Cheston...Correction on your site!!!
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
About the 2002 Maxima, you posted that it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP. However, "Automobile" Magazine said that it was a 260 HP. Just thought that I would let you know. Also, "Automobile" raped the 2002 Maxima. Saying that although it is a good looking car, the rear end still sucks on tight cornering. THey said that it is another Ford Taurus SHO. I think we need to gang up on these guys. Anyways, peace.
#2
Originally posted by Ramius83
About the 2002 Maxima, you posted that it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP. However, "Automobile" Magazine said that it was a 260 HP. Just thought that I would let you know. Also, "Automobile" raped the 2002 Maxima. Saying that although it is a good looking car, the rear end still sucks on tight cornering. THey said that it is another Ford Taurus SHO. I think we need to gang up on these guys. Anyways, peace.
About the 2002 Maxima, you posted that it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP. However, "Automobile" Magazine said that it was a 260 HP. Just thought that I would let you know. Also, "Automobile" raped the 2002 Maxima. Saying that although it is a good looking car, the rear end still sucks on tight cornering. THey said that it is another Ford Taurus SHO. I think we need to gang up on these guys. Anyways, peace.
#3
Originally posted by Ramius83
About the 2002 Maxima, you posted that it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP. However, "Automobile" Magazine said that it was a 260 HP. Just thought that I would let you know. Also, "Automobile" raped the 2002 Maxima. Saying that although it is a good looking car, the rear end still sucks on tight cornering. THey said that it is another Ford Taurus SHO. I think we need to gang up on these guys. Anyways, peace.
About the 2002 Maxima, you posted that it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP. However, "Automobile" Magazine said that it was a 260 HP. Just thought that I would let you know. Also, "Automobile" raped the 2002 Maxima. Saying that although it is a good looking car, the rear end still sucks on tight cornering. THey said that it is another Ford Taurus SHO. I think we need to gang up on these guys. Anyways, peace.
#6
Originally posted by Ramius83
Ok guys, sorry about that, my bad. But what I don't understand is why Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle? Looks like we are being shoved out of the way.
Ok guys, sorry about that, my bad. But what I don't understand is why Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle? Looks like we are being shoved out of the way.
#8
Three strikes and you're out
Erik, you were wrong when you said this ...
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
#9
Re: Three strikes and you're out
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Erik, you were wrong when you said this ...
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
Erik, you were wrong when you said this ...
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
BTW, I hate the rock, I just thought it would sound funny!
#10
Re: Three strikes and you're out
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Erik, you were wrong when you said this ...
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
Erik, you were wrong when you said this ...
it was only to be 255 HP, instead of 260 HP.
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Nissan giving their flag-ship vehicle a smaller engine than the secondary vehicle
... and you were wrong when you said this ...
Altima is a smaller, lighter vehicle
You have been a fountain of misinformation on this subject. Please do your homework before jumping on Cheston or anybody else.
Oh man, the first time I've ever seen you post a "negative" post! Yeah yeah I know you were being sarcastic.
Actually on that last item, yes the Altima is larger, but it actually is a bit lighter than the Maxima I think.
#12
actually guys.....as stated from Nissan dealerships, the AUTOMATIC maxs will have 255 hp....and the 6-speed SEs will have 260....how this works, I don't know....but that's what all the dealers say, I've even seen spec sheets, and one window sticker.
BTW, Most dealers are selling them around 2 grand over MSRP.
BTW, Most dealers are selling them around 2 grand over MSRP.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
06-06-2017 02:01 PM