4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

My 96 GLE blows the doors off my wifes 99 Why?

Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #1  
rboberdier's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
My 96 GLE blows the doors off my wifes 99 Why?

I have two fouth Gen Maximas, a 96 and a 99. They are both GLEs. My wife's 99 is very noticably slower. Even she notices a big difference - she fries the tires in my car after driving hers because she has to stand on hers to get performance. My car seems light, nimble and fast - her car drives like a boat.

I have a K&N filter on hers no mods at all to my car, that I know of. I bought them both used. Is there something that I can do to hers that will get it to perform closer to mine and that won't be expensive?
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
MaximaTodd's Avatar
G
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 643
her knock sensor is probably bad
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #3  
chrish09's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 65
yea, that would be my guess also. how many miles?
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:50 PM
  #4  
lilaclucymaxima's Avatar
Team Ramrod
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,817
well the '99 maximas r much heavier than the 96's because they had much more parts because of emissions
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #5  
MAXRB8's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,986
"won't be expensive" How about money back!....... Sell the 99 and buy a 96! LOL
Your info is a little vague, there could be so many factors that stops a definitive answer, try starting with a complete tuneup, plugs, oil, throttle body clean. Is there much of an odometer difference?
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:53 PM
  #6  
Terran's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,983
Could be the KS as suggested. Check the codes as it won't set off the CEL.

95-96 are lighter, but it shouldn't be noticeable.

Is her's cali-spec? I believe they have an extra precat and since elimination of the precats is what gives aftermarket y-pipes their gain it would make sense that an extra one would further reduce performance.

Since her's is a 99 the coil packs could have gone bad. I would think that would set off the CEL, but I don't really know.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
SlackR237's Avatar
Rollin' on 'Caps
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 425
The heaviness factor is true, but I don't know about all this knock sensor talk...

If the check engine light isn't on then it probably isn't your knock sensor, people just like to pin it on poor performance because it's an all-too-easy diagnosis for a power loss situation.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
idolsword's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 535
Originally Posted by SlackR237
If the check engine light isn't on then it probably isn't your knock sensor, people just like to pin it on poor performance because it's an all-too-easy diagnosis for a power loss situation.
Thats not true, a bad knock sensor WILL NOT trip the CEL light, you have to run the codes yourself to see if the knock has gone bad.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #9  
jkklim's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 629
prolly the knock sensor
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #10  
MaximaTodd's Avatar
G
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 643
Originally Posted by SlackR237

If the check engine light isn't on then it probably isn't your knock sensor, people just like to pin it on poor performance because it's an all-too-easy diagnosis for a power loss situation.
eh you are wrong. as said above the knock sensor doesnt trip a CEL. its a ghost code. dont give misinformation.

knock sensor failure is the most common cause of performance loss. check for codes, then go from there.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #11  
idolsword's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 535
Originally Posted by MaximaTodd
eh you are wrong. as said above the knock sensor doesnt trip a CEL. its a ghost code. dont give misinformation.

knock sensor failure is the most common cause of performance loss. check for codes, then go from there.
And thank you for backing me up.

Besure to check out your information before giving it out;

- Bad knock sensor info.
- 95-96 Red Clear info.
- So so so much more of the recent questions and advice given on the Org.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #12  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Don'tn forget the coils
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #13  
Terran's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,983
Originally Posted by ScreamingVE
Don't forget the coils
I didn't .

The KS is often suggested because it is often goes bad (especially as our beloved 4th gens grow older) and unless you check the codes for no reason (since there's no CEL) then you won't know about it. It really does make a big difference too.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #14  
SlackR237's Avatar
Rollin' on 'Caps
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 425
Originally Posted by idolsword
Thats not true, a bad knock sensor WILL NOT trip the CEL light, you have to run the codes yourself to see if the knock has gone bad.
No, THATS not true, my knock sensor went bad a while ago, and guess what, it threw a code.

Be sure to check out your information before giving it out
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #15  
JC98MAXSE's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
I just had my knock sensor replaced

98 SE w/only 65k miles. No CEL. BIG difference in performance.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:43 PM
  #16  
CUSEMAX's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 245
throwing a code, doesnt mean it trips the CEL!!!!!!
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #17  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by SlackR237
No, THATS not true, my knock sensor went bad a while ago, and guess what, it threw a code.

Be sure to check out your information before giving it out
Ummm...it throws a code but the Check Engine Light won't come on. They're right.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #18  
SlackR237's Avatar
Rollin' on 'Caps
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 425
Oh, yeah, sorry guys, it tripped the CEL, and also threw a code (duh), my fault.

So, in conclusion, a bad knock sensor did trip the CEL, at least in my car. I don't know how you can argue that...
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #19  
Terran's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,983
It really doesn't matter, but you did say:

Originally Posted by SlackR237
If the check engine light isn't on then it probably isn't your knock sensor...
But you are correct. There will be a code, but not a light (unless something else is wrong).
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #20  
superblack99's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 127
wats a good price for a new ks?? my car has 138000 miles
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:04 PM
  #21  
Terran's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,983
$90 shipped on ebay. $112 plus shipping from Jr nissan with "maxima" promo code. Don't just replace it though. Check your codes.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #22  
idolsword's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 535
Originally Posted by SlackR237
Oh, yeah, sorry guys, it tripped the CEL, and also threw a code (duh), my fault.

So, in conclusion, a bad knock sensor did trip the CEL, at least in my car. I don't know how you can argue that...
Just follow me for a second, we are arguing that a bad knock sensor (with the exception of your Maxima and a mabye a couple others) will not trip a CEL light and will throw a code. Our point is that you said "because your CEL is not on it is probably not your knock sensor" when in truth if the CEL is not on and there is a big loss in power chances are with that year and mileage it is probably the knock sensor...........now let this one go and move on with your life.

- Steve
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #23  
s0ber's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,833
Originally Posted by SlackR237
Oh, yeah, sorry guys, it tripped the CEL, and also threw a code (duh), my fault.

So, in conclusion, a bad knock sensor did trip the CEL, at least in my car. I don't know how you can argue that...
KS dont trip CEL's... ok?
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #24  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,082
From: Chiiiii
Originally Posted by enjoyincubus504
well the '99 maximas r much heavier than the 96's because they had much more parts because of emissions
You should be banned forever for stupidity.
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #25  
daveyg68's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 129
I have a 95 and a 96 SE. How do I go about checking codes on these to see if either of them has a bad KS? My 95 has 206k and I'm concerned about it's performance. Thanks.

daveyg68
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 02:08 AM
  #26  
Oblongshapes's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
This guy wanted to know why his wifes car lacked to his. And you gave him an arguement over whether or not the CEL is triggered. WOW, I love the .org
Welcome to it man Where question are asked and off topic arguments are started.
BTW, it is true, your information is vague. A master mechanic couldnt even figure this one out without more information.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 05:15 AM
  #27  
Jatan's Avatar
...
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,324
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by rboberdier
I have two fouth Gen Maximas, a 96 and a 99. They are both GLEs. My wife's 99 is very noticably slower. Even she notices a big difference - she fries the tires in my car after driving hers because she has to stand on hers to get performance. My car seems light, nimble and fast - her car drives like a boat.

I have a K&N filter on hers no mods at all to my car, that I know of. I bought them both used. Is there something that I can do to hers that will get it to perform closer to mine and that won't be expensive?
Do a tuneup on the 99 (or both if you want to - not that expensive if you use NGK copper plugs). If the 99 runs like crap performance wise then I'm guessing it's the coil packs or knock sensor.

Have the 99's computer checked for codes at AutoZone for free. Since you do have a 96, take your coil packs (less problematic than the 99s) and put them in the 99 to see if that helps.

Mostly likely giving the cars a tuneup and checking the coil pack problem on the 99 will fix it. Also clean the throttle body on each car and use some Sea Foam to help get some of the carbon out (check the Fluids & Lub section of the forums)
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 05:21 AM
  #28  
mzmtg's Avatar
Minister of Silly Walks
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,772
Originally Posted by enjoyincubus504
well the '99 maximas r much heavier than the 96's because they had much more parts because of emissions
Let's just say, "no."
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 06:13 AM
  #29  
rboberdier's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
Thanks folks for all of the input. I never expected as much. You all were great. Sorry to create a stir though. To answer some of your questions... I don't have any CE lights on and the mileage diff is... my car has 128K my wife's about 90K. They have been this way since I bought them both at about 80K. I have not done tune-ups on either car though it sounds like the first thing I should do. I will also look into the KS since it sounds like a reasonably easy thing to get checked. Thanks a lot.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 07:50 AM
  #30  
Gears & Crosses's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 250
Originally Posted by rboberdier
Thanks folks for all of the input. I never expected as much. You all were great. Sorry to create a stir though. To answer some of your questions... I don't have any CE lights on and the mileage diff is... my car has 128K my wife's about 90K. They have been this way since I bought them both at about 80K. I have not done tune-ups on either car though it sounds like the first thing I should do. I will also look into the KS since it sounds like a reasonably easy thing to get checked. Thanks a lot.
It sounds like your in the right track. After I tuned up mine mine felt a lot better. So much so I wish I would have brought it to the track. Performance has slipped a little now, I think I need some plugs.

Can let us know what you find out?

Good Luck,
Gears
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 08:09 AM
  #31  
rboberdier's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
What about a fuel injector cleaning. Do those help?
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #32  
MaxKlinger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 873
Originally Posted by SlackR237
No, THATS not true, my knock sensor went bad a while ago, and guess what, it threw a code.

Be sure to check out your information before giving it out
True. Two summers ago my knock sensor went bad (about 160k miles or so) and I found out because the CEL came on. Why would the ECU trip an error code and not alert the driver?
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 10:18 AM
  #33  
Saddles's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 577
From: Boonville, Missouri
Originally Posted by SlackR237
No, THATS not true, my knock sensor went bad a while ago, and guess what, it threw a code.

Be sure to check out your information before giving it out
what...a knock sensor will throw a code, no one said it wouldn't. they just said it wouldn't trip the CEL, which is correct.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 10:42 AM
  #34  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by MaxKlinger
Why would the ECU trip an error code and not alert the driver?
The knock sensor code can come up for several different reasons including but not limited to:

O2 sensor malfunction
Knock sensor malfuntion
Knock sensor detecting knocking/pinging

Now can you imagine the CEL coming on every single time your engine knocked or pinged??....that's why...
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #35  
lilaclucymaxima's Avatar
Team Ramrod
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,817
[QUOTE=DAVE Sz]You should be banned forever for stupidity.

why is that
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #36  
lilaclucymaxima's Avatar
Team Ramrod
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,817
Originally Posted by mzmtg
Let's just say, "no."
prove me wrong
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #37  
Max Noob's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,725
From: 90706 so cal
weight diff from a 96 and a 99 is like under 70 lbs. heavier front impact bumper reinforcement, a little bit of emmision stuff. doesnt make much of a difference at all.

tune up the cars first. then let us know if there is still a problem. most likely just bad plugs, coils, dirty air filter, possibly bad KS. theres a bunch of things.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #38  
Big_Ham's Avatar
MaximaFreak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,136
Originally Posted by DAVE Sz
You should be banned forever for stupidity.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #39  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,082
From: Chiiiii
Weight difference between a 96 and a 99 isn't more than 15lbs, maybe even 10.
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #40  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by DAVE Sz
Weight difference between a 96 and a 99 isn't more than 15lbs, maybe even 10.
Do you know that for sure or are you speculating like he was??

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 PM.