4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Anyone ever meet a Spec V owner thats thinks they are faster then us?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #81  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
0-60, 1/4 mile, my money is on the A32,
Originally Posted by Me
Imagine a VQ'd Spev V
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
Been done, several times over. T
Hence why the smiley.

Last edited by NmexMAX; Mar 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #82  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
^ yah, I have seen them, They are all over youtube. The handling of a specV and the power of a Gen 5... haha... CYA...

Those specvs with just a VQ35 swap prob do low 14s Not mid like a Gen 5 max would. God, I would love to wipe away WRXs, RX8s and keep up with S2000s all day, If I could.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #83  
Crusher103's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 54,042
From: Dur-ham NC
how bout we put it like this alot of SpecV owners are like mini BMW owners, extremely cocky and think their cars own everything(there not a the Viper owner's level of d1ckheaded-ness yet) my friend omg when i bought my MT last year he told me "Now Ur on my level!" i just laughed and told him the auto his been on Ur level and passed ur level along time ago.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #84  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
yah that is pretty funny. I don't know what is funnier... That or my friend who thinks he can chirp in 4th.

WE can chirp in 2nd, with a 5 speed. I can see MAYBE chirping in 3rd in a 6speed spec, but that is maybe... 4th? hell no...
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #85  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
Originally Posted by Coremanx
yah that is pretty funny. I don't know what is funnier... That or my friend who thinks he can chirp in 4th.

WE can chirp in 2nd, with a 5 speed. I can see MAYBE chirping in 3rd in a 6speed spec, but that is maybe... 4th? hell no...
I agree: 3rd- no problem (CHIRPING that is- no chance to burn in 3rd)...4th- no way.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #86  
The Russian's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,198
From: Russia
i got beat by a spec v before....well...
he did have a vq35 swap in it tho
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #87  
bigpulve+'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,656
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by Coremanx
Those specvs with just a VQ35 swap prob do low 14s Not mid like a Gen 5 max would. God, I would love to wipe away WRXs, RX8s and keep up with S2000s all day, If I could.
No, most would most likely be in the mid 13s...

Also vq30 5th gens have quickness on par with 4th gens...Unless we are talking 5.5 gens...
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 02:18 AM
  #88  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
Originally Posted by bigpulve
No, most would most likely be in the mid 13s...

Also vq30 5th gens have quickness on par with 4th gens...Unless we are talking 5.5 gens...

good point, then again, I don't really count the early 5 gens to be truly 5 gens in my opinon when I mention a Gen 5, just because it is basically the engine as a gen 4s VQ30+Mevi.

and damn mid 13s? hmm, ok, NVM RX8s, WRXs and S2000, Time to take out 350z's and GTOs, and keep up with any maybe beat (depending on Driver and launch), Evos, STIs and 99-04 Cobras.... :-) but those are low 13s sec cars so it could be tough.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 05:48 AM
  #89  
clint240sx's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 457
From: San Antonio, Tx
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
I agree: 3rd- no problem (CHIRPING that is- no chance to burn in 3rd)...4th- no way.
i can chirp third...sometimes. Like if I'm shifting REAL hard on the right road, i'll hear a small chirp. More than enough for me

Definantly not in 4th though
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 06:18 AM
  #90  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Maybe you guys need better tires.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #91  
bigpulve+'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,656
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by Coremanx
good point, then again, I don't really count the early 5 gens to be truly 5 gens in my opinon when I mention a Gen 5, just because it is basically the engine as a gen 4s VQ30+Mevi.

and damn mid 13s? hmm, ok, NVM RX8s, WRXs and S2000, Time to take out 350z's and GTOs, and keep up with any maybe beat (depending on Driver and launch), Evos, STIs and 99-04 Cobras.... :-) but those are low 13s sec cars so it could be tough.
Why? They are because they had a redesigned exterior and was given more power...Oh and its not a VQ30 + MEVI...Its a completely different and much better UIM...MEVIs were on 4th gen Maximas/Cefiros outside of the US...

Well If you think about it, conservatively 200 WHP on a 3.5 swapped Sentra with a 2700 pound frame...Maximas with a 3000 lb frame are hitting 13s with roughly that...Now if you say add a spacer kit, 3" maf, SSIM, EU, 3" headers to muffler...You could be looking at roughly 240+ WHP with a decent tune...with good tires and good driver 12s wouldn't be to hard.

Most 3.5 swaps are going to still need a few bolt ons to run with EVOs, STIs, GTOs...Also There is only a handful of Maximas that would be able to stay with a stock to lightly modded 03/04 Cobra...350s and G35s along with most swapped Hondas, DSMs, Camaros ect, would be pretty easy for a modded 3.5 swap in a sentra...
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #92  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
^ which car? The specv? yah the QR engine is not the best design, then had many engine issues... which shockes me for Nissan...

O and lol... Nvm a Pinto or a bus could beat a LS1 GTO... (lol, i kno im jking) those things suck so bad for performence and for putting out over 400HP and can't even beat a 280hp 350z track times. lolz

They get like a 13.8s were a Z can get in the 13.7's with almost half the HP. Nissan all the way baby!
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #93  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Coremanx
^ which car? The specv? yah the QR engine is not the best design, then had many engine issues... which shockes me for Nissan...

O and lol... Nvm a Pinto or a bus could beat a LS1 GTO... (lol, i kno im jking) those things suck so bad for performence and for putting out over 400HP and can't even beat a 280hp 350z track times. lolz

They get like a 13.8s were a Z can get in the 13.7's with almost half the HP. Nissan all the way baby!
Dude you're a flaming idiot. Get your facts straight. You've been listing off all these cars and performance figures and it's all wrong. For example, you mentioned an S2000 above. S2000's can be high 13 second cars if you really abuse them at the track. Driven conservatively, my friend pulled a 14.1 at a crappy track with his, just for example.

Secondly, LS1 GTOs do not have 400 HP. They have 350. They're also total pigs. LS2 GTOs, however, have 400 HP and are quite quick. I also don't see how Z's have "almost half the HP". Especially when you're talking about an LS1 GTO. 287 (at the lowest) does not = half of 350 or 400, either way you look at it. Plus the Z is much lighter. Stop being such an ill-informed fanboy.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #94  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
umm no, I am right... The LS2 is the one with 400HP, I think I kno that... Why do you think I mentioned the engine? also, I also kno that S2000s do low 14s all day... That is also what I said... How could I be all wrong? The LS1 GTO does a 13.8 and the LS2 one does a low 13 I did not mention the LS2 because I was referring to the one that the 350z can keep up with or beat.

And a low 13 is still pretty crappy for perfromence for 400HP in the V8 LS2 engine, why do you think they stopped making them because they were great sellers and had great performence? A 400HP car should put mid 12's AT LEAST stock. I would hate to have a LS2 GTO and get beaten by STIs and EVOs all day when they also have less then 300HP. Kid, I am guru at this ****, please dont get me started.

and obv I was joking about a Pinto or a bus beating a GTO... seems like I am not the idiot here.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #95  
made in china's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 619
Are you guys still arguing whose car is slower?

It's a lot of arguing about a slow car (Sentras)
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #96  
The Russian's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,198
From: Russia
Originally Posted by made in china
Are you guys still arguing whose car is slower?

It's a lot of arguing about a slow car (Sentras)
honestly i love the max and its comfort, but its not a rocket either.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #97  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
yah, I never call it a rocket, Just a pretty quick whippy sports sedan is what I refar too it... Fast too me is a low 14 car. Which may be my next car.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #98  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Coremanx
yah, I never call it a rocket, Just a pretty quick whippy sports sedan is what I refar too it... Fast too me is a low 14 car. Which may be my next car.
With a mod or 2 and a good driver, the 4th gen is a low 14 second car.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 08:57 PM
  #99  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
^no way... what mods? I bet I am getting at least 14.9... and engine, I have only done intake, and ypipe exaust... no headers though...
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #100  
The Russian's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,198
From: Russia
its good tires, good driver, and then the lil mods can count...
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #101  
The Russian's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,198
From: Russia
my altima 3.5 ran 14.6 on a auto.....with just exhuast and intake...
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #102  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
If you’re a great driver and have some great conditions, you could be this cool:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....613&highlight=
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....069&highlight=
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #103  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Coremanx
umm no, I am right... The LS2 is the one with 400HP, I think I kno that... Why do you think I mentioned the engine? also, I also kno that S2000s do low 14s all day... That is also what I said... How could I be all wrong? The LS1 GTO does a 13.8 and the LS2 one does a low 13 I did not mention the LS2 because I was referring to the one that the 350z can keep up with or beat.
Show me where you said S2000's could run low 14's. I don't see it. Oh wait, you never said that. Also, if we're quoting factory numbers here, the 350Z pretty much runs a 13.8 also, but that's a moot point because it's an apples to oranges comparison. Also, here you stated:
Originally Posted by Coremanx
O and lol... Nvm a Pinto or a bus could beat a LS1 GTO... (lol, i kno im jking) those things suck so bad for performence and for putting out over 400HP and can't even beat a 280hp 350z track times. lolz
You said the LS1 GTO has 400 HP. Read it. There is no other way to interpret it. YOU said it, not me.

Originally Posted by Coremanx
And a low 13 is still pretty crappy for perfromence for 400HP in the V8 LS2 engine, why do you think they stopped making them because they were great sellers and had great performence? A 400HP car should put mid 12's AT LEAST stock. I would hate to have a LS2 GTO and get beaten by STIs and EVOs all day when they also have less then 300HP. Kid, I am guru at this ****, please dont get me started.
Low 13 second? Again, you're quoting factory times. It's been in the 12's bone stock, apparently you've never heard of a factor called driving skill. You're probably an expert on GTOs, though, so I should probably give up Oh, and did you just call me "kid"? How old are you, like 12? If you're such a guru maybe I should think up some really hard questions that only you would know the answer to.

Originally Posted by Coremanx
obv I was joking about a Pinto or a bus beating a GTO... seems like I am not the idiot here.
When did I try and call you out on the Pinto comment? Oh wait, I DIDN'T. DIAF dude, seriously. Actually, keep going, it's kind of fun watching your grammatically terrible self act like a toolbag.

Last edited by Tatanko; Mar 5, 2008 at 09:23 PM.
Old Mar 5, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #104  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
haha, you got some ***** kid to start a specs war in my topic, yah I called u kid. And if u look at my profile it says my age.

When I compare 3 cars that do low 14s, And throw and S2000 in it, obv that is in the same group... That is like my saying... well at least you can beat or keep up with Ford GTs, Lambos(LP640s) and SRT10 Vipers if u had an 11 sec car. Wen we kno those are mid 11 cars. I don't have to STATE that they are mid 11's but when a car gets mid 11's and I compare it to them, your supposed to put 2 and 2 together... but I guess you can't do that.

O yah and don't get these track times from factory specs... I get them from my car and driver mags.

Last edited by S1cTech; Mar 6, 2008 at 12:21 AM.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 05:38 AM
  #105  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
STFU with the magazine racing, unless you want this locked.

Last edited by phenryiv1; Mar 6, 2008 at 05:45 AM.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #106  
UkiSash's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 144
From: Weth CT
Just to add my fuel to the fire, I drove my friends 04 Spec V, loved the 6 spd. But it felt like i was driving a bus! Now I've taken a 5th gen 6spd not sure of the motor or the drivers capabilities. However back in its prime state i just dont see my SE getting beat by a sentra.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #107  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Coremanx
haha, you got some ***** kid to start a specs war in my topic, yah I called u kid. And if u look at my profile it says my age.
Actually, no it doesn't say your age. Take a look for yourself. I didn't start a specs war, either, YOU did. My cajones are huge, thanks

Originally Posted by Coremanx
When I compare 3 cars that do low 14s, And throw and S2000 in it, obv that is in the same group...
The S2000 is a high 13 second car, the WRX a low 14 second car, and the RX-8 a mid 14 second car. Sorry, automatic comparison not found.

Originally Posted by Coremanx
O yah and don't get these track times from factory specs... I get them from my car and driver mags.
Wow, and we all know Car and Driver is just god at everything

If you're so much older than me, why don't you act and talk like it?
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #108  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
Act and talk like it? You started with me... why don't you use your head and look bad cause you called me out... Too bad you live in PA, cause I would love to wipe the floor with u... but all I got is Bolt ons... so who knows... Driver will come to that.

and a WRX is not a mid 14sec car. MID is 14.5-14.06. I have seen WRXs do 14.2s and 14.3s stock.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 08:17 AM
  #109  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Actually, no it doesn't say your age. Take a look for yourself. I didn't start a specs war, either, YOU did. My cajones are huge, thanks


The S2000 is a high 13 second car, the WRX a low 14 second car, and the RX-8 a mid 14 second car. Sorry, automatic comparison not found.


Wow, and we all know Car and Driver is just god at everything

If you're so much older than me, why don't you act and talk like it?
Originally Posted by Coremanx
Act and talk like it? You started with me... why don't you use your head and look bad cause you called me out... Too bad you live in PA, cause I would love to wipe the floor with u... but all I got is Bolt ons... so who knows... Driver will come to that.

and a WRX is not a mid 14sec car. MID is 14.5-14.06. I have seen WRXs do 14.2s and 14.3s stock.
*taps foot...*
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
STFU with the magazine racing, unless you want this locked.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #110  
bigpulve+'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,656
From: Vermont
If the OP is a guru, than what is NmexMax, Nismology, Irish, SR20, Jime, ect, ect.........

I still believe this thread is a direct result of the closure of weekend battles....

I have a couple questions for the OP...

1. Have you ever driven/ridden in a LS2 GTO?
2. Have you ever driven/ridden in a S2000?
3. Have you ever driven/ridden in a RX8?
4. Have you ever driven/ridden in a Z33?
5. Why do you think low 14's are fast?
6. Why does it matter is someone with a Spec v, Honda, Ford, Chevy says they are faster than you?
7. How are you a Guru?
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #111  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
*taps foot...*
It's done, my apologies.


Originally Posted by Coremanx
Act and talk like it? You started with me... why don't you use your head and look bad cause you called me out... Too bad you live in PA, cause I would love to wipe the floor with u... but all I got is Bolt ons... so who knows... Driver will come to that.
Yes, act and talk like it. Your grammar and spelling are worse than a 5th grader. Oh, and did you just make a personal threat? I'm pretty sure that's a big no-no on these forums, tough guy.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #112  
bigpulve+'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,656
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by Tatanko
It's done, my apologies.



Yes, act and talk like it. Your grammar and spelling are worse than a 5th grader. Oh, and did you just make a personal threat? I'm pretty sure that's a big no-no on these forums, tough guy.
I believe he wants to "race" you in his most likely stock 4th gen...
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #113  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by bigpulve
I believe he wants to "race" you in his most likely stock 4th gen...
Good, he can try. Especially if it involves turns
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #114  
bigpulve+'s Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,656
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Good, he can try. Especially if it involves turns
stock suspension FTL...


But I am going back to it since K sports sucks at making COs...
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #115  
Crusher103's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 54,042
From: Dur-ham NC
Originally Posted by Coremanx
^ which car? The specv? yah the QR engine is not the best design, then had many engine issues... which shockes me for Nissan...

O and lol... Nvm a Pinto or a bus could beat a LS1 GTO... (lol, i kno im jking) those things suck so bad for performence and for putting out over 400HP and can't even beat a 280hp 350z track times. lolz

They get like a 13.8s were a Z can get in the 13.7's with almost half the HP. Nissan all the way baby!
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Dude you're a flaming idiot. Get your facts straight. You've been listing off all these cars and performance figures and it's all wrong. For example, you mentioned an S2000 above. S2000's can be high 13 second cars if you really abuse them at the track. Driven conservatively, my friend pulled a 14.1 at a crappy track with his, just for example.

Secondly, LS1 GTOs do not have 400 HP. They have 350. They're also total pigs. LS2 GTOs, however, have 400 HP and are quite quick. I also don't see how Z's have "almost half the HP". Especially when you're talking about an LS1 GTO. 287 (at the lowest) does not = half of 350 or 400, either way you look at it. Plus the Z is much lighter. Stop being such an ill-informed fanboy.
Aww those made me lol

Originally Posted by phenryiv1
STFU with the magazine racing, unless you want this locked.
We should let them keep going see where we can go with this, some of the people we have on here.......
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #116  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
omfg...Im reading this for the first time and this is retarded. Coremanx, you need to stop throwing around numbers acting like you know everything about every car. And as far as Im concerned, age doesnt mean ****...like Tatanko said, it doesnt show your (Coremanx) age in your profile like you said and even if it did, Tatanko will always have more respect here.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #117  
Blackwind's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,598
From: SEATTLE, WA
i still think the "Duce in a Bucket" method is faster.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #118  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by black_maxed95
omfg...Im reading this for the first time and this is retarded. Coremanx, you need to stop throwing around numbers acting like you know everything about every car. And as far as Im concerned, age doesnt mean ****...like Tatanko said, it doesnt show your (Coremanx) age in your profile like you said and even if it did, Tatanko will always have more respect here.
Thanks. I'm done with this thread. Both the original topic of it and what he and I were "arguing" (if you can call it that) about are stupid.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #119  
S1cTech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,612
From: Lowell/Boston, MA
Well Respected or not, he did start with me and rudely I might add... I am not a troll but when people come out and call me and idiot or what ever... there trying to start something. I am not acting like I know every spec about cars... but I do know a majority of the ones that are fast and the 1/4 times and specs of them by heart... I never made a threat. I meant wiping the floor with you in a race.. how can I threat you by saying the better driver? And I am 23... If that matters. I barely even insulted you.. You came out of nowhere and said something rude.

I am gonna be the bigger man here and just stop after this... and continue with the topic... And No... I did not drive all those cars but I do read car mags and research and went to school for this since I was 13.
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #120  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Coremanx
blah blah blah
It's the internet. Cry a little more.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:21 AM.