4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.
View Poll Results: Best Perfoming CAI for the 4th Gen?
AEM
1
1.96%
Injen
23
45.10%
Place Racing
20
39.22%
Other (please name)
7
13.73%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Best performing CAI for the 4th Gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2004 | 09:18 AM
  #1  
FutureProof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 252
Best performing CAI for the 4th Gen?

What do you think is the best performing CAI for the 4th gens?

I remember reading something on here about PR receiving the coolest air, but can't find the thread any longer, and wanted to get a general consensus on performance... So, what do you think? Please vote and add any comments you have

Cheers

Keir
Old 09-02-2004 | 09:35 AM
  #2  
97maxxx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 927
i have the place racing style now and is much better in my opinion than any other i have had the popcharger and it really robs the low end so with this it is great and amzing power on low end compared to the other setup -but u do have to drill a 3inch hole in your car but yea i would def go with pr
Old 09-02-2004 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
I own a PR and an Injen intake and the Injen is the one on my car.
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:05 AM
  #4  
FutureProof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 252
Any particular reason?

P.S. Wanna sell the PR?

Cheers

K
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:16 AM
  #5  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,105
From: Chiiiii
I doubt it's the injen. Look where the filter is placed when installed.
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:24 AM
  #6  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
Shhh! Let the guy get a good deal on the PR

Originally Posted by DAVE Sz
I doubt it's the injen. Look where the filter is placed when installed.
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:25 AM
  #7  
usmcbigguns's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 127
was thinking of getting the injen just because of placement of the filter, would think it would get colder air. Maybe i am wrong. I have issues with cutting a 3" hole in my car.
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:27 AM
  #8  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
How warm is the air directly behind the radiator?
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:32 AM
  #9  
usmcbigguns's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 127
no clue? any links of anyone actually doing comparative tests on the various CAI?
Old 09-02-2004 | 10:34 AM
  #10  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
use some spock logic

Originally Posted by usmcbigguns
no clue? any links of anyone actually doing comparative tests on the various CAI?
Old 09-02-2004 | 11:04 AM
  #11  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
After leaving a stop how warm do you think it is compared to the rest of the air in the engine?
Old 09-02-2004 | 11:18 AM
  #12  
FutureProof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 252
So you wanna sell the PR?

Old 09-02-2004 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by FutureProof
So you wanna sell the PR?


I only have the lower piece of the PR intake left.. Sorry.
Old 09-02-2004 | 11:27 AM
  #14  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
Not any colder than the PR, plus the PR is cold all the time. So I don't know what the advantage is. Especially when it's going to gulp down a chunk of hot air everytime you are at a stop.

Originally Posted by Y2KSESteve
After leaving a stop how warm do you think it is compared to the rest of the air in the engine?
Old 09-02-2004 | 11:28 AM
  #15  
FutureProof's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 252
Ahhh no worries, thought I'd chance my arm!

Cheers anyway!

K
Old 09-02-2004 | 12:28 PM
  #16  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Not any colder than the PR, plus the PR is cold all the time. So I don't know what the advantage is. Especially when it's going to gulp down a chunk of hot air everytime you are at a stop.
Very true. The only reason I chose the Injen over the PR is looks and sound.
Old 09-02-2004 | 01:01 PM
  #17  
Viscous's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 836
dont forget that the injen is CARB approved.
Old 09-02-2004 | 01:48 PM
  #18  
Nismo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Y2KSESteve
Very true. The only reason I chose the Injen over the PR is looks and sound.
How is the sound of Injen different form Place Racing. In my opinion if you have the same filter on both intakes, it's gonna give out the same sound.

Andrei
Old 09-02-2004 | 01:49 PM
  #19  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by Nismo98
How is the sound of Injen different form Place Racing. In my opinion if you have the same filter on both intakes, it's gonna give out the same sound.

Andrei
The PR seemed to sound somewhat muffled and probably was considering it was in the fender. The Injen seems to be a more crisp sound and definitely louder at WOT. The Injen does whistle considerably more though..
Old 09-02-2004 | 02:20 PM
  #20  
happyricefob's Avatar
V^___^V
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,407
From: Fremont, CA
bomz-r CAI......
Old 09-02-2004 | 02:23 PM
  #21  
jdm71488's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,415
dude why dont you just got short ram?

on deciding on intake type, you have to go with your knowledge... by that, i mean you have to layout where the filter will sit, and what you think will be more beneficial in power... unless someone has a dyno, which i have yet to see one then this will never end...

i have a few links you should read on my site: maxima.accessjdm.com/threads.php

i've looked at your flash page so i guess your into computers... please disregard the css coding if it does not display right in your browser... i am working on fixing it now!
Old 09-02-2004 | 03:53 PM
  #22  
4GenMaxMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 108
I like my Injen. I installed a larger filter because the one that comes with it is so small.
Old 09-02-2004 | 04:37 PM
  #23  
Taken2DaMax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,336
From: san antonio, Tejas
An CAI is a CAI. THat's what I always thought. Aren't the ones from ebay as effective as the PR? Since the injen isn't really a CAI, it's harder for that to compare to the PR.
Old 09-02-2004 | 06:02 PM
  #24  
NYC_Maxima97's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 464
Has anybody done any dyno testing of these intakes in the same car? I'd like to see some numbers. I have the injen intake but I would assume the PR has to provide colder air and therefore more power. I can't imagine the difference to be that big though, prob immaterial.
Old 09-02-2004 | 06:23 PM
  #25  
MidwestMaX1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 343
AEM is ghey......
Old 09-02-2004 | 06:27 PM
  #26  
Keyser Skoze's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 813
I have the injen and I love it. I was going to go with the PR but what I assumed was that if the car is dropped, wont it hit the filter. And isnt it easier for water to get up in the filter leading to hydro lock?
Old 09-03-2004 | 09:28 AM
  #27  
Nismo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by Keyser Skoze
I have the injen and I love it. I was going to go with the PR but what I assumed was that if the car is dropped, wont it hit the filter. And isnt it easier for water to get up in the filter leading to hydro lock?
I think it's other way around, IMO you have a higher change of catching water with Injen since the filter is just sitting in a whide open spot. On the other hand, Place Racing is covered be the plastic piece.

Andrei
Old 09-03-2004 | 09:33 AM
  #28  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,105
From: Chiiiii
No it isn't. It's right behind the foglight.
Old 09-03-2004 | 10:10 AM
  #29  
Nismo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,770
Originally Posted by DAVE Sz
No it isn't. It's right behind the foglight.
Do you have PRCAI, if so have you checked where the filter sits?

Andrei
Old 09-03-2004 | 10:11 AM
  #30  
MrEous's Avatar
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,775
From: Garland (DFW), TX
I linked a buddy that did temp measurements of different areas that assorted intakes are positioned.

The Injen was the worst location...even compared to a popcharger.
Old 09-03-2004 | 11:33 AM
  #31  
Imobejoas's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 80
Originally Posted by MrEous
I linked a buddy that did temp measurements of different areas that assorted intakes are positioned.

The Injen was the worst location...even compared to a popcharger.
Hello, I'm the buddy that MrEous linked in here... I did a little experiment a while back with some thermocouples (temperature probes) and these were my findings.

I do UL (Underwriter's Laboratories) experiments every once in a while at work. And so I had the brilliant idea to bring some of the test equipment into my car. Specifically, the thermal couples that are used to measure temperature at specific points. There's a hot (excuse the pun) debate on whether the Injen CAI, Placeracing CAI, and popchargers really take in different temperatures of air in the engine bay. So I decided to wire up some thermal couples and drive around. The results are quite interesting...

Probe #1
I placed one right behind the driver's side foglight bay (I don't have any foglights, so it's straight ram air). This would be pretty close to where the place racing CAI would be, except in the wheel well and not directly exposed.

Probe #2
I had another thermalcouple taped to the filter of my Injen CAI, this intake sits right behind the radiator (not the best place, but the only place if you don't want to cut holes)

Probe #3
And one more was placed where your favorite WAI would normally go.

Probe #4
As a control, I had one located outside of the engine bay for ambient temperatures. It's was cloudy/scattered showers in Dallas, Texas at about 65F.


Fired up the engine and went for a little drive. I drove three different stlyes: Normal start/stop traffic, aggressive WOT, and cruising on the highway. Turning A/C off or on made no difference at all. Results?

Probe #1 kept at a VERY steady 65 degrees, I figured it would be actually colder with all that wind. But I guess that's windchill not temperature.

Probe #2 Was the HOTTEST out of all the the sensors. Sitting behind the radiator the probe would read anywhere from 90 degrees up to 130 degrees. At idle, or at a stop light, it would increase a slight 5 degrees and settle because the radiator fan would kick in.

Probe #3 the big surprise... This probe had the most fluctuations. At idle or at a stop light it would heat up to the same temp as the probe #2 (the CAI). Sometimes it would be hotter, but most of the time it was the same temp. But the interesting thing is that when I was driving and cruising, the temperature would drop to about 10 degrees above ambient (so mid 70s) so actually it would be about 20-30 degrees COOLER than the COLD AIR INTAKE.

This kind of data made some interesting conclusions. And I guess you can draw your own or discuss on this thread... I think from a standstill, the Cold Air might have a slight advantage since the engine bay heats up. But from a cruising speed, it sure does look like the WAI has the cooler air flowing into the engine. The best would place for the intake would probably right at the fog light, where there's plenty of cold air flowing there, however it's more susceptible to water entering.

What do you guys think?
As for sound, I would say that Injen hollas/screams/groans/intimidates really well. Can't say that I had a comparison with other CAI, but everyone that's heard me on the dyno remarks how loud it sounds (with stock cat-back)
Old 09-03-2004 | 12:12 PM
  #32  
cardana24's Avatar
Blown
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,765
From: Charlottesville, VA
I had an injen and really liked but I sold it and now my intake is running into my passenger side fender well
Old 09-03-2004 | 12:47 PM
  #33  
ShRapNeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 679
i love the sound my PR makes...

but soon imma have on in the passenger side fender well also
Old 09-03-2004 | 01:29 PM
  #34  
Tyrexx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,421
From: Madison, WI
This again?

The ebay place racing CAI style is the best!

The only competition is between the Short Ram/HAI/PC CAI

The Injen looks better but is in the WORST place, basicly touching exhaust pipes and the radiator.
Old 09-03-2004 | 01:36 PM
  #35  
Keyser Skoze's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 813
Originally Posted by Nismo98
I think it's other way around, IMO you have a higher change of catching water with Injen since the filter is just sitting in a whide open spot. On the other hand, Place Racing is covered be the plastic piece.

Andrei
Its the same thing with the injen. There is a splash gard there also. Granted im sure it would be easier to get water in there then the PR. I just didnt know that the filter for the PR would be behind the actual splash gard. Thats the only reason i didnt get it the first time.
Old 09-05-2004 | 12:20 PM
  #36  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by DAVE Sz
No it isn't. It's right behind the foglight.
You have a PR CAI?? It IS protected by the plastic shield directly behind the fog light.
Old 09-05-2004 | 01:47 PM
  #37  
dawalkster's Avatar
is craving Bojangles
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 740
isnt this all just a debate over 1-2 hp??
Old 09-05-2004 | 02:55 PM
  #38  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,720
From: Atlanta
very true

Originally Posted by max prodigy
isnt this all just a debate over 1-2 hp??
Good Point.
Old 09-05-2004 | 03:02 PM
  #39  
jdm71488's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,415
Originally Posted by max prodigy
isnt this all just a debate over 1-2 hp??
nothing has changed... and it will not until people read the faqs
Old 09-05-2004 | 07:01 PM
  #40  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,116
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by max prodigy
isnt this all just a debate over 1-2 hp??
You are right in a sense. But the real issue is drivability. The PR CAI will feel much better around town due to the cooler air it has access to. With my PR CAI, I don't feel any bogginess even after idling for 10+ min. You can't say that with the Injen.


Quick Reply: Best performing CAI for the 4th Gen?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:22 PM.