 2K for $9500.

If it were me Id buy the 99 and put 3K worth of mods on it



DING! DING! DIING!! We have a WINNER!!
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:13 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
corruptone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 102
Well, I just go back from looking at the 99 SE LTD and it was a real crap box. My 1995 was in 10 times better shape plus I wouldn't have bought a piece of gum from the guy much less a car. Oh well. Thanks for all the great replies. I did love my 4th Gen, but I don't want to miss out on anything either since I generally drive a car to the wheels fall off and then just buy another.
corruptone is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:45 PM
  #15  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by corruptone
I generally drive a car to the wheels fall off and then just buy another.
Me too, look at my sig, 209k and counting!!
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:53 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
minsbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,085
why buy a '99 when you can just buy a '96 and convet it and save yourself some $$. i regret buying my '99 SE. i would buy a '96 or a '97
minsbang is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 02:56 PM
  #17  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Yeah, and you could do the ECU mod, and engines, if it in fact were to go bad, are only in the 400-600 dollar range used, low miles.(50-70k)
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 03:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
JJmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 100
i would definitly go with the 99, that's what i'm looking to get right now, i like the look better, and like it was said, the 2000 would probrobly be slower. I would take the 99 even if they were the same price, so for me it would be no contest. if it was a 2k2, with a 3.5, then that's a different story.
JJmax is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 03:32 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
minsbang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,085
before i purchased my '99 SE with all the options, i was either looking at '99's or '00.
i could have bought a '99 with all the options or buy a '00 with fewer options (gxe)..
so i bought the '99 SE with all the options (i still do not regret picking '99 over '00).
but like i said b4, if i knew that you can do cosmetic conversions to make a '95-'96 look like a '97-'99 (front bumper, headlights, grill, rear trunt and spoiler), i would have purchased a '96 and saved myself some $$
minsbang is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 04:10 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
NissanSE98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 424
Originally Posted by 95MaxSE
I have read many reviews (C&D included), and they all reported that 2000 model are slower than the 4th gen, by around 1 second. They were testing models with manual transmission.

Sam

i did too--- the 4th generations all had higher ratings than the 5thers--but it wasn't by much!--mainly power issues----if i totalled my 98 today, i would go out tomorrow and get another 98
NissanSE98 is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 04:13 PM
  #21  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
They also got the 04 slower than what stock guys are running on here(15.0 compared to here 14.6), and same story with the '03's. Just because a magazine tells you something, don't believe it.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 01-07-2004, 07:45 PM
  #22  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
1996blackmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 4,534
My sister has a 2k auto Max and it drives nice. I have not really pushed it being that it is her car, and also her first car (my first car was a 1977 Buick LeSabre ), but it feels like it has a good amount of oomph. On the highway at higher speeds I would think that it has more get up than our cars due to the variable intake right? Maybe I will take it out for a spin when she comes back from Mexico.
1996blackmax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kjlouis
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
11
11-24-2018 06:09 AM
smplyamzng
6th Generation Classifieds (2004-2008)
1
12-13-2015 01:19 PM
Stagnet04
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
09-02-2015 07:53 AM
TonyJr
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
4
08-20-2015 12:14 AM
jholley
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
08-11-2015 09:38 AM



Quick Reply: Help with 1999 vs 2000 Max buying needed



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:43 PM.