4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

I have a hard time believing this but it happened...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 06:11 AM
  #1  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
I have a hard time believing this but it happened...

Driving home from St. Louis, I managed to get 40.8 mpg. The speed limit was 55 so I was doing 59 the entire way. My car never broke 2,500 RPMs and was cruising at about 1,950 RPMs. I did 163.3 miles on 4 gallons of gas and I forced as much gas in the tank as I could. From there to my home, I managed 99.7 miles on exactly 3 galloons of fuel, again, cramming as much of the stuff into my tank as possible. On that leg of the trip, I was cruising at about 68mph. My girlfriend though I was a little on the crazy side for being so excited, lol.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 06:50 AM
  #2  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
I don't believe it! You won't get an accurate assessment on fuel economy unless a) you drive further, and b) don't stop filling the tank up so frequently. You must have been going downhill all the way with a hurricane at your back.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:07 AM
  #3  
joecraps's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 88
Originally Posted by THT
Driving home from St. Louis, I managed to get 40.8 mpg. The speed limit was 55 so I was doing 59 the entire way. My car never broke 2,500 RPMs and was cruising at about 1,950 RPMs. I did 163.3 miles on 4 gallons of gas and I forced as much gas in the tank as I could. From there to my home, I managed 99.7 miles on exactly 3 galloons of fuel, again, cramming as much of the stuff into my tank as possible. On that leg of the trip, I was cruising at about 68mph. My girlfriend though I was a little on the crazy side for being so excited, lol.

~THT
Yeah, hard to believe. Run full tank and do your calculations.

Topping off with small amounts of gas is rife with variablity- fuel volume in lines, fuel rail and filter become a huge percentage relative to 3 or 4 gallons of fuel. I would estimate another half to 3/4 of a gallon or so you are not including do to this. In my estimation this would drop your MPG by 25% in your 3-gallon measurement - dropping 40 MPG to ~30. (about right-I've approached 30 few times in all highway driving).
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #4  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
I've got a few 300 mile trips coming up this month so we'll see what happens.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #5  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
Can I get some fries with that whopper? Just kidding, it maybe remotely possible with 93 octane and all highway. 40 mpg at 68 mph is unheard of though.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:12 AM
  #6  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
No, 40mpg at 59mph and 33mpg at 68mph. And yes, I filled up with only 93 (Mobil or BP) and it was pure highway driving.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:15 AM
  #7  
maxima_kenny96's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,446
Im sure it would be nice if it was **true** (not saying it is but in the state of it being REASONABLLY true)
shiiiiit I get....20 mpg(?) but I think it is do to a bad knock sensor.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #8  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
The reason I don't believe it is that I have never seen any posts remotely resembling the mileage you are claiming to achieve. The most I have ever had on the highway is 31.7 mpg and that was going 885 km (550 miles) with the idiot light on for ever and the car running on fumes. I filled it up until the gas was almost spashing on the side of the car. I have had 29 plus on numerous occasions on longer trips, but that is not exceeding 75 mph.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #9  
adithius's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 648
Immpossible.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #10  
PhillyDonut's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 533
From: Phila, PA
maybe something is wrong with the trip o'meter...
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #11  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
I have a witness although everyone here would claim bias as she's my girlfriend. Anyway, I posted my experience because I recognized it as a fluke. But that's not going to stop me from trying to repeat the feat. And no, the trip odometer is pretty accurate when compared to the posted distances.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #12  
Crockpot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by adithius
Immpossible.


Are you calling him a liar?? It is most certainaly not 'immpossible'
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #13  
VIP Maxima
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
lols, max ive gotten on highways has been 24 mpg
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #14  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
I drive behind semi's on the highway to get top MPG
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #15  
sryth's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,420
From: Poughkeepsie, NY
Originally Posted by joecraps
Yeah, hard to believe. Run full tank and do your calculations.

Topping off with small amounts of gas is rife with variablity- fuel volume in lines, fuel rail and filter become a huge percentage relative to 3 or 4 gallons of fuel. I would estimate another half to 3/4 of a gallon or so you are not including do to this. In my estimation this would drop your MPG by 25% in your 3-gallon measurement - dropping 40 MPG to ~30. (about right-I've approached 30 few times in all highway driving).


There are too many variables to get accurate calculations with that amount of fuel. Consider all joecraps said as well as the following contributing factors:

Different pumps shut off at different pressure
Tire pressure can affect accuracy of odometer

The more data you accumulate, the more accurate your findings will be. Try running a full tank, refilling at the same pump, using the automatic shutoff (don't top it off). Better yet, go through more than one tank and keep track of the mileage.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #16  
TheFink's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 119
haha yeah, sure you did!
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #17  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
Originally Posted by TheFink
haha yeah, sure you did!
You know what? I really don't care if you believe me or not. Why? Because I don't need your approval or praise. Why? Because it's not important to me. Like I said, you can choose to believe my story or not. I have a witness who saw both the odometer and the receipts. Did my car really do 40.8mpg? Maybe. Maybe not. I don't know for sure and you sure as hell don't know either.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #18  
Crockpot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I drive behind semi's on the highway to get top MPG
lol.. how's your hood paint lookin?
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #19  
Batxel's Avatar
blah
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,615
From: Philadelphia, PA
Were you literally speaking when you said you were smashing the gas in the tank (like until it was pouring down your leg) or do you wait for the pump to stop on its own. Go on a longer trip try using the whole tank to get a more accurate measurement because if this is true I'll trade.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #20  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Excellent work, Its a refreshing change from someone posting about poor mileage
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #21  
sryth's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,420
From: Poughkeepsie, NY
My car got infinite gas mileage the other day. (I pushed it into my driveway)
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #22  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
Yes, I literally forced the gas into my car until it came out. I did that to eliminate the variable that was mentioned above with regard to pumps and pressure.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #23  
Nismotic's Avatar
Always sunny in philly
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,242
Originally Posted by THT
Driving home from St. Louis, I managed to get 40.8 mpg. The speed limit was 55 so I was doing 59 the entire way. My car never broke 2,500 RPMs and was cruising at about 1,950 RPMs. I did 163.3 miles on 4 gallons of gas and I forced as much gas in the tank as I could. From there to my home, I managed 99.7 miles on exactly 3 galloons of fuel, again, cramming as much of the stuff into my tank as possible. On that leg of the trip, I was cruising at about 68mph. My girlfriend though I was a little on the crazy side for being so excited, lol.

~THT

congrats, but be careful about cramming th gas into the tank. this may lead to an evap problem. we all do it, but you should fill up until the "click."
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:06 PM
  #24  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
a couple times a pulled about 31 mpg on a 300mile road trip.

actually I just did about 345 miles to the gallon on about half a tank of gas,I noticed a better fuel consumption when I changed to NGK sparks @ .43 gap spec, was on Platimun Bosch before.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:16 PM
  #25  
THT's Avatar
THT
Thread Starter
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
I thought I'd add, the conditions couldn't have been better. Dry, 70s, and flat terrain. Don't know about the direction of the wind though.

~THT
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #26  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
i believe it, the vq is capable of some crazy things m
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #27  
konak85's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,310
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I drive behind semi's on the highway to get top MPG
Ride the wave baby.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #28  
magneto112's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 886
I think its possible. When I was working for Volvo last year, I had to drive a S60R to an outing many hours away. I did 65 with the cruise control on the entire time and averaged 33mpg. The S60R averages 25mpg on the highway. If you were going 58mph, I can see you getting 40mpg. If you did your math correctly and drove on mostly flat land. 1,900 rpms is pretty damn low.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #29  
maximazation's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,882
From: Sunnyvale, CA
i dont think i have ever broke 28 mpg.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #30  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by Crockpot
lol.. how's your hood paint lookin?
Order us some salsa to go with them chips.
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #31  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by Crockpot
lol.. how's your hood paint lookin?
Alot of rockchips. But all that gas money I save can go towards repairing those
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #32  
Crockpot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 494
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #33  
MaxKlinger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 873
It is most definetly possible. I routinely get around 30mpg on the highway. My record stands at 34.2 mpg, on a 300 mile trip with cruise set at 74mph (and this was with 180k miles on the car). Therefore, it stands to reason that at a lower speed of 59mph, as THT claims, even higher fuel economy ratings are possible. If the car is in excellent condition, not loaded with many passengers or crap in the trunk, if the weather was good, if there aren't many grades on the roadway, if you're using good fuel, if you use cruise control, and traffic was minimal, I see no reason why this couldn't be achieved.

As was said before, there are many variables at play here. Honestly, if you've never gotten above 28mpg on the highway there's a problem in your equation somewhere, and I'd first suspect people not using cruise control or just having a lead foot.

I hope this doesn't become another "what is your fuel economy" thread.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #34  
Nismotic's Avatar
Always sunny in philly
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,242
ill agree its possible. My trip from PA to NY to pick up my crapnabi's from Freddie was a long ride, but with the AC at full blast, my subs in the trunk, and an extra passenger, i mustard 375 miles w/ 1/4 tank of gas left.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #35  
paultyler_82's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 276
I can beleive it, my brother's '04 525i was getting 42mpg the other day on one leg of the trip, tach didn't top 2500, that car has a MPG gauge in it to let you know what kind of mileage you're getting.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #36  
Ant96GLE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,682
If all the variables are right I would not doubt it. Now imagine if OD or 5th gear in 5 speeds would be just a tad higher, so instead of hitting 2,800 rpm at about 70, we could hit about 2k rpm, it would be very nice.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 01:42 PM
  #37  
BigLou93SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,581
From: Danbury, CT \ Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by paultyler_82
I can beleive it, my brother's '04 525i was getting 42mpg the other day on one leg of the trip, tach didn't top 2500, that car has a MPG gauge in it to let you know what kind of mileage you're getting.
That's not an accurate way to tell gas economy - the guage you're referring to just tells the INSTANTATEOUS gas consuption, not the whole trip. Just look when he accelerates next time: even if he is using light throttle-acceleration, the gauge goes below 0 mpg. If he did it out, and divided the total miles accumalated on that tank of gas, by the amount of gas put into the car to get back to full, then he would know his gas mileage. But the way you described it, he did not get 42 mpg.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #38  
Skiptronic's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 292
From: SF Bay Area
Had he continued driving as he was doing exactly at that time, he would of gotten 42 mpg. Or at least somewhere around that number.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #39  
Conrad283's Avatar
I need a truck
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 73,115
From: Naples, Fl
No pics, no care.

Nah, that's impressive. I wish my car performed like that.
Old Apr 5, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #40  
sryth's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,420
From: Poughkeepsie, NY
Originally Posted by BigLou93SE
That's not an accurate way to tell gas economy - the guage you're referring to just tells the INSTANTATEOUS gas consuption, not the whole trip. Just look when he accelerates next time: even if he is using light throttle-acceleration, the gauge goes below 0 mpg. If he did it out, and divided the total miles accumalated on that tank of gas, by the amount of gas put into the car to get back to full, then he would know his gas mileage. But the way you described it, he did not get 42 mpg.
I'm not sure how it works on BMWs, but my Chrysler has two modes: One for current MPG and one for average. The average mode is more accurate than measuring at the pump.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM.