4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

which bumper looks better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #1  
Studio718's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 541
From: 11435
which bumper looks better?



or

Old May 24, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #2  
CystumMax's Avatar
Well I should wrap this up before I start to ramble.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,830
Sorry to say, but I think they are both ugly.
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #3  
rome06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,086
From: cincinnati, oh
Originally Posted by CystumMax
Sorry to say, but I think they are both ugly.
lol yah man im with him....those are ugly
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #4  
Ruthless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 536
I like the first one more. But, I dont really like either
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:28 AM
  #5  
Geophrum's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 475
choose one you like, i personnaly like stillen.... simple and looks good.. these look like they belong on a honda... IMO
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
Studio718's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 541
From: 11435
Guess I'll wait for paradox system to finish theirs and see what it looks like
Old May 24, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
CystumMax's Avatar
Well I should wrap this up before I start to ramble.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,830
With the first bumper you have to rewire your parking lights so they act as your bumper lights for signal. I would go with Stillen kit, So much better looking.
Old May 24, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #8  
maxinitout's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 142
go with the skyline kit. that looks pretty sick
Old May 24, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
'96MaxGLE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 611
The 1st pick is the M-bumper with the bumper lights shaved, u can't purchase it with the holes shaved. I'm thinking the reason they did that was the terrible fitment of the bumper lights with the M-bumper. I definatly like the 1st one better...that's the one I have, but thinking about changing to a 97-99 w/ stillen lip.
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #10  
SiCkBLaCKMaX99's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 886
get the new carbon fiber front that is featuired at http://www.vqpower.com/v2/

is anyone else making body kits for our max's i want the sarona type 2 rear cuz im doing dual exhaust and airbag suspension but is anyone in the process of a better kit than sarona type 1
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #11  
drivinmax
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
both ugly get a stock 99 front bumper
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
NismoGTR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 334
From: New Jersey
Depends on what u like. You should try looking at the lip kits. By the way is the 99 bumper the same as the 98
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #13  
DrTySOUFMaX23's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 985
i kinda like the first one better but it's all up to you what u can afford and what ur taste is..
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
owais's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 770
From: Central FL
If I HAD to choose one from the two, it would be the first one. Otherwise, I think both are ugly. But do what you want, your car.
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #15  
Redmax's Avatar
Redlinemax Owner
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,027
Originally Posted by '96MaxGLE
The 1st pick is the M-bumper with the bumper lights shaved, u can't purchase it with the holes shaved. I'm thinking the reason they did that was the terrible fitment of the bumper lights with the M-bumper. I definatly like the 1st one better...that's the one I have, but thinking about changing to a 97-99 w/ stillen lip.

Th M Bumper definately had fitment issues and so I am now in the process of having it redone.
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #16  
Dubbya's Avatar
VK56 Inside
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,386
If I HAD to choose, I would choose to run with no bumper at all. Neither are my style. I like the sleeper look.
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #17  
Chris99SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 128
From: Philly, PA
Will either of those bumpers make your car faster?
Old May 24, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #18  
RastaManMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,013
OEM > Those.

LEMAR
Old May 24, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #19  
Dubbya's Avatar
VK56 Inside
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,386
Originally Posted by Chris99SE
Will either of those bumpers make your car faster?

Didnt you know each aftermarket bumper adds 10-15hp depending on if you use the JDM mounting bolts.
Old May 24, 2005 | 02:13 PM
  #20  
Fr33way™'s Avatar
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,471
From: Atlanta
Stock '99 with Stillen lip. Of the two the first one . .
Old May 24, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #21  
sk24iam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,570
I like the first one.
Old May 24, 2005 | 05:51 PM
  #22  
tekneekzz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 327
Originally Posted by Chris99SE
Will either of those bumpers make your car faster?
did he really ask this???? ..................................




also if i had to pick yea i would pick the first one but IMO they both are super ugly.. i could eat kimchi with that rice
Old May 24, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #23  
sunten1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Chris99SE
Will either of those bumpers make your car faster?

Well from the looks of it the first one looks hella more dynamic

Just put the stillen lip on it and be happy. No need for this other BS. Like everyone else said, both look like crap

Old May 24, 2005 | 06:32 PM
  #24  
rome06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,086
From: cincinnati, oh
Originally Posted by sunten1
Well from the looks of it the first one looks hella more dynamic

Just put the stillen lip on it and be happy. No need for this other BS. Like everyone else said, both look like crap

hopefully he said it as a joke to make fun of the person who started this thread....HOPEFULLY ahaha
Old May 24, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #25  
4x4Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,577
First one is the better looking of the 2.

That could look good on a maxima if the rest of the car is done correctly.
Old May 24, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #26  
SmoothMax's Avatar
OG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,594
From: Jersey
I say the first one
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #27  
CystumMax's Avatar
Well I should wrap this up before I start to ramble.
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,830
Originally Posted by SmoothMax
I say the first one
LOL you have thefirst one, Or is that your car in the first picture.....
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #28  
nick99's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 167
i would go with the first one.
Old May 24, 2005 | 08:12 PM
  #29  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Neither.......
Old May 24, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #30  
maxiquin's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
i like the first one, id get that bumper with the stillen sides and back bumper
Old May 25, 2005 | 06:41 AM
  #31  
Adrian112597's Avatar
Adrian
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 263
go with the first one
Old May 25, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #32  
SmoothMax's Avatar
OG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,594
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by CystumMax
LOL you have thefirst one, Or is that your car in the first picture.....
It's an old pic of my car....

it kinda looks like this now

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Calabar
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
3
Oct 5, 2015 09:57 PM
ricky7780
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
0
Sep 24, 2015 06:50 PM
Max8
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
16
Sep 22, 2015 02:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 AM.