4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.
View Poll Results: coilover poll
ksport
29.69%
d2
20.31%
tien basic
45.31%
nex
4.69%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

Coilover Opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #41  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by MOHFpro90
New rims dude...wtf? Everytime I turn around you have something new. Do you have a thread titled "Mr ****s weekly rims" or something?
lol. ive had these for quite a while. these are gonna stay... hopefully..
gonna be refinished in Volk white.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #42  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by MOHFpro90
Agreed.


However, for your situation, look at Teins.


You could run Ground Controls on Illuminas if you want, but the reliability of Illuminas doesnt compare to the Konis.
before i went to GC/Koni's i was running GC/Illuminas. the ride over flat roads was decent and handling department was pretty decent although when the roads got bad, the car got pretty dang bouncy and it didnt seem like the suspension was dampening the potholes etc. i had it set from 3 to 4 to 5 in the Illuminas on the GC's 450/350 rates. setting 3 was waay to soft. even on full stiff, the car just didnt feel right. the illuminas seemed too soft for the GC's. I only had one strut blow which was surprising but when i changed to Koni/GC, the car felt much better. you can actually feel the suspension working (ie the dampers dampening, the rebound/compression properly) there wasnt any jarring bounciness i found with the Illumina/GC setup. I know for how low i was on the Illuminas i was riding on the bumpstops the majority of the time.

ultimate decision: Koni Yellow and GC. everything else for the maxima in that price range is junk.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #43  
MOHFpro90's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,705
From: Sunshine State
^^Which is why I am working my way towards that setup. Just takes time... ^^

Whatever happened to the 89548 spoke rims where the outer surface was aluminum but the 'walls' were black?
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #44  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
Originally Posted by essential1
If you wanna go low:
-ksport
-D2
-nex (with a set of camber bolts)

For a RELIABLE setup thats more comfortable than s-techs with a similar drop:
-Koni/GC
-Tein basics

But thats just from the choices listed up there. Too bad they dont make BCs for 4th gens. If I were in your situation, i'd get some 5th gen BCs and just relocate one of the lower strut mounting holes in the front. You will have a setup that is comfortable for a daily driver, reliable, and for the times you just wanna slam it, you wont loose suspention travel.

And yes, this has been done before.



I agree 100% that it destroys the geometry if the setup is not optimized.

But I dissagree that a drop of more than 2" looks bad. It all depends on the setup. I'm dropped ~4" lower than stock all around. With my wheel choice and style i'm going for, any higher than this will just look retarded.
can you tell me any more about that. i thought of something like that when i saw the megans for 5th gen i said i wish they were for the 4th gen. the rears are the same? seems like the third hole drilled on the lower part of the front strut would be really clse to one of the original ones. safe? got any pics?
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
true to an extent, but i don't need to spend hundreds of dollars to know that k-sports blow (literally). that one guy who is happy with his set is probably a less accurate depicition of the product than the dozens of cases of those with problems. honestly, no one who has done their research should have first hand experience with the "orange hotness".

i also don't need to have fisrt hand experience with the gc/koni or tein setups to know they are not well suited to go low (significantly over 2" in this context). it is a design issue rather than a quality issue. if the op didn't mention wanting to occasionally go "quite low" then these 2 would be the obvious choices.

as for what's left, i can't speak on it cause i haven't tried them.
yeah i am def trying to dump it and fit my wheels. nothing crazy 17x8 +30 front/+23 rear.ksports arent looking too good right now really and i cant lower the teins too much. also i kinda want to keep my illuminas in one piece and either sell them or keep them for the winter months so im not too interested in the GC's either.
Originally Posted by Mr****s95SE
before i went to GC/Koni's i was running GC/Illuminas. the ride over flat roads was decent and handling department was pretty decent although when the roads got bad, the car got pretty dang bouncy and it didnt seem like the suspension was dampening the potholes etc. i had it set from 3 to 4 to 5 in the Illuminas on the GC's 450/350 rates. setting 3 was waay to soft. even on full stiff, the car just didnt feel right. the illuminas seemed too soft for the GC's. I only had one strut blow which was surprising but when i changed to Koni/GC, the car felt much better. you can actually feel the suspension working (ie the dampers dampening, the rebound/compression properly) there wasnt any jarring bounciness i found with the Illumina/GC setup. I know for how low i was on the Illuminas i was riding on the bumpstops the majority of the time.

ultimate decision: Koni Yellow and GC. everything else for the maxima in that price range is junk.
thanks for the first hand experience with the illumina/GC setup. i dont think im gonna do it. prob just gonna keep the illuminas for winter, id hate to ruin them theyre brand new. im still really feeling that whole, keeping suspension travel as you lower deal.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #45  
indeep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 109
I'm on the same stage looking to lower my car..dont really want to spend too much because down here in toronto we get enough snow..I will probably just buy tien basic..would that be good for me?
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #46  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Keep in mind :

Snow + lowering = problems. If you drive it in the winter, STRONGLY consider height adjustable springs, as said adjustments usually arent necessary for most applications unless your auto-xing. But if you drive it where there is snow you NEED to remember that you're gonna be driving a plow if you lower more than 1"
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 07:11 PM
  #47  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
oh yeah the coilovers would be coming off for the winter, even before snowfall just because of the cold. ill be able to go through them and everything. i have a winter setup, i think thats one of the things that kills coilovers,riding them through the winter.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #48  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
the tiens are definatly not an option at this point. as well as the GC/koni setup. i dont think the teins will be able to lower me enough as much as i would want. and even if they did the struts would blow it seems. thats not knocking on tein at all its just the design for these particular coilovers.

i dont really want to hack up my illuminas either and from what ive gathered from mr****s it can be done but its non comparable to the konis. id rather hold on to those and keep them with my s techs for a decent winter setup.

ive heard a lot of bad about k sport but thats also because the most people have them and your only gonna hear when people ***** about them, not when they are fune. the dampning adjustment range is a little overkill for me but its not a bad thing at all. i also like the camber plates up top.(do these things ever loosen up/make noise?). and the ability to keep full strut travel regardless of ride height. same thing for the D2s. that is really all you could ask for in a coilover, adjustment wise.

are they (ksport/D2) really that bad? what if i babied the car, maintained the suspension and took them off during the winter months? do you guys honestly think they would not hold up still?

for some reason im honestly really feeling the Nex coilovers. the price is right but i guess thats because of the lack of dampining and camber plates. but i kinda think about it like thats just less **** that could go wrong with them. im stuck with the dampning but the ride would have to be just as good or better than what im on now. and the handling i assume would be much better. im perfectly fine without the camberplates if it came down to it id adjust it with bolts. also they maintain strut travel no matter whatthe ride height it. i definatly need this feature in which ever set im gonna get.

im gonna look around about the 5th to 4th gen suspension swap.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 10:22 PM
  #49  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
can you tell me any more about that. i thought of something like that when i saw the megans for 5th gen i said i wish they were for the 4th gen. the rears are the same? seems like the third hole drilled on the lower part of the front strut would be really clse to one of the original ones. safe? got any pics?

yeah i am def trying to dump it and fit my wheels. nothing crazy 17x8 +30 front/+23 rear.ksports arent looking too good right now really and i cant lower the teins too much. also i kinda want to keep my illuminas in one piece and either sell them or keep them for the winter months so im not too interested in the GC's either.

thanks for the first hand experience with the illumina/GC setup. i dont think im gonna do it. prob just gonna keep the illuminas for winter, id hate to ruin them theyre brand new. im still really feeling that whole, keeping suspension travel as you lower deal.
If, your planning on slamming and tuckin some 17s, IMHO, you have no choice other than ksports, D2s, JICs. Unless you like riding on the bumpstops all the time.

I dont have any pics of the modded front strut but my buddy nax has been riding on 5th gen JICs for atleast a year and a half to 2 years with no problems what so ever. He's slammed on 19x9.5 up front and 20x10 in the rear. You can lean a car key on his front lip and side skirts and thats his daily ride height. I will tell you right now that the car is very comfortable.

I have pics of the car if you want.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #50  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Flava_24/7
How to you optimize the setup to not destroy the geometry by going with an extreme drop?
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
ball joint relocation. lca relocation/custom lca, stabilizer bar link flipping... you know... all those things no one has ever done.
Originally Posted by Flava_24/7
Exactly!!
I have the resources to do it, but none of the money...

Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
Blah blah blah ground controls blah blah shortened konis blah blah blah

/thread
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
blah blah blah suspension travel blah blah blah none blah blah blah
blah blah bla icanlayframe blah blah blah youcant blah blah blah igetnewaxleseverymonth blah blah blah
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
what essential needs to do is whip out that essential credit card and give me an essential call.

Originally Posted by Mr****s95SE
hahahah. SOMEONE needs to get JICs to go with that I30 19" ballin outta control setup...

You guys are killing me...

Can you just let me live in this dream world that I have the best possible suspension setup known to man? pretty please.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #51  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
oh yeah the coilovers would be coming off for the winter, even before snowfall just because of the cold. ill be able to go through them and everything. i have a winter setup, i think thats one of the things that kills coilovers,riding them through the winter.

Have fun with that impractical idea.

Changing your coilovers every winter? Thats going to drive your pocketbook to the ground, and if you're doing it yourself, it'll drive you nuts.

As far as winter driving/cold hurting your coilovers? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heared, makes no difference at all, you'd have to buy some REALLY, REALLY cheap crap for temperature to make any difference at all on there performance or reliability.

I'm not trying to flame anyone, but you're asking for advice, I'm giving it, and trying to help you see all the angles before your decision before you make it and regret it.

A bit of extra coin on adjustable springs > paying for or changing coilovers twice a year.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #52  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Have fun with that impractical idea.

Changing your coilovers every winter? Thats going to drive your pocketbook to the ground, and if you're doing it yourself, it'll drive you nuts.

As far as winter driving/cold hurting your coilovers? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heared, makes no difference at all, you'd have to buy some REALLY, REALLY cheap crap for temperature to make any difference at all on there performance or reliability.

I'm not trying to flame anyone, but you're asking for advice, I'm giving it, and trying to help you see all the angles before your decision before you make it and regret it.

A bit of extra coin on adjustable springs > paying for or changing coilovers twice a year.
haha changing the suspension would literally take me one hour max using hand tools. ask anyone who cares about their coilovers if they rock them in the winter. it absolutly has a negative effect on them in many ways. i would laugh in your face because you know nothing about this...please stay out of my thread. if you have anything else to say pm me
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #53  
RA030726's Avatar
I'm nutty for Nissans
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,311
Apparently some of you think lower is better
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #54  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by essential1
blah blah bla icanlayframe blah blah blah youcant blah blah blah igetnewaxleseverymonth blah blah blah
blah blah blah you can't lay frame blah blah blah stop lying blah blah blah i call bs blah blah blah

first of all there is no frame. second of all air over coils with notched/tubbed frame rails and rear wheel wells only laid exhaust. pics or it didn't happen.



Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
As far as winter driving/cold hurting your coilovers? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heared...
i tend to agree with this statement, but my opinion is not based on fact so i won't say too much about it.

it makes sense that with a cheap coilover prone to seal issues cold/salt couldn't help any but then again they blow straight out of the box sometimes.

i think the process of elimination has left you with d2's being the best choice in this scenario.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #55  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
blah blah blah you can't lay frame blah blah blah stop lying blah blah blah i call bs blah blah blah

first of all there is no frame. second of all air over coils with notched/tubbed frame rails and rear wheel wells only laid exhaust. pics or it didn't happen.




OMG.... can you let a brotha dream for a little? Always gotta get technical with it. lol (not sure if you noticed the sarcasm)

on a serious note though. The height range of these coilovers are crazy. Even sitting as low as i am right now, I can still go down another 2 inches at the very least. Not taking into account the limitation factors that were already stated previously of course.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:42 PM
  #56  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by JSutter
Apparently some of you think lower is better
It's not?
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #57  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by essential1
OMG.... can you let a brotha dream for a little? Always gotta get technical with it. lol (not sure if you noticed the sarcasm)
sarcasm > me

use a smiley next time fool.

Originally Posted by JSutter
Apparently some of you think lower is better
ascetically lower is far superior to not lower (imo). as long as you can get over the fact that your maxima will no longer be the best handling car on the planet (that's how you do sarcasm) then yes, lower is better.
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #58  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
sarcasm > me

use a smiley next time fool.



ascetically lower is far superior to not lower (imo). as long as you can get over the fact that your maxima will no longer be the best handling car on the planet (that's how you do sarcasm) then yes, lower is better.
trying to mimic sarcasm in text format > me :
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 08:02 AM
  #59  
SpooledVQ35's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 298
From: NYC
Originally Posted by JSutter
Apparently some of you think lower is better
A good amount here also think that being slammed is the only way yet forgetting about suspension geometry
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #60  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by SpooledVQ35
A good amount here also think that being slammed is the only way yet forgetting about suspension geometry
who says anyone forgot about it? personally i just don't care.

the same way a performance oriented builder may overlook some cosmetics in favor of function, someone going for looks may give up a little performance. different strokes...
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #61  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by essential1
I agree 100% that it destroys the geometry if the setup is not optimized.

But I dissagree that a drop of more than 2" looks bad. It all depends on the setup. I'm dropped ~4" lower than stock all around. With my wheel choice and style i'm going for, any higher than this will just look retarded.
I disagree with your choice of the word "optimized". As someone mentioned already, it's not just a simple matter of optimizing the existing setup; it involves customizing parts (ball joints etc.) to get the proper geometry back. So it's no minor consideration.

Regarding aesthetics, I was referring specifically to the 4th gen Maxima but any car will look bad if the wheels are tucked up too high (e.g. frame resting on the ground haha). 4" drop IMO is too much for a 4th gen body. With 20" rims the wheelgap might look perfect at the top but because of the wheel well design there will be relatively huge gaps at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, which IMO looks terrible. However, feel free to support your opinion with a photo of your I30 since I can't see your wheelgap well in your avatar.

Originally Posted by JSutter
i mean good and cheap
OIC. I certainly agree there. By the way, can you or someone throw me a link to the write-up of your GC/Koni/Eibach assembly? I haven't been on the Org much lately.

EDIT: 4,444th post FTW!!!!
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #62  
Coolsaber57's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,081
From: Northern Va
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98


ascetically lower is far superior to not lower (imo).


Definition of ascetic: pertaining to or characteristic of an ascetic or the practice of rigorous self-discipline; "ascetic practices"

Old Mar 22, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #63  
95MaximaDriver's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 75
From: Knoxville TN and Charlotte NC
i would go with the GC's and shortened konis..ive had ksports on my max for a little over a year and a half..it rides ok..no blown struts and its survived the cold weather in tennessee and made it thrugh the rough roads in SC..but do your research before you buy...get what best suits your needs
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #64  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
theres no point in optimizing the suspension on a 4th gen (fwd,heavy, rear beam...ect.) IMO for DD. so i wouldnt mind not maintaining effective suspension geometry. im looking to dump the car, chew through fender liners, destroy front lips and eat axles...all that good stuff.

the struts need to survive with the car being slammed so its between D2 and Nex. im probably gonna get the d2 because of the camber plates and dampning adjustments but ill have to see if Nex can change spring rates and stuff.

any more help is appreciated...thanks
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #65  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
4th gens aren't heavy cars unless your standard is a Civic or something.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #66  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by VQuick
4th gens aren't heavy cars unless your standard is a Civic or something.
werd. pretty light for its size.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #67  
Redline Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 690
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
do you have a lot of room to lower it more in that pic? my wheel gap is like that now with 17s, id be looking to go at least 1-2" lower....

yea i have room to go lower. however if i did the front bumper would be sittin on the floor. i am in the middle of a big project and will be dropping it lower in the next few weeks.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 05:24 PM
  #68  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Coolsaber57


Definition of ascetic: pertaining to or characteristic of an ascetic or the practice of rigorous self-discipline; "ascetic practices"

wow. i was way off on that one. for the record i meant aesthetic, but we already knew that.

---

on another note. i saw a non-maxima related koni insert write up that got me to thinking.

the theory is to use a shorter overall insert to achieve full travel at drop. i started thinking how this would apply to a maxima suspension which led me to do some research.

apparently the 3rd gen inserts are significantly shorter, to the point where the couple guys who have tried it ran into problems because they were running them within the confines of "the 2" rule" for performance reasons and topping them out. you are also not limited to maxima applications (the write up i saw was using wrx inserts on a q45).

i think 3rd gen or other short inserts with an extreme ground control drop might be a viable option as far as slamming a maxima using quality parts on a budget. for around the same as cheap taiwanese coilovers you could have a much better suspension.

the (not so) short coming would be there are still no camber plates, but in all honesty they don't do much on an a32. nothing that couldn't be accomplished with camber bolts anyway.

i know i'm kind of changing my story here, but a little bit more insight has changed my outlook on it.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 06:39 AM
  #69  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by VQuick
I disagree with your choice of the word "optimized". As someone mentioned already, it's not just a simple matter of optimizing the existing setup; it involves customizing parts (ball joints etc.) to get the proper geometry back. So it's no minor consideration.

Regarding aesthetics, I was referring specifically to the 4th gen Maxima but any car will look bad if the wheels are tucked up too high (e.g. frame resting on the ground haha). 4" drop IMO is too much for a 4th gen body. With 20" rims the wheelgap might look perfect at the top but because of the wheel well design there will be relatively huge gaps at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions, which IMO looks terrible. However, feel free to support your opinion with a photo of your I30 since I can't see your wheelgap well in your avatar.

EDIT: 4,444th post FTW!!!!
I completely agree with you there with optimizing the setup. Which is why, for what I use my car for, it's not worth it. (even though I brought it up )

As far as the wheel being tucked, i personally dont like that look. I prefer for the tire to be completely tucked with the rim as close the the fender as possible. And by the way, what's wheel gap? lol


More Pics of my car here: http://forums.maxima.org/members-rid...l1-01-i30.html

The sides are painted now. I'll try to get more pictures, but it's been raining non stop so the car will be dirty.

As far as a 4th gen goes. This one is pretty much as low as me.


19s in the front and 20s in the back.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 06:50 AM
  #70  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
im looking to dump the car, chew through fender liners, destroy front lips and eat axles...all that good stuff.
Honestly, with the correct tire choice, you wont chew the fender liners. My passenger side is gone just because It was sagging from a previous miss hap so I just removed it. Driver side is good.

As far as destroying front lips go... get urathane. (spelling?)

Axles? get the life time warranty axles from advance auto. They last for a while considering the height. And when they go bad, take them back and walk out with 2 new ones.

Originally Posted by Redline Maxima
yea i have room to go lower. however if i did the front bumper would be sittin on the floor. i am in the middle of a big project and will be dropping it lower in the next few weeks.
The 4th gen I posted in my previous post got rid of your same bumper and went with the 97-99 bumper with the stillen lip because he couldnt go lower.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 07:02 AM
  #71  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by essential1
And by the way, what's wheel gap? lol


As far as a 4th gen goes. This one is pretty much as low as me.
now do it on 17s and really be low.

Old Mar 23, 2009 | 07:26 AM
  #72  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
Nice ride, essential. The rims are beautiful. But IMO your car would look much better if you were raised an inch and had 1" smaller rims. Ya call me crazy, but to each his own. However, the low drop is aggressive looking and I'd certainly turn my head if your car drove by.

That 4th gen doesn't look bad but I suspect at least the rears have a greater-than-stock overall tire diameter, which changes everything because it fills the wheel well more.

Not feeling the Q; if you're going to be that low you need bigger rims. Also those rims look like they belong on a Rolls....
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #73  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by VQuick
Not feeling the Q; if you're going to be that low you need bigger rims. Also those rims look like they belong on a Rolls....
ha ha. that's what they keep telling me. already got my eye on my next 2 sets of 17s...

and actually they belong on a q. period correct (old school) impul's (nissan factory tuner) designed specifically for this chassis.

we can talk a32s also...



factory 1/4 on 17s



19s w/ radiused 1/4s

unfortunately this one never lived to see the outside world. r.i.p.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #74  
MaximaMan98's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 22
I would say k sport cause they are good for my daily driving and also I had a uestion on how do u roll your fenders?
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:19 AM
  #75  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by BLACKonBLACK98
now do it on 17s and really be low.

tempting... Oh so tempting...

How about I throw on my stock 16" and snap a pic?

Originally Posted by VQuick
Nice ride, essential. The rims are beautiful. But IMO your car would look much better if you were raised an inch and had 1" smaller rims. Ya call me crazy, but to each his own. However, the low drop is aggressive looking and I'd certainly turn my head if your car drove by.

That 4th gen doesn't look bad but I suspect at least the rears have a greater-than-stock overall tire diameter, which changes everything because it fills the wheel well more.

Not feeling the Q; if you're going to be that low you need bigger rims. Also those rims look like they belong on a Rolls....
Thanks for the complment. I'll take your advice and raise it an inch... After I drop it 2" more. lol. I see what you mean. But I just love when I'm walking back to my car and hear people saying things like "this has to be on bags/hydrolics" or "watch him raise it before he drives of". Then when they see me take a steep decline at a crazy angle just to get out of the plaza all I see is . lol.

The tire size in the rear for the 4th gen is 235/35/20. (wheels are 20x10)Which is just a tad bit larger than the stock overall diameter if i'm not mistaken. (i'm more familiar with 5th gen tire sizing).
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:22 AM
  #76  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by MaximaMan98
I would say k sport cause they are good for my daily driving and also I had a uestion on how do u roll your fenders?
Get a fender rolling tool (google) and heat your fenders while you roll them so the paint doesnt chip.

Or you can be ghetto like me and use a jack handle or baseball bat. If you dont mind minor paint chips on the inside
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #77  
BLACKonBLACK98's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,414
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by essential1
tempting... Oh so tempting...

How about I throw on my stock 16" and snap a pic?
do it!



this angle please.

but anyways... i think we kinda took over this thread. sorry op.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #78  
Digitized's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,318
D2's this will be my 5th summer with them, no issues, I take them off for the winter season...
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #79  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,581
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by essential1
Thanks for the complment. I'll take your advice and raise it an inch... After I drop it 2" more. lol. I see what you mean. But I just love when I'm walking back to my car and hear people saying things like "this has to be on bags/hydrolics" or "watch him raise it before he drives of". Then when they see me take a steep decline at a crazy angle just to get out of the plaza all I see is . lol.
Dude, that is excellent! There must be a few driveways you just can't make it up, though. We have so many steep ones around here and I get nervous even angling up them with a 1.8" drop (although I have an LTB which reduces my clearance a lot). And I guarantee your car would not survive the roads up here. One of the city's main thoroughfares had frost heaves so bad this winter they had to put up "Rough Road" signs. It was ridiculous.

The tire size in the rear for the 4th gen is 235/35/20. (wheels are 20x10)Which is just a tad bit larger than the stock overall diameter if i'm not mistaken. (i'm more familiar with 5th gen tire sizing).
Stock OD is about 25.3 inches. 235/35/20 is more than an inch bigger (26.5"), so that explains it.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #80  
QNO_A32's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: NY
Originally Posted by essential1
Honestly, with the correct tire choice, you wont chew the fender liners. My passenger side is gone just because It was sagging from a previous miss hap so I just removed it. Driver side is good.

As far as destroying front lips go... get urathane. (spelling?)

Axles? get the life time warranty axles from advance auto. They last for a while considering the height. And when they go bad, take them back and walk out with 2 new ones.



The 4th gen I posted in my previous post got rid of your same bumper and went with the 97-99 bumper with the stillen lip because he couldnt go lower.
im kinda stuck with my tire choice, i have 245/40/17. i know thats fine in the back but would probably rub at a certain point in the front. the wheels are 8" +30 Front, and +23 Rear. nothing crazy but a decent little poke all the way around. even though the poly lip would have been nice i liked the ID one better and it has held up well.

in for pics with teh stock wheels
Originally Posted by Digitized
D2's this will be my 5th summer with them, no issues, I take them off for the winter season...
good to know... thats probably going to go with.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 PM.