New best time.2k2 Auto..14.6
11-04-2002, 11:18 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
New best time.2k2 Auto..14.6
Went to the track this weekend. Did a lot better than my last 1/8 times. Only got two passes in.
link to thread
link to thread
11-04-2002, 03:14 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 612
Re: New best time.2k2 Auto..14.6
Originally posted by 2k2max
Went to the track this weekend. Did a lot better than my last 1/8 times. Only got two passes in.
link to thread
Went to the track this weekend. Did a lot better than my last 1/8 times. Only got two passes in.
link to thread
11-04-2002, 03:21 PM
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by F23A4
I'm hoping to get that time without mods. It would be a nice baseline. Good run.
I'm hoping to get that time without mods. It would be a nice baseline. Good run.
I am a believer that the 2K2 auto Max are capable of mid to low 14's depending on the 60'. The lowest 60' posted is 2.18.
Does everyone agree?
11-04-2002, 03:45 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 612
Originally posted by 2k2max
You've got a good 60' time.
I am a believer that the 2K2 auto Max are capable of mid to low 14's depending on the 60'. The lowest 60' posted is 2.18.
Does everyone agree?
You've got a good 60' time.
I am a believer that the 2K2 auto Max are capable of mid to low 14's depending on the 60'. The lowest 60' posted is 2.18.
Does everyone agree?
11-04-2002, 03:56 PM
#8
Originally posted by 2k2max
You've got a good 60' time.
I am a believer that the 2K2 auto Max are capable of mid to low 14's depending on the 60'. The lowest 60' posted is 2.18.
Does everyone agree?
You've got a good 60' time.
I am a believer that the 2K2 auto Max are capable of mid to low 14's depending on the 60'. The lowest 60' posted is 2.18.
Does everyone agree?
I have the timeslip for people that start acting sketchy. Just have to find a way to post it since my ex took my all in one printer
11-04-2002, 08:00 PM
#9
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I have a 2.13 60' with just an intake I have the timeslip for people that start acting sketchy. Just have to find a way to post it since my ex took my all in one printer
I have a 2.13 60' with just an intake
I have the timeslip for people that start acting sketchy. Just have to find a way to post it since my ex took my all in one printer
You mean to tell us there isn't a single scanner in that po dung engineering facility you call work?
11-05-2002, 03:48 AM
#10
Originally posted by SR20DEN
You mean to tell us there isn't a single scanner in that po dung engineering facility you call work?
You mean to tell us there isn't a single scanner in that po dung engineering facility you call work?
11-05-2002, 06:54 AM
#11
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 369
I ran a 2.174 60' with my completely stock 2K2 auto. Had lots of wheel hop. I am sure I could have done better with the hop eliminated. Now I have exhaust and pulley and I feel a 2.0 might be possible with traction.
11-05-2002, 07:13 AM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by xfirepwr1
Wow I wish my 60' culd be like that I would be running low 14's as well. I cant get my car to grip the road and the wheel hop is horrible. i think its the goodrich stoch tires that i have. wht kinda tires were you running at 2k2max?
Wow I wish my 60' culd be like that I would be running low 14's as well. I cant get my car to grip the road and the wheel hop is horrible. i think its the goodrich stoch tires that i have. wht kinda tires were you running at 2k2max?
I'm running stock tires at 23psi at the track. I don't have any wheel hop, but I do spin off the line. I didn't know how much I really spinned until I reviewed the video.
I think if I was a split second faster at shifting out of 1st I could pulled a better time, because I bounced off the limiter. But who knows now. For me, it seems the 1-2nd shift is the most important. My times varied by .19 by leaving the shifter in 2nd, as apposed to 1st.
11-05-2002, 07:16 AM
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I have a 2.13 60'
I have a 2.13 60'
Timeslip please.... j/k. I believe you, no need to lie here, we're all adults.That's sweet! Do you recall launching any differently to get this time? did you ease into the gas at launch. do a quick burn-out to clean the tires?
11-05-2002, 07:22 AM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by Larry
I ran a 2.174 60' with my completely stock 2K2 auto. Had lots of wheel hop. I am sure I could have done better with the hop eliminated. Now I have exhaust and pulley and I feel a 2.0 might be possible with traction.
I ran a 2.174 60' with my completely stock 2K2 auto. Had lots of wheel hop. I am sure I could have done better with the hop eliminated. Now I have exhaust and pulley and I feel a 2.0 might be possible with traction.
BTW - when you installed the pulley did you feel a noticable difference. I've read that the pulley will release somewhere around 5 hp and most notice the car pulls quicker to redline? If so, this mod should improve 1/4 time by XX?
11-05-2002, 07:30 AM
#15
Originally posted by 2k2max
Timeslip please.... j/k. I believe you, no need to lie here, we're all adults.
That's sweet! Do you recall launching any differently to get this time? did you ease into the gas at launch. do a quick burn-out to clean the tires?
Timeslip please.... j/k. I believe you, no need to lie here, we're all adults.That's sweet! Do you recall launching any differently to get this time? did you ease into the gas at launch. do a quick burn-out to clean the tires?
11-05-2002, 07:34 AM
#16
Originally posted by 2k2max
Sweet 60' time. I'm fortunate I don't have wheel hop.
BTW - when you installed the pulley did you feel a noticable difference. I've read that the pulley will release somewhere around 5 hp and most notice the car pulls quicker to redline? If so, this mod should improve 1/4 time by XX?
Sweet 60' time. I'm fortunate I don't have wheel hop.
BTW - when you installed the pulley did you feel a noticable difference. I've read that the pulley will release somewhere around 5 hp and most notice the car pulls quicker to redline? If so, this mod should improve 1/4 time by XX?
11-05-2002, 07:46 AM
#19
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 369
Originally posted by 2k2max
Sweet 60' time. I'm fortunate I don't have wheel hop.
BTW - when you installed the pulley did you feel a noticable difference. I've read that the pulley will release somewhere around 5 hp and most notice the car pulls quicker to redline? If so, this mod should improve 1/4 time by XX?
Sweet 60' time. I'm fortunate I don't have wheel hop.
BTW - when you installed the pulley did you feel a noticable difference. I've read that the pulley will release somewhere around 5 hp and most notice the car pulls quicker to redline? If so, this mod should improve 1/4 time by XX?
Thanks!
The car seems to pull very good now with the addition of the ASP underdrive pulley but the weather has been cooler since then too. Throttle response seems to be better as well and I am sure that will convert into hp. I have used underdrive pulleys on other cars like my 88 Mustang and gained .15-.20 et. On my 98 Camaro which doesn't have a smog pump like the Mustang I only gain about .10+ et. On the Maxima's we don't pull a water pump so the gains will probably not be near as much as on a Mustang pulling a smog and water pump.
In addition to a small hp gain, I like the fact that with the UD pulley the alternator and ac compressor speed is reduced by 20%. At 6300 engine rpm this alternator is really working hard. That's got to take a toll on it over a period of time. And with the ac compressor turning slower it's got to last longer too. Particularly on the highway at 75 mph, 2500-3000 rpm range, you sure don't need to be turning either that fast.
I don't get into a lot of traffic jams so I have never had a problem with UD pulleys. On occasion when I do in hot weather with the ac on, I put the tranny in neutral and give the engine a little throttle periodically to insure the battery stays charged.
11-05-2002, 07:47 AM
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I have a UDP and I feel no difference at all. I think SR20DEN showed a 2whp gain from his dynos which are know to be the only corrected ones to my knowledge.
I have a UDP and I feel no difference at all. I think SR20DEN showed a 2whp gain from his dynos which are know to be the only corrected ones to my knowledge.
Because of our "mad" skills with an auto, what do you foresee us running with the Y-pipe. I/Y/E should get us in the low 14's. What would it take to see high 13's? No turbo, no juice.
11-05-2002, 07:59 AM
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by Larry
I don't get into a lot of traffic jams so I have never had a problem with UD pulleys. On occasion when I do in hot weather with the ac on, I put the tranny in neutral and give the engine a little throttle periodically to insure the battery stays charged.
I don't get into a lot of traffic jams so I have never had a problem with UD pulleys. On occasion when I do in hot weather with the ac on, I put the tranny in neutral and give the engine a little throttle periodically to insure the battery stays charged.
Riiightt...maybe I will use this excuse the next time I want to provoke a race
j/k have fun!
11-05-2002, 08:37 AM
#22
Originally posted by 2k2max
They I will most likely save my money for a Y-Pipe.
Because of our "mad" skills with an auto, what do you foresee us running with the Y-pipe. I/Y/E should get us in the low 14's. What would it take to see high 13's? No turbo, no juice.
They I will most likely save my money for a Y-Pipe.
Because of our "mad" skills with an auto, what do you foresee us running with the Y-pipe. I/Y/E should get us in the low 14's. What would it take to see high 13's? No turbo, no juice.
11-05-2002, 09:59 AM
#25
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
I have a UDP and I feel no difference at all. I think SR20DEN showed a 2whp gain from his dynos which are know to be the only corrected ones to my knowledge.
I have a UDP and I feel no difference at all. I think SR20DEN showed a 2whp gain from his dynos which are know to be the only corrected ones to my knowledge.
11-05-2002, 10:07 AM
#26
Originally posted by SR20DEN
I have never reported any gains at all out of the UDP or the RT cat.
I have never reported any gains at all out of the UDP or the RT cat.
11-05-2002, 10:55 AM
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by blubyu2k2
ohh i thought your baseline dyno was up 2 hp from when you installed the UDP guess not. I'm a liar that makes up a bunch of ****. everyone shoot me
ohh i thought your baseline dyno was up 2 hp from when you installed the UDP guess not. I'm a liar that makes up a bunch of ****. everyone shoot me
11-05-2002, 11:18 AM
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 259
Originally posted by Larry
Or you could just buy a Camaro or Trans Am and run low 13s right off the show room floor! LOL!
Or you could just buy a Camaro or Trans Am and run low 13s right off the show room floor! LOL!
, 24-26mpg car is priceless.I love my Max.
11-05-2002, 03:38 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 165
Originally posted by xfirepwr1
Wow I wish my 60' culd be like that I would be running low 14's as well. I cant get my car to grip the road and the wheel hop is horrible. i think its the goodrich stoch tires that i have. wht kinda tires were you running at 2k2max?
Wow I wish my 60' culd be like that I would be running low 14's as well. I cant get my car to grip the road and the wheel hop is horrible. i think its the goodrich stoch tires that i have. wht kinda tires were you running at 2k2max?