5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:05 PM
  #1  
95gxe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 194
2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Right now I have a 1995 GXE. I am looking to trade it in (due to mechanical problems) within the next couple of weeks. I am looking at the 2002 SE w/Nav. If I find a good deal on a 2001 is there really a big diffeence other that the 30 horsepower? I would like to hear from those that have them so that I can better make my decision. Your expertise will help me out a lot. Also, I was told by the dealer today that they can add the Nav to the 2001 if I wanted to get it? Does that sound right? I didn't think that was possible. Thanks for reading.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:12 PM
  #2  
Uconn411's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 453
Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by 95gxe
Right now I have a 1995 GXE. I am looking to trade it in (due to mechanical problems) within the next couple of weeks. I am looking at the 2002 SE w/Nav. If I find a good deal on a 2001 is there really a big diffeence other that the 30 horsepower? I would like to hear from those that have them so that I can better make my decision. Your expertise will help me out a lot. Also, I was told by the dealer today that they can add the Nav to the 2001 if I wanted to get it? Does that sound right? I didn't think that was possible. Thanks for reading.
I have no idea what a 2001 drives like. I have a 2003 auto maxima and love it (same engine as 2002). Its a lot more power than I ever had in any previous (GM) vehicle. As far as navigation, there are many add-on units you can buy (check ebay). The dealer probably wasn't talking about adding factory nav, unless the cost was up there (probably 1500+).

Check out cars.com or autotrader.com for used cars.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
The 2002 are considerably faster and have a few more options than are available for 2k-2k1s. The 2k-2k1 stock suspension is better and seem to have less problems, especially with mass air flow sensors and such. I love my car and I really dont know if I would trade it for a new one either.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:35 PM
  #4  
max...to the ma's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 549
and not to mention that it looks better in my opinion too. but if u can afford it i definetly recommend an '02. just wont be able to live without the power once u get it
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #5  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Originally posted by max...to the ma
and not to mention that it looks better in my opinion too. but if u can afford it i definetly recommend an '02. just wont be able to live without the power once u get it
I agree, plus the 02+ have the trip computer unlike the 01, better looking seats very similar looking to the 04's front seats. The HIDS are great and the side sills just do something to the car. I drove my brothers 00 Accord the other day and I waslike man this is slow the 3.5s power stock is addicting.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #6  
max...to the ma's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 549
o yeah forgot to mention the HIDs. and the trip computer i wasnt sure about. i thought they had it. also dont think they have memory seats in the earlier models.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 05:35 PM
  #7  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by 95gxe
Right now I have a 1995 GXE. I am looking to trade it in (due to mechanical problems) within the next couple of weeks. I am looking at the 2002 SE w/Nav. If I find a good deal on a 2001 is there really a big diffeence other that the 30 horsepower? I would like to hear from those that have them so that I can better make my decision. Your expertise will help me out a lot. Also, I was told by the dealer today that they can add the Nav to the 2001 if I wanted to get it? Does that sound right? I didn't think that was possible. Thanks for reading.
If you are looking at a 2k1, I suggest you try to get an Anniversary Edition 5 speed. You will get perforated seats, body kit, AE touches, and a VSLD.

With 2k2's+ you get additiona tq/hp, but the HID's I think are hideous and prone to theft, not as tight an SE suspension, problems with MAF's (more so than previous Max's, at least from what I have read here), a front end that needed to be recalled, and taillights that look like they should have been on a riced out Civic.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #8  
Craig Mack's Avatar
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Let's put it this way:


Auto 2k2 Max 0-60: 6.6 seconds

Auto 2k1 Max 0-60: 7.8 seconds

The torque difference is probubly one of the biggest factors along with a more efficient transmission. The 2k2 Max puts out around 270lb-ft at the crank whereas the 2k1 puts 217 at the crank.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #9  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


If you are looking at a 2k1, I suggest you try to get an Anniversary Edition 5 speed. You will get perforated seats, body kit, AE touches, and a VSLD.

With 2k2's+ you get additiona tq/hp, but the HID's I think are hideous and prone to theft, not as tight an SE suspension, problems with MAF's (more so than previous Max's, at least from what I have read here), a front end that needed to be recalled, and taillights that look like they should have been on a riced out Civic.
Why do you think the HIDS's are hideous they light up the road much better than the halogens on the 01's. No one is stealing the HIDS but in the NY area so thats not a wide spread problem. Most of the MAF problems are from guys that have modded out their cars not stock and I havent heard about the front end problem. The tailights are not gaudy looking they are nice(especially on the light colored cars) and nothing like the riced out Civic Altezza'a or even Altima taillights.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
Jakester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 195
Well, you know what they say about opinions, so, here is mine:

I have a 2k1 max, and, love it. It is by far, the best car I have owned, it is quick enough, and, relativley cheap to mod and(if you choose to do so). It is fun to drive, and, with the WAI/CAI you will need plastic surgery to get the smile off your face when you gun it.

I travel a lot on business, and, whenever I get the chance, I get a 2k2 or 2k3 max as a loaner, and, the difference is noticable, VERY noticable, the additional hp and torque is awsome. I think the HID's add a little more aggression to the look, and, the tail lights, for me, look really nice, so much so that I will be putting them on my 2k1. Internally I think the gauge cluster, while laid out the same, the silver dials look great, and the auto shift tree is better looking too. The seats seem a little firmer, but, the ride is very similar.

All in all, if I could have afforded a 2k2, I would have gotten one, and, would say that if you can afford it, get one. but, saying that, I have not for a moment regretted my 2k1, it is an awsome car.

It all boils down to you in the end, either way you will be getting a great car with a strong motor, and pretty decent ride. If you got the 2k1, you could spend the extra savings on the requisite mods.

Good luck in whatever you choose, you won't be dissapointed.


-J
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:20 PM
  #11  
naerok's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 791
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Let's put it this way:


Auto 2k2 Max 0-60: 6.6 seconds

Auto 2k1 Max 0-60: 7.8 seconds

The torque difference is probubly one of the biggest factors along with a more efficient transmission. The 2k2 Max puts out around 270lb-ft at the crank whereas the 2k1 puts 217 at the crank.
Hmm.. i dont know about those numbers....2k1 max manual does 6.7... not 7.8.. according to the borchure..
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #12  
Scormunch240's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 21
Originally posted by Naerok:
Hmm.. i dont know about those numbers....2k1 max manual does 6.7... not 7.8.. according to the borchure..
Well the 7.8 is clearly for an auto 2k1, not the manual as you quoted. I agree with both of Craig Macks time's of 6.6 and 7.8 for the 2k2 and 2k1 AUTOs respectively...
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:38 PM
  #13  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
Originally posted by Scormunch240


Well the 7.8 is clearly for an auto 2k1, not the manual as you quoted. I agree with both of Craig Macks time's of 6.6 and 7.8 for the 2k2 and 2k1 AUTOs respectively...
But 2k autos are 7.7
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:49 PM
  #14  
vito1281's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,216
Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by MONTE 01&97 SE
Why do you think the HIDS's are hideous they light up the road much better than the halogens on the 01's. No one is stealing the HIDS but in the NY area so thats not a wide spread problem. Most of the MAF problems are from guys that have modded out their cars not stock and I havent heard about the front end problem. The tailights are not gaudy looking they are nice(especially on the light colored cars) and nothing like the riced out Civic Altezza'a or even Altima taillights.
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 07:55 PM
  #15  
guitarn247's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 135
i just got my 2k1 SE 2 weeks ago and i am more then pleased..
i originally was in the market for a 2003 altima..test drove it ..it was nice..but when i saw the 2001 max sittin there, sparkling like a pearl, i had to know how much..so the price was right..the car was in great shape (fully loaded to the brim, anything and everything you can get with out the AE)and it drives like a dream, of course the 2k2 and 2k3s have better features in their own rights..but theres nothign wrong with gettin a 2k1, i love mine
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 09:26 PM
  #16  
GreekMaxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,283
From: East Hartford, CT
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Let's put it this way:


Auto 2k2 Max 0-60: 6.6 seconds

Auto 2k1 Max 0-60: 7.8 seconds

The torque difference is probubly one of the biggest factors along with a more efficient transmission. The 2k2 Max puts out around 270lb-ft at the crank whereas the 2k1 puts 217 at the crank.
Auto 2k2 Max 0-60: 6.6 seconds??? I dont think so man...
I have a 2k2 maxima auto and my time from 0 to 60 is... (depends from spin)... 8.0 (with stillen intake and muffler---2 persons and me), 7.5 (stillen intake and muffler---1 person and me) and 7.0 (stillen intake , frankencar midpipe and muffler---1 person and me)

8.0 (spin)
7.5 (little spin)
7.0 (no spin)
Old Mar 31, 2003 | 09:35 PM
  #17  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Originally posted by GreekMaxima


Auto 2k2 Max 0-60: 6.6 seconds??? I dont think so man...
I have a 2k2 maxima auto and my time from 0 to 60 is... (depends from spin)... 8.0 (with stillen intake and muffler---2 persons and me), 7.5 (stillen intake and muffler---1 person and me) and 7.0 (stillen intake , frankencar midpipe and muffler---1 person and me)

8.0 (spin)
7.5 (little spin)
7.0 (no spin)
Something must be wrong with your car Greek Craig Mack is correct man 00/01's are running mid to high 7's to 60mph stock. Most guys here are running 6.6-6.8 or so to 60 all stock in 02/03 autos, Heck C&D even got heavier I35 to 60 in 7 flat a few months ago and Motor trend the Alti auto in 6.6 sec a few months ago which is a fair comparison. 1/4 mile times for most stock guys are running 14.6-14.8's in stock 02/03 autos and if they were running 0-60's on times like yours its no way they could get those times. There are several timeslips showing this. No one is going to dispute his times they are on par for 02/03 autos.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 01:24 AM
  #18  
E55AMG2's Avatar
Wat
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,188
Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Go with the 02. I have had every year of the 5th gen (I drive an 03 now) and the newer the better IMO
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 05:36 AM
  #19  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by MONTE 01&97 SE
Something must be wrong with your car Greek Craig Mack is correct man 00/01's are running mid to high 7's to 60mph stock. Most guys here are running 6.6-6.8 or so to 60 all stock in 02/03 autos, Heck C&D even got heavier I35 to 60 in 7 flat a few months ago and Motor trend the Alti auto in 6.6 sec a few months ago which is a fair comparison. 1/4 mile times for most stock guys are running 14.6-14.8's in stock 02/03 autos and if they were running 0-60's on times like yours its no way they could get those times. There are several timeslips showing this. No one is going to dispute his times they are on par for 02/03 autos.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 05:56 AM
  #20  
ssp34's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 157
Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


If you are looking at a 2k1, I suggest you try to get an Anniversary Edition 5 speed. You will get perforated seats, body kit, AE touches, and a VSLD.

With 2k2's+ you get additiona tq/hp, but the HID's I think are hideous and prone to theft, not as tight an SE suspension, problems with MAF's (more so than previous Max's, at least from what I have read here), a front end that needed to be recalled, and taillights that look like they should have been on a riced out Civic.
Hideous? Put some 2K2 HIDs on your car. You'll get more complements than you could imagine. The guy that designed the internal housing should get an award. Its sleek and stylish, probably the best looking headlights I've seen on a non-luxury model car, and compares to some of the luxury car headlights. The guy that came up with the mounting procedures should actually be shot, but I guess you can't have it all.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #21  
ychuw's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
get 2k2
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 06:31 AM
  #22  
JAKE02's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 717
Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


If you are looking at a 2k1, I suggest you try to get an Anniversary Edition 5 speed. You will get perforated seats, body kit, AE touches, and a VSLD.

With 2k2's+ you get additiona tq/hp, but the HID's I think are hideous and prone to theft, not as tight an SE suspension, problems with MAF's (more so than previous Max's, at least from what I have read here), a front end that needed to be recalled, and taillights that look like they should have been on a riced out Civic.
Hmmm seems like jealousy talking here...in fact this response has shades of Russ, gosh you have a 2K1 and it has to be the best right? Who are you kidding no contest between a 2K2/3 vs 2k1.....no brainer which to get....of course the 2K2/3 and since when are HID's hideous? Like i said jealousy is an ugly thing
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:11 AM
  #23  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by JAKE02


Hmmm seems like jealousy talking here...in fact this response has shades of Russ, gosh you have a 2K1 and it has to be the best right? Who are you kidding no contest between a 2K2/3 vs 2k1.....no brainer which to get....of course the 2K2/3 and since when are HID's hideous? Like i said jealousy is an ugly thing
Hardly jealousy. Max HID's ARE hideous. Like I have said many times before, they look like mismatched flashlights taped together and then shoved in a housing. And the tails are pure rice. You need to get a grip and realize you DO NOT have a car everyone is envious of. I have gotten positive comments on my AE from several 2k2+ owners. Also, it is interesting how many 2k2+ owners are trying to get someone to build them an AE bodykit.

Short of a few horses which I don't need since I don't race, I prefer mine.

Sounds like you are suffering from the Russ syndrome.

Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:18 AM
  #24  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


Hardly jealousy. Max HID's ARE hideous. Like I have said many times before, they look like mismatched flashlights taped together and then shoved in a housing. And the tails are pure rice. You need to get a grip and realize you DO NOT have a car everyone is envious of. I have gotten positive comments on my AE from several 2k2+ owners. Also, it is interesting how many 2k2+ owners are trying to get someone to build them an AE bodykit.

Short of a few horses which I don't need since I don't race, I prefer mine.

Sounds like you are suffering from the Russ syndrome.

shampoo is betttttttttttttaaaaaaaaa nooooooooooooooooo conditioner is betttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaa to each his own. One of my buddies has a 01 AE and it is a very nice car
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:18 AM
  #25  
vito1281's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,216
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


Hardly jealousy. Max HID's ARE hideous. Like I have said many times before, they look like mismatched flashlights taped together and then shoved in a housing. And the tails are pure rice. You need to get a grip and realize you DO NOT have a car everyone is envious of. I have gotten positive comments on my AE from several 2k2+ owners. Also, it is interesting how many 2k2+ owners are trying to get someone to build them an AE bodykit.

Short of a few horses which I don't need since I don't race, I prefer mine.

Sounds like you are suffering from the Russ syndrome.

You sound a little TOO bitter to be NOT jealous!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:19 AM
  #26  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by vito1281


You sound a little TOO bitter to be NOT jealous!
Grow up.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:21 AM
  #27  
NT2SHBBY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


Hardly jealousy. Max HID's ARE hideous. Like I have said many times before, they look like mismatched flashlights taped together and then shoved in a housing. And the tails are pure rice. You need to get a grip and realize you DO NOT have a car everyone is envious of. I have gotten positive comments on my AE from several 2k2+ owners. Also, it is interesting how many 2k2+ owners are trying to get someone to build them an AE bodykit.

Short of a few horses which I don't need since I don't race, I prefer mine.

Sounds like you are suffering from the Russ syndrome.

sounds like someone is a bit envious of our HID's.

I say get the 02...HIDs, better seats, 255hp!!, better looking wheels, and umm yeah that would be it!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:25 AM
  #28  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
TO EACH HIS OWN!!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:26 AM
  #29  
guitarn247's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 135
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by blubyu2k2


shampoo is betttttttttttttaaaaaaaaa nooooooooooooooooo conditioner is betttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaa to each his own. One of my buddies has a 01 AE and it is a very nice car
STOP LOOKING AT ME SWANNNNN!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:27 AM
  #30  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by NT2SHBBY


sounds like someone is a bit envious of our HID's.

I say get the 02...HIDs, better seats, 255hp!!, better looking wheels, and umm yeah that would be it!
Is noone reading my posts? I am suggesting the AE, not a run of the mill 2k1.

Have you sat in an AE? The seats are noticably different (at least to me) than regular 2k1 SE's due to the perforated leather. One of the main reasons I went AE and not a standard SE. Wheels....hmmmm, AE bright finish wheels look a whole lot like Titanium Edition wheels.

You people have GOT to get over your HID fixation. Just 'cuz someone doesn't like them, you get a juvenile and threatened.

Yet again, examples of you people being put off by any suggestion/opinion that is not your own. I will now move on to a thread where a bit more maturity is prevalent.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:41 AM
  #31  
vito1281's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,216
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


Is noone reading my posts? I am suggesting the AE, not a run of the mill 2k1.

Have you sat in an AE? The seats are noticably different (at least to me) than regular 2k1 SE's due to the perforated leather. One of the main reasons I went AE and not a standard SE. Wheels....hmmmm, AE bright finish wheels look a whole lot like Titanium Edition wheels.

You people have GOT to get over your HID fixation. Just 'cuz someone doesn't like them, you get a juvenile and threatened.

Yet again, examples of you people being put off by any suggestion/opinion that is not your own. I will now move on to a thread where a bit more maturity is prevalent.
Relax man, you gonna bust an artery!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #32  
getz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Get an 02/03 6-speed, and you'll have plenty of power bone stock, plus a shiny new warranty. You have to get pretty mod happy to get 6-speed numbers out of the 3.0L, and short of forced induction (with all its potential headaches in a daily driver) you probably will not reach what a stock 3.5L pumps out. One thing to remeber about heavy modding is that you're throwing money in to the mod while simultaneously raping the resale of your car. While a lot of fun, it is essentially a rolling money pit.
-Getz
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 08:45 AM
  #33  
skandalouz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,681
From: duluth, ga
get the 2k2. tho BOTH the 2k1 SE and the 2k1 AE are great cars... but you'll regret it if u don't get the newer 2k2. i agree the new taillights are ugly on dark cars (on the lighter shade cars, they look good) BUT there are PLENTY of people here on .org that are willing to trade you their 2k1 taillights for ur 2k2's... headlights? you'll love the HIDs. i dont kno what people are talking about when they say that the new headlight designs are ugly. put a 2k1 and a 2k2 next to each other and you be the judge. the 2k1 headlights dont even compare... the new designs are aggressive and it looks great. the AE bodykits are nice tho. and tho i've never actually sat in one before, i'm sure the perforated seats are nice as well...but no matter what i or anyone else posts on here... ultimately the choice is up to you.. people have a tendency to want to justify their own purchases, and so you'll hear 2k1 owners telling you to buy the early 5th gen.. and the 2k2+ owners will tell you to buy later 5th gen.... you know the facts.. so do what you want and be happy with it.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #34  
GR8MAX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 37
I love this comparison...it funny to me how everyone is quoting the great 255hp #'s, but aren't you the same group that is trying to sue Nissan over the missing 15-20HP! Come on, the much better choice is the 2K1. Why, because of resale! With 2K1 you can get a great deal, and in 2-3 years dump it with not much of a loss. With the 2K3 you just through 10K down the drain. Sorry but it's true...whatever we think of the 04's they are going to severly hurt the market for 2K+ and the 03's will be hurt the most. If you need to get the 03 and the "Made-up HP" then go ahead, but your throwing good money away in my opinion.

Go with a 2K1 and get everything you want and then some with the money you saved!

BTW I do own a 2K1 and love it....and I wouldn't trade it for anything right now!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 10:05 AM
  #35  
JAKE02's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 717
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


Hardly jealousy. Max HID's ARE hideous. Like I have said many times before, they look like mismatched flashlights taped together and then shoved in a housing. And the tails are pure rice. You need to get a grip and realize you DO NOT have a car everyone is envious of. I have gotten positive comments on my AE from several 2k2+ owners. Also, it is interesting how many 2k2+ owners are trying to get someone to build them an AE bodykit.

Short of a few horses which I don't need since I don't race, I prefer mine.

Sounds like you are suffering from the Russ syndrome.

Lets get something straight JJS I never said one harsh word about a 2K1AE, nice Max, wouldnt be my choice dont like the look of the body kit etc however everyone has their opinions, etc however you are the one trashing a 2K2/3 with the hideous HID and and rice tail comment. What kind of responses do you expect to get when you trash other org members rides? You are always starting flame wars on here with your crap, thus why i said you remind of Russ.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #36  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by GR8MAX
I love this comparison...it funny to me how everyone is quoting the great 255hp #'s, but aren't you the same group that is trying to sue Nissan over the missing 15-20HP! Come on, the much better choice is the 2K1. Why, because of resale! With 2K1 you can get a great deal, and in 2-3 years dump it with not much of a loss.
Missing horsepower? If my 2K2 has that problem then it must really be a low-mid 14 second car as I've already run 14.7/14.8s consistently and stock.

If you want:
- more power
- HID headlamps
- Clear (Altezza) taillamps
- OEM Navigation
- Gated shifter
Then go with the 2K2.

If those features are not that important to you, get a 2K1 AE.

But I will say that the Y2K/2K1 Maximas are VERY inexpensive here in NJ.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 11:50 AM
  #37  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by JAKE02


Lets get something straight JJS I never said one harsh word about a 2K1AE, nice Max, wouldnt be my choice dont like the look of the body kit etc however everyone has their opinions, etc however you are the one trashing a 2K2/3 with the hideous HID and and rice tail comment. What kind of responses do you expect to get when you trash other org members rides? You are always starting flame wars on here with your crap, thus why i said you remind of Russ.
Well said Jake, the moderator should lock this "pathetic" thread. You cant come in and say things like that and ezxpect not to be bashed!
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 12:11 PM
  #38  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by MONTE 01&97 SE
Well said Jake, the moderator should lock this "pathetic" thread. You cant come in and say things like that and ezxpect not to be bashed!
OK, both of you...one last read and comment and I hope they do lock this lame thread. Read the freaking first post. He asked a question. I gave answers. Some opinions, yes...but car buying decisions are replete with opinions...why else does the world have som many cars to pick from? I have, and will continue to express my oninions on the appeal or lack thereof of any vehicle when it is part of a thread clearly asking...

"If I find a good deal on a 2001 is there really a big diffeence other that the 30 horsepower? I would like to hear from those that have them so that I can better make my decision. Your expertise will help me out a lot."

If people can't handle that, then that is their problem and they better grow up and deal with it.
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 07:44 PM
  #39  
JAKE02's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 717
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by jjs


OK, both of you...one last read and comment and I hope they do lock this lame thread. Read the freaking first post. He asked a question. I gave answers. Some opinions, yes...but car buying decisions are replete with opinions...why else does the world have som many cars to pick from? I have, and will continue to express my oninions on the appeal or lack thereof of any vehicle when it is part of a thread clearly asking...

"If I find a good deal on a 2001 is there really a big diffeence other that the 30 horsepower? I would like to hear from those that have them so that I can better make my decision. Your expertise will help me out a lot."

If people can't handle that, then that is their problem and they better grow up and deal with it.

Yea JJS we all can see who needs to grow up around here.....
Old Apr 1, 2003 | 10:32 PM
  #40  
JTMAX03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 363
Originally posted by guitarn247
i just got my 2k1 SE 2 weeks ago and i am more then pleased..
i originally was in the market for a 2003 altima..test drove it ..it was nice..but when i saw the 2001 max sittin there, sparkling like a pearl, i had to know how much..so the price was right..the car was in great shape (fully loaded to the brim, anything and everything you can get with out the AE)and it drives like a dream, of course the 2k2 and 2k3s have better features in their own rights..but theres nothign wrong with gettin a 2k1, i love mine
I just purchase a 03 SE and it feel really good. I would suggest you get an 02 because it has more hp.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM.