4th gen getting wasted by WRX
#1
This is a video of a race between a WRX, Dakota RT and an automagic 4th gen with I/E (I think a Y pipe too). I think it did alright considering what he was running , but better luck next time hehe. http://63.98.144.165/Movies/RacingVids/WRXvsRTvsMAX.WMV
#2
Originally posted by Nismo87SE
This is a video of a race between a WRX, Dakota RT and an automagic 4th gen with I/E (I think a Y pipe too). I think it did alright considering what he was running , but better luck next time hehe. http://63.98.144.165/Movies/RacingVids/WRXvsRTvsMAX.WMV
This is a video of a race between a WRX, Dakota RT and an automagic 4th gen with I/E (I think a Y pipe too). I think it did alright considering what he was running , but better luck next time hehe. http://63.98.144.165/Movies/RacingVids/WRXvsRTvsMAX.WMV
#5
What the hell are you talking about? What technical aspects of the Subaru 2.0 turbo makes it less "good" than the VQ engine?
Originally posted by abnorm
Lets not forget that WRX's engine is not nearly as good as the VQ. Any engine can be turbocharged.
Lets not forget that WRX's engine is not nearly as good as the VQ. Any engine can be turbocharged.
#7
Jeff I was thinking the exact samething. I see flames coming .
Originally posted by Jeff92se
What the hell are you talking about? What technical aspects of the Subaru 2.0 turbo makes it less "good" than the VQ engine?
What the hell are you talking about? What technical aspects of the Subaru 2.0 turbo makes it less "good" than the VQ engine?
#13
I wouldn't expect an automagic 4th gen...
To really give a WRX a run for it's money. Really. Check out the new Car and Driver and the current SCC. The CAr and Driver tested the WRX against an S4 and a 330xi. Unfair, right? Not! The WRX ran a blistering 5.4 secs from 0-60mph, even faster than the S4!!
And in SCC, WRXs have responded pretty well to mods. A couple of the tuner cars they tested would give 'Vette owners something to worry about(ex: 0-60 in 4.6 secs!).
And in SCC, WRXs have responded pretty well to mods. A couple of the tuner cars they tested would give 'Vette owners something to worry about(ex: 0-60 in 4.6 secs!).
#14
Re: I wouldn't expect an automagic 4th gen...
Originally posted by Black VQ
To really give a WRX a run for it's money. Really. Check out the new Car and Driver and the current SCC. The CAr and Driver tested the WRX against an S4 and a 330xi. Unfair, right? Not! The WRX ran a blistering 5.4 secs from 0-60mph, even faster than the S4!!
And in SCC, WRXs have responded pretty well to mods. A couple of the tuner cars they tested would give 'Vette owners something to worry about(ex: 0-60 in 4.6 secs!).
To really give a WRX a run for it's money. Really. Check out the new Car and Driver and the current SCC. The CAr and Driver tested the WRX against an S4 and a 330xi. Unfair, right? Not! The WRX ran a blistering 5.4 secs from 0-60mph, even faster than the S4!!
And in SCC, WRXs have responded pretty well to mods. A couple of the tuner cars they tested would give 'Vette owners something to worry about(ex: 0-60 in 4.6 secs!).
Kirk
#15
I haven't lost to a WRX yet.....and I haven't even had to use NOS. Granted they were all highway runs, no stoplight runs...I would probably get beat without the NOS in the stoplight runs
#16
Re: Re: I wouldn't expect an automagic 4th gen...
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
Don in Texas' maxima that ran a 12.2 is an automagic. I dont understand why there is such tension between the 5-speed guys and the auto's. True, until forced induction or NO2 is used the 5-speed will win, but after that it shifts to the automagic's side.
Kirk
Don in Texas' maxima that ran a 12.2 is an automagic. I dont understand why there is such tension between the 5-speed guys and the auto's. True, until forced induction or NO2 is used the 5-speed will win, but after that it shifts to the automagic's side.
Kirk
anyway i went 2 the track last sunday..and a WRX was running 15.6...
#17
Re: Re: Re: I wouldn't expect an automagic 4th gen...
Originally posted by buss95max
i thought he ran a 12.8..
anyway i went 2 the track last sunday..and a WRX was running 15.6...
i thought he ran a 12.8..
anyway i went 2 the track last sunday..and a WRX was running 15.6...
Kirk
#18
Just remember this, if you race a WRX from a stop, you are dusted.
The WRX is mostly fast b/c of its launch (& turbo). They are the only 4 cyl cars that i know that can pull 1.9-2.0 60 foots. (Hey, I was lurkering their board!). If you notice, their times are really fast but their mph is slow for their times. Thus meaning they are great for acceleration other then that, they start to lag.
If you race a WRX, dont race from a stop, race them from a rolling start. Pref kinda like doing a 60mph pull. I have read (from teh board) that they just dont pull as hard after 4500rpms. This is where we gain.
The WRX is mostly fast b/c of its launch (& turbo). They are the only 4 cyl cars that i know that can pull 1.9-2.0 60 foots. (Hey, I was lurkering their board!). If you notice, their times are really fast but their mph is slow for their times. Thus meaning they are great for acceleration other then that, they start to lag.
If you race a WRX, dont race from a stop, race them from a rolling start. Pref kinda like doing a 60mph pull. I have read (from teh board) that they just dont pull as hard after 4500rpms. This is where we gain.
#21
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
Thought so...damn nice wheels. How much more do the 18's weigh? For the tantrums that is.
Kirk
Thought so...damn nice wheels. How much more do the 18's weigh? For the tantrums that is.
Kirk
They're 17s. The rims themselves don't weigh that much, about 23lbs each. However, the tires that I got, Dunlop SP 9000 are heavy, total weight of rims and tires are about 47lbs. Yikes!
#22
47lbs isn't that bad, my old Borbet Type M's were 54lbs w/ tires in 17".
Originally posted by Cumalot
They're 17s. The rims themselves don't weigh that much, about 23lbs each. However, the tires that I got, Dunlop SP 9000 are heavy, total weight of rims and tires are about 47lbs. Yikes!
They're 17s. The rims themselves don't weigh that much, about 23lbs each. However, the tires that I got, Dunlop SP 9000 are heavy, total weight of rims and tires are about 47lbs. Yikes!
#23
Originally posted by Synki
I have read (from teh board) that they just dont pull as hard after 4500rpms. This is where we gain.
I have read (from teh board) that they just dont pull as hard after 4500rpms. This is where we gain.
#24
Originally posted by abnorm
Lets not forget that WRX's engine is not nearly as good as the VQ. Any engine can be turbocharged.
Lets not forget that WRX's engine is not nearly as good as the VQ. Any engine can be turbocharged.
Ummm...do your homework. The EJ20 is prepped for turbocharging. A strengthened bottom end, forged pistons with oil-spraying cooling jets, and a lower compression ratio. A VQ running a WRX's boost would blow.
#25
I think good straight-line acceleration on the WRX's part is just icing on the cake. Let's face it, they'll run circles around a Maxima. SCC tested a WRX with the M2 suspension package and it ran a 73.6mph on the skidpad. That's better than an NSX. Better than a F355. Better than a Viper!!
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
#26
Originally posted by La Jolla Max
I think good straight-line acceleration on the WRX's part is just icing on the cake. Let's face it, they'll run circles around a Maxima. SCC tested a WRX with the M2 suspension package and it ran a 73.6mph on the skidpad. That's better than an NSX. Better than a F355. Better than a Viper!!
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
I think good straight-line acceleration on the WRX's part is just icing on the cake. Let's face it, they'll run circles around a Maxima. SCC tested a WRX with the M2 suspension package and it ran a 73.6mph on the skidpad. That's better than an NSX. Better than a F355. Better than a Viper!!
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
Kramer rules!!!
#27
Originally posted by La Jolla Max
I think good straight-line acceleration on the WRX's part is just icing on the cake. Let's face it, they'll run circles around a Maxima. SCC tested a WRX with the M2 suspension package and it ran a 73.6mph on the skidpad. That's better than an NSX. Better than a F355. Better than a Viper!!
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
I think good straight-line acceleration on the WRX's part is just icing on the cake. Let's face it, they'll run circles around a Maxima. SCC tested a WRX with the M2 suspension package and it ran a 73.6mph on the skidpad. That's better than an NSX. Better than a F355. Better than a Viper!!
They're built for handling and kicking **** on an autocross--or rallycross. Anyone who buys a WRX just for drag racing should be smacked upside the head.
Kirk
#28
Re: Re: Re: Re: I wouldn't expect an automagic 4th gen...
He recently ran a 12.2@108mph... Yes, D A M N fast!
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
Maybe it was a 12.8...cant remember...but D@mn fast.
Kirk
Maybe it was a 12.8...cant remember...but D@mn fast.
Kirk
#30
Talking about the skid pad.... you have a lot more handling with AWD than a rear wheel drive car or even a fron wheel drive car. the viper, is notorious for oversterring? Front engine rear drive, no weight in the back.... ITS A DRAGSTER, most american muscle isn't known for its handling. I hate reading aobut car comparisons, they rarely compare equal cars, most are made to boast a certain car.
#31
Uh, I drive an auto!
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
Don in Texas' maxima that ran a 12.2 is an automagic. I dont understand why there is such tension between the 5-speed guys and the auto's. True, until forced induction or NO2 is used the 5-speed will win, but after that it shifts to the automagic's side.
Don in Texas' maxima that ran a 12.2 is an automagic. I dont understand why there is such tension between the 5-speed guys and the auto's. True, until forced induction or NO2 is used the 5-speed will win, but after that it shifts to the automagic's side.
#32
Re: Uh, I drive an auto!
For about a $1000, you could turn your automagic into a serious launching machine... VB mod and a high stall torque converter go a long way! Ive only got a Y-pipe and a couple other mods.... I fear no WRX, though I know plenty are probably out there that can whoop on me...
Originally posted by Black VQ
I have an auto, by the way.lol I'm just saying that No one should really expect a normal automagic Maxima to stand a chance in a drag race against a WRX. Don's Max is a very, very special exception. This Max that was mentioned in the video only had a y-pipe and maybe a couple other mods.
I have an auto, by the way.lol I'm just saying that No one should really expect a normal automagic Maxima to stand a chance in a drag race against a WRX. Don's Max is a very, very special exception. This Max that was mentioned in the video only had a y-pipe and maybe a couple other mods.
#33
Re: Re: Uh, I drive an auto!
Originally posted by mtrai760
For about a $1000, you could turn your automagic into a serious launching machine... VB mod and a high stall torque converter go a long way! Ive only got a Y-pipe and a couple other mods.... I fear no WRX, though I know plenty are probably out there that can whoop on me...
For about a $1000, you could turn your automagic into a serious launching machine... VB mod and a high stall torque converter go a long way! Ive only got a Y-pipe and a couple other mods.... I fear no WRX, though I know plenty are probably out there that can whoop on me...
Kirk
#34
Re: Re: Re: Uh, I drive an auto!
Sorry, I kinda rounded the numbers off a little, I shoulda said about $1200 I guess, $450 for the VB and about $650-700 for the tq converter, Mods every auto should have...
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
Where can you get a high stall torque converter for $550? If you can get that price I'll take 10! Don's VB mod costs $450. Out of the $1000 you say it would cost that leaves $550 for the torque converter. Last I saw those babies were like $700-$900. Arent those some of the mods every auto should have?
Kirk
Where can you get a high stall torque converter for $550? If you can get that price I'll take 10! Don's VB mod costs $450. Out of the $1000 you say it would cost that leaves $550 for the torque converter. Last I saw those babies were like $700-$900. Arent those some of the mods every auto should have?
Kirk
#35
Re: Re: Re: Re: Uh, I drive an auto!
Originally posted by mtrai760
Sorry, I kinda rounded the numbers off a little, I shoulda said about $1200 I guess, $450 for the VB and about $650-700 for the tq converter, Mods every auto should have...
Sorry, I kinda rounded the numbers off a little, I shoulda said about $1200 I guess, $450 for the VB and about $650-700 for the tq converter, Mods every auto should have...
When I get my SC installed this will be the wrx---><---this will be me.
Kirk
#36
Not off the line, you won't...
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo
When I get my SC installed this will be the wrx---><---this will be me.Kirk
When I get my SC installed this will be the wrx---><---this will be me.Kirk
#37
I think that Black VQ has a point with the AWD Subaru, but I think that the Torque and Power of the S/C VQ will be able to pull forward in less than a 1/4. I've seen some really quick Maxima S/C's with some sweet times.
#38
Originally posted by SLC I30t
I think that Black VQ has a point with the AWD Subaru, but I think that the Torque and Power of the S/C VQ will be able to pull forward in less than a 1/4. I've seen some really quick Maxima S/C's with some sweet times.
I think that Black VQ has a point with the AWD Subaru, but I think that the Torque and Power of the S/C VQ will be able to pull forward in less than a 1/4. I've seen some really quick Maxima S/C's with some sweet times.
Kirk
#39
Heh. You can forget about spanking even a lightly modded WRX though. With simple boltons they'll run mid 13's, and with an upgraded turbo, full exhaust, boost control and a better IC, they can run as quick as mid to high 12's.
#40
Originally posted by La Jolla Max
Heh. You can forget about spanking even a lightly modded WRX though. With simple boltons they'll run mid 13's, and with an upgraded turbo, full exhaust, boost control and a better IC, they can run as quick as mid to high 12's.
Heh. You can forget about spanking even a lightly modded WRX though. With simple boltons they'll run mid 13's, and with an upgraded turbo, full exhaust, boost control and a better IC, they can run as quick as mid to high 12's.
Kirk