Difference between the 95-96 and 97-99 maxs?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 36
Difference between the 95-96 and 97-99 maxs?
I have a 3d gen max and i'm selling it to get a 4th gen....could anyone tell me the difference between the 95-96/97-99 maxs? CUz i'm lookin at just some exterior mods and some are made for those first two years only, and then different ones for the last 3 years..
thanks
thanks
use the search function.
i used "differences 95-96 97-99" and came up with this:
http://forums.maxima.org/search.php?...der=descending
look at the second to the last thread. lots of info there.
i used "differences 95-96 97-99" and came up with this:
http://forums.maxima.org/search.php?...der=descending
look at the second to the last thread. lots of info there.
WORDD!!!
Originally posted by 95emeraldgxe
well - the 95 is supposably the fastest one......but the 97+ are slightly more sleeker......the taillights are simple to clear out - most modifications are the same for all 4th gens
well - the 95 is supposably the fastest one......but the 97+ are slightly more sleeker......the taillights are simple to clear out - most modifications are the same for all 4th gens
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
95 Maxima's would be the fastest because that was the last year of OBD-I diagnostics/ECU's. All 96+ cars in the US have OBD-II ECU's which are much more strict on engine/emission controls and as a result are much less responsive to engine modifications.
That would explain any reasoning that says that 95 Max's are the fastest and 96-99 seem a bit slower, if that reasoning exists...
That would explain any reasoning that says that 95 Max's are the fastest and 96-99 seem a bit slower, if that reasoning exists...
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,857
From: San Bruno, Petaluma, SF Bay area
Originally posted by SteVTEC
95 Maxima's would be the fastest because that was the last year of OBD-I diagnostics/ECU's. All 96+ cars in the US have OBD-II ECU's which are much more strict on engine/emission controls and as a result are much less responsive to engine modifications.
That would explain any reasoning that says that 95 Max's are the fastest and 96-99 seem a bit slower, if that reasoning exists...
95 Maxima's would be the fastest because that was the last year of OBD-I diagnostics/ECU's. All 96+ cars in the US have OBD-II ECU's which are much more strict on engine/emission controls and as a result are much less responsive to engine modifications.
That would explain any reasoning that says that 95 Max's are the fastest and 96-99 seem a bit slower, if that reasoning exists...
95 has no MAP sensor and 96+ has MAP sensors.
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally posted by Turbo95Max
my 95 and all te 95's ive been working on is OBDII. There is an OBDII port near the ECU on the passenger side, if you have that, you have OBDII.
95 has no MAP sensor and 96+ has MAP sensors.
my 95 and all te 95's ive been working on is OBDII. There is an OBDII port near the ECU on the passenger side, if you have that, you have OBDII.
95 has no MAP sensor and 96+ has MAP sensors.
At least on Honduh's they all switched over in MY96. I guess Nissan did it a bit early ??
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,857
From: San Bruno, Petaluma, SF Bay area
Originally posted by SteVTEC
I stand corrected
At least on Honduh's they all switched over in MY96. I guess Nissan did it a bit early ??
I stand corrected
At least on Honduh's they all switched over in MY96. I guess Nissan did it a bit early ??
i think 95 was the first year OBDII started on most models.
sorta like most 94+ cars switched to R134a
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
t6378tp
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
11
Sep 29, 2018 04:27 PM
0m3nc0w
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
3
Sep 11, 2015 05:21 PM
JoshG
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
17
Sep 5, 2015 10:10 PM