4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Premium 93 octane huh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #41  
DARQ MX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well, I was just wondering if WE HAD to put 93 in, Like I saqid some cars you NEED to.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 03:16 AM
  #42  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Another data point:
I've been running 89 octane for a couple of months now, and I've seen no decrease in fuel economy. (I always scribble the mileage down on my gas receipt and put it into a little spreadsheet, so I *know* what my fuel economy is). No knock sensor codes either.

Interestingly, I've found that avoiding running the A/C save a good bit of fuel. I run the auto climate control at 77 in summer, and in winter I make sure to switch from defroster to heat asap. I used to run it in heat/defrost all winter long and my fuel economy suffered.

Dave
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 07:30 AM
  #43  
alleydawg6's Avatar
Livin dreams thru his Maxima
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 560
Originally Posted by Nismotic
I would suggest to do some reading of previous threads. Donating will allow you to use your search function.

And if you're contemplating on a few cents for the health of your ride, you shouldn't even consider modding your car.

Good point ....
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 07:35 AM
  #44  
NoMax...yet's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 50
Originally Posted by zander
Honestly if the 7-10 dollars a tank is going to break the bank I would suggest selling the car and getting a small 4 banger, or maybe even a bike-cycle. Get a honda insight or something and not have to worry about gas prices
I have two bikes that cost more than my Max! Oh yeah I use premium. My wife filled it once with mid-grade and I scolded her "whats $1.80 per tank!
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:21 AM
  #45  
Wetballoon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Some people on here are not average drivers.
SO true, most likely, very few are actually "average" drivers, I'm certain that most believe that they are above average, and a few probably are. But I would wager that most on here are below average and don't realize it.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #46  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Another data point:
I've been running 89 octane for a couple of months now, and I've seen no decrease in fuel economy. No knock sensor codes either.
Dave
Correlations. Remember correlations. And knock sensor will constantly adjust itself without throwing a code. No code does not = 'perfect running engine'. Very important to know what's happening with your engine without solely relying on codes. My $.02.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #47  
theshawn's Avatar
the Light is among you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 339
From: Dayton, Ohio
Holy crap, another gas thread.

Who gives a rats azz. Use regular if you wish or use premium if you wish. Write about how regular is the greatest or write about how premium is the greatest.

I use premium because that's what the car says is the best for best performance. If you want to nit pick or distrust or give reason why that's wrong so what.

I choose to spend 20 cents more per gallon and you don't. I choose to spend 20 cents less per gallon and you don't. So the fukk what.

In the grande scheme of things WHO GIVES A ****!!....
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #48  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by theshawn
Holy crap, another gas thread.

Who gives a rats azz. Use regular if you wish or use premium if you wish. Write about how regular is the greatest or write about how premium is the greatest.

I use premium because that's what the car says is the best for best performance. If you want to nit pick or distrust or give reason why that's wrong so what.

I choose to spend 20 cents more per gallon and you don't. I choose to spend 20 cents less per gallon and you don't. So the fukk what.

In the grande scheme of things WHO GIVES A ****!!....
I agree that these gas threads are frustrating, but Wow! You ever thought of enjoying a nice, relaxing cup of tea?
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #49  
theshawn's Avatar
the Light is among you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 339
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by nelledge
I agree that these gas threads are frustrating, but Wow! You ever thought of enjoying a nice, relaxing cup of tea?

Somebody crapped in my cornflakes this morning I think....
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:10 AM
  #50  
Apparition's Avatar
Ichiban King
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,822
From: PNW
Originally Posted by theshawn
Holy crap, another gas thread.

Who gives a rats azz. Use regular if you wish or use premium if you wish. Write about how regular is the greatest or write about how premium is the greatest.

I use premium because that's what the car says is the best for best performance. If you want to nit pick or distrust or give reason why that's wrong so what.

I choose to spend 20 cents more per gallon and you don't. I choose to spend 20 cents less per gallon and you don't. So the fukk what.

In the grande scheme of things WHO GIVES A ****!!....

agreed.. (sips a cup of green tea.)
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #51  
Stagnet04's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,444
From: SoCal
.......
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #52  
udienow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 868
From: Palatine, IL
haha use whatever you want.... i choose to use 93, it may do nothing, and even if it be proven to do nothing someday, I dont care, I still feel like im doing better for my car by running the BEST there is. Because thats all my baby deserves... the best. BP 93 FTW!
I spent 80 bucks on plugs when I could have spend $40... I spent almost $100 for a o2 when I could have spent $60.... My car is just not something I go cheap on. You want to save money, skip that fast food your about to pick up. Thats the 7 bucks right there that you cut your car out of.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #53  
isawyou's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 131
I find it funny when people are loyal to a name brand of gas station. How many big name stations are there in your market? I've never counted, but there's Hess, Shell, ExxonMobil, Conoco, Marathon, Sunoco, the list goes on depending on where you live. I suppose about a dozen or so anywhere you go. Now, how many oil refineries are there that serve your market? Probably one or two, again, depending on where you live. Your fuel is made at the refineries, not the stations. The refineries give every one they serve the same fuel. They all sell the same thing. The same truck delivers to many different name brand stations. Now, there could be differences in business practices that are worthy to support, but not differences in quality of fuel (of comparable grade).
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:01 PM
  #54  
udienow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 868
From: Palatine, IL
each gas company adds its own additives to the fuel. For citgo thats water.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #55  
Batxel's Avatar
blah
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,615
From: Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by MIXXMAX
Our Maxima's require premium, bottom line! Run anything lower, and eventually you notice a difference in performance from your car, let alone of possible knocking noise from the engine. Down here in PA, we have as high as 94 octane (Sunoco). I only run 93 and never will put in anything less, even if gas prices are high. I don't want to spend more money down the line in replacing parts in my car from running lower octane. Just my $.02.
This is thing I noticed at sunoco gas stations. Their ultra (94 octane) and their premium (93 octane) has switched in the philly area a couple months ago. Now ultra is 93 and premium is 91? What's up with that? Their 93 octane is now more expensive than the neighboring gas stations with 93.

As far as the gas debate goes I just use whatever the car company recomends
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #56  
sonicrunch's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 737
From: Minneapolis,MN
What happened to the sticky that said "Anyone who starts gas threads will be banned"?

We need it back.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #57  
Wetballoon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by isawyou
I find it funny when people are loyal to a name brand of gas station. How many big name stations are there in your market? I've never counted, but there's Hess, Shell, ExxonMobil, Conoco, Marathon, Sunoco, the list goes on depending on where you live. I suppose about a dozen or so anywhere you go. Now, how many oil refineries are there that serve your market? Probably one or two, again, depending on where you live. Your fuel is made at the refineries, not the stations. The refineries give every one they serve the same fuel. They all sell the same thing. The same truck delivers to many different name brand stations. Now, there could be differences in business practices that are worthy to support, but not differences in quality of fuel (of comparable grade).
The refineries that you refer to are terminals, fuels are pumped into the terminals via the pipelines. Remember last years "shortage" after Katrina? Many pipeline pumps lost power. When the tanker driver load up at the terminal, they select the grade of fuel and the supplier, and the brand name additives are added to the fuel while it is being loaded. Whether you choose to believe it or not, there is a difference in brands. And if you compare the color of Amoco Ultimate it to any other gas, you will notice the ultimate is clear, not yellow.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #58  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by nelledge
Correlations. Remember correlations. And knock sensor will constantly adjust itself without throwing a code. No code does not = 'perfect running engine'. Very important to know what's happening with your engine without solely relying on codes. My $.02.
As long as I continue getting 25-26mpg on my commute, and it doesn't show any other symptoms, I don't care about any supposed performance loss. The 'value' of a Maxima with 149k miles is insignificant compared to the cost of fuel.

Dave
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #59  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by Wetballoon
The refineries that you refer to are terminals, fuels are pumped into the terminals via the pipelines. Remember last years "shortage" after Katrina? Many pipeline pumps lost power. When the tanker driver load up at the terminal, they select the grade of fuel and the supplier, and the brand name additives are added to the fuel while it is being loaded. Whether you choose to believe it or not, there is a difference in brands. And if you compare the color of Amoco Ultimate it to any other gas, you will notice the ultimate is clear, not yellow.
There is another issue: when the truck arrives at the gas station, the manager instructs the driver how much of which fuel to put into which storage tank. A guy I know who drove tanker trucks said he had a disturbing number of managers instruct him to put 87 or 89 in the 93 tank, and so on. He would deliver to all different chains too.

The only fuel *I* place additional value in is Sunoco 94. I figure because they blend it with 87 at the pump to make the 89 and 93 grades, and because nobody else makes the 94, that I'm less likely to be given crap gas (lied to). And I only buy the 94 for my turbocharged RX-7, where low-grade gas will blow your engine, rather than trip some weenie knock sensor code or retard your timing for a week. The Maxima gets fuel from whatever pump is cheap and convenient.

Dave
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #60  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
As long as I continue getting 25-26mpg on my commute, and it doesn't show any other symptoms, I don't care about any supposed performance loss. Dave
I can respect that. I tell the same thing to all those health nuts warning to stay away from 'bad cholesterol'. My body feels fine, I'm trim and slender, and I have great energy. Screw those guys! What do they know? I can eat as many double bacon cheeseburgers with extra cheese and wash it down with as many lard shakes as I want, because I don't see any bad results, yet.
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
The 'value' of a Maxima with 149k miles is insignificant compared to the cost of fuel.

Dave
Tell you what. I'll trade you 10 tanks of gas for your car.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #61  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,036
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
What's a knock sensor?

its the sensor that activates ur alarm when u knock on the window........and its recommended to use Premium fuel....is it required....no ....ur car may run like ***....and ur knock sensor MAY have premature life....but do as u wish
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #62  
Wills98MaxSE's Avatar
1 of few unmodded 4G Maxs
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,827
From: Commerce Twp., MI
Bottom line, our Max's are optimized for 93 octane, don't cheap out by using 87 or 89 just to save a buck or 2.

If you want a more thorough explanation on why our Max's need 93, I suggest, as most already have, to read the FAQ's

This thread needs to be
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #63  
Nismotic's Avatar
Always sunny in philly
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,242
Originally Posted by isawyou
Who here has talked about mods? Not the original poster. Not me. And I challenge you to find someone who has sacrificed the OVERALL LIFE of their car to lower octane gas. Nissan would be out of business if gasoline grade affected overall life of thier car. People perhaps sacrifice MAXIMUM performance (much more than a driver would ever notice on a day-to-day basis), but that's it. 100 years of vehicular evolution in the technology age protects the consumer from the demons within the lower priced fuel grades.

When I discuss my preferences for lower priced fuel, not only do I quote my real life experiences, but I share the raw data with everyone here. I encourage anyone who has any form of empirical data confirming that high octane fuel will be better for the average driver over the long run to please share it.
If you owned a nice BMW and it asked for premium, would you still feed it regular to save a few pennies?

Collect the pennies you've saved by using less than premium to donate 20 bucks in order to use the search engine. I've seen diagrams, graphs, equations, chutes and ladders, etc on this stupid topic. In my preference, I will spend the extra few dollars to help me sleep a little better.

You don't have to challenge me to anything. If you want to save a few bucks on your vehicle, be my guest. It's not like Nissan Engineers know wtf they are talking about anyways
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 06:27 PM
  #64  
Nismotic's Avatar
Always sunny in philly
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,242
Originally Posted by Wills98MaxSE
Bottom line, our Max's are optimized for 93 octane, don't cheap out by using 87 or 89 just to save a buck or 2.

If you want a more thorough explanation on why our Max's need 93, I suggest, as most already have, to read the FAQ's

This thread needs to be

It seems like the longer I'm on this damn site, the more defensive people get when it comes to saving money. This reminds me of the thread where the guy bought a tornado and really thought it worked. God forbid.
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #65  
NYC32798's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 533
From: Long Island, NY/Tampa, FL
What's regular?
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 04:49 PM
  #66  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
I use 93 octane. 93 has a better resistance to pinging since it combustes less easily. Also, it's not that big of a price difference once I fill up anyways so I go all the way. 93 is $2.89 here in TN.
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #67  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by Nismotic
It seems like the longer I'm on this damn site, the more defensive people get when it comes to saving money.
It's not like these are $30k cars anymore. Most are more like $3k. If you have an aging car, it does pay to save your spending for things that really matter, and skip some of the things that aren't.

Dave
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 05:15 PM
  #68  
gto400no1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,091
From: Franklinville, NJ
I just dont see the point in buyin a car you cant afford the gas for. I have never put in anything less than premium (i have 93 out my way) and i wont regardless of the age of the car. And its not just maxima owners doin this, i see you guys are makin coments about doin that to beemers... sadly (i work for a gas station) i have bmws, mercedes, tls, and so on that come in all the time and buy regular. Its funny its the people that have the mercedes that complain to me the most at work about the price... first i could care less about the price, second i could care less how people feel, third Kia's have great gas milage lol.
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 06:43 PM
  #69  
Wetballoon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
There is another issue: when the truck arrives at the gas station, the manager instructs the driver how much of which fuel to put into which storage tank. A guy I know who drove tanker trucks said he had a disturbing number of managers instruct him to put 87 or 89 in the 93 tank, and so on. He would deliver to all different chains too.
Yes, this does happen, and any driver caught doing this is in deep 541t. It is highly illegal. When I was hauling the stuff myself, my dispacher told me how much of which grade to haul, and I didn't even speak to the store personnel until it was in the ground. Some of the less scrupulous stores would request more of the 87 than they could hold, forcing us to put it somewhere, but we knew they did it and alway cut back the load by 500 gallons or so. If a driver knowingly puts the wrong grade of fuel into a tank, s/he is responsible. It isn't worth the consequences since the driver receives nothing for the risk.
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #70  
max ride 41's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,789
From: in my max, pa. :p
good god, i've always run 87 in all my cars. never noticed a difference at all in gas mileage or performance, sheesh. i thought it made it run better, but it was a mind control thingy( placibo?? ) that made me think it ran better. keep your fluids fresh, and fix stuff when it breaks, not rocket science< you know??
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #71  
Ceasars Chariot's Avatar
Old Maxima Legend
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,058
From: Paraparaumu, NZ
Originally Posted by Nismotic
it's the knockoff of the Xbox 360.
ha ! good guess, its new technology introduced in the sport of boxing, instead of the ref, doing a count or trying to make a visual observation, the ref connects the knock sensor to each temple to determine if the boxer is in fact ---> KO'd. i believe this is often confusing because Nissan developed the technology.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #72  
oTranscendental's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 837
From: Maryland
93 smells better and it keeps deer away. But 87 does taste a lot like regular pepsi.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #73  
LOST's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 39
personally i think everyones nuts gas is gas 87 never hurt any car out there

87 in my max all day long cheaper and just as good as 93 really no difference in performance watch the nightly world news they even tell you that.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #74  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
Originally Posted by Wills98MaxSE
Bottom line, our Max's are optimized for 93 octane, don't cheap out by using 87 or 89 just to save a buck or 2.

If you want a more thorough explanation on why our Max's need 93, I suggest, as most already have, to read the FAQ's

This thread needs to be
The sheer comedy of these threads is how the facts get twisted and more twisted. Maxima has 91 octane recommended, not 93. And the manual says 87 can and I quote, "CAN" be used.

And when you multiply 20 cents per gallon, it's 3.70, not 7, not 1, not 2.

People are so one-sided here they get the facts wrong, and then they continue to insist on the same position without even thinking about what they are saying.

Can the Maxima benefit from 91 octane over 87 octane?? YES. Can a CR-V? NO. Can an Avalon? YES. Can a BMW? YES.

Does it cost only $7 more per tank for super? NO. It costs about $3.70.

Can it be concluded that a person who uses regular is cheap, or can't afford to use super? NO.

Is super relatively cheaper today than it was in 2001? YES. When you think about it, 0.20/3.199 is only 6.25%. That's relatively cheap. The absolute marginal amount is basically unchanged.

Sometimes I can't understand why facts aren't important on this forum. The only thing I can possibly think of is the age factor.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #75  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
The sheer comedy of these threads is how the facts get twisted and more twisted....
Sometimes I can't understand why facts aren't important on this forum. The only thing I can possibly think of is ...
Well stated. I applaud your struggle for an objective stance.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #76  
Nismotic's Avatar
Always sunny in philly
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,242
Do what you want. It's your car
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #77  
ErichTL's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 16
Originally Posted by Scooobay
they money you'll save using reg you'll lose MPG and have to fill up more with less performance....BLEH...
that's what I've experienced.. i don't have a Max, but premium is recommended on my car. I was curious as to the mpg diff.. performancewise, i wasnt able to tell any difference (i don't run my car hard).. however, i did 2 fillups on regular grade, and then 2 fillups on premium.. My mpg was better with the premium and thus I was able to driver a longer range.. its actually cheaper by the mile to drive with premium instead of regular unleaded on my TL.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
Jan 6, 2017 06:05 PM
Fbana41
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
3
Aug 29, 2016 12:18 PM
Redfox
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:41 AM
REDinLV
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 12:31 AM
JoshG
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
51
Sep 21, 2015 10:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 PM.