5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:02 PM
  #41  
jjs's Avatar
jjs
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by JAKE02



Yea JJS we all can see who needs to grow up around here.....
Yes, we ALL can Baby Jake..
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #42  
NT2SHBBY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hey JJS...i'm not gonna hate on your car, because its a banging car!!!

AE's were sooooo much nicer than reg SE's in 01....I actually wanted to purchase one new back in the day, just couldn't come up with the funds to do the deal....

as for your leather seating, I'd prefer cloth because of many obvious reasons.....

but yeah, your car is most definitely hotness!!

Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #43  
jatt806's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 150
Opinion

Here how I look at this 00/01 vs. 02/03 thing. If options like leather, moonroof, Bose, etc... are important to you over horsepower, you can get a fully loaded 01 SE for the same price as a base model 02 SE. One is faster, but the other is fully loaded. It's your choice.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 12:50 PM
  #44  
MaximaDisciple's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 686
Re: Re: Re: 2001 vs. 2002 SE? Which is better?

Originally posted by MONTE 01&97 SE
Why do you think the HIDS's are hideous they light up the road much better than the halogens on the 01's. No one is stealing the HIDS but in the NY area so thats not a wide spread problem. Most of the MAF problems are from guys that have modded out their cars not stock and I havent heard about the front end problem. The tailights are not gaudy looking they are nice(especially on the light colored cars) and nothing like the riced out Civic Altezza'a or even Altima taillights.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #45  
PrinzII's Avatar
OG and counting...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 12,839
My 2 cents

First, a little history. Like the original poster of this thread, I had an older Max ('94 GXE) and had to make the painful decision to get rid of it because the costs of maintenance/repair were greatly outweighing the costs of getting a new car.

Initially, I was looking at an AE. However, when I saw the price of an AE, I nearly choked. Even used, AEs still command a premium (Case in point, the one I looked at was $23,000+). The same day, I drove a 2002 GLE in Majestic Blue and liked that because of the performance. I also liked the amenities offered on the '02 versus the AE (e.g. Trip Computer). After reading the ad for the AE, I decided to get an '02 SE instead because there really was not much of a price benefit between an AE and the '02 SE that I own now.

Another word of wisdom, you can get '02s for a lower price than even AEs.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #46  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
jjs.........EASY man.

I LOVE the AE body kit, but EVERY other feature about the 02 I like better...especially the power gains.

GO WITH THE 02


Did I mention that I LOVE the AE body kit??
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #47  
getz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Our 02/03's may be down on hp form the 255, but we still got an *** load of torque. Lots of fun from a stop-light.
-Getz
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 06:32 PM
  #48  
PIONEER's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,686
From: Raleigh, NC
02-03 is faster stock but the 00-01 is just as fast after Intake/Y-pipe.

If your objective it to get a cheaper car, get 00-01, If you want somthing newer, get 02-03. I like the 02-03 but My car almost paid off, and I hardly drive this one to go spend money on another one.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #49  
Craig Mack's Avatar
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by PIONEER
02-03 is faster stock but the 00-01 is just as fast after Intake/Y-pipe.

No dude, it's not. An intake and y-pipe won't shave 1.2 seconds off your 0-60. And it won't add the LOW end torque that ONLY extra displacement or forced induction can give. While it might give similer PEAK torque to the 2k2 (-20+ lbs), it won't make near as much down low, do to the 183cubic inch motor vs. 214cubic inch motor.
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 07:21 PM
  #50  
jkratzer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 657
A benefit of getting the 2K1 is you can get the Nissan AE body kit from your Nissan dealer and the kit makes the 2K1 look awesome. I know because I did that and I would never drive a 2K-2K1 without the kit. If you get the kit, be sure to get the AE painted splash guards to go with it. Awesome. The kit won't fit the 2K2-2K3 models. See my homepage for pics( taken before splash guards were added ).
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 05:37 AM
  #51  
PIONEER's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,686
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by Craig Mack


No dude, it's not. An intake and y-pipe won't shave 1.2 seconds off your 0-60. And it won't add the LOW end torque that ONLY extra displacement or forced induction can give. While it might give similer PEAK torque to the 2k2 (-20+ lbs), it won't make near as much down low, do to the 183cubic inch motor vs. 214cubic inch motor.
I've already proven it on Videos with my 2000 Vs 2002,2003 6spd !!! A thread that got locked about 2 months ago

I still Have the Videos
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 05:44 AM
  #52  
JTMAX03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 363
Originally posted by PIONEER


I've already proven it on Videos with my 2000 Vs 2002,2003 6spd !!! A thread that got locked about 2 months ago

I still Have the Videos

lol
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 05:52 AM
  #53  
MarcusJY's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 201
Simply, drive both cars get the one you like the best and ignore all these posts.
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 06:09 AM
  #54  
PIONEER's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,686
From: Raleigh, NC
To be honest, Forget who's faster or slower. The Fact is, 2002-2003 have more to offer for the Money, More goodies you don't get with the earlier models.
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #55  
PrinzII's Avatar
OG and counting...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 12,839
Originally posted by PIONEER
To be honest, Forget who's faster or slower. The Fact is, 2002-2003 have more to offer for the Money, More goodies you don't get with the earlier models.
Couldn't have said it better.
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #56  
getz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 42
Pioneeer,
Post some time slips that show low to mid 14s out of a 2000-2001 with out forced induction. Too many variables come in to play with a ricer video like the one you filmed to be an accurate judge of who has a faster car. If you truly have the 02-03 in top end then you should be trapping in the high 90s, show the slips. Remember, for every bolt on you add to your 3.0L, a guy will be able to do the same to the 3.5L. Look at the times emax and others are posting with similar mods, they're busting into the 13's.
-Getz
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #57  
max...to the ma's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 549
Originally posted by MarcusJY
Simply, drive both cars get the one you like the best and ignore all these posts.
best post so far!
Old Apr 3, 2003 | 06:41 PM
  #58  
Matticus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 290
I have a 2K1 SE which is pretty quick for me. I was pretty upset when the 2K2 came out, I bought the 2K1 just a few months befor the announcement was made about the new Altimas and then the Max. One thing that the 00/01 has over the 02/03, as far as I know, is the supercharger and the diff. upgrade. However, they are a bit spendy for the average consumer who would have to have them installed by a mechanic. But you could take the few thousand you saved from the 02/03 and buy the charger. That should solve the power puzzle. But if Nav. leather, and the "luxury" iteams are really important, then maybe just buy the 03. As others have said, to each his own. Drive em both, see which fills your needs the best and buy it. Oh, 2K1 is better.... Or.... Buy an EVO 8 and smoke em all!!!
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:40 AM
  #59  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by PIONEER


I've already proven it on Videos with my 2000 Vs 2002,2003 6spd !!! A thread that got locked about 2 months ago

I still Have the Videos
I don't know about the 6sp vs 5sp but, I'd be more than happy to race a Y2K/2K1 Auto (w/intake & Y-pipe) vs my stock 2K2.
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:42 AM
  #60  
NT2SHBBY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by F23A4


I don't know about the 6sp vs 5sp but, I'd be more than happy to race a Y2K/2K1 Auto (w/intake & Y-pipe) vs my stock 2K2.
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:53 AM
  #61  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by F23A4


I don't know about the 6sp vs 5sp but, I'd be more than happy to race a Y2K/2K1 Auto (w/intake & Y-pipe) vs my stock 2K2.
already have and its no contest not even close
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 08:33 AM
  #62  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by blubyu2k2


already have and its no contest not even close
Exactly!!
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #63  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Originally posted by F23A4


Exactly!!
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #64  
Maxmann's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 596
I traded my awesome 2k1 SE/AE for an 02 SE. Never looked back; only thing I missed was the body kit on the AE, very nice. But the 02 had so much more to offer...no contest b/w them. Both are great cars, but 02 fit my needs much better.

srm
Old Apr 6, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #65  
Shift_VQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 475
I know that 2k auto maxes with 17" rims are the slowest since i think 95. Is a 5-speed 2k-2k1 a lot slower or about the same as an auto 2k2-2k3?
Old Apr 6, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #66  
slickrick's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,228
From: Florida
go with the 2k2. they are so cheap now.
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 06:33 AM
  #67  
PIONEER's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,686
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally posted by F23A4


I don't know about the 6sp vs 5sp but, I'd be more than happy to race a Y2K/2K1 Auto (w/intake & Y-pipe) vs my stock 2K2.
02 Auto is faster then 00-01 Auto By Far. I've Rented the 02 Several times, and Feels like they Run about the same as 00-01 5Spd (STOCK)
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #68  
jatt806's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 150
Originally posted by Shift_VQ
I know that 2k auto maxes with 17" rims are the slowest since i think 95. Is a 5-speed 2k-2k1 a lot slower or about the same as an auto 2k2-2k3?
01 SE 5-spd is about the same as a 02/03 Auto. But that's not a fair race, the 5-spd is still at least .5 seconds slower than a 02/03 6-spd.

I have been tempted many times to trade up from my 01 SE 5-spd, but I can't justify spending an extra 5-6 grand for basically the same car that is a little faster and has a trip computer. I will wait another 2 years and move up to an Acura/Lexus/Infiniti class car. Just my opinions.
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 09:33 AM
  #69  
Instingkt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
Well, I have both (no, I'm not joking). My wife has the 2001 now and I have the 2002. I like the 2002 much better. Not knocking the 2001, since it was my baby for a little while.
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 11:11 AM
  #70  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
Originally posted by Instingkt
Well, I have both (no, I'm not joking). My wife has the 2001 now and I have the 2002. I like the 2002 much better. Not knocking the 2001, since it was my baby for a little while.



Old Apr 7, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #71  
NT2SHBBY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can see this thread going another 5 pages easy!!!
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 11:54 AM
  #72  
Instingkt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
/me waves back at Padsy!

Old Apr 7, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #73  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
Originally posted by slickrick
go with the 2k2. they are so cheap now.
ummm Cost Effective is a better term.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
user 11122324
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
42
Jul 18, 2022 03:35 PM
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Aug 8, 2020 10:31 AM
MaxLvr21
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Oct 17, 2015 12:11 PM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM
Tmax78
New Member Introductions
0
Sep 25, 2015 09:07 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:45 PM.